M. Hanky wrote...
My biggest problem with IT:
The prothean VI says that you're not indoctrinated (or at least HEAVILY implies that you're not) and says that the Illusive man and Kai Leng are. It's really hard to convince me that the ending is Shepard fighting/being indoctrinated and has been being indoctrinated since ME1 when the Prothean VI, which seems to be able to tell the difference, says that Shepard isn't.
Shepards not indoctrinated yet. His resolve is deteriorating but he hasn't turned. Also, he only started getting indoctrinated in Arrival, not ME1.
Second biggest problem:
Bioware may have dropped the ball on the ending, but if they were really trying to say that everything on the Citadel was some kind of internal battle and choosing the destroy ending is Shepard winning the battle in his mind so he can really kill the reapers now, there's no way they'd be stupid/cruel enough to leave it there.
Are you sure, they gave us the ending we have. Plus we're getting DLC in summer, so maybe they won't.
Third biggest problem:
The poorly written/really wierd stuff after such as the Normandy crashing on some wierd planet and the guy with the kid would make no sense.
Stargazer never makes sense. The rest is shepard's (who doesn't realize its an hallucination) mind filling in what he expects/hopes will happen including his LI and squadmate surviving on a Reaper free garden planet.
This is actually the only thing that makes that scene make sense. If you brought your LI on the final run, that scene has both you squadmates-completely unharmed-get out of the normandy. Why didn't they go up the beam if they were fine!?
Modifié par Hawk227, 16 avril 2012 - 08:32 .