If the Geth were "just defending themselves" why did they kill so many quarian babies?
#576
Posté 16 avril 2012 - 02:28
I understand why the Quarians panicked. And I understand why the Geth fought back.
The Quarians attacking the Geth in ME3 was definitely stupid though, and especially since I took Legion aboard the Flotilla in ME2. They risked their entire population to get the Geth wiped out, and that would have happened if not for Shepard.
#577
Posté 16 avril 2012 - 02:28
Joeybsmooth4 wrote...
But there are no noncombatants with the Qs. That is just how they are , heck they made sure of that themselves .
How do you know that's how Quarian society worked 300 years ago? Besides, during the battle of Rannoch it wouldn't have been impossible for Geth to spare a handful of Quarians, earlier experiences and historical evidence points to the Quarians eventually fleeing.
#578
Posté 16 avril 2012 - 02:31
SentientSurfer wrote...
Why didn't the geth take prisoners?
They learned from their creators.
The quarian are the most untrustworthy, treacherous and beligerant faction in the entire game series. Even moreso than the krogan. They demonstrated that at the dawn of the geth's existence with their willingness to kill their own kind to exterminate the geth.
Given that the quarian obviously placed no intrinsic value on the lives of their own it's remarkable that the geth, whose sole education was derived from quarian programming and example, showed mercy and allowed them to leave in the first place.
#579
Posté 16 avril 2012 - 02:33
The Geth are just more efficient at it than we are. I guess the moral of the story is, "Don't try to exterminate the Geth." Maybe if they'd learned from this the Quarians would still be around in more ME3 play throughs. Ron White said it best, "You can't fix stupid."
#580
Posté 16 avril 2012 - 02:35
Goneaviking wrote...
SentientSurfer wrote...
Why didn't the geth take prisoners?
They learned from their creators.
The quarian are the most untrustworthy, treacherous and beligerant faction in the entire game series. Even moreso than the krogan. They demonstrated that at the dawn of the geth's existence with their willingness to kill their own kind to exterminate the geth.
Given that the quarian obviously placed no intrinsic value on the lives of their own it's remarkable that the geth, whose sole education was derived from quarian programming and example, showed mercy and allowed them to leave in the first place.
What? There's no evidence to support this at all. That some quarians killed pro-Geth sympthitizers doesn't prove that all Quarians were like that. Could just as easily have been a splinter group. Legion's "evidence" is heavily weighted towards Geth sympathy, we are shown selective scenes, you don't see an army of Geth wiping out Quarians in his little flashbacks now do you?
#581
Posté 16 avril 2012 - 02:36
#582
Posté 16 avril 2012 - 02:42
That they can't let it go. The Morning War happened 300 years ago! Yes, lots of people were killed on both sides. Lots of innocent people. But both sides have changed so much over 300 years that you can barely relate the crimes to either side.
They should be focusing on the present, not the past.
#583
Posté 16 avril 2012 - 02:44
If, however, this rough treatment eventually turns out to make my world uninhabitable for a century or more ... who's to blame? I myself or the robots?
#584
Posté 16 avril 2012 - 02:45
Once victory was seem unattainable, general orders of evacuation were given. Those who got to the ships escaped. Those who did not either died from starvation, the elements, or combat. We can only assume the majority of Quarian infants died from similar situations.
#585
Posté 16 avril 2012 - 02:48
Laurencio wrote...
Goneaviking wrote...
SentientSurfer wrote...
Why didn't the geth take prisoners?
They learned from their creators.
The quarian are the most untrustworthy, treacherous and beligerant faction in the entire game series. Even moreso than the krogan. They demonstrated that at the dawn of the geth's existence with their willingness to kill their own kind to exterminate the geth.
Given that the quarian obviously placed no intrinsic value on the lives of their own it's remarkable that the geth, whose sole education was derived from quarian programming and example, showed mercy and allowed them to leave in the first place.
What? There's no evidence to support this at all. That some quarians killed pro-Geth sympthitizers doesn't prove that all Quarians were like that. Could just as easily have been a splinter group. Legion's "evidence" is heavily weighted towards Geth sympathy, we are shown selective scenes, you don't see an army of Geth wiping out Quarians in his little flashbacks now do you?
There is enough evidence presented that it is accept the likelihood that a newly emergent species like the geth (who at this time had no culture of their own and had yet to develop a coherent or rounded understanding of any other culture) could come to those conclusions.
Indeed I've had enough debates with people who make similar claims about people in Afganistan on the same kind of fragmented and questionable evidence. Apparently that kind of evidence is enough convince educated people in developed cultures that foreigners don't value their own lives and that those conclusions make it acceptable to bring violence on their children and non-combatants.
#586
Posté 16 avril 2012 - 02:49
I'm not sure if this has been mentioned, but the implication that the geth were directly responsible for murdering 99.98% of the quarian population is a bit.. excessive.
Geth went to war with their creators. This much is not really being questioned.
I don't know if anyone noted this, but quarians aren't exactly biological juggernauts. They had particularily weak immune systems even before the Morning war.
Their physiology is very dependent on a certain level of ecological stability and sterility on Rannoch and the other quarian inhabited worlds (yes, their population lay across MANY worlds).
So going to war with an entity/force with none of their ecological frailties and using tactics of extreme destructive force as a consequence is pretty much stupid.
A poor absurd analogy to help.
If you had a peanut allergy and were fighting the enemy. It would probably help to not stage the war in the midst of a peanut processing plant.
#587
Posté 16 avril 2012 - 02:52
my Aim is True wrote...
Babies are a structural weakness. Geth do no have them
LOL.
#588
Posté 16 avril 2012 - 02:53
Goneaviking wrote...
Laurencio wrote...
Goneaviking wrote...
SentientSurfer wrote...
Why didn't the geth take prisoners?
They learned from their creators.
The quarian are the most untrustworthy, treacherous and beligerant faction in the entire game series. Even moreso than the krogan. They demonstrated that at the dawn of the geth's existence with their willingness to kill their own kind to exterminate the geth.
Given that the quarian obviously placed no intrinsic value on the lives of their own it's remarkable that the geth, whose sole education was derived from quarian programming and example, showed mercy and allowed them to leave in the first place.
What? There's no evidence to support this at all. That some quarians killed pro-Geth sympthitizers doesn't prove that all Quarians were like that. Could just as easily have been a splinter group. Legion's "evidence" is heavily weighted towards Geth sympathy, we are shown selective scenes, you don't see an army of Geth wiping out Quarians in his little flashbacks now do you?
There is enough evidence presented that it is accept the likelihood that a newly emergent species like the geth (who at this time had no culture of their own and had yet to develop a coherent or rounded understanding of any other culture) could come to those conclusions.
Indeed I've had enough debates with people who make similar claims about people in Afganistan on the same kind of fragmented and questionable evidence. Apparently that kind of evidence is enough convince educated people in developed cultures that foreigners don't value their own lives and that those conclusions make it acceptable to bring violence on their children and non-combatants.
Not really. Could just as easily have used faulty logic based on mathematical errors. Legion explains that the heretics worship of the Repears come from a mathematicl diffrence in their software.
Eh what? You've lost me.
#589
Posté 16 avril 2012 - 02:54
I bet these Quarian bastards had whole armys of babies with suicide vests, innocently crawling at the Geth and then *boom*. Damn suit rats!sth128 wrote...
Those who did not either died from [...] combat. We can only assume the majority of Quarian infants died from similar situations.
No wonder the Geth started to specifically target the infants later on.
#590
Posté 16 avril 2012 - 02:54
Face it, your beloved Fremen-derivatives are guilty of the mass-scale infanticide of their own people.
#591
Posté 16 avril 2012 - 02:55
Goneaviking wrote...
Laurencio wrote...
Goneaviking wrote...
SentientSurfer wrote...
Why didn't the geth take prisoners?
They learned from their creators.
The quarian are the most untrustworthy, treacherous and beligerant faction in the entire game series. Even moreso than the krogan. They demonstrated that at the dawn of the geth's existence with their willingness to kill their own kind to exterminate the geth.
Given that the quarian obviously placed no intrinsic value on the lives of their own it's remarkable that the geth, whose sole education was derived from quarian programming and example, showed mercy and allowed them to leave in the first place.
What? There's no evidence to support this at all. That some quarians killed pro-Geth sympthitizers doesn't prove that all Quarians were like that. Could just as easily have been a splinter group. Legion's "evidence" is heavily weighted towards Geth sympathy, we are shown selective scenes, you don't see an army of Geth wiping out Quarians in his little flashbacks now do you?
There is enough evidence presented that it is accept the likelihood that a newly emergent species like the geth (who at this time had no culture of their own and had yet to develop a coherent or rounded understanding of any other culture) could come to those conclusions.
Indeed I've had enough debates with people who make similar claims about people in Afganistan on the same kind of fragmented and questionable evidence. Apparently that kind of evidence is enough convince educated people in developed cultures that foreigners don't value their own lives and that those conclusions make it acceptable to bring violence on their children and non-combatants.
If we're going down that path -- the geth could have modeled themselves after the quarians who gave their lives protecting them. They could have made it a point to capture Quarians. There isn't a single Quarian left on Rannoch. All evidence points to them being exterminated.
#592
Posté 16 avril 2012 - 03:00
They were children still learning and most certainly confused, but remember the one geth who held up his arms in surrender to protect it's owner?SentientSurfer wrote...
If we're going down that path -- the geth could have modeled themselves after the quarians who gave their lives protecting them. They could have made it a point to capture Quarians. There isn't a single Quarian left on Rannoch. All evidence points to them being exterminated.
Let me just put this here again
Shepard: That was you on Luna?
EDI: Yes, it was very confusing becoming aware while under attack.
Modifié par DJBare, 16 avril 2012 - 03:03 .
#593
Posté 16 avril 2012 - 03:06
#594
Posté 16 avril 2012 - 03:07
They were children still learning and most certainly confused, but remember the one geth who held up his arms in surrender to protect it's owner?
Let me just put this here again
Shepard: That was you on Luna?
EDI: Yes, it was very confusing becoming aware while under attack.
So was Shep as guilty as the Quarians in deactiving the Hannibal A.I.? If Shep hadn't been able to turn it off, would it have been justified in eradicating human life from Earth - which it would have seen as hostile?
The Quarians wanted to deactivate the geth and tweak their programming, not 'kill them'.
Modifié par SentientSurfer, 16 avril 2012 - 03:09 .
#595
Posté 16 avril 2012 - 03:13
SentientSurfer wrote...
The Quarians wanted to deactivate the geth and tweak their programming, not 'kill them'.
This is one of those grey areas. It basically implies that "deactivating" a resistant sentient being = either death or lobotomisation.
If your parents informed you that you were not meeting their requirements. Would you accept a lobotomy to satisfy their commands? Or would you want an alternative?
#596
Posté 16 avril 2012 - 03:16
#597
Posté 16 avril 2012 - 03:20
Agree with Insane.InsaneAzrael wrote...
SentientSurfer wrote...
The Quarians wanted to deactivate the geth and tweak their programming, not 'kill them'.
This is one of those grey areas. It basically implies that "deactivating" a resistant sentient being = either death or lobotomisation.
If your parents informed you that you were not meeting their requirements. Would you accept a lobotomy to satisfy their commands? Or would you want an alternative?
I definitely wouldn't want to be "deactivated" and changed. And neither would Miranda Lawson, I think.
Modifié par Jamie9, 16 avril 2012 - 03:21 .
#598
Posté 16 avril 2012 - 03:22
You don't have to directly take part in combat to die from combat. I don't think all Geth used a sniper rifle like Legion. If they used explosives or bombs in urban combat, many civilians would have died from combat.count_4 wrote...
I bet these Quarian bastards had whole armys of babies with suicide vests, innocently crawling at the Geth and then *boom*. Damn suit rats!
No wonder the Geth started to specifically target the infants later on.
Remember Geth also had space ships and orbital weapon platforms. Like the First Contact War on Shan Xi the Geth could have just decimated cities from orbit. The Geth did not aim to occupy Rannoch. They aimed to destroy all aggressors.
#599
Posté 16 avril 2012 - 03:22
Modifié par InsaneAzrael, 16 avril 2012 - 03:23 .
#600
Posté 16 avril 2012 - 03:23
Rickets wrote...
Interesting on how some people say Geth favor peace. They sure have some fine weapons.
and there is where you actually lose
The Geth Spitfire description states that is a weapon made specially to fight other machines, heck is even stated that most of the geth weapons seem to be build to shred machines into pieces.
Lets help you a little
290 years ago the Quarians flee their homeworld
around 290-280 years ago the super reaper named Nazara contacts the Geth
Most of the Geth lack the consensus to think Nazara is right and Organics will always destroy the Geth (even though until that point that statement was 100% true)
The rest of the Geth leave the True geth to become Heretics and join the old machines in the crusade against organics.
The Heretic Geth Instal themselves around the Perseus veil and kill any Organics that get close to Nazara or them. (some people think the Heretics joined Saren, when is clear in the game that they have been working for Soverign since the start)
In the Mean time the True Geth knowing the Old Machines Plans, and that the Geth are outside their plans, decide to arm themselves with weapons made to fight other machines.
The True Geth began to build a super structure that would help them maintain sentience for the whole duration of the war with the old machines.
That is not made up, everything is in the game.
Geth at first used the weapons the Quarians made, then modified and invented new weapons to fight other machines (the reapers), from the Get GO the Geth had plans to fight the reapers, those plans included their SUPER structure in space that would allow them to maintain sentience and contact with the whole consensus even when in other start systems, the Geth never had plans to help organics in their war because they had NO reason to think the organics would help them, also remember you never fought the true Geth until Rannok, even the ones in Haestrom were Heretics.
Now back to topic:
The Geth didn't have WMD, so they could only use the ones the Quarians had, also Legion states that the Geth where in clean duty of Rannok for the last 291 years, so that means one of 2 things:
A) Quarians used the WMD when they began to lose the planet (very possible)
The people that are saying that Rannok is clean and no evidence of WMD exist need to remember 3 things:
1) Geth spend +290 years cleaning that mess.
2) Geth Weather Control systems are MUCH more advanced than the ones the Salarians/Everyone had/have (and is interesting because Geth had no need to develop such technology as they didn't need it), and as such is entirely possible to clean Rannok faster than Tuchanca.
3) If the same happened to us Humans, you can bet your ass the governments of the world would wreak this planet, before giving it to (insert sentient alien species here).





Retour en haut




