Aller au contenu

Photo

Loghain in DA3? Any hope?


220 réponses à ce sujet

#126
Guest_Begemotka_*

Guest_Begemotka_*
  • Guests

brushyourteeth wrote...

I would like to see Loghain's tomb or Denerim statue in DAIII.

..... so that I can defile it in some way.


Strange that Loghain,also a man with a serious case of PTSD, who -similar to a certain Templar ;)- can be made to see how horribly he overstepped the line with the justification of "things being necessary" and who is prepared to die to redeem himself and save his country, should be spoken about in such a fashion,but similar faults are conveniently overlooked when a certain Templar is concerned:blush:


I have nothing against certain templar,and I am not blind to Loghain`s faults,either.
I like you,brushyourteeth  *glomps*   and respect your opinion - I was just surprised by such a harsh remark. :o

Modifié par Begemotka, 25 avril 2012 - 12:03 .


#127
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Begemotka wrote...

Strange that Loghain,also a man with a serious case of PTSD, who -similar to a certain Templar ;)- can be made to see how horribly he overstepped the line with the justification of "things being necessary" and who is prepared to die to redeem himself and save his country, should be spoken about in such a fashion,but similar faults are conveniently overlooked when a certain Templar is concerned:blush: 


Probably because Loghain thought that the nation that had a history of conquest since its inception might use the opportunity to take over Ferelden through "aiding" them during the Blight, like they did with Nevarra after the Third Blight. Attempts had been made to conquer Ferelden before the occupation, and Alistair reveals that there are still attempts by certain Orlesians to regain control of Ferelden. Loghain wasn't exactly off-base in distrusting the Orlesians, and the Grey Wardens in The Calling didn't exactly help promote the image of the order to Loghain.

As for the "certain templar," wanting to kill certain people for something they aren't responsible for makes "a certain templar" asinine. Then again, it was an absurd storyline where pretty much everyone was a caricature, and very little of the plot actually made sense. I don't see how you can compare a flawed and three-dimensional character like Loghain to "a certain templar."

#128
Guest_Begemotka_*

Guest_Begemotka_*
  • Guests

LobselVith8 wrote...

Begemotka wrote...

Strange that Loghain,also a man with a serious case of PTSD, who -similar to a certain Templar ;)- can be made to see how horribly he overstepped the line with the justification of "things being necessary" and who is prepared to die to redeem himself and save his country, should be spoken about in such a fashion,but similar faults are conveniently overlooked when a certain Templar is concerned:blush: 


Probably because Loghain thought that the nation that had a history of conquest since its inception might use the opportunity to take over Ferelden through "aiding" them during the Blight, like they did with Nevarra after the Third Blight. Attempts had been made to conquer Ferelden before the occupation, and Alistair reveals that there are still attempts by certain Orlesians to regain control of Ferelden. Loghain wasn't exactly off-base in distrusting the Orlesians, and the Grey Wardens in The Calling didn't exactly help promote the image of the order to Loghain.

As for the "certain templar," wanting to kill certain people for something they aren't responsible for makes "a certain templar" asinine. Then again, it was an absurd storyline where pretty much everyone was a caricature, and very little of the plot actually made sense. I don't see how you can compare a flawed and three-dimensional character like Loghain to "a certain templar."


Lobsel, thank you for the above.
Perhaps the comparison was a bit off (Loghain / Templar C.),but it was not the primary goal of my post,and neither was to question another user`s NPC preferences.
I just found their comment re: Loghains cameo (be given the chance to defile Loghain`s memorial in DAIII) a bit harsh,in the light of their preference of an NPC that also struggles with PTSD,moral dilemmas and is not without his faults.

I just found it a bit off-base on a thread that was started by Costin Razvan respectfully asking the devs to give Loghain`s fans a chance to see him in some capacity in The Next Thing ™.
Different strokes for different folks,but I would not go to a thread dedicated to fans of a certain character to bash the NPC.
Might have my opinion,and voice it too,but...dunno.:blink:

#129
brushyourteeth

brushyourteeth
  • Members
  • 4 418 messages

thats1evildude wrote...

brushyourteeth wrote...

I would like to see Loghain's tomb or Denerim statue in DAIII.

..... so that I can defile it in some way.


How dare you say that! The Orlesians killed his dog, you know. That clearly justifies all the murder and slavery and whatnot.


Image IPB

#130
brushyourteeth

brushyourteeth
  • Members
  • 4 418 messages

Begemotka wrote...

brushyourteeth wrote...

I would like to see Loghain's tomb or Denerim statue in DAIII.

..... so that I can defile it in some way.


Strange that Loghain,also a man with a serious case of PTSD, who -similar to a certain Templar ;)- can be made to see how horribly he overstepped the line with the justification of "things being necessary" and who is prepared to die to redeem himself and save his country, should be spoken about in such a fashion,but similar faults are conveniently overlooked when a certain Templar is concerned:blush:


I have nothing against certain templar,and I am not blind to Loghain`s faults,either.
I like you,brushyourteeth  *glomps*   and respect your opinion - I was just surprised by such a harsh remark. :o



aw, it was intended to be funny. Please don't stop liking me Image IPB

#131
Guest_Begemotka_*

Guest_Begemotka_*
  • Guests

brushyourteeth wrote...

Begemotka wrote...

brushyourteeth wrote...

I would like to see Loghain's tomb or Denerim statue in DAIII.

..... so that I can defile it in some way.


Strange that Loghain,also a man with a serious case of PTSD, who -similar to a certain Templar ;)- can be made to see how horribly he overstepped the line with the justification of "things being necessary" and who is prepared to die to redeem himself and save his country, should be spoken about in such a fashion,but similar faults are conveniently overlooked when a certain Templar is concerned:blush:


I have nothing against certain templar,and I am not blind to Loghain`s faults,either.
I like you,brushyourteeth  *glomps*   and respect your opinion - I was just surprised by such a harsh remark. :o



aw, it was intended to be funny. Please don't stop liking me Image IPB



@brushyourteeth :

For what it is worth,I cannot not like you  [smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/angry.png[/smilie]
Sorry if I misunderstood your intent. [smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/andy.png[/smilie]  It is just I have become totally defensive since wearing this avatar :o)
I have learnt that coming to BSN warrants donning a full asbestos suit though  [smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/bandit.png[/smilie]

Modifié par Begemotka, 25 avril 2012 - 08:34 .


#132
brushyourteeth

brushyourteeth
  • Members
  • 4 418 messages

Begemotka wrote...

brushyourteeth wrote...

Begemotka wrote...

brushyourteeth wrote...

I would like to see Loghain's tomb or Denerim statue in DAIII.

..... so that I can defile it in some way.


Strange that Loghain,also a man with a serious case of PTSD, who -similar to a certain Templar ;)- can be made to see how horribly he overstepped the line with the justification of "things being necessary" and who is prepared to die to redeem himself and save his country, should be spoken about in such a fashion,but similar faults are conveniently overlooked when a certain Templar is concerned:blush:


I have nothing against certain templar,and I am not blind to Loghain`s faults,either.
I like you,brushyourteeth  *glomps*   and respect your opinion - I was just surprised by such a harsh remark. :o



aw, it was intended to be funny. Please don't stop liking me Image IPB



@brushyourteeth :

For what it is worth,I cannot not like you  Image IPB
Sorry if I misunderstood your intent. Image IPB  It is just I have become totally defensive since wearing this avatar :o)
I have learnt that coming to BSN warrants donning a full asbestos suit though  Image IPB





I totally understand! And I'm glad. Image IPB And yes, you do need a full suit of armor sometimes on the BSN. We as a group either aren't very good at expressing ourselves without arguing, or DA must have the most passionate fans ever! Image IPB

#133
jsadalia

jsadalia
  • Members
  • 370 messages
I liked him hugely as a character.

I also hugely liked ending him. Honestly, I suspect he's dead in most playthroughs: if he's in DA3 his role could only be so minor as to hardly matter.

#134
thats1evildude

thats1evildude
  • Members
  • 11 007 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

Probably because Loghain thought that the nation that had a history of conquest since its inception might use the opportunity to take over Ferelden through "aiding" them during the Blight, like they did with Nevarra after the Third Blight.


Pity that he ignored all that history about monsters trying to destroy the world. Maybe if he hadn't been obsessed with old prejudices, he wouldn't have nearly handed Ferelden over to the darkspawn on a silver platter.

Modifié par thats1evildude, 25 avril 2012 - 10:34 .


#135
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages

thats1evildude wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

Probably because Loghain thought that the nation that had a history of conquest since its inception might use the opportunity to take over Ferelden through "aiding" them during the Blight, like they did with Nevarra after the Third Blight.


Pity that he ignored all that history about monsters trying to destroy the world. Maybe if he hadn't been obsessed with old prejudices, he wouldn't have nearly handed Ferelden over to the darkspawn on a silver platter.


Hey, let's not forget that the Chantry also deserves blame here for sending only seven mages to fight the Blight and probably not that many Templars either.

Certainly he should've listened to the Wardens more and devised a better strategy to combat the Darkspawn, but he's not the only one at fault here.

Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 25 avril 2012 - 11:13 .


#136
MEBengal2008

MEBengal2008
  • Members
  • 214 messages

Costin_Razvan wrote...

I know a lot of people killed Loghain ( either Landsmeet or Ultimate Sacrifice ), but some of us didn't and I have to ask if Loghain will show in any sort of capacity for those that did not kill him, if the choice with him will have any relevance.

I wouldn't expect it to really play a huge role, but I think a cameo would be quite nice, perhaps a side quest where he plays a major role ( Kinda like Jack in Grissom, Grunt in the Rachni Mission etc. ). I know Loghain is mentioned if he is alive and Alistair is alive and there but still is there a possibility for him to be there in DA3?

I ask this because Loghain is by far my favorite Bioware character. I really enjoyed talking with him, fighting against him, fighting alongside him and his entire character is just very well crafted.


I agree with this. I didn't kill him in my last play through in DAO and he made a cameo appearance in DA Awakening. It would be nice to see or hear of him in DA3.

#137
thats1evildude

thats1evildude
  • Members
  • 11 007 messages

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Hey, let's not forget that the Chantry also deserves blame here for sending only seven mages to fight the Blight and probably not that many Templars either.


Ironically, that decision probably helped to save Ferelden. If the bulk of mages and templars had been deployed to Ostagar and they all died because of Loghain's treachery, then there wouldn't have been anyone for the Warden to recruit.

Before you say "but more mages could have tipped the odds," no, they couldn't. It doesn't matter how much heavy artillery you have on the ground if they're following a flawed battle plan that isn't intended to work.

In fact, if it wasn't for Loghain's stupid scheming, there would have been a lot more mages and templars available for final battle, because without Loghain, Uldred would never have attempted his coup.

Maker's Breath, the Archdemon couldn't have found a better ally than Teryn Loghain if it tried.

Modifié par thats1evildude, 26 avril 2012 - 02:26 .


#138
JamesMoriarty123

JamesMoriarty123
  • Members
  • 898 messages

David Gaider wrote...

JamesMoriarty123 wrote...
You mean like the Alistair moment in DA2? Yeah, that would terrible. Oh, sorry...


Yes, exactly like that. The people who such a cameo would be included to make happy wouldn't be happy with it anyway. So instead they get nothing. And fair enough, you know? Easier that way, anyhow.


If it isn't gonna be done right, best not to bother at all. I'm with you on that score.

It's of my opinion (and usually I don't know what I'm talking about) but the WHOLE DA2 storyline should just be left to die, abandoned and forgot about. The only character to come out of it, if one must, is Varric. He was awesome.

DA3 should pick up after DA:O, with the Grey Wardens, and if you died in DA:O you should have to make a new Warden or play a different role altogether.

#139
Costin_Razvan

Costin_Razvan
  • Members
  • 7 010 messages

David Gaider wrote...

JamesMoriarty123 wrote...
You mean like the Alistair moment in DA2? Yeah, that would terrible. Oh, sorry...


Yes, exactly like that. The people who such a cameo would be included to make happy wouldn't be happy with it anyway. So instead they get nothing. And fair enough, you know? Easier that way, anyhow.


I am fairly certain most Loghain fans liked his cameo in Awakening. So really we don't need more then that. Sure it would be very nice indeed if it was more but still.

Modifié par Costin_Razvan, 26 avril 2012 - 10:58 .


#140
Guest_TafferS_*

Guest_TafferS_*
  • Guests

David Gaider wrote...

Costin_Razvan wrote...

I know a lot of people killed Loghain ( either Landsmeet or Ultimate Sacrifice ), but some of us didn't and I have to ask if Loghain will show in any sort of capacity for those that did not kill him, if the choice with him will have any relevance.

I wouldn't expect it to really play a huge role, but I think a cameo would be quite nice, perhaps a side quest where he plays a major role ( Kinda like Jack in Grissom, Grunt in the Rachni Mission etc. ). I know Loghain is mentioned if he is alive and Alistair is alive and there but still is there a possibility for him to be there in DA3?

I ask this because Loghain is by far my favorite Bioware character. I really enjoyed talking with him, fighting against him, fighting alongside him and his entire character is just very well crafted.


If Loghain showed up, I'd really rather have it be more than a quick "Hi! I'm Loghain and I'm still alive!" moment, you know? If we can't do more than that, I'd rather let it lie.


I would agree with the above assessment.I enjoyed his cameo in Awakening,but it only served to make me miss him more as a companion.

#141
Dave of Canada

Dave of Canada
  • Members
  • 17 484 messages

thats1evildude wrote...

How dare you say that! The Orlesians killed his dog, you know. That clearly justifies all the murder and slavery and whatnot.


They also raped and killed his mother and caused untold atrocities throughout Ferelden.

Modifié par Dave of Canada, 26 avril 2012 - 03:00 .


#142
Fiery Phoenix

Fiery Phoenix
  • Members
  • 18 968 messages

Costin_Razvan wrote...

I know a lot of people killed Loghain ( either Landsmeet or Ultimate Sacrifice ), but some of us didn't and I have to ask if Loghain will show in any sort of capacity for those that did not kill him, if the choice with him will have any relevance.

I wouldn't expect it to really play a huge role, but I think a cameo would be quite nice, perhaps a side quest where he plays a major role ( Kinda like Jack in Grissom, Grunt in the Rachni Mission etc. ). I know Loghain is mentioned if he is alive and Alistair is alive and there but still is there a possibility for him to be there in DA3?

I ask this because Loghain is by far my favorite Bioware character. I really enjoyed talking with him, fighting against him, fighting alongside him and his entire character is just very well crafted.

Um, no? Loghain's story-arc is done for, whether you killed him or not. I understand (and agree with) the notion that he's a very likeable and well-written character, but let's face it: if there is no reason for him to show up again, then he simply shouldn't.

#143
Dave of Canada

Dave of Canada
  • Members
  • 17 484 messages

Fiery Phoenix wrote...

if there is no reason for him to show up again, then he simply shouldn't.


Flipping tables and punching Orlesians.

#144
Chewin

Chewin
  • Members
  • 8 478 messages

Costin_Razvan wrote...
I am fairly certain most Loghain fans liked his cameo in Awakening. So really we don't need more then that. Sure it would be very nice indeed if it was more but still.


Well it depends. It was very short and came out from basically nowhere, and he gives us a sh*tty item. But I did squee.

As for his role would he make an apperanace, obviously I'd want a major one rather than a minor, though I'm afraid BW would just end up ruining him. So to be on the safe side, if there is no good reason for him to show up, just leave him out from it all.

#145
Guest_Begemotka_*

Guest_Begemotka_*
  • Guests

Dave of Canada wrote...

Fiery Phoenix wrote...

if there is no reason for him to show up again, then he simply shouldn't.


Flipping tables and punching Orlesians.


Hell yeah:O

Or,alternatively,flipping Orlesians and punching tables.

#146
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages

thats1evildude wrote...

Ironically, that decision probably helped to save Ferelden. If the bulk of mages and templars had been deployed to Ostagar and they all died because of Loghain's treachery, then there wouldn't have been anyone for the Warden to recruit.


Loghain's "treachery", as you call it, was only done as a military retreat because of the numbers of the Darkspawn horde. Yes, he betrayed his king by leaving him to die. But it was a justified act of treachery in this case, when considering the greater threat.

Loghain more then likely would've come up with a better plan if he had more forces at his disposal. Yes, the anvil and hammer stategy he employed was a failure at Ostagar. But I doubt Loghain would've done the same thing if he had a couple hundred Mages and hundreds if not a couple thousand of Templars to fight alongside his forces.

And especially if Arl Howe hadn't assaulted the Couslands.

In fact, he can't even be said to have killed Cailan. Not really. He kept urging Cailan to stay off the front lines in the battle, but Cailan wouldn't have it. He never wanted to kill Cailan, despite how they were not getting along. I imagine he didn't want to have Maric's son left to die should the plan go awry.

But he really didn't have any choice in the matter.

Before you say "but more mages could have tipped the odds," no, they couldn't. It doesn't matter how much heavy artillery you have on the ground if they're following a flawed battle plan that isn't intended to work.


You're assuming that Loghain still would've used the same strategy we saw him come up with had the Mages been present.

*is going to be joking below, sort of*

And you obviously don't understand that having Abominations vs. Darkspawn would be an awesome military move.

Okay, not an awesome military move. But definitely awesome to see, since Abominations want to enslave the world -- at least the ones that were demons to begin with -- and Darkspawn want to destroy the world.

So an Abomination would be forced to defend itself from the Darkspawn, where either the Darkspawn would end up killing the Abomination but after some Darkspawn were killed or the Abomination would end up killing the Darkspawn.

Either way, it turns a loss into a win-win scenario, for the time being.

Not that I'm advocating turning mages into Abominations and setting them loose on the Darkspawn, but if it did happen it wouldn't mean there was nothing to salvage from it.

And yes, I want to see an Abomination vs. Darkspawn at some point in time.


In fact, if it wasn't for Loghain's stupid scheming, there would have been a lot more mages and templars available for final battle, because without Loghain, Uldred would never have attempted his coup.


Doubtful. Wynne says that Uldred was very vocal about his Libertarian thoughts and we know that he was a blood mage that ratted out -- and more then likely set up -- apprentices that dabbled in blood magic to increase his own standing.

Uldred would've done it eventually, Loghain or no.

Maker's Breath, the Archdemon couldn't have found a better ally than Teryn Loghain if it tried.


Loghain never wanted a war with the Bannorn though. He was hoping to have them all understand that he couldn't save Cailan without risking the loss of the entire army and that they would all unify under his military leadership in an effort to fight the Darkspawn.

It wouldn't have been wise for him to have surrendered immediately methinks, because then he might have faced the hangman's noose and the Bannorn would be scattered and lacking leadership.

Yes, Loghain made some dire mistakes -- most notably casting the Wardens off as unnecessary and keeping the Orlesian Wardens from entering -- but if you actually examine why he did some of what he did, you'll find that it's not because he's evil or bad.

His reasons were solid. The consequences of his actions ended up dashing what he had planned to smithereens.

Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 26 avril 2012 - 04:20 .


#147
thats1evildude

thats1evildude
  • Members
  • 11 007 messages

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Loghain's "treachery", as you call it, was only done as a military retreat because of the numbers of the Darkspawn horde. Yes, he betrayed his king by leaving him to die. But it was a justified act of treachery in this case, when considering the greater threat.


It's been established that Loghain planned to abandon the Wardens to be slaughtered by the darkspawn horde. He didn't necessarily want to kill Cailan but he also didn't abandon his plans when the king announced his intention to fight with the diversionary force.

If Loghain was truly acting in Ferelden's best interests, he would have convinced the king that the battle was unwinnable and they would have retreated from Ostagar to muster more troops. Better yet, he would have elented when it came to Cailan's plan to bring in Orlesian reinforcements.

But he didn't even try. He allowed Cailan, the Warden and countless other soliders to take the field with a plan that was designed to fail. Cailan's death was unfortunate, but in the end, only the great Hero of the River Dane could protect Ferelden from the dreaded Orlesians.

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

You're assuming that Loghain still would've used the same strategy we saw him come up with had the Mages been present.


You seem to believe that Loghain's battle plan was intended to work in some way. It wasn't.

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Doubtful. Wynne says that Uldred was very vocal about his Libertarian thoughts and we know that he was a blood mage that ratted out -- and more then likely set up -- apprentices that dabbled in blood magic to increase his own standing.


Uldred had been training blood mages in secret for some time, but his attempted coup was an act of desperation when Wynne showed up at the tower and told everyone what Loghain had done at Ostagar. When it became clear that the Circle would not ally itself with the Teryn, he tried to take over the tower and ended up summoning a demon that was beyond his control.

Do you think that Uldred would have attempted a rebellion in the middle of a Blight if his plan hadn't gone ******-up? The man have been opportunistic, but that would have been pure madness.

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Loghain never wanted a war with the Bannorn though. He was hoping to have them all understand that he couldn't save Cailan without risking the loss of the entire army and that they would all unify under his military leadership in an effort to fight the Darkspawn.


His approach to the Bannorn was "follow me or I'll destroy you". Had Cailan's death not seemed so suspicious — had Loghain not played the role of the obvious usurper — would so many of the nobles have rebelled?

I don't think Loghain was evil, but I do think he was an idiot. I think he was a foolish old man so obsessed with decades-old grudges that he nearly destroyed his own country in the name of trying to save it. Was Ferelden really any better off under Loghain than when the Orlesians ruled?

The only smart thing he did the entire game was surrender at the Landsmeet, and that literally took the Warden beating the **** out of him to make him realize that someone else could protect Ferelden.

Modifié par thats1evildude, 26 avril 2012 - 05:43 .


#148
Dakota Strider

Dakota Strider
  • Members
  • 892 messages
As long as the subject of the strategy at Ostagar has come up here, there is one thing that has always bothered me. Why did not somebody point out, that Ostagar was a fortress, and that the object of fortresses is to fight BEHIND the walls, and on top of them, not in front of the fortress, where all that brick, stone and mortor does you no good?

If Loghain was the military genius he seems to believe he was, then he could have pointed that out. Hell, my warden wanted to scream that at the strategy meeting he was invited to, for some strange reason. Even a fortress in bad repair, is better than no fortress at all. The time they had, could have been used to make repairs, and the strategy could have been to use a small force to lure the darkspawn to the walls, and then let the "bait" escape inside the gates, The only plausible reason to fight out in the open, is if your forces has a very large contigent of cavalry. And I saw none myself.

Modifié par Dakota Strider, 26 avril 2012 - 05:43 .


#149
thats1evildude

thats1evildude
  • Members
  • 11 007 messages

Dakota Strider wrote...

The only plausible reason to fight out in the open, is if your forces has a very large contingent of cavalry. And I saw none myself.


It makes sense if you consider that the plan was set up to fail.

Modifié par thats1evildude, 26 avril 2012 - 06:06 .


#150
Persephone

Persephone
  • Members
  • 7 989 messages

thats1evildude wrote...


The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

You're assuming that Loghain still would've used the same strategy we saw him come up with had the Mages been present.


You seem to believe that Loghain's battle plan was intended to work in some way. It wasn't.


Evidence?

:bandit: