Luzarius wrote...
We know that a child trusts the parent. We know that followers of a god trust in their god and follow his orders. If you studied human culture you would know these basic principles.
The creator of the reapers did two simple things:
1. showed itself to you as a child.
2. gave you control
So you're saying that I should trust a child because it's a child and simply take whatever it says as granted?
Sorry, but if it had given me control, this child would be dead by now.
The reapers gave you control and showed itself to you as a child. If that isn't humility I don't know what is.
I know though. It's called deception.
I can't prove that the starchilds homeworld was devastated by AI. But sometime in the starchilds life it must of been scarred by an AI somehow. This is a logical conclusion devoid of objective evidence. Bioware intended for us to speculate and this is a strong speculation. Legion states that the mind of the reapers were once organic. Given the fact that organics are destined to run into problems with an AI we can safely assume the starchild was harmed by AI at one point.
That's not actually true. The Reapers' minds are organic. Legion says that as well - the Reapers are very similar in their way of thinking to the way the Geth think and work; as thousands of programs forming one hive mind but unlike the Geth, these programs do not form a network. They are completely independent. To quote Sovereign on that:
"We are each a nation. Independent. Free of all weakness."
Legion has never said that their minds were once organic. All he said was that Nazara interacted with the Geth on the same level the Geth interact with each other - exchanging data FTL. That is a Synthetic ability, not an organic one. Reapers are simply made of organic genetic material but what the effect of this is has never been clarified.
As for the Starchild, you're grasping for thin straws there, Luz. It really is strong speculation, but nothing more. There is no real indication that the Starchild was in any way organic at all. It talks with logic, with nothing but mere logic, which is why the child-thing doesn't work as well. If this Reaper master would really want you to accept it's truth easier by showing itself in the form of a child, then it did not do a very good impression of a child. This is the coldest child I have ever seen, my Shepard would not have believed one word it said (and btw my Shepard is an atheist).
You don't have to, that is why I used the "parent" argument as well. The concept of sloth can be translated into "lazy". If you were open minded you would interpret this with great ease.
I know what sloth means, don't worry. And again, the Reaper master did not do a very good job in imitating the form of a child to make Shepard more willing to accept it's logic. And it didn't give me any control either, other than me having to choose from 3 narrow-minded endings. Other than that it was the child exerting control on me.
As for the rest, does not belong here. Rest assured, I have nothing to feel bad about.
Modifié par iorveth1271, 13 avril 2012 - 11:29 .