Dendio1 wrote...
Leo716 wrote...
I actually prefer her rather large breast.
http://tvtropes.org/...n/BuxomIsBetter
Though not for everything. I prefer jack stay the way she is.
tractrpl wrote...
Sparatus wrote...
EDI isn't even alive. Not really. EDI is just a machine, and machines can be broken.
--Jeff Moreau.
This line of reasoning could extend to Republicans.
Too political?
Guest_Sparatus_*
zaeeds rage wrote...
It's pretty immature as stated by several others. She's wearing Miranda's outfit. The tight sin outfit sure showed off her a**, but her vag wasn't on display. It was purposefully put. Amazing they can waste time designing Edi's vag, but not Tali's face
Katherine wrote...
.... but having things like this thrust in your face during the entire game (especially when there are a lot of deep conversations about what it means to be human with EDI) feels innapropriate. To me, at least.
Yelloheadx wrote...
Katherine wrote...
.... but having things like this thrust in your face during the entire game (especially when there are a lot of deep conversations about what it means to be human with EDI) feels innapropriate. To me, at least.
You have to do a lot of camera/view manupulation to get things like this thrust in your face.....or so I'm told.
Modifié par RocketManSR2, 21 avril 2012 - 08:44 .
RocketManSR2 wrote...
The step the geth took to true sentience would be lost if they were recreated by the quarians after you destroy them (grrrrrrrrrrr). It wouldn't be the same. If the Normandy is destroyed, EDI dies. Just like any other member of the crew that happens to be on board.
Dendio1 wrote...
I respect your opinion that it adds nothing. However, I think that nudity in video games adds a level of authenticity .
People laugh about the witcher 2's sex scenes but I found they really set the stage. The first one you see geralt waking up with a naked triss in bed. This immediately tells the viewer that the game is not going to coddle them. It adds realism, and a serious tone instead of the laughable underwear in shower scene. It invites deeper emersion, as we leave our social norms in favor of the games where nudity isn't as taboo. Geralt never giggles to himself when he sees a woman with her chest bared, and so an emersed player won't either.
Dendio1 wrote...
RocketManSR2 wrote...
The step the geth took to true sentience would be lost if they were recreated by the quarians after you destroy them (grrrrrrrrrrr). It wouldn't be the same. If the Normandy is destroyed, EDI dies. Just like any other member of the crew that happens to be on board.
We created them, we can do it again. Actually we have tech to bring organics back to life as well. Shepard....wrex....shepard....wrex....
Modifié par RocketManSR2, 21 avril 2012 - 08:50 .
Modifié par Forsythia, 21 avril 2012 - 08:47 .
eddieoctane wrote...
Dendio1 wrote...
I respect your opinion that it adds nothing. However, I think that nudity in video games adds a level of authenticity .
People laugh about the witcher 2's sex scenes but I found they really set the stage. The first one you see geralt waking up with a naked triss in bed. This immediately tells the viewer that the game is not going to coddle them. It adds realism, and a serious tone instead of the laughable underwear in shower scene. It invites deeper emersion, as we leave our social norms in favor of the games where nudity isn't as taboo. Geralt never giggles to himself when he sees a woman with her chest bared, and so an emersed player won't either.
Did a character walk around with nipples and/or labia intentionally made visible the whole game? Honestly, I have yet to play Witcher 2. It looks amazing, but there is a point where the nudity becomes excessive. I liked Rome on HBO, I like the Spartacus series on Starz. But sometimes they had ****** flying around for sheer shock value. I hit FF to a point where someone actually starts talking again. It brakes the flow of the narrative when things get that draw out.
Modifié par Dendio1, 21 avril 2012 - 08:54 .
Very glad to know that Jack has nipples and they are always hard. It suits her character.Katherine wrote...
Sepharih wrote...
Honestly guys...it's probably just a mirrored texture error. I don't think they intended it
LOL. As someone who creates 3D models and textures, that would be an extremely shoddy excuse for the cameltoe. Mirroring a supposed flat area like that is easy, and if an "error" like the camletoe appared, it could be fixed. The cameltoe is on purpose, just look at the shading.
I suppose you want to say Jack's nipples are a bump map texture error too?
Dendio1 wrote...
eddieoctane wrote...
Dendio1 wrote...
I respect your opinion that it adds nothing. However, I think that nudity in video games adds a level of authenticity .
People laugh about the witcher 2's sex scenes but I found they really set the stage. The first one you see geralt waking up with a naked triss in bed. This immediately tells the viewer that the game is not going to coddle them. It adds realism, and a serious tone instead of the laughable underwear in shower scene. It invites deeper emersion, as we leave our social norms in favor of the games where nudity isn't as taboo. Geralt never giggles to himself when he sees a woman with her chest bared, and so an emersed player won't either.
Did a character walk around with nipples and/or labia intentionally made visible the whole game? Honestly, I have yet to play Witcher 2. It looks amazing, but there is a point where the nudity becomes excessive. I liked Rome on HBO, I like the Spartacus series on Starz. But sometimes they had ****** flying around for sheer shock value. I hit FF to a point where someone actually starts talking again. It brakes the flow of the narrative when things get that draw out.
Witcher 1 had some characters permanantly naked, but again it added immersion. We had forest nymphs on the brink of society. Their norms did not see nudity as anything worth commenting on. It would have been odd to see such a culture running around with bras on despite their premise. As a player I reached a point where I wouldn't even notice their green bare breasts. They were forest nypmhs...its like being upset that tali has 3 fingers...its just what they were.
RocketManSR2 wrote...
Dendio1 wrote...
RocketManSR2 wrote...
The step the geth took to true sentience would be lost if they were recreated by the quarians after you destroy them (grrrrrrrrrrr). It wouldn't be the same. If the Normandy is destroyed, EDI dies. Just like any other member of the crew that happens to be on board.
We created them, we can do it again. Actually we have tech to bring organics back to life as well. Shepard....wrex....shepard....wrex....
Any recreated version wouldn't be EDI. That is the nature (and danger) of true AI. You don't know what personality it will have, like how some humans are good and others evil.
Dendio1 wrote...
Yelloheadx wrote...
Katherine wrote...
.... but having things like this thrust in your face during the entire game (especially when there are a lot of deep conversations about what it means to be human with EDI) feels innapropriate. To me, at least.
You have to do a lot of camera/view manupulation to get things like this thrust in your face.....or so I'm told.
Essentially you thrust your face into it, rather than having it thrust at you
Modifié par Katherine, 21 avril 2012 - 08:59 .
eddieoctane wrote...
Dendio1 wrote...
I respect your opinion that it adds nothing. However, I think that nudity in video games adds a level of authenticity .
People laugh about the witcher 2's sex scenes but I found they really set the stage. The first one you see geralt waking up with a naked triss in bed. This immediately tells the viewer that the game is not going to coddle them. It adds realism, and a serious tone instead of the laughable underwear in shower scene. It invites deeper emersion, as we leave our social norms in favor of the games where nudity isn't as taboo. Geralt never giggles to himself when he sees a woman with her chest bared, and so an emersed player won't either.
Did a character walk around with nipples and/or labia intentionally made visible the whole game? Honestly, I have yet to play Witcher 2. It looks amazing, but there is a point where the nudity becomes excessive. I liked Rome on HBO, I like the Spartacus series on Starz. But sometimes they had ****** flying around for sheer shock value. I hit FF to a point where someone actually starts talking again. It brakes the flow of the narrative when things get that draw out.
MassiveEffects wrote...
Dendio1 wrote...
eddieoctane wrote...
Dendio1 wrote...
I respect your opinion that it adds nothing. However, I think that nudity in video games adds a level of authenticity .
People laugh about the witcher 2's sex scenes but I found they really set the stage. The first one you see geralt waking up with a naked triss in bed. This immediately tells the viewer that the game is not going to coddle them. It adds realism, and a serious tone instead of the laughable underwear in shower scene. It invites deeper emersion, as we leave our social norms in favor of the games where nudity isn't as taboo. Geralt never giggles to himself when he sees a woman with her chest bared, and so an emersed player won't either.
Did a character walk around with nipples and/or labia intentionally made visible the whole game? Honestly, I have yet to play Witcher 2. It looks amazing, but there is a point where the nudity becomes excessive. I liked Rome on HBO, I like the Spartacus series on Starz. But sometimes they had ****** flying around for sheer shock value. I hit FF to a point where someone actually starts talking again. It brakes the flow of the narrative when things get that draw out.
Witcher 1 had some characters permanantly naked, but again it added immersion. We had forest nymphs on the brink of society. Their norms did not see nudity as anything worth commenting on. It would have been odd to see such a culture running around with bras on despite their premise. As a player I reached a point where I wouldn't even notice their green bare breasts. They were forest nypmhs...its like being upset that tali has 3 fingers...its just what they were.
Yeah, I can agree with this. But then, it wasn't some weird attempt at fan service, it was just part of the lore and added to the atmosphere. The sex cards in The Witcher 1, however, were attempts at fan service, didn't add to the atmosphere, and as such, I did not like them.
Modifié par Dendio1, 21 avril 2012 - 09:14 .
eddieoctane wrote...
It has something to do with the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and quantum computing. Basically, there's only so much about a blue box you can know and control, but the entire thing will factor into determine how the AI responds. Nature vs nurture, I guess.
AI like the Geth, who exist only as code, can be replicated rather reliably, though. Code is something that has to be readable. It all breaks down to 0's and 1's (maybe some 2's if you have a ternary computer, I'm not sure what the Geth run on). That can be printed out, manually punched into another machine, and the new system will behave like the old one.
Modifié par RocketManSR2, 21 avril 2012 - 09:10 .
silverspirit2001 wrote...
eddieoctane wrote...
Dendio1 wrote...
I respect your opinion that it adds nothing. However, I think that nudity in video games adds a level of authenticity .
People laugh about the witcher 2's sex scenes but I found they really set the stage. The first one you see geralt waking up with a naked triss in bed. This immediately tells the viewer that the game is not going to coddle them. It adds realism, and a serious tone instead of the laughable underwear in shower scene. It invites deeper emersion, as we leave our social norms in favor of the games where nudity isn't as taboo. Geralt never giggles to himself when he sees a woman with her chest bared, and so an emersed player won't either.
Did a character walk around with nipples and/or labia intentionally made visible the whole game? Honestly, I have yet to play Witcher 2. It looks amazing, but there is a point where the nudity becomes excessive. I liked Rome on HBO, I like the Spartacus series on Starz. But sometimes they had ****** flying around for sheer shock value. I hit FF to a point where someone actually starts talking again. It brakes the flow of the narrative when things get that draw out.
Sex is a fundimental human activity. I was not shocked by the sex scenes in witcher 2. The excesive bad language though....Crikes, I sound like an american sensor.
Simpley put, in context, sex, nuduity and bad language has a place in "art". Only excessive use is detrimental. In Rome and Sparticus, it gave us a view of history which seems accurate. In Witcher 2, bad language seemed forced - especially since the epithets where in morden language and definitions of swearing.
Only not really.
I woke up on Aria's couch.jules_vern18 wrote...
See, this is what I don't understand. They do tacky **** like this and then claim that ME3 is the Mona Lisa and can't be changed or else we set a precedent that will allow fans to add their own illustrations to the Sistine Chapel. Or something.
Because Mass Effect - with all the camel toes and ass shots therein - is high art akin to Monet's Water Lilies, Michelangelo's David, and Les Miserables.
And if you take enough shots in Purgatory you can wake up on the elevator. Voila! Art!
/rant
You need to drink more right after that.Jackal7713 wrote...
I woke up on Aria's couch.
Retour en haut
![=]](https://lvlt.forum.bioware.com/public/style_emoticons/default/sideways.png)
