CNevarezN wrote...
Rhaina wrote...
Dasher1010 wrote...
CNevarezN wrote...
Dasher1010 wrote...
Europe is a continent with dragons, knights and pitchfork-wielding peasants. They have no internet 
On a more serious note, they thought you were Mexican and can't find Spain on a map.
*Rolls*!
What's funny is that I've been to Europe twice. Once to Spain and once to Italy. They have everything that's in North America, their architechture is older but that's about it. And Asia's very much the same way (at least in China, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan and Thailand). If anything the United States is backwards right now since our rail lines are horrible. As oil starts to plateau, expect Europe and Asia to be far better places to live.
Visiting and living in a place are much different experiences.
I passed through Europe. Been all over the middleast and Thailand. People who travel abroad tend to have a more open mind.
I would
generally agree with your response, but this is not what the first post I quoted was refering to. I was addressing that if the general take on these places that have been visited are as stated, I will be direct and intend no hard feelings, the statement indicates that they were only visited, because if old architecture and rail transit should not be what you walked away with as being differences between what is found in North America and what is found in those European Countries, in regards to having the same things. Mind you, based upon your response CNevarezN, I find it safe to assume that you hopefully know much of what I just stated, and I hope the original posters statement was phrased in its manner due to the material it was responding to rather than an exact take from traveling abroad.
Understand this coming from a fellow traveler who has also been to these places, and lived in some. unfortunatly not to Asia... yet. I was merely attempting to point out that European nations, North America, and other countries may have some similar lets say for ease of discussion, first world aspects, but their cultures and implementation of the first world aspects can be vastly different.
I'm also curious where the first poster traveled in the US in regards to rail comparison, I know in many places (most of the USA) the comparison is more than true but other places which have similar densities and urban settings like those found in Europe that are considered comparative to mass transit in Europe. Geographic proximity and cultural desire such as large suburbs render the application of the same systems less effective or pointless. Again, implementation and taxation play a huge role, I'm curious who has bought gasoline in Europe compared to the USA, this is yet another factor in regards to the use of mass transit, and is completely artificially created through taxation of a product not the actual cost of the product.
^ how's that for thread derailment.
Modifié par Rhaina, 13 avril 2012 - 08:32 .