Did you feel particularly connected to "Earth"?
#51
Posté 18 avril 2012 - 09:37
#52
Posté 18 avril 2012 - 09:40
BUT EVERYONE HATES BATARIANS SO ITS NOT EVEN AN APPEASEMENT THING. also they still have their homeworld, right? she only blew up a colony or something.The Angry One wrote...
Lisylis wrote...
I think it's one of those irritating 'narrative convenience' things : which I'm sure you know already. I agree that literally everyone in the Alliance should know that Shep is too important to be held in prison for like 6 months though!
I even bought Arrival but that's not really much of an explanation. SHEPARD DOES NOT CARE ABOUT BATARIANS (even as a paragon)
Indeed. Also, I don't buy the "refitting Normandy" excuse. Give Shepard another ship and off they go.
In fact, give Shepard her mom's ship. Because that would be awesome. Non spacers could get some other dreadnought.
But anyway yeah Batarians. Basically Shepard's in jail just to please the damn Batarians. My Shepard would be so pissed off.
Especially since, partly due to this, the Batarians are now all dead. Nice one Alliance! Screwing everybody over for minor and temporary political convenience.
THIS DOESNT HELP ANYONE.
#53
Posté 18 avril 2012 - 09:41
#54
Posté 18 avril 2012 - 09:42
YES.KingKhan03 wrote...
The scene where thessia was burning and reapers were landing was better then anything we got from earth.
@Baronesa too, because this largely covers the same thing: I felt way more attached to Thessia just because we talked to some Asari that were hanging around.
It wouldn't have taken much on Earth to create that same attachment surely
#55
Posté 18 avril 2012 - 09:42
Lisylis wrote...
BUT EVERYONE HATES BATARIANS SO ITS NOT EVEN AN APPEASEMENT THING. also they still have their homeworld, right? she only blew up a colony or something.The Angry One wrote...
Lisylis wrote...
I think it's one of those irritating 'narrative convenience' things : which I'm sure you know already. I agree that literally everyone in the Alliance should know that Shep is too important to be held in prison for like 6 months though!
I even bought Arrival but that's not really much of an explanation. SHEPARD DOES NOT CARE ABOUT BATARIANS (even as a paragon)
Indeed. Also, I don't buy the "refitting Normandy" excuse. Give Shepard another ship and off they go.
In fact, give Shepard her mom's ship. Because that would be awesome. Non spacers could get some other dreadnought.
But anyway yeah Batarians. Basically Shepard's in jail just to please the damn Batarians. My Shepard would be so pissed off.
Especially since, partly due to this, the Batarians are now all dead. Nice one Alliance! Screwing everybody over for minor and temporary political convenience.
THIS DOESNT HELP ANYONE.
There are vague references to the Alliance locking up Shepard to avoid another war with the Hegemony (because everybody fears the 5 Batarian ships that actually work).
Modifié par The Angry One, 18 avril 2012 - 09:42 .
#56
Posté 18 avril 2012 - 09:43
#57
Posté 18 avril 2012 - 09:46
Why would the Alliance be so concerned about what the Batarians think of them? :it is a mystery:The Angry One wrote...
Lisylis wrote...
BUT EVERYONE HATES BATARIANS SO ITS NOT EVEN AN APPEASEMENT THING. also they still have their homeworld, right? she only blew up a colony or something.The Angry One wrote...
Lisylis wrote...
I think it's one of those irritating 'narrative convenience' things : which I'm sure you know already. I agree that literally everyone in the Alliance should know that Shep is too important to be held in prison for like 6 months though!
I even bought Arrival but that's not really much of an explanation. SHEPARD DOES NOT CARE ABOUT BATARIANS (even as a paragon)
Indeed. Also, I don't buy the "refitting Normandy" excuse. Give Shepard another ship and off they go.
In fact, give Shepard her mom's ship. Because that would be awesome. Non spacers could get some other dreadnought.
But anyway yeah Batarians. Basically Shepard's in jail just to please the damn Batarians. My Shepard would be so pissed off.
Especially since, partly due to this, the Batarians are now all dead. Nice one Alliance! Screwing everybody over for minor and temporary political convenience.
THIS DOESNT HELP ANYONE.
There are vague references to the Alliance locking up Shepard to avoid another war with the Hegemony (because everybody fears the 5 Batarian ships that actually work).
#58
Posté 18 avril 2012 - 09:46
#59
Posté 18 avril 2012 - 09:47
Probably would've been a better idea to take a cue from other SF where Earth is an overpopulated, polluted craphole that no-one wants to see.
#60
Posté 18 avril 2012 - 09:49
I kind of thought that was what they were implying, that's why Earthborn Shep's life is so ****.AlienSpaceBats wrote...
I didn't feel connected to the place at all but in order to do that, I guess they'd have had to have made the entire game on Earth.
Probably would've been a better idea to take a cue from other SF where Earth is an overpopulated, polluted craphole that no-one wants to see.
Although their ME1 info on earth doesnt seem so terrible. It looks nice in the one image you can view of it
#61
Posté 18 avril 2012 - 09:51
Akranadas wrote...
Another issue with Earth was the lack of it looking like Earth, the end mission was in London so you had big ben and red phone boxes. But the beginning had nothing to tie modern Earth to future Earth.
Hm... does anyone think it was a mistake setting the intro in Vancouver?
I mean yeah BioWare's Canadian and all but for the rest of the world... there's not exactly any significant landmarks in Vancouver that stand out.
To me it was just a generic future city. I just wonder if it would've been better to set it somewhere with familiar landmarks like, say, New York or Paris. Even if cliche.
#62
Posté 18 avril 2012 - 09:52
Baronesa wrote...
I felt no real connection towards Earth, or not a bigger one than towards other Homeworlds... In fact I felt more connected to Thessia (My Liara's world!), Palaven (My best friend ever!) and Tuchanka (my Brother Wrex!).
My Paragon Spacer was more interested in SAVING the WHOLE GALAXY, rather than individual worlds, anyway... Being so... Earth-Centric is almost like going back to Mass Effect, and FORCE you to support Terra Firma, no matter what.
Especially because no matter how Earth-centric a Shep may be it's pretty obvious that Earth isn't going to win this one alone, it'll take a united Galaxy. That whole bit about "I don't want to leave Earth, I want to stay and fight!" was incredibly jarring and made Shep sound like an idiot.
The hell you do, myShep. Shut up, stop whining, get off your ass and go find Garrus.
#63
Posté 18 avril 2012 - 09:53
Then, we get to ME3. Sure, it starts out on Earth, in Vancouver, but since they glossed over any sort of Earth element in ME2, I didn't feel any sort of connection to Earth. The only connection I felt was to the city of Vancouver since I live relatively close by, here in Edmonton. The disconnected feeling only got worse when I found that I can spend untold amounts of time sitting in a bar on the Citadel drinking Shep's butt off, all while Earth is burning (not to mention Thessia, Palaven, and hundreds/thousands of other worlds)
Then, we get back to Earth. Except apparently the best time to fight the Reapers is in the dead of night, with little to no lighting (aside from the in game, atmospheric lighting). I knew London was wrecked, but it kind of lost any impact it may have had if it had been seen in day light. During the London sequence, I felt more connected to the Firefighters who had been ordered to use their trucks as a distraction for the Reapers, rather than using them to help civilians and put out fires. I'm a former volunteer firefighter, and I know that the situation would have to be apocalyptic in scale if that kind of order is passed down, and that hit me more than London being a wreck, along with the rest of the world.
So no, I didn't feel connected to Earth. I only felt connected to one city, and the brave fire fighters that were only mentioned in a PDA...and no, I didn't feel that I even "Took back the Earth." But that's another story for another time...
Modifié par CTWraith, 18 avril 2012 - 09:53 .
#64
Posté 18 avril 2012 - 09:54
It actually makes a lot more sense if you never did Arrival because then Shepard's just on trial for working with Cerberus.The Angry One wrote...
Lisylis wrote...
BUT EVERYONE HATES BATARIANS SO ITS NOT EVEN AN APPEASEMENT THING. also they still have their homeworld, right? she only blew up a colony or something.The Angry One wrote...
Lisylis wrote...
I think it's one of those irritating 'narrative convenience' things : which I'm sure you know already. I agree that literally everyone in the Alliance should know that Shep is too important to be held in prison for like 6 months though!
I even bought Arrival but that's not really much of an explanation. SHEPARD DOES NOT CARE ABOUT BATARIANS (even as a paragon)
Indeed. Also, I don't buy the "refitting Normandy" excuse. Give Shepard another ship and off they go.
In fact, give Shepard her mom's ship. Because that would be awesome. Non spacers could get some other dreadnought.
But anyway yeah Batarians. Basically Shepard's in jail just to please the damn Batarians. My Shepard would be so pissed off.
Especially since, partly due to this, the Batarians are now all dead. Nice one Alliance! Screwing everybody over for minor and temporary political convenience.
THIS DOESNT HELP ANYONE.
There are vague references to the Alliance locking up Shepard to avoid another war with the Hegemony (because everybody fears the 5 Batarian ships that actually work).
#65
Posté 18 avril 2012 - 09:54
...The Angry One wrote...
Akranadas wrote...
Another issue with Earth was the lack of it looking like Earth, the end mission was in London so you had big ben and red phone boxes. But the beginning had nothing to tie modern Earth to future Earth.
Hm... does anyone think it was a mistake setting the intro in Vancouver?
I mean yeah BioWare's Canadian and all but for the rest of the world... there's not exactly any significant landmarks in Vancouver that stand out.
To me it was just a generic future city. I just wonder if it would've been better to set it somewhere with familiar landmarks like, say, New York or Paris. Even if cliche.
i did not know that was meant to be vancouver.
#66
Posté 18 avril 2012 - 09:54
The Angry One wrote...
Akranadas wrote...
Another issue with Earth was the lack of it looking like Earth, the end mission was in London so you had big ben and red phone boxes. But the beginning had nothing to tie modern Earth to future Earth.
Hm... does anyone think it was a mistake setting the intro in Vancouver?
I mean yeah BioWare's Canadian and all but for the rest of the world... there's not exactly any significant landmarks in Vancouver that stand out.
To me it was just a generic future city. I just wonder if it would've been better to set it somewhere with familiar landmarks like, say, New York or Paris. Even if cliche.
Any landmark that's known world wide would have done. Because it's hard to tell Earth from a cololy beyond the lack of prefab shelters everywhere.
#67
Posté 18 avril 2012 - 09:55
Modifié par AngryFrozenWater, 18 avril 2012 - 09:55 .
#68
Posté 18 avril 2012 - 09:57
Lisylis wrote...
...The Angry One wrote...
Akranadas wrote...
Another issue with Earth was the lack of it looking like Earth, the end mission was in London so you had big ben and red phone boxes. But the beginning had nothing to tie modern Earth to future Earth.
Hm... does anyone think it was a mistake setting the intro in Vancouver?
I mean yeah BioWare's Canadian and all but for the rest of the world... there's not exactly any significant landmarks in Vancouver that stand out.
To me it was just a generic future city. I just wonder if it would've been better to set it somewhere with familiar landmarks like, say, New York or Paris. Even if cliche.
i did not know that was meant to be vancouver.
It says so in the save file. Yes, that's your only in game notification that it is in fact Vancouver.
The sad thing is if you have the CE artbook, it has a lovely painting of a shopping district in Vancouver. They could've used that, have a little gameplay in that area to get to know the place and see what gets lost.
You could run around the place, talk to people, even interact with THAT KID. Then, later you go there again after it's been destroyed.
Modifié par The Angry One, 18 avril 2012 - 09:59 .
#69
Posté 18 avril 2012 - 09:58
Hell, i had a bigger attachment to Palaven than Earth, and you never even go there (was hoping for a mission on Palaven itself, not Menae).
#70
Posté 18 avril 2012 - 10:00
#71
Posté 18 avril 2012 - 10:00
#72
Posté 18 avril 2012 - 10:00
eet's so beegtilusN7 wrote...
I think I read somewhere they wanted to do it in a harbour city which is fine. Personally I think they should have done Sydney, since it has some of the most recognisable harbour landmarks in the world. I am however a little biased
#73
Posté 18 avril 2012 - 10:01
#74
Posté 18 avril 2012 - 10:01
The time on Earth was simply too short and we didn't get much of life on it. I feel much more connected to the Citadel as the galactic hub, where we got 3 games of Mass Effect letting us explore different parts of it.
#75
Posté 18 avril 2012 - 10:02
Modifié par FabricatedWookie, 18 avril 2012 - 10:04 .





Retour en haut






