Dean_the_Young wrote...
Besides that ME2 expanded the story quite a bit via the characters (which were the focus of ME2, not the combat), your presumed offense is just that: presumed. Bioware has never denied that people had legitimate grievances about ME3, nor has their strategy been reliant on that blurb.-Skorpious- wrote...
I stuck by Bioware when ME2 started to focus more on combat than story, I stuck by Bioware when they released the overwhelmingly disappointing DA2, and I would have stuck by Bioware with ME3 if they acknowledged that the fanbases grievances with ME3's endings were completely valid. Instead, Bioware brushed off our concerns and insulted our intelligence by repeatedly mentioning their "75+ perfect scores" and using our dissatisfaction as a positive PR spin.And when you're swearing off a company that does take in feedback, and has even conceded and agreed to retroactively change their product in an attempt to meet the concerns of a large percentage of the fanbase? What should we call you then?If swearing off a company because they refuse to acknowledge not only my conerns, but the concerns of a large percentage of their fanbase, iis being a "fair-weather consumer" than so be it.
You are not some scorned majority being ignored by the big arrogant corporation that refuses to change itself.
you are INCORRECT DEAN... bioware is not changing their product to meet demand. they are changing nothing only providing some lame cutscences to a crappy poorly written ending. the VAST MAJORITIES DEMANDS are the endings suck and there are too many plotholes.. oh and space magic and god child too. none of these things are changing with the extended cut.





Retour en haut





