Funkdrspot wrote...
FS3D wrote...
Funkdrspot wrote...
DJBare wrote...
Funkdrspot wrote...
lol no it wasnt. It clearly laid out the time it would take and the current speeds in the ME universe.
They cannot maintain FTL for long, and bare in mind all of these ships have seen battle, they need to rebuild, now I wonder where those resources are coming from, certainly not earth in it's current state.
You're throwing out junk excuses that rely on mass assumption.
Codex. Read it. It clearly states the requirements for fuel, and the necessity for discharging the Eezo core of all FTL capable ships routinely in a Star System before proceeding on the next leg of their journey.
Junk excuses? The Codex refutes this appeal to ridicule clearly. All you have to do is read the damned thing...
And I'll say it as often as I need to.
ANYTHING in the game trumps ANYTHING out of the game... Including tweets and speculations by BioWare PR employees.
Please enlighten me and tell me how the codex refutes the ability to travel using conventional FTL for long distances.
social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/355/index/11158454
Did you not read the requirements for discharging the Eezo core of a starship?
Did you not read the requirements for refuelling vessels that undertake FTL journeys?
Did you not read the fact that there is no way to maintain maximum cruising velocity in FTL for the above reasons?
Or is it that you want to consider these acceptable compromises for a variety of ships needing more than decades to get from one side of the Galaxy to the other (as the Quarians and the Geth, assuming they lived in various endings, would need to do)?
It comes down to this. You are willing to ignore the above problems in order to accept the endings as they are... And that's up to you, but it doesn't make you right.