Would you have waited 5 years for Mass Effect 3?
#76
Posté 21 avril 2012 - 06:58
#77
Posté 21 avril 2012 - 06:58
Modifié par TheNexus, 21 avril 2012 - 06:59 .
#78
Posté 21 avril 2012 - 07:00
#79
Posté 21 avril 2012 - 07:04
#80
Posté 21 avril 2012 - 07:07
#81
Posté 21 avril 2012 - 07:10
#82
Posté 21 avril 2012 - 07:10
Deuterium_Dawn wrote...
For the epic conclusion of what could have been one of the greatest series of all time? Absolutely.
Absolutely What He Said.
#84
Posté 21 avril 2012 - 07:12
#85
Posté 21 avril 2012 - 07:15
#86
Posté 21 avril 2012 - 07:40
#87
Posté 21 avril 2012 - 07:51
FatalX7.0 wrote...
TheNexus wrote...
sistersafetypin wrote...
Yes. In a heartbeat if I would be assured an unrushed ending with a lack of game breaking plotholes
But what if you hadn't played through ME3 yet? You had no idea about the endings or the plot at all. All you knew was that the game was being pushed back. You wouldn't be a bit frustrated?
I would still wait.
I think most people would agree that 1-2 years is not long enough for this game.
When the game was delayed the first my excitement grew. I thought they were using that time to make the game better.
Clearly it should have been delayed further
#88
Posté 21 avril 2012 - 07:58
#89
Posté 21 avril 2012 - 07:59
daecath wrote...
5 years seems a little long, but if BioWare said "We're sorry, we're working as hard as we can to make this a really great game, the kind of game that will really be the best ending to this franchise that we can make, but it's taking us longer than we had hoped." I'd be fine with that. I'd be disappointed sure, but I'd rather have a little disappointment in having to wait for something great, than the soul-crushing despair that was the ending we actually got (not to mention all the other half-****ed stuff the did to butcher it).
I would have waited as well, and an attitude like this would only reinforce my respect for BioWare. Of course, that "fictional" statement looks nothing like BioWare at the moment. Humility? Noooo, over 75 perfect scores blablabla...
#90
Posté 21 avril 2012 - 07:59
#91
Posté 21 avril 2012 - 08:00
now that I heard what happened with Casey and Mac on the ending, I wouldn't care when it came out.
#92
Posté 21 avril 2012 - 08:02
reminds me of Shigeru Miyamoto Quote "A delayed game is eventually good, a bad game is bad forever."daecath wrote...
5 years seems a little long, but if BioWare said "We're sorry, we're working as hard as we can to make this a really great game, the kind of game that will really be the best ending to this franchise that we can make, but it's taking us longer than we had hoped." I'd be fine with that. I'd be disappointed sure, but I'd rather have a little disappointment in having to wait for something great, than the soul-crushing despair that was the ending we actually got (not to mention all the other half-****ed stuff the did to butcher it).
well there is the exeption to that. Duke Nukem forever
#93
Posté 21 avril 2012 - 08:04
Someone wise once said something very profound...:
"A delayed game is eventually good, a bad game is bad forever."
--Shigeru Miyamoto
#94
Posté 21 avril 2012 - 08:05
Can0fCorn wrote...
Yes. I honestly thought this same question to myself in the middle of my excitement for ME3 to come out.
Someone wise once said something very profound...:
"A delayed game is eventually good, a bad game is bad forever."
--Shigeru Miyamoto
EDIT: just saw the post above me. Double the emphasis.
#95
Posté 21 avril 2012 - 08:11
#96
Posté 21 avril 2012 - 08:11
An extra 6-18 months, though, could very easily have been sustained.
#97
Posté 21 avril 2012 - 08:33
Having said that, A game like Diablo 3 is different because the story is not important. ME3 continues a story, there a long wait is more problematic. But for me it wouldn't have mattered much.
#98
Posté 21 avril 2012 - 10:01
#99
Posté 21 avril 2012 - 10:03
#100
Posté 21 avril 2012 - 10:05
5 years ain't no thang.





Retour en haut






