206 réponses à ce sujet

[delphonic]

I waited 10 years for Starcraft 2 and I never had a problem with that.

Waiting 5 years for ME3 is a no-brainer. Quality is the most important thing.

[sydranark]

wolfstanus wrote...

You guys say "yes" now
But if you had to wait 5 years. You would be saying "release it now what's with the delay"

so lucky we have someone who knows exactly what we will say. you must be a mindreader. or a crazy stalker that has learned our every thought process. 

[Unholyknight800]

Yes but like that one guy said I would've been complaining at how long it would be taking.

Modifié par Unholyknight800, 18 mai 2012 - 09:07 .

[Captain_Obvious]

For the release as the game as it is? I would have preferred it ended up in development limbo and was never released. At least then I would have been wondering how epic it would be instead of realizing how awful it was.

I would have gladly waited ten years for a proper game with an epic ending. My opinion, anyway.

[shakey123]

would have paid 200 english sterling fact..and waited 7 years

Modifié par shakey123, 18 mai 2012 - 09:08 .

[someone else]

of course - what would be my alternative? Like NOT buy it when it finally came out? Scream and kick? - kinda silly thread

[calvinocious]

Yeah, I'm used to waiting years and years for good sequels *cough* Starcraft 2*cough*

I would have been fine waiting however long it took for this game to be done properly, and I immensely respect the game developers that take the time to deliver good games.