Damage Reduction - Math *Updated with Cover DR*
#26
Posté 21 avril 2012 - 05:27
[Damage Suffered] = [Base Damage] * 0.75 * (1 - [Total DR] / 100) + [Base Damage] * 0.25
You would need the total DR to be 133% to reach 0 damage taken, because the damage reduction only affects 75% of the base damage.
#27
Posté 21 avril 2012 - 09:52
tyhw wrote...
Actually, according to your formula
[Damage Suffered] = [Base Damage] * 0.75 * (1 - [Total DR] / 100) + [Base Damage] * 0.25
You would need the total DR to be 133% to reach 0 damage taken, because the damage reduction only affects 75% of the base damage.
You're right. Took some screenshots with a Batarian against Geth Rocket Trooper to get the values.
When I saw that post about the Batarian under Biotic Sphere I immediately thought that heavy melee DR could be 70%, as that would total a convenient 100% Total DR with maxed out Blade Armor. I was correct, see below
Here are my Batarian tests. Unmitigated and Heavy Melee DR percentage are highlighted to emphasize that those are estimated values used to calculate the rest. Batarian's maxed out Shield strength is 1238.
Modifié par Egermano, 21 avril 2012 - 10:32 .
#28
Posté 29 avril 2012 - 11:42

During my tests I acquired a fair amount of data now, and I keep getting different results for rocket damage on different characters. First I thought it was rounding or reading the graphics error, which is unavoidable, but some errors are too big to be explained by that. I keep getting errors bigger than 6 pixels, when the worst case scenario of a rounding error would be 4 pixels by my calculations (and the best case is 0.5, rounding can't get better than that obviously). Whatever is in works here, it's hard to be distinguished from the error, so a correct Base Damage value is needed. I gave in and consulted coalesced.bin to get Rocket Trooper's base damage. The base damage of the rocket is 425. Since there are no changes in the balancing thread I assume that this is still correct. Damage scale on bronze is -0.25 to 0.25, there is a variable called NoCoverDamageBonus at 0.4, and CoverDamageReduction at 0.9. I couldn't find any other data for monster damage, so this is what I worked with. 425 upscaled with 0.25 is 531.5. This should be the Base Damage in cover. Outside of cover the 0.4 bonus should apply, though I'm not sure how at this moment, so I'll present only in-cover rocket hit results.

This shows quite clearly that damage suffered depends on total shield points, the more total shield points we have, the less damage we suffer (although this is almost unnoticeable in normal gameplay). Out of curiosity I did a double rocket test (getting another rocket hit before shield regen starts). A bit hard to get two rocket hits and nothing else, but I managed to get screenshots on a cyclonic modulatored Krogan (2600 total shield points). The second hit was 7.6% larger than the first one! 777.64 vs 722.66 damage (these were unmitigated shots, no cover DR). 777 is the biggest rocket damage I suffered on Bronze yet, so this can mean that current shield/health standing effects final damage suffered in addition to everything else.
If this is true designers want us to duck back to cover as soon as we get damaged. Not only our shields start to regen faster if our shields are only partially damaged, but the damage is lower on full shields too.
#29
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 10:25
I had already noticed that my Krogan Sentinel could take a Gold Nemesis shot and still have shields remaining. (40% from Tech Armor, 40% from cover, and 1600 shields.) Given the information in this thread, an Asari Justicar should be able to make any class with innate damage reduction nearly immortal - 40% from cover, 40% from bubble, 30%-40% for armor powers = 110% to 120% damage reduction.
Edit: Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this what your formula really says?
Real_DR = 0.75 * Shown_DR
Modifié par Kenaras, 30 avril 2012 - 10:37 .
#30
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 10:29
very nice work
#31
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 05:52
Kenaras wrote...
Fantastic thread. It never would have occurred to me that damage taken increases with less shields.
I had already noticed that my Krogan Sentinel could take a Gold Nemesis shot and still have shields remaining. (40% from Tech Armor, 40% from cover, and 1600 shields.) Given the information in this thread, an Asari Justicar should be able to make any class with innate damage reduction nearly immortal - 40% from cover, 40% from bubble, 30%-40% for armor powers = 110% to 120% damage reduction.
Yeah, Asari Justicar is near the immortal treshold (Bubble 40%+Reave 40%+Cover 40%=120%, tested, it works) BUT all my measurings are on full barrier. I did more double rocket tests, and confirmed that the second rocket does more damage than the first. I still need more data to get an updated formula. All I can say for now is that the formula works only on full barrier/shield, and that total DR is even lower on damaged barrier/shield.
To fully use AJ DR get shield regen speed evolution on Fitness and the shield regen armor equipment, and keep your barrier full. Tanking stuff without barrier regen downtime is not possible. Less damage on barrier means a lot shorter downtime though, so high DR is not useless.
Edit: Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this what your formula really says?
Real_DR = 0.75 * Shown_DR
Yes, but I obviously hate simple things
There's no magic
I work in Excel, and math is not my profession, so I didn't bother to simplify the formula. Here it is:
[Damage Suffered] = [Base Damage] * (1 - 0.75 * [Total DR])
Again, I emphasize, it's only accurate on full shields and if you take an unmitigated shot on same total shield points as Base Damage. I'll try to get the full damage model, so we can use the damage values from coalesced.bin to calculate every damage, but I don't guarantee that I'll get there ever. Someone familiar with the unreal engine (and or BlackICE) could help a lot
Modifié par Egermano, 30 avril 2012 - 06:01 .
#32
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 08:40
With the way shield gating works, any information on the damage model can be huge help to players in optimizing their builds.
#33
Posté 16 mai 2012 - 03:34
#34
Posté 16 mai 2012 - 03:40
#35
Posté 16 mai 2012 - 03:42
Serge_THE_GREAT wrote...
Apologizes for asking like this instead of reading all of the material, but, are you also saying that taking cover behind a wall actually increases your damage reduction?
Yes, that's what the data shows -- even if the mob targeting you is on the same side of the cover as you. I.e. has a clean shot at you.
#36
Posté 16 mai 2012 - 03:46
Shampoohorn wrote...
Serge_THE_GREAT wrote...
Apologizes for asking like this instead of reading all of the material, but, are you also saying that taking cover behind a wall actually increases your damage reduction?
Yes, that's what the data shows -- even if the mob targeting you is on the same side of the cover as you. I.e. has a clean shot at you.
Oh wow, hah! Thank you for the polite post. I have personal reasons for not reading everything I see on forums.
#37
Posté 16 mai 2012 - 03:49
Serge_THE_GREAT wrote...
Shampoohorn wrote...
Serge_THE_GREAT wrote...
Apologizes for asking like this instead of reading all of the material, but, are you also saying that taking cover behind a wall actually increases your damage reduction?
Yes, that's what the data shows -- even if the mob targeting you is on the same side of the cover as you. I.e. has a clean shot at you.
Oh wow, hah! Thank you for the polite post. I have personal reasons for not reading everything I see on forums.
Ironically, TMI.
edit: Oh, and you're welcome.
Modifié par Shampoohorn, 16 mai 2012 - 03:55 .
#38
Posté 16 mai 2012 - 03:51
#39
Posté 16 mai 2012 - 03:55
So that's why bubble + reave + cover does not give immunity...?
Shows what use 80% DR is... (or 120% DR including cover bonus)
Modifié par Biotic_Warlock, 16 mai 2012 - 03:56 .
#40
Posté 16 mai 2012 - 04:02
#41
Posté 16 mai 2012 - 04:09
#42
Posté 16 mai 2012 - 04:43
I've done that. Great way to hold an objective. On Gold you can still go down pretty easily, but if you're in cover and have the bubble specialized for shield regeneration as well, people can get back into the fight very quickly.Wordlywisewiz wrote...
even with just 40 precent from barrier and 40 precent from the bubble throw down a geth turret and your almost invincible
#43
Posté 23 mai 2012 - 10:40
#44
Posté 16 juin 2012 - 08:11
#45
Posté 17 juin 2012 - 08:27
#46
Posté 25 août 2012 - 08:12
#47
Posté 21 octobre 2012 - 03:01
I remember reading somewhere that you get a default DR based either on how much shields of your total shields are left or the maximum number of shields you can have. Is this true?
#48
Posté 21 octobre 2012 - 03:07
#49
Posté 15 mars 2013 - 04:45
#50
Posté 15 mars 2013 - 04:51
Gaw_Damnit wrote...
Very late to the game, but just wanted to say: awesome post.
You revived a FIVE MONTH DEAD thread just to say... THAT?





Retour en haut







