255 réponses à ce sujet

[dreman9999]

FatalX7.0 wrote...

Auralius Carolus wrote...

FatalX7.0 wrote...

I've had recurring nightmares about seemingly random things.

I doubt you're part of a narrative. A good story teller can give you a direct look at something, but get the message right past you, only to surprise you later.

But in all reality, neurology is about the only science that can quantify what goes on in the brain. Everything else is heavily theoretical- it's just so complicated and difficult to reproduce phenomina. You basically have a big mesh of neural tissue, chemicals and energy frequencies that appear to contribute to dream frequency and intensity.

Specific content is a big pile of question marks.

That's probably why, along with the paranormal connection, that Bioware went with EMF as a primary contributor to indoctrination- it's one of the few known quantities and it has real roots in science.

And why are so many people taking that reply seriously?

Because reapers can effect dreams and some how you missed that detail in the plot.

[liggy002]

FatalX7.0 wrote...

liggy002 wrote...

Wait... so he said wasteland? Was that him telling us that he was going to destroy the Mass Effect galaxy or am I missing something here?

Yes, he said wasteland, that this was the end and that it'd be boring.

If he means to end it like this, I have to ask:  What the hell was he thinking?

[FatalX7.0]

dreman9999 wrote...

FatalX7.0 wrote...

Auralius Carolus wrote...

FatalX7.0 wrote...

I've had recurring nightmares about seemingly random things.

I doubt you're part of a narrative. A good story teller can give you a direct look at something, but get the message right past you, only to surprise you later.

But in all reality, neurology is about the only science that can quantify what goes on in the brain. Everything else is heavily theoretical- it's just so complicated and difficult to reproduce phenomina. You basically have a big mesh of neural tissue, chemicals and energy frequencies that appear to contribute to dream frequency and intensity.

Specific content is a big pile of question marks.

That's probably why, along with the paranormal connection, that Bioware went with EMF as a primary contributor to indoctrination- it's one of the few known quantities and it has real roots in science.

And why are so many people taking that reply seriously?

Because reapers can effect dreams and some how you missed that detail in the plot.

My reply is obviously sarcasm and I was being a smartass. You know, a joke, satire.

At least, I thought it was obvious.

[Bill Casey]

IsaacShep wrote...

It doesn't look like the conduit at all. Instead, it fits perfectly a part of the reactor you shot at in Destroy ending:


Exactly the same channels, same proportions and the right scale compared to Shep's body

You want to circle what you're talking about?
Because I sure don't see it...

[dreman9999]

FatalX7.0 wrote...

Okay, here.

That just mean he won't be directing it. ME, a series, is not one that belongs only to him and his team.

[dreman9999]

FatalX7.0 wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

FatalX7.0 wrote...

Auralius Carolus wrote...

FatalX7.0 wrote...

I've had recurring nightmares about seemingly random things.

I doubt you're part of a narrative. A good story teller can give you a direct look at something, but get the message right past you, only to surprise you later.

But in all reality, neurology is about the only science that can quantify what goes on in the brain. Everything else is heavily theoretical- it's just so complicated and difficult to reproduce phenomina. You basically have a big mesh of neural tissue, chemicals and energy frequencies that appear to contribute to dream frequency and intensity.

Specific content is a big pile of question marks.

That's probably why, along with the paranormal connection, that Bioware went with EMF as a primary contributor to indoctrination- it's one of the few known quantities and it has real roots in science.

And why are so many people taking that reply seriously?

Because reapers can effect dreams and some how you missed that detail in the plot.

My reply is obviously sarcasm and I was being a smartass. You know, a joke, satire.

At least, I thought it was obvious.

You know there is a conditon out there where people don't get that sarcaum is not easilly detectible on the internet....Especially when the persons comment comes more off as snarky then sarcastic.

[FatalX7.0]

dreman9999 wrote...

FatalX7.0 wrote...

Okay, here.

That just mean he won't be directing it. ME, a series, is not one that belongs only to him and his team.

How could you possibly know that?

"Whatever we do would likely happen before or during the events of Mass Effect 3, not after."

If you somehow know that he is not directing, then who is we? And who is? And why get rid of the executive producer?

Just, wat.

[FatalX7.0]

dreman9999 wrote...

FatalX7.0 wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

FatalX7.0 wrote...

Auralius Carolus wrote...

FatalX7.0 wrote...

I've had recurring nightmares about seemingly random things.

I doubt you're part of a narrative. A good story teller can give you a direct look at something, but get the message right past you, only to surprise you later.

But in all reality, neurology is about the only science that can quantify what goes on in the brain. Everything else is heavily theoretical- it's just so complicated and difficult to reproduce phenomina. You basically have a big mesh of neural tissue, chemicals and energy frequencies that appear to contribute to dream frequency and intensity.

Specific content is a big pile of question marks.

That's probably why, along with the paranormal connection, that Bioware went with EMF as a primary contributor to indoctrination- it's one of the few known quantities and it has real roots in science.

And why are so many people taking that reply seriously?

Because reapers can effect dreams and some how you missed that detail in the plot.

My reply is obviously sarcasm and I was being a smartass. You know, a joke, satire.

At least, I thought it was obvious.

You know there is a conditon out there where people don't get that sarcaum is not easilly detectible on the internet....Especially when the persons comment comes more off as snarky then sarcastic.

A condition? That's rude.

Sarcasm is very easy to see on the internet. Or you don't internet enough. You should internet more.

'Cause I don't like you. :innocent:

[FatalX7.0]

Bill Casey wrote...

IsaacShep wrote...

It doesn't look like the conduit at all. Instead, it fits perfectly a part of the reactor you shot at in Destroy ending:


Exactly the same channels, same proportions and the right scale compared to Shep's body

You want to circle what you're talking about?
Because I sure don't see it...

It's right there, obviously.

[Necrotron]

Anything other than the IT sucks because....
...because it means the ending really happened.

I actually like Indoc Theory because the idea of indoctrination and Shepard's exposure to Reaper tech are never explored.

Modifié par Bathaius, 20 avril 2012 - 05:00 .

[DJBare]

IsaacShep wrote...


It doesn't look like the conduit at all. Instead, it fits perfectly a part of the reactor you shot at in Destroy ending:
*Snips massive speculation image*
Exactly the same channels, same proportions and the right scale compared to Shep's body

"Re-used assets"
Oh where have I heard that phrase before, oh that's right, by people refuting IT AND those supporting IT.

On both sides of the argument those images only really have one distinguishing feature, the imagespace.

Modifié par DJBare, 20 avril 2012 - 04:59 .

[Auralius Carolus]

IsaacShep wrote...

liggy002 wrote...

Aaleel wrote...

liggy002 wrote...

Uncle Jo wrote...

If you think that there's still hope for the IT after Biowares annoucement, then you're dreaming dude... In blue, green and red... Time to wake up...

I will.  It feels a little rough with all of that London rubble around me.

London rubble?  That's Citadel rubble Shepard wakes up in, which is one of the many reasons why the IT makes no sense to me.

And Shepard surving that explosion does?  The rubble looks like what we saw on London.  And if you look at that curved metal structure behind the rubble you will find that it looks suspiciously like a part of the conduit that we see in London.

It doesn't look like the conduit at all. Instead, it fits perfectly a part of the reactor you shot at in Destroy ending:


Exactly the same channels, same proportions and the right scale compared to Shep's body

Not seeing it... that debris takes a mild S-curve, but I don't see that in the other photos.

[Auralius Carolus]

dreman9999 wrote...

[color=rgb(170,170,170)">Fact 6. The reapers can manipulate ]dreams...http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=ldIJFRvDUp4#t=690s[/color]

The reseachers on project rho in Arrival also taked about strange dreams  when they were being indoctrinated.

http://www.youtube.c...YTITiTw#t=249s 

How did I miss that...

[shepskisaac]

DJBare wrote...

Oh where have I heard that phrase before, oh that's right, by people refuting IT.

On both sides of the argument those images only really have one distinguishing feature, the imagespace.

Except that they put 1 distinctiviely different, shiny, mettalic and curved piece in a pile of otherwise same looking rubble next to Shepard that just happens to look the same as a piece of Destroy reactor Shep we standing next to when we saw him the last time 2 minutes eariler?

Possible. But even if it's not the same piece, you still have to agree the curvy metallic piece in the "Breathe" scene rubble looks different than the rest and sitcks out.

Modifié par IsaacShep, 20 avril 2012 - 05:03 .

[FatalX7.0]

Oh.

The Catalyst's voice is a combination of the kid from the vent, Mark Meer and Jennifer Hale.

Kinda random and late, but there it is.

[hex23]

dreman9999 wrote...

That just mean he won't be directing it. ME, a series, is not one that belongs only to him and his team.

Uh....what? He said they're doing more "Mass Effect" stories, just not after "ME3". So yes, his team will be handling the series. If you seriously think they're going to hand off the series to a third party you're insane.

I don't see how what he said is open to interpretation....especially what you're saying.

[shepskisaac]

Auralius Carolus wrote...

Not seeing it... that debris takes a mild S-curve, but I don't see that in the other photos.

Yes, there's a little "s" curve at the end of the piece (in breateh scene). Could be bent due to explosion. But if you see this, then you surely see the channels, proportions and that they look exactly like the reactor piece?

[Bill Casey]

Circle what you're talking about...

[DJBare]

IsaacShep wrote...
Except that they put 1 distinctiviely different, shiny, mettalic and curved piece in a pile of otherwise same looking rubble next to Shepard that just happens to look the same as a piece of Destroy reactor Shep we standing next to when we saw him the last time 2 minutes eariler?

Possible. But even if it's not the same piece, you still have to agree the curvy metallic piece in the "Breathe" scene rubble looks different than the rest and sitcks out.

"Need to get this game out the door and published" throw any old assets into the rubble, you don't have time to be picky, after all, it's just a pile of rubble.

[shepskisaac]

Bill Casey wrote...

Circle what you're talking about...

Even people who are fans of IT and disagree with me know which peace I'm talking about, stop pretending lol

[Bill Casey]

IsaacShep wrote...

Bill Casey wrote...

Circle what you're talking about...

Even people who are fans of IT and disagree with me know which peace I'm talking about, stop pretending lol

So you're trolling...
Fine...

[FatalX7.0]

The appearance of that piece of rubble is certainly similar to what could be found on the Citadel. Some of the other pieces of rubble also have a shine to them and some intricate shapes and lines, along with being scorched by explosions.

Did the Crucible explode or was that only a part of the Citadel that exploded?

[shepskisaac]

Bill Casey wrote...

So you're trolling...
Fine...

And everyone else along with me who do see the piece I'm obviously talking about even if they disagree with me that it's deliberate reference?

[Bill Casey]

Would someone just ****ing circle it then?

[Auralius Carolus]

FatalX7.0 wrote...

My reply is obviously sarcasm and I was being a smartass. You know, a joke, satire.

At least, I thought it was obvious.

Knight takes pawn... I mean, troll takes sarcasm!