Aller au contenu

Photo

Would you have waited 5 years for Mass Effect 3?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
206 réponses à ce sujet

#76
TheNexus

TheNexus
  • Members
  • 565 messages
PS: I just made a poll asking the same question, so check it out if you're interested.

#77
TheNexus

TheNexus
  • Members
  • 565 messages
whoops.

Modifié par TheNexus, 21 avril 2012 - 06:59 .


#78
Johcande XX

Johcande XX
  • Members
  • 369 messages
Yes.

#79
FlamingBoy

FlamingBoy
  • Members
  • 3 064 messages
oh my god, yes, if i knew how dissapointing it was going to be and thats not just the ending

#80
MstrJedi Kyle

MstrJedi Kyle
  • Members
  • 2 266 messages
To hear the Mass Effect 3 was pushed back a year or two I would be upset, until it was released. The wait would be terrible, but that beautiful, complete, work of art would be worth the wait come release day.

#81
TenmaTaro

TenmaTaro
  • Members
  • 835 messages
I probably would have forgotten about it. So yes, I could have been able to wait.

#82
Rabid Rooster

Rabid Rooster
  • Members
  • 240 messages

Deuterium_Dawn wrote...

For the epic conclusion of what could have been one of the greatest series of all time? Absolutely.



Absolutely What He Said.

#83
OldSwede

OldSwede
  • Members
  • 540 messages

TheNexus wrote...

PS: I just made a poll asking the same question, so check it out if you're interested.


:D I did - and you made good answers (a bit hard to answer, which I think is good) 

Just adding the link here, as well: 

poll here

#84
BanksHector

BanksHector
  • Members
  • 469 messages
No.

#85
Wintermaulz

Wintermaulz
  • Members
  • 569 messages
i waited over 10 years for starcraft 2. I think i could survive 1-3 more years for ME3

#86
daecath

daecath
  • Members
  • 1 277 messages
5 years seems a little long, but if BioWare said "We're sorry, we're working as hard as we can to make this a really great game, the kind of game that will really be the best ending to this franchise that we can make, but it's taking us longer than we had hoped." I'd be fine with that. I'd be disappointed sure, but I'd rather have a little disappointment in having to wait for something great, than the soul-crushing despair that was the ending we actually got (not to mention all the other half-****ed stuff the did to butcher it).

#87
sistersafetypin

sistersafetypin
  • Members
  • 2 413 messages

FatalX7.0 wrote...

TheNexus wrote...

sistersafetypin wrote...

Yes. In a heartbeat if I would be assured an unrushed ending with a lack of game breaking plotholes


But what if you hadn't played through ME3 yet? You had no idea about the endings or the plot at all. All you knew was that the game was being pushed back. You wouldn't be a bit frustrated?


I would still wait.


I think most people would agree that 1-2 years is not long enough for this game.


When the game was delayed the first my excitement grew. I thought they were using that time to make the game better. 

Clearly it should have been delayed further

#88
sefudargo

sefudargo
  • Members
  • 73 messages
I could have waited another year hell maybe 2 years extra delay as long as the were putting out comics and books and art books and swag. yes i could wait longer. prime example is Zelda Skyward Sword. it got delays a couple of times and when it was released they added a CD of the orcistated tour with it. and the game is beautiful. all Bioware would have said is that they don't think that it is up to Bioware standerds and delayed it tell November 2013 if they wanted. I wouldn't mind

#89
Daniel_N7

Daniel_N7
  • Members
  • 435 messages

daecath wrote...

5 years seems a little long, but if BioWare said "We're sorry, we're working as hard as we can to make this a really great game, the kind of game that will really be the best ending to this franchise that we can make, but it's taking us longer than we had hoped." I'd be fine with that. I'd be disappointed sure, but I'd rather have a little disappointment in having to wait for something great, than the soul-crushing despair that was the ending we actually got (not to mention all the other half-****ed stuff the did to butcher it).


I would have waited as well, and an attitude like this would only reinforce my respect for BioWare. Of course, that "fictional" statement looks nothing like BioWare at the moment. Humility? Noooo, over 75 perfect scores blablabla...

#90
Ponei

Ponei
  • Members
  • 822 messages
Honestly, no.

#91
NickelToe

NickelToe
  • Members
  • 137 messages
would have waited and looked forward to innovation with good story telling, unfortunately the only thing innovative about ME3 is the micro-transaction process, the story of ME3 was great and all you accomplished was good, then all those accomplishments were undone.

now that I heard what happened with Casey and Mac on the ending, I wouldn't care when it came out.

#92
sefudargo

sefudargo
  • Members
  • 73 messages

daecath wrote...

5 years seems a little long, but if BioWare said "We're sorry, we're working as hard as we can to make this a really great game, the kind of game that will really be the best ending to this franchise that we can make, but it's taking us longer than we had hoped." I'd be fine with that. I'd be disappointed sure, but I'd rather have a little disappointment in having to wait for something great, than the soul-crushing despair that was the ending we actually got (not to mention all the other half-****ed stuff the did to butcher it).

reminds me of Shigeru Miyamoto Quote "A delayed game is eventually good, a bad game is bad forever."
well there is the exeption to that. Duke Nukem forever

#93
Can0fCorn

Can0fCorn
  • Members
  • 306 messages
Yes. I honestly thought this same question to myself in the middle of my excitement for ME3 to come out.

Someone wise once said something very profound...:
"A delayed game is eventually good, a bad game is bad forever."
--Shigeru Miyamoto

#94
Can0fCorn

Can0fCorn
  • Members
  • 306 messages

Can0fCorn wrote...

Yes. I honestly thought this same question to myself in the middle of my excitement for ME3 to come out.

Someone wise once said something very profound...:
"A delayed game is eventually good, a bad game is bad forever."
--Shigeru Miyamoto


EDIT: just saw the post above me.  Double the emphasis.

#95
Sean

Sean
  • Members
  • 786 messages
Even without playing the game I would understand. Only problem with 5 years would be that the new consoles are expected for a late 2013 to early 2014.

#96
TODD9999

TODD9999
  • Members
  • 455 messages
5 years does seem a bit long, but I would have waited. Not really with bated breath, but I would have kept the game on my radar, especially when I pulled out ME2 to play through yet again.

An extra 6-18 months, though, could very easily have been sustained.

#97
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 183 messages
I've waited more than five years for one of my favorite book series to continue. So yes. I wouldn't be exactly happy about the waiting, but if the results was worth the wait, I'd be happy.

Having said that, A game like Diablo 3 is different because the story is not important. ME3 continues a story, there a long wait is more problematic. But for me it wouldn't have mattered much.

#98
AshirahTSparkle

AshirahTSparkle
  • Members
  • 379 messages
I would wait in a heartbeat. I waited years for the Elder Scrolls Series (replaying for years, the previous one before the new one comes out, Morrowind before Oblivion, Oblivion before Skyrim.) I waited years for Fallout III to be revived. Heck I can totally wait for Mass Effect. I've been replaying 1 and 2 a lot.

#99
wright1978

wright1978
  • Members
  • 8 115 messages
yep would have waited any amount of time for it.

#100
KingNothing125

KingNothing125
  • Members
  • 2 291 messages
I waited 11 years for Starcraft 2, and will have waited for Diablo 3 for 12 years.

5 years ain't no thang.