Aller au contenu

Photo

just finished ME3


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
155 réponses à ce sujet

#1
warmonger180

warmonger180
  • Members
  • 37 messages
and i fail to see what the big deal is over the ending. Emily Shepard, being who she is, could do nothing other than what she did, which was self-sacrifice. sadly there'll be no house with a white picket fence to share with Samantha:(.

#2
Sdrol117

Sdrol117
  • Members
  • 4 338 messages
 http://achievements.... think about it

#3
loungeshep

loungeshep
  • Members
  • 1 864 messages
Don't worry about it, just carry your love for the game.

#4
EDDS86

EDDS86
  • Members
  • 3 messages
same, i liked the ending.

#5
Shermos

Shermos
  • Members
  • 672 messages
There's nothing terribly wrong with the ending as it is. I rather enjoyed it. It's good to see theads like this. People are buying the game to see what all the fuss is about and end up liking it.

#6
AJRimmsey

AJRimmsey
  • Members
  • 1 459 messages
20 minutes and no bile or venom,did the haters get banned again ??

apart from the slo mo i also liked it.

#7
metawanderer

metawanderer
  • Members
  • 434 messages
I liked the ending and the chocies you have to make though I respect those who do not. The only issue and I believe many others have is the ending cutscene. It never explains why Joker & crew are leaving. It is interesting because that could have been easily prevented/fixed by showing an additional 5-10 sec footage of how the crew got into the Normandy.

#8
ebevan91

ebevan91
  • Members
  • 1 511 messages
I don't mind the outcome. I just want those holes filled to make it easier to understand.

Modifié par ebevan91, 18 avril 2012 - 12:53 .


#9
Atakuma

Atakuma
  • Members
  • 5 609 messages
Well, the supposed majority of people disagree, so you're opinion is wrong.

#10
Guest_Catch This Fade_*

Guest_Catch This Fade_*
  • Guests

ebevan91 wrote...

I don't mind the outcome. I just want those holes filled to make it easier to understand.

This is what BioWare thinks the problem is which is why the ending DLC is only clarification. Sometimes things are just downright stupid. Clarification won't fix all the faults of the ending.

#11
Frailstrength

Frailstrength
  • Members
  • 53 messages

jreezy wrote...

ebevan91 wrote...

I don't mind the outcome. I just want those holes filled to make it easier to understand.

This is what BioWare thinks the problem is which is why the ending DLC is only clarification. Sometimes things are just downright stupid. Clarification won't fix all the faults of the ending.


And the hate begins. :) No worries, soon people will post on here telling you that you have no idea what you're talking about. :) I am in agreement. The endings are very good; although they could have used a little help. I just finished with a pure renegade who I think I roleplayed pretty well; she got everyone on earth killed in the end, and synthesis wasn't even a possiblity. What is really amazing is to think about all the ramifications of the other things you did. Imagine if you sided with the geth but then chose destroy; that means Rannoch is completely lifeless now. There are a lot of different things that took place as a result of your actions, choices with consequences that will have ramifications for ages to come. Just need a little imagination. That being said, some of the symbolism didn't quite work for Bioware because logistics are in the way; Joker and the Normandy stand out here. 

All in all though, it was pretty fantastic. I'm playing from ME1 with an infiltrator; should be fun. :)

#12
AJRimmsey

AJRimmsey
  • Members
  • 1 459 messages

jreezy wrote...

ebevan91 wrote...

I don't mind the outcome. I just want those holes filled to make it easier to understand.

This is what BioWare thinks the problem is which is why the ending DLC is only clarification. Sometimes things are just downright stupid. Clarification won't fix all the faults of the ending.


if you call them faults then no,nothing they do would change the endings for some people

but other people simply might not see faults,like someone above said about everyone getting in the normandy,i just took it for granted they boarded while i was doing the slo mo shuffle,but then others want to actually see a cutscene of them boarding the normandy.

i dont get that,nobody wanted to see cutscenes of mission take offs and landings when the crew left and returned to the normandy.

#13
Guest_Cthulhu42_*

Guest_Cthulhu42_*
  • Guests
Watch this, and you'll see what all the fuss is about:

Modifié par Cthulhu42, 18 avril 2012 - 01:08 .


#14
Swordfishtrombone

Swordfishtrombone
  • Members
  • 4 108 messages

warmonger180 wrote...

and i fail to see what the big deal is over the ending. Emily Shepard, being who she is, could do nothing other than what she did, which was self-sacrifice. sadly there'll be no house with a white picket fence to share with Samantha:(.


Here you go:  

After watching that, you'll at least understand why so many people hate the ending.

#15
FlashedMyDrive

FlashedMyDrive
  • Members
  • 1 153 messages
Whether or not you liked or disliked the ending usually boils down to how much you care and your ability to pay attention to details and inconsistencies.

To each their own I suppose.

Modifié par FlashedMyDrive, 18 avril 2012 - 01:13 .


#16
Il Divo

Il Divo
  • Members
  • 9 785 messages
Glad you liked it, OP. I wish I was in your camp.

#17
Guest_Catch This Fade_*

Guest_Catch This Fade_*
  • Guests

Cthulhu42 wrote...

Watch this, and you'll see what all the fuss is about:

Great video. It sure gave me a new perspective that I didn't have before.

#18
RusZap

RusZap
  • Members
  • 47 messages
I don't mind the theory behind the ending. Having to destroy all the reaper tech (including the relays) was something I wondered about. Heck I was ready for Earth or other races/planets to have to be sacrificed.

I just had problems with the plot holes: why was the normandy running and where was it going to? If Star Child was there all along why didn't he just open the citadel relay instead of relying on keepers, then soverign/Saren and when they failed again why did he just not open the relay himself? Why does Shepard that questions EVERY authority just blindly follow this dude without barely a question? Why if Star Child controls the reapers do we need to blow everything up to stop them. Why doesn't he just shut them off and let us go about our buisness or send them off to dark space again if he is willing to let us work it out ourselves? Those are a few off the top of my head.

That coupled with a build up that is expecting some great revalation and epic conclusion that all your choices over 120+ hours factor into, given that EVERY DANG press release talked about "where your choices matter", "now we can let things go in different paths", etc.

All that Just left me saying: That's it?

I wasn't sign a petition mad, but I'd say a little disappointed.

Imagine Return of the Jedi ending in vader throwing the emperor down the shaft then the death star exploding and seeing the millenium falcon crashing on endor to lando stepping out then credits.

You'd probably had said, what just happened to everyone.

Sorry didn't mean to soapbox. I was just disappointed. Loved almost every other aspect of the game though.

#19
Gethian

Gethian
  • Members
  • 7 messages
I enjoyed the ending as well. But I still like the whole indoctrination theory.

#20
warmonger180

warmonger180
  • Members
  • 37 messages

metawanderer wrote...

I liked the ending and the chocies you have to make though I respect those who do not. The only issue and I believe many others have is the ending cutscene. It never explains why Joker & crew are leaving. It is interesting because that could have been easily prevented/fixed by showing an additional 5-10 sec footage of how the crew got into the Normandy.


actually, I think the very last cut scene after the credits is something on an explaination. the crew of Normandy, having been damaged, had to land somewhere and that was the nearest planet. this is where they would start anew, and I think that was Joker walking with his grandkid telling him about someone who saved humanity, and all the other races, even tho there's no interstellar travel for a good long time, and of the sacrifice we all must make for whatever reason at one time or another

#21
FlashedMyDrive

FlashedMyDrive
  • Members
  • 1 153 messages

warmonger180 wrote...

metawanderer wrote...

I liked the ending and the chocies you have to make though I respect those who do not. The only issue and I believe many others have is the ending cutscene. It never explains why Joker & crew are leaving. It is interesting because that could have been easily prevented/fixed by showing an additional 5-10 sec footage of how the crew got into the Normandy.


actually, I think the very last cut scene after the credits is something on an explaination. the crew of Normandy, having been damaged, had to land somewhere and that was the nearest planet. this is where they would start anew, and I think that was Joker walking with his grandkid telling him about someone who saved humanity, and all the other races, even tho there's no interstellar travel for a good long time, and of the sacrifice we all must make for whatever reason at one time or another


-Why did joker run?
-Why did he make a relay jump?
-Why wasn't he killed when he snapped back to sublight veolcity?
-Why were my dead crew members on the Normandy?
-How would joker manage to find a planet mid-jump?
-How would the crew of the normandy repopulate?
-How are dextro aliens going to survive?
-Vice-Versa how are non-dextro species going to survive?
-Is the food even safe to eat?

Modifié par FlashedMyDrive, 18 avril 2012 - 01:30 .


#22
Documental

Documental
  • Members
  • 256 messages

jreezy wrote...

ebevan91 wrote...

I don't mind the outcome. I just want those holes filled to make it easier to understand.

This is what BioWare thinks the problem is which is why the ending DLC is only clarification. Sometimes things are just downright stupid. Clarification won't fix all the faults of the ending.


I only want those plotholes filled as well, I just want some clarification. I don't want a new ending, I want the existing one expanded, am I wrong for thinking this?

#23
FlashedMyDrive

FlashedMyDrive
  • Members
  • 1 153 messages

Documental wrote...

jreezy wrote...

ebevan91 wrote...

I don't mind the outcome. I just want those holes filled to make it easier to understand.

This is what BioWare thinks the problem is which is why the ending DLC is only clarification. Sometimes things are just downright stupid. Clarification won't fix all the faults of the ending.


I only want those plotholes filled as well, I just want some clarification. I don't want a new ending, I want the existing one expanded, am I wrong for thinking this?


No you arent. Opinions are opinions.

#24
Guest_Catch This Fade_*

Guest_Catch This Fade_*
  • Guests

Documental wrote...

jreezy wrote...

ebevan91 wrote...

I don't mind the outcome. I just want those holes filled to make it easier to understand.

This is what BioWare thinks the problem is which is why the ending DLC is only clarification. Sometimes things are just downright stupid. Clarification won't fix all the faults of the ending.


I only want those plotholes filled as well, I just want some clarification. I don't want a new ending, I want the existing one expanded, am I wrong for thinking this?

No. You can think whatever you want to, no matter what anyone else thinks.

#25
LegendaryBlade

LegendaryBlade
  • Members
  • 1 482 messages

FlashedMyDrive wrote...

warmonger180 wrote...

metawanderer wrote...

I liked the ending and the chocies you have to make though I respect those who do not. The only issue and I believe many others have is the ending cutscene. It never explains why Joker & crew are leaving. It is interesting because that could have been easily prevented/fixed by showing an additional 5-10 sec footage of how the crew got into the Normandy.


actually, I think the very last cut scene after the credits is something on an explaination. the crew of Normandy, having been damaged, had to land somewhere and that was the nearest planet. this is where they would start anew, and I think that was Joker walking with his grandkid telling him about someone who saved humanity, and all the other races, even tho there's no interstellar travel for a good long time, and of the sacrifice we all must make for whatever reason at one time or another


-Why did joker run?
-Why did he make a relay jump?
-Why wasn't he killed when he snapped back to sublight veolcity?
-Why were my dead crew members on the Normandy?
-How would joker manage to find a planet mid-jump?
-How would the crew of the normandy repopulate?
-How are dextro aliens going to survive?
-Vice-Versa how are non-dextro species going to survive?
-Is the food even safe to eat?


What are the direct consequences of my choice?
Is anything the Catalyst said actually true? Edi and Shep can both survive the red ending after all.
Why did they try to wrap up a 120 hour plot with fourteen sentences of dialogue?
Why is a Deus Ex Machina considered acceptable writing?
Who decided that the reaper logic was at all acceptable when literally any other reason would of fit the universe better?
Why do we all get the same ending (As long as we got an easily obtained amount of EMS) despite radically different choices throughout the series and different levels of work (I.E completionist versus straight playthru)?