Aller au contenu

Photo

Anyone else hate admiral hacket?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
223 réponses à ce sujet

#26
pjotroos

pjotroos
  • Members
  • 482 messages

Ingvarr Stormbird wrote...

pjotroos wrote...
Hackett always got your back

Not true though, there were plenty of examples in one of the other threads when he preferred to stay away when Shepard could really use his help.

Can't think of any that could actually be blamed on Hackett being an ass, not plotholes. I mean, take the whole of ME2 for example - the main reason we can't even ask Alliance for help is because we're railroaded into rolling with Cerberus. The script dictates, the characters follow.

#27
Ryven

Ryven
  • Members
  • 410 messages
The only thing I disliked is that he got to make the speech towards the end and not Shepard. But I am assuming that was due to time/budget constraints maybe?

#28
Giga Drill BREAKER

Giga Drill BREAKER
  • Members
  • 7 005 messages

Dictionary.com


awesome
[aw-suhm]   Example Sentences Origin
awe·some
   [aw-suhm] Show IPA
adjective
1.
inspiring awe: an awesome sight.
2.
showing or characterized by awe.
3.
Slang . very impressive: That new white convertible is totally awesome.
4.
Admiral Hackett

 


Modifié par DinoSteve, 13 avril 2012 - 10:55 .


#29
sp0ck 06

sp0ck 06
  • Members
  • 1 318 messages
Yeah he's kinda a b***h. Just always ordering everyone around. Why does he sit at the Crucible while the galaxy burns> The "F" does that dude know about science? Get out there and fight the enemy, "Admiral."

#30
Ingvarr Stormbird

Ingvarr Stormbird
  • Members
  • 1 179 messages

Xydorn wrote...

The only thing I disliked is that he got to make the speech towards the end and not Shepard. But I am assuming that was due to time/budget constraints maybe?

Also Hackett had two bouncers with him ;)

#31
ahandsomeshark

ahandsomeshark
  • Members
  • 3 250 messages
I don't hate him, he's just annoying the way he's pops in and out and never really does anything.

#32
ahandsomeshark

ahandsomeshark
  • Members
  • 3 250 messages

pjotroos wrote...

Ingvarr Stormbird wrote...

pjotroos wrote...
Hackett always got your back

Not true though, there were plenty of examples in one of the other threads when he preferred to stay away when Shepard could really use his help.

Can't think of any that could actually be blamed on Hackett being an ass, not plotholes. I mean, take the whole of ME2 for example - the main reason we can't even ask Alliance for help is because we're railroaded into rolling with Cerberus. The script dictates, the characters follow.


it's not just that, the collectors were specifically targeting teminus system colonies where the alliance had no jurisdiction. So if shepard had wanted to get anything done he'd have had to partner with someone else anyway.

#33
Deuterium_Dawn

Deuterium_Dawn
  • Members
  • 790 messages

ZerebusPrime wrote...

In ME1 Hackett was borderline closet badguy. There was the business on Luna with the rogue AI he claims doesn't exist and there was the bit where Hackett tries to manipulate a renegade Shepard into killing a red sand dealer that Hackett may have wanted to get rid of for reasons of personal implication.


I assume you're referring to the mission you get when you hit 75% renegade, on...Nonuel? Something like that. IIRC, he's not a red sand dealer, he's a merc/warlord sitting on an eezo-rich rock the alliance made a deal wih and is now becoming more trouble than he's worth. Yeah he's got you cleaning up the Alliance's dirty laundry(there's also the mission with the espionage probe booby trapped with a 20 kiloton nuke), but he's not a villain unless you really hate the alliance or something.

Then in ME2 Arrival Hackett sends Shepard on a special mission straight into a trap set specifically to lure in and capture Shepard. Hackett could have sent any number of N7 operatives or a whole team to effect a rescue. There just is no logical reason to contact and send Shepard while Shepard is both affiliated with a terrorist organisation and known to have been previously KIA.


Yeah, you wouldn't want to send in the guy who killed a reaper to investigate when someone who claims they've found proof the reapers are coming goes missing. That would just be stupid. He mentions why he doesn't want to send a team in, it's in Batarian space and getting caught would start a war. He doesn't even specficically know about Object Rho, and has no way of predicting Kenson and her people were being indoctrinated.

#34
MaaZeus

MaaZeus
  • Members
  • 1 851 messages

Ingvarr Stormbird wrote...

I think people fault him because he pushed all these Crucible shenanigans ;)
Hackett pushes for Crucible => Crucible makes Ending => Ending is Horrible
Hackett => Ending is Horrible
;)



Very likely hypothesis. You sir are a genious. :D

#35
xefiroEA

xefiroEA
  • Members
  • 141 messages
I think Hackett is awesome.

As an Admiral, the guy is privy to a number of black ops, so it makes sense that when something goes wrong he looks for a contact outside the Alliance to clean them up. I don't recall any of the missions he sends you on to be particularly evil, except maybe the rogue AI in Luna.

Does he really believe it to be a VI gone crazy? I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt there, because it would be really dumb to create an AI and train it to kill humans instead of keeping it in a lab somewhere where you don't need to kill it when after you train it to kill humans, it starts killing humans. That's the sort of behavior I expect of Cerberus, not the Alliance. And that mission is cool anyway because it unlocks a specialization.

Otherwise, the guy has your back. If you look in his dossier in the Shadow Broker's base, he's keeping annoying officers from trying to detain you. And in ME3 he writes Shepard the biggest blank check in history. "Go save the galaxy, I give you the authority to do anything you need to."

#36
ahandsomeshark

ahandsomeshark
  • Members
  • 3 250 messages
i actually liked him in ME1 cause I thought he was being set up as like a renegade foil to anderson. the guy who's all by any means necessary.

#37
ahandsomeshark

ahandsomeshark
  • Members
  • 3 250 messages

xefiroEA wrote...

Does he really believe it to be a VI gone crazy? I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt there, because it would be really dumb to create an AI and train it to kill humans instead of keeping it in a lab somewhere where you don't need to kill it when after you train it to kill humans, it starts killing humans. That's the sort of behavior I expect of Cerberus, not the Alliance. And that mission is cool anyway because it unlocks a specialization.
"


I'd say you overestimate the decision making ability of our military leaders.

#38
Ingvarr Stormbird

Ingvarr Stormbird
  • Members
  • 1 179 messages

xefiroEA wrote...
If you look in his dossier in the Shadow Broker's base, he's keeping annoying officers from trying to detain you.

Some people in other thread pointed out (and it kind of made sense) that this looked extremely like perverting course of justice for some personal means.

#39
Oldbones2

Oldbones2
  • Members
  • 1 820 messages
No way OP, Hackett is the man.

And I can't imagine anyone else playing him in the film but Lance H.


As a side not though, I was disapointed in the renegade options as a whole in this game. No longer could you be a true badass even to your CO.

Now you are badass lite, or saint lite. With absolutely no middle ground.

Holy crap, look back at KoTOR where you had 3-4 options in every dialogue, Now look at ME 3, you have 2.

How is that even a choice anymore?

Seriously if things aren't black and white, then why is there a binary based choice system built into the core of the game?

#40
kaztas

kaztas
  • Members
  • 127 messages
Lance Henriksen is just under Christopher Walken damn you!!!

#41
Ingvarr Stormbird

Ingvarr Stormbird
  • Members
  • 1 179 messages

Oldbones2 wrote...

Now you are badass lite

More like homicidal maniac, shooting friends in the back when your CO is not looking.

Modifié par Ingvarr Stormbird, 13 avril 2012 - 11:11 .


#42
Guest_Sparatus_*

Guest_Sparatus_*
  • Guests
You are literally the only person.

#43
krayt298

krayt298
  • Members
  • 129 messages
As long as Starchild exists, I can't hate another character.

#44
Oldbones2

Oldbones2
  • Members
  • 1 820 messages

Ingvarr Stormbird wrote...

Oldbones2 wrote...

Now you are badass lite

More like homicidal maniac, shooting friends in the back when your CO is not looking.


You always shot friends in the back. Wrex, being the first. 

But back in ME 1 you could shoot someone without regrets.  Or with regrets.  Or not shoot them at all.

Because there was very little auto dialogue and 3 chocies most of the time.

#45
KrabFace

KrabFace
  • Members
  • 64 messages
3 words that made me hate him
"Keep me posted"
-_-

Modifié par KrabFace, 13 avril 2012 - 11:31 .


#46
BatmanPWNS

BatmanPWNS
  • Members
  • 6 392 messages
What's with all the hate lately?

#47
tractrpl

tractrpl
  • Members
  • 1 271 messages

krayt298 wrote...

As long as Starchild exists, I can't hate another character.


Yeah, no sh*t. Starbrat makes Udina look downright cuddly.

#48
Baldrick67

Baldrick67
  • Members
  • 229 messages
I like the character alot.

Seeing him in the "flesh" in ME2 during arrival was great, tough but fair with a ton of honour. They built upon that in ME3.

The man is the supreme leader of all human forces. I think he should be coordinating Shepards missions.

I think we need a DLC to see how he got the scar ! Maybe him and Zaeed.

#49
Menethra

Menethra
  • Members
  • 420 messages
I liked hackett it also helps he the guy who voices him did the voice for sheppard in MW2 ^_^

#50
Erield

Erield
  • Members
  • 1 220 messages

Deuterium_Dawn wrote...

Hackett's cool. He's the only member of the Alliance that didn't manage to ****** me off at some point. Looking at you, Anderson, VS, Udina, random defense committee retards.