AJRimmsey wrote...
Kuari999 wrote...
AJRimmsey wrote...
1 - radiation
2 - space battle
3 - behind you..or before you as blast propelled him
4 - sensors
5 - they chose london for the scenery
6 - same way harbinger did
7 - radiation mutates and its energy
8 - neutron radiation destroys bio but not synthetic matter
9 - joker never once goes on away missions...coward ?
10 - you answered your own question
First off, while you can speculate reasons, the fact you need to speculate is generally what makes it a plot hole in the first place.
Second, radiation does not work that way. Mutations don't change your body into synthetic parts.
Third, why the heck would Kohaku have access to the Citadel's sensors?
Fourth, it had less to do with why they chose a certain location and more to do with, why did they prepare so far ahead of time to give a clear path straight to what could destroy them?
Fifth, not going on away missions doesn't make him a coward. Abandoning his comrades in a last ditch battle? Oh hell yeah, that makes someone a coward. In fact, irl militaries, of all sorts? Abandoning comrades a pretty major offense. Its just about the quickest way to get court martialed and thrown in prison. Seriously, what's with your habit and trying to argue something completely unrelated to try and bash someone's point. What relation does going on away missions have with RUNNING AWAY FROM A BATTLE?
1 - its a game,everything about it is speculation
2 - calcium is a metal
3 - because he wanted too
4 - the writers decided on it
5 - i am not arguing anything,you are getting upset at me giving my opinion
anyway,this is just derailing yet another "i liked the game " threads
just let someone voice an opinion without getting gang banged for once,its just a game
Okay I was going to just bypass this and move on, but lord I need to say something.
NO RADIATION POSITIVELY AFFECT LIVING ORGANISMS. I'm going to go ahead and clarify this for you simply. The sun, emits radiation. If you are exposed to too much of it, then that radiation in varying doses can cause malignant cancer in the skin. Radiation does not build life, it destroys it, in all forms of radioactivity emitted. Radiation is ALWAYS harmful to living organisms, no matter what end of the spectrum it's being emitted from. Always. So no, radiation does not explain why organics combined with synthetics. That would require mutation of the DNA (and some sort of magical, rapid surgery of some kind since the complex mechanics necessary for synthetic materials to combine successfully with organic materials could NEVER spontaneously appear out of thin air, and would be impossible to install without direct intervention of some kind of intelligent being--like Miranda) , which more often than not results in negative results instead of positive results--especially if the being is already ALIVE, when their DNA begins to mutate.
"The writers decided on it" is a pretty cheap cop-out for failing to utilize the most basic critical thinking skills. No amount of money or notoriety elevates the writers of BioWare, or BioWare themselves above critique. The ending is broken. It's fine if someone likes it, but be prepared to have delivered the technical, academic, objective reasons as to why the ending fell short of its intended purposes, as the WRITERS meant for them--not as how the community perceived it. Without the ability to critically analyze, an individual will not be able to recognize the short-comings of the ending, and will fall back on your line of thinking that: "the writers obviously meant it, so here's my money BioWare." No. Just... no.
The way stories work, in case you were unaware, is not based on speculation. "Because the character wanted to," "because it was just meant to be that way." No, there is a neccessity for solid evidence to be presented, that can be quoted, and verified for any/all of your statements to be valid. That being said, the current ending as it stands can do no such thing. Games are not MEANT to be speculated on. This is again, another cop-out excuse.
GOOD WRITING WILL PROVIDE ANSWERS TO ITS MOST BASIC, FUNDAMENTAL, MEANINGFUL QUESTIONS THAT ARE PRESENTED BY THE WRITING ITSELF. IT IS NOT PROPER WRITING IF THE AUDIENCE FINDS IT NECESSARY TO SEARCH OUTSIDE OF THE TEXT TO ANSWER THE TEXT. A STORY IS WRITTEN AS A SELF-SUSTAINING, STAND-ALONE PIECE, WHERE ALL ANSWERS LIE WITHIN IT.
This is based on generations of academia within the field of writing itself. It's an established rule that is not subjective. If the piece of writing explicitly directs the reader to go elsewhere, it is no longer a story, it is a research/report piece.
I do not mind individuals who enjoy the ending, I do mind individuals who push out blanket statements of "just cuz" like you. Present reasonable arguments if you wish for your case to be valid, otherwise, you're doing more harm to the OP of this thread posting what you've posted, than good. I know individuals who have stated eloquent cases for why they like the ending, and I have nothing but respect for them, and have chosen not to debate further with them, but you... should probably stop talking, because you're doing them disservice. You've spoken many more unfounded, and illogical things... but this was just, a basic blunder of physics 101 that I needed to clarify.
Modifié par EmEr77, 14 avril 2012 - 08:04 .
Retour en haut
