Aller au contenu

Photo

Loghain in DA3? Any hope?


220 réponses à ce sujet

#151
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages

thats1evildude wrote...

It's been established that Loghain planned to abandon the Wardens to be slaughtered by the darkspawn horde. He didn't necessarily want to kill Cailan but he also didn't abandon his plans when the king announced his intention to fight with the diversionary force.

not quite. I'm looking up old posts about Loghain and it's been said that Loghain never wanted the plan to fail, per Gaider. Nor that he made a plan designed to fail.

But he did plan for that eventuality. He made a plan that allowed for a tactical retreat.

He underestimated the horde certainly. But he never went "Damn those Wardens, I'll leave them to die and run away because I'm evil!! MUAHAHAHAHAHAHA!"

thats1evildude wrote...
You seem to believe that Loghain's battle plan was intended to work. It wasn't.


No? I have said numerous times that it failed. I've said on threads in the past that it wouldn't have worked.
I know his intended battle plan -- that of the anvil and hammer strategy -- wasn't going to work.

Don't know why you're assuming that I believe it could've worked. I said I doubt he would've proposed the same strategy if he had an army of Mages and Templars alongside him. Meaning he wouldn't have proposed the anvil and hammer strategy.

Ostagar could've been won, had different strategies been employed. Had Loghain understood his enemies better.

It wouldn't have worked. At least, not in the way Loghain had planned. Had he understood that the Darkspawn were a bigger threat then he thought, he may have come up with a better way to do the strategy. If such a thing is possible.

thats1evildude wrote...
If Loghain was truly acting in Ferelden's best interests, he would have convinced the king that the battle was unwinnable and they would have retreated from Ostagar to muster more troops. Better yet, he would have elented when it came to Cailan's plan to bring in Orlesian reinforcements.

1) You're assuming Cailan would've listened to Loghain. Cailan wanted to have glory and it's made clear that the two of them have been arguing longer then we see. .

As for the Orlesians, well there's no guarantee that the Orlesian Chevaliers would've been those that weren't working for the Orlesian nobles that want to reconquer Ferelden.

I mean hell, Cailan can't even fathom the idea of waiting for Eamon to arrive with his forces because he thinks Eamon just wants glory. That's all Cailan can wrap his head around. Glory. Glory, glory, glory.

If Cailan can't even wait for his uncle to arrive who isn't that far away, how can we trust him to wait for the Orlesians?

The Wardens Loghain should've let in. The Chevaliers are iffy.

thats1evildude wrote...
But he didn't even try. He allowed Cailan, the Warden and countless other soliders to take the field with a plan that was designed to fail. Cailan's death was unfortunate, but in the end, only the great Hero of the River Dane could protect Ferelden from the dreaded Orlesians.


I don't think he intentionally designed the plan to fail. I think he underestimated the threat of the Darkspawn, certainly. But he made a plan that he was sure would work based on what he believed, yet also considered that there's a chance it might fail.

He should've listened to the Wardens more, certainly. I'll concede that much since they're the people that understand Darkspawn the most.

Also his actions with the Tower of Ishal's lower levels were idiotic.


thats1evildude wrote...

Uldred had been training blood mages in secret for some time,

Though that's what I believe he was doing -- I've often posted my theory on Uldred in the past, like on here -- but do we have proof that he was training mages to be blood mages?

All we have is that he was good at finding blood mages because he was one. But nothing to indicate that he was the reason mages were turning to blood magic.

Unless we're to take the blood mages that were with him as evidence that he was training them, which is valid and I suppose it would validate my belief that he was the reason Mages were being "discovered" for being blood mages.



thats1evildude wrote...

but his attempted coup was an act of desperation when Wynne showed up at the tower and told everyone what Loghain had done at Ostagar. When it became clear that the Circle would not ally itself with the Teryn, he tried to take over the tower and ended up summoning a demon that was beyond his control.

Still, I don't think one should say that Uldred wouldn't have attempted a coup on his own, had Loghain done no scheming.

By your own words, Uldred had been training various mages in blood magic, which would take a great deal of time -- months if not years to keep it hidden from the Templars. That seems to point to him having planned to launch a rebellion for some time.


thats1evildude wrote...

His approach to the Bannorn was "follow me or I'll destroy you". Had Cailan's death not seemed so suspicious — had Loghain not played the role of the obvious usurper — would so many of the nobles have rebelled

I'm not denying he's a crappy politician or that he shouldn't have tried to become Regent.

But he was at Ostagar, so he saw the field. Mary Kirby has said in the past that Loghain was able to see enough of the field to know his plan was a failure because the Darkspawn were more numerous then expected. She's said that he couldn't charge too early, lest he risk being sandwiched between the Darkspawn.

Gaider has said that Loghain didn't go to Ostagar with the intention of just walking away.

David Gaider wrote...

In my mind, Loghain did not go to Ostagar expecting to walk away from the battle. It was clear, however, that he and Cailan were already having profound disagreements -- mainly centering on Cailan's overtures to Orlais. Loghain was obviously moving to confront Cailan in some way, undercutting his access to allies and so forth. But did Loghain plan on killing Cailan? No, I don't think that. I think he was doing what Loghain does, and trying to ensure that when that moment of confrontation with Cailan came the battle was already won.

That said, he had been fighting the darkspawn for some time in the south with Cailan there, and had already seen what Cailan was capable of. I think he made preparations prior to that last battle for the possibility that he would have to walk away. He once made a promise to Maric that he would never allow one man to be more important than the Kingdom -- and in his eyes Cailan was recklessly endangering both himself and his kingdom. Whether that error in judgement condemns him right there is up to you.


and...

David Gaider wrote...
The darkspawn forces were getting stronger with each engagement. Loghain knew that, and knew that it wasn't going to keep being so easy. I would say that he knew what might happen the minute Cailan made his strategy clear: rely on the Grey Wardens to win the day. In my mind, Loghain still wasn't certain that he would walk away -- and if he thought that riding into the valley could have won the battle, he probably would have done so. Whether his belief that this couldn't happen was the truth or just his twisted perception of it is something you can decide for yourself. Certainly the darkspawn horde at the last battle was far bigger than anyone had anticipated.

The decision, I think, was made at the moment Loghain saw the beacon lit. He prepared for the possibility, as he
prepared for everything, but I don't think he decided to go through with it until right then.


Thing is, Cailan was relying on a scarce amount of Wardens to win the battle. Yes, Wardens are important to defeating the Blights.

But two dozen or so? That's not going to be enough to defeat the Darkspawn if they're at the vanguard.

Image IPB

Not against those numbers anyway, with what army was available at Ostagar. And based on the cinematic showing Ostagar as well as comments from the soldiers, they weren't steelfaced in the battle. They seemed to be the sort that would run away before fighting.

So yes, Loghain should've brought in more Wardens. 

One of Loghain's flaws at Ostagar with his strategies is that he didn't bother to know his enemy well enough for the battle. Well, that and he didn't understand that a Shield Wall probably would've done wonders against the horde, given Ostagar's design.

*some of what I said in this post may not be in the right spots.*

Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 26 avril 2012 - 07:05 .


#152
thats1evildude

thats1evildude
  • Members
  • 11 007 messages
Aside from the fact that the plan is horribly flawed? Aside from the fact that he tries to arrange it so that the tower was occupied solely by his followers? Aside from the fact that he orders the retreat the instant he sees the beacon lit? I have Word of God:

Either Loghain or Uldred wanted to be in control of the tower, so that they could make sure the beacon wouldn't be lit -- if it came to that. If the beacon wasn't lit, Loghain couldn't be blamed for not joining the battle in time.


Modifié par thats1evildude, 26 avril 2012 - 06:44 .


#153
Costin_Razvan

Costin_Razvan
  • Members
  • 7 010 messages
And you don't blame Cailan who wants to sell his country out to Orlais and who thinks the Wardens are basically gods who can win every battle they get thrown in?

Cailan was the one in charge, not Loghain.

#154
FieryDove

FieryDove
  • Members
  • 2 635 messages

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Loghain's major flaw at Ostagar is that he didn't bother to know his enemy well enough for the battle. Well, that and he didn't understand that a Shield Wall probably would've done wonders against the horde, given Ostagar's design.


Logain didn't believe this was a true blight, just a large raid. Everyone knows (Or should that fights, commands armies or studies history) that DS are only organized during a blight. If Logain believed this why leave? Because he wanted to get rid of Calian who was becoming too friendly with his arch-enemies.

He also didn't believe wardens were needed for fighting DS or a blight and it was fabricated to make them weasel into countries to SPY for again...his arch enemies. Even IF the warden in question was a Cousland who never left home and was forced or saved (depending on view) into the warden ranks.

He was a bad boy...no amount of talk will make me think otherwise. Tis why I do like him so much, he was awesome and the AD, Meredith or O couldn't compare. Off with his head tho. Image IPB

#155
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages

thats1evildude wrote...

Aside from the fact that the plan is horribly flawed? Aside from the fact that he tries to arrange it so that the tower was occupied solely by his followers? Aside from the fact that he orders the retreat the instant he sees the beacon lit? I have Word of God:

David Gaider wrote..Either Loghain or Uldred wanted to be in control of the tower, so that they could make sure the beacon wouldn't be lit -- if it came to that. If the beacon wasn't lit, Loghain couldn't be blamed for not joining the battle in time.


He did that in the eventuality that his plan would fall to pieces. He wouldn't have remained at Ostagar if he was creating a plan designed to fail or if he thought Ostagar was completely unwinnable. He just would've left.

He wasn't sure how successful the battle would play out, so he made it so that retreat was possible. That doesn't mean he made a plan destined to fail. Gaider has said that the Darkspawn horde was far more numerous then anyone could have anticipated or had anticipated.

#156
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages

FieryDove wrote...

 If Logain believed this why leave? Because he wanted to get rid of Calian who was becoming too friendly with his arch-enemies.


No. The battle was unwinnable. That image I posted displays how far the horde goes, as far as we can see. All that lighting in the Wilds are the Darkspawn torches.

Yes Loghain and Cailan chalked it up to being a large raid. But that doesn't mean he deliberately made a plan destined to fail.

Gaider has said that the horde was far too numerous for Loghain's plan to have worked. It was more then anyone had anticipated.

He didn't leave because he wanted Cailan to die. He never wanted Cailan to fight on the front lines and he continuously tries to get him to see reason prior to the battle -- we hear him even tell him that he shouldn't fight on the front lines -- and we have dev quotes that say he didn't want to get rid of Cailan.

Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 26 avril 2012 - 07:06 .


#157
thats1evildude

thats1evildude
  • Members
  • 11 007 messages

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

not quite. I'm looking up old posts about Loghain and it's been said that Loghain never wanted the plan to fail, per Gaider. Nor that he made a plan designed to fail.

But he did plan for that eventuality. He made a plan that allowed for a tactical retreat.


Not allowed — facilitated. Necessitated. Retreat was always the intended outcome, no matter how much Loghain wavered.

I don't doubt that Loghain went to Ostagar with the intention of defeating the darkspawn, or that he doubted whether he would abandon the field up until the moment he called for a retreat. He wouldn't be human if he made the decison to betray his own king and son-in-law lightly.

But he still set it up so that the plan would fail, the Wardens would die and Cailan would be murdered. He didn't "allow" for a retreat; the plan necessitated it, no matter what secret doubts Loghain harboured. The deaths of all those who died at Ostagar, at Lothering and everywhere in between rests on Loghain's shoulders.

Between poisoning Eamon, unintentionally facilitating the demon invasion at the Circle of Magi and starting a civil war, Loghain couldn't have done a better job of softening up Ferelden for the darkspawn if he tried.

What a damn stupid, foolish old man he was. The only reason I'd ever want to see him in DA3 is so I could kill him again.

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

He underestimated the horde certainly. But he never went "Damn those Wardens, I'll leave them to die and run away because I'm evil!! MUAHAHAHAHAHAHA!"


I don't think he was evil. I just think he was immensely stupid and unbelievably arrogant.

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Ostagar could've been won, had different strategies been employed.


It's all fruit from the same poisoned tree. The fault was with Loghain, not poor planning or lack of troops.

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

1) You're assuming Cailan would've listened to Loghain. Cailan wanted to have glory and it's made clear that the two of them have been arguing longer then we see.


If Loghain had pressed Cailan on this point and got the Wardens to agree with him, then Cailan would have relented. And if he didn't, then Loghain would have been justified in sticking a knife between his ribs.

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

As for the Orlesians, well there's no guarantee that the Orlesian Chevaliers would've been those that weren't working for the Orlesian nobles that want to reconquer Ferelden.


The days of Orlesian expansionism are done, man. The empire is in ruins only a decade after the end of Origins. And even if Orlesian occupation was a threat, it's still better to deal with them later and worry about the darkspawn now.

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

If Cailan can't even wait for his uncle to arrive who isn't that far away, how can we trust him to wait for the Orlesians?


It was his plan.

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Though that's what I believe he was doing -- I've often posted my theory on Uldred in the past, like on here -- but do we have proof that he was training mages to be blood mages?


Well, they didn't appear out of thin air.

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

By your own words, Uldred had been training various mages in blood magic, which would take a great deal of time -- months if not years to keep it hidden from the Templars. That seems to point to him having planned to launch a rebellion for some time.


Not during a Blight. Not when an army of monsters is beating down your doorstep.

David Gaider wrote...

In my mind, Loghain did not go to Ostagar expecting to walk away from the battle. It was clear, however, that he and Cailan were already having profound disagreements -- mainly centering on Cailan's overtures to Orlais. Loghain was obviously moving to confront Cailan in some way, undercutting his access to allies and so forth. But did Loghain plan on killing Cailan? No, I don't think that. I think he was doing what Loghain does, and trying to ensure that when that moment of confrontation with Cailan came the battle was already won.

That said, he had been fighting the darkspawn for some time in the south with Cailan there, and had already seen what Cailan was capable of. I think he made preparations prior to that last battle for the possibility that he would have to walk away. He once made a promise to Maric that he would never allow one man to be more important than the Kingdom -- and in his eyes Cailan was recklessly endangering both himself and his kingdom. Whether that error in judgement condemns him right there is up to you.


That's the most important phrase to pick out of there.

Modifié par thats1evildude, 26 avril 2012 - 07:19 .


#158
FieryDove

FieryDove
  • Members
  • 2 635 messages

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

No. The battle was unwinnable. That image I posted displays how far the horde goes, as far as we can see. All that lighting in the Wilds are the Darkspawn torches.

Gaider has said that the horde was far too numerous for Loghain's plan to have worked. It was more then anyone had anticipated.

He didn't leave because he wanted Cailan to die. He never wanted Cailan to fight on the front lines and he continuously tries to get him to see reason prior to the battle -- we hear him even tell him that he shouldn't fight on the front lines -- and we have dev quotes that say he didn't want to get rid of Cailan.


He knew Cailan to a T. He used words and tones that made C even more stubborn. He wasn't trying to talk him down, half-hearted attempt if he was...actually lousy attempt if at one time he really did love him as a son.

-Yes, a Glorius moment for us all - Loghain
(With a look that could have fried eggs on a sidewalk) I am not blind.

Modifié par FieryDove, 26 avril 2012 - 07:08 .


#159
Guest_Begemotka_*

Guest_Begemotka_*
  • Guests
Thank you,Redux.

#160
Aeowyn

Aeowyn
  • Members
  • 1 988 messages

FieryDove wrote...

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

No. The battle was unwinnable. That image I posted displays how far the horde goes, as far as we can see. All that lighting in the Wilds are the Darkspawn torches.

Gaider has said that the horde was far too numerous for Loghain's plan to have worked. It was more then anyone had anticipated.

He didn't leave because he wanted Cailan to die. He never wanted Cailan to fight on the front lines and he continuously tries to get him to see reason prior to the battle -- we hear him even tell him that he shouldn't fight on the front lines -- and we have dev quotes that say he didn't want to get rid of Cailan.


He knew Cailan to a T. He used words and tones that made C even more stubborn. He wasn't trying to talk him down, half-hearted attempt if he was...actually lousy attempt if at one time he really did love him as a son.

-Yes, a Glorius moment for us all - Loghain
(With a look that could have fried eggs on a sidewalk) I am not blind.


What an excellent analysis. /sarcasm
Frankly, Cailan was too stupid for his own good. There was no way to talk him down, he wanted the honour and nothing Loghain would say would change his mind.

Additionally, I believe that final line is a remnant from when Gaider and co were actually going to have Loghain as the big bad who left Cailan on purpose.

#161
FieryDove

FieryDove
  • Members
  • 2 635 messages

Aeowyn wrote...


What an excellent analysis. /sarcasm
Frankly, Cailan was too stupid for his own good. There was no way to talk him down, he wanted the honour and nothing Loghain would say would change his mind.

Additionally, I believe that final line is a remnant from when Gaider and co were actually going to have Loghain as the big bad who left Cailan on purpose.


I have never ever said Calian was a good king, tactical advisor or even an awesome fighter. He was a glory hound no doubt about that. But if Logain truly thought there was no win it should have been pack it up, fall back and get more troops...somehow.

#162
Guest_Begemotka_*

Guest_Begemotka_*
  • Guests

FieryDove wrote...

He knew Cailan to a T. He used words and tones that made C even more stubborn. He wasn't trying to talk him down, half-hearted attempt if he was...actually lousy attempt if at one time he really did love him as a son.

-Yes, a Glorius moment for us all - Loghain
(With a look that could have fried eggs on a sidewalk) I am not blind.


We can only guess here,I suppose - but Loghain`s gestures and Templeman`s intonation during the War Council spelled total exasperation to me.And it is typical Loghain,at least that is how I interpreted it.

#163
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages

FieryDove wrote...

He knew Cailan to a T. He used words and tones that made C even more stubborn. He wasn't trying to talk him down, half-hearted attempt if he was...actually lousy attempt if at one time he really did love him as a son.

-Yes, a Glorius moment for us all - Loghain
(With a look that could have fried eggs on a sidewalk) I am not blind.


While that line is obviously foreshadowing something bad happening -- I mean, it is apparent. I saw it when I first played -- it is not foreshadowing Loghain going "MUAHAHAHA Cailan will die by my hand!! MUAHAHAHAHAHA!!!"

Loghain, my decision is final. I will stand by the Grey Wardens in this assault. -- Cailan

You risk too much Cailan. The Darkspawn horde is too dangerous to be playing hero on the front lines. -- Loghain


Yes, Loghain's an evil bastard intent on seeing Cailan die.

Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 26 avril 2012 - 07:36 .


#164
Zkyire

Zkyire
  • Members
  • 3 449 messages
[quote]thats1evildude wrote...

It's been established that Loghain planned to abandon the Wardens to be slaughtered by the darkspawn horde. He didn't necessarily want to kill Cailan but he also didn't abandon his plans when the king announced his intention to fight with the diversionary force.[/quote]

Planned being that it was one of many possibilities, but he didn't decide that he was going to do that until that exact moment.

[quote]thats1evildude wrote...
If Loghain was truly acting in Ferelden's best interests, he would have convinced the king that the battle was unwinnable and they would have retreated from Ostagar to muster more troops.[/quote]

Loghain repeatedly told Cailan that his plan was moronic and wouldn't work. Cailan shot him down "You will remember who is King". Loghain doesn't give the orders. Cailan did. And when the King basically tells you to stop, you stop. Loghain tried to warn him, Cailan wouldn't listen.

[quote]thats1evildude wrote...
Better yet, he would have elented when it came to Cailan's plan to bring in Orlesian reinforcements.[/quote]

They occupied the country for what, 30 years? 30 years of rape, murder and pillaging. They occupied the country until Logahin and Marric rose up and kicked them out. I don't think he, or any Ferelden loyalist would ever say "Yeah let's let an Orlesian army through Ferelden's borders again."

Why? What happens if in the battle, the Orlesian soldiers decide to let the Ferelden soldiers take massive casualties in the war with the Darkspawn before they eventually help? The remnants of the Ferelden army wont be able to stop the Orlesians from taking this town or that town or whatever.

Besides, it hasn't been that long. Many of the Fereldens who fought in the war are still alive. What do yo think they might do (say rebellion?) if the King starts letting in the Orlesians in? Likewise many Orlesians that fought in the war are also still alive. There is bad blood on both sides.

Sure, Cailan's plan was admirable - a military alliance against a common enemy that will lead the way to peaceful relations.

But to Loghain, myself and many others; the risk is just too damned high (both the risk of civil war within Ferelden itself and the risk of the Orlesians betraying you).
[/quote]

Modifié par Zkyire, 26 avril 2012 - 07:31 .


#165
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages

thats1evildude wrote...

Not allowed — facilitated. Necessitated. Retreat was always the intended outcome, no matter how much Loghain wavered.


No. Devs have stated that the Darkspawn horde was more numerous then people thought. Loghain came up with a plan that -- based on his assumptions of the numbers of the horde -- would work.

This is what Loghain's plan was for the battle.

Image IPB

Image IPB

Courtesy of KnightofPhoenix's amazing blog on the battle of Ostagar.

Obviously, that's not how it turned out. But that's what Loghain was thinking would happen even though he also considered the plan failing.

Even Duncan knows that the best laid plans can go awry.

But he still set it up so that the plan would fail, the Wardens would die and Cailan would be murdered. He didn't "allow" for a retreat; the plan necessitated it. The deaths of all those who died at Ostagar, at Lothering and everywhere in between rests on Loghain's shoulders.


If he had set it up so it would fail, that would mean had an appropriate estimation of the Darkspawn's numbers.

He didn't. No one did.




thats1evildude wrote...
It's all fruit from the same poisoned tree. The fault was with Loghain, not poor planning or lack of troops.


Sorry, but no. For reasons I've stated above.

If Loghain had pressed Cailan on this point and got the Wardens to agree with him,


The Wardens did agree with him! Duncan had tried to get Cailan to wait for his uncle's forces and Cailan just said "Eamon just wants in on the glory."

Cailan wouldn't even listen to the Warden-Commander of Ferelden or the General of his army. And Loghain's at fault? 


The days of Orlesian expansionism are done, man. The empire is in ruins only a decade after the end of Origins. And even if Orlesian occupation was a threat, it's still better to deal with them later and worry about the darkspawn now.


Perhaps, but the fact that half of Orlais was supporting reconquering Ferelden and Empress Celene was barely able to control the situation -- and we were told she was also an expansionist -- is cause to consider that Loghain's views were not entirely unfounded.

Misguided? Yea, definitely considering there was a larger threat. But you can't expect a man who suffered under Orlesian rule -- especially when Orlais has a history of conquering fellow nations -- to acquiesce so easily.

And besides, they couldn't have waited even if Loghain was supporting such a thing. The Darkspawn aren't going to be courteous and go "Okay, they want to build up their forces. Let's give them time".

War is not built on courtesy. War is bloody and violent, more so when you're fighting an enemy incapable of communication with its enemies.

It was his plan.


And it was his plan that Ferelden also be a part of fighting the Blight. If he can't wait for reinforcements that are only a few days away, I don't see why I should believe that he can wait for reinforcements from another nation.

He's an impatient, prideful, glory-hounding, idealistic to the point of absurdity, idiotic brat.

Hell, he was only a king in name only. Anora was Ferelden's ruler, operating from the shadows.

Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 26 avril 2012 - 07:48 .


#166
thats1evildude

thats1evildude
  • Members
  • 11 007 messages

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

No. Devs have stated that the Darkspawn horde was more numerous then people thought. Loghain came up with a plan that -- based on his assumptions of the numbers of the horde -- would work.


The size of the darkspawn horde was irrelevant. He never even engaged them, so why would it matter?

Zkyire wrote..

Loghain repeatedly told Cailan that his plan was moronic and wouldn't work. Cailan shot him down "You will remember who is King". Loghain doesn't give the orders. Cailan did. And when the King basically tells you to stop, you stop. Loghain tried to warn him, Cailan wouldn't listen.


He tried to warn him from relying on the Grey Wardens, who he believed (WRONGLY!) were pawns of the Orlesians.

Zkyire wrote..

They occupied the country for what, 30 years? 30 years of rape, murder and pillaging. They occupied the country until Logahin and Marric rose up and kicked them out. I don't think he, or any Ferelden loyalist would ever say "Yeah let's let an Orlesian army through Ferelden's borders again."


And yet they still weren't as bad as the darkspawn. Even when it became clear that there was no way for Ferelden to win on its own barring a miracle, he still denied them access.

Modifié par thats1evildude, 26 avril 2012 - 08:15 .


#167
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages

thats1evildude wrote...

The size of the darkspawn horde was irrelevant. He never even engaged them, so why would it matter?


It's entirely relevant, because we've been told that everyone at Ostagar assumed the horde was smaller then it really was.

Meaning that you trying to label him as a man that deliberately made a plan that was intended to fail is a logical fallacy, it seems.

He made a plan open to the possibility of a tactical retreat, because he saw the horde progressively getting bigger each time. But he still thought the horde could be defeated, because he thought their numbers were still manageable. So he came up with a plan that could increase the potential for victory, even if the Fereldan army's numbers weren't that strong.

He didn't make a plan that was deliberately going to fail. He made a plan that was intended to succeed, based on his knowledge of the horde.

The Hammer and Anvil strategy is based on the idea of sandwiching the opponent between two armies. This was Loghain's intended plan.

Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 26 avril 2012 - 08:27 .


#168
HiroVoid

HiroVoid
  • Members
  • 3 680 messages
Dragon Age: Origins suffers from a storyline change in case you haven't noticed.

Originally, Loghain was intended to have left him there on purpose because he was abandoning Anora to go marry Celene. This would have been Loghain's motivation to abandon Cailan because in his mind, Cailan would be betraying both his country and his daughter which is his two most cherished things in the world.

This storyline was scrapped, so changes had to come as a result though some elements had to remain. Without that storyline, Loghain has no more motivation to kill his best friend's child. As a result, what happened at Ostagar was simply a matter of bad planning and the darkspawn being much more powerful than imagined.

#169
thats1evildude

thats1evildude
  • Members
  • 11 007 messages

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

The Wardens did agree with him! Duncan had tried to get Cailan to wait for his uncle's forces and Cailan just said "Eamon just wants in on the glory."


Duncan may have told Loghain about Eamon's forces, but I never heard one word from Loghain about waiting for Eamon's reinforcements. Considering that Loghain was planning to poison Eamon, I doubt he would be eager for his help.

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

It's entirely relevant, because we've been told that everyone at Ostagar assumed the horde was smaller then it really was.


If Loghain's battle plan was foiled solely because he accounted for a smaller number of darkspawn, then why even plan to retreat from the field at all? Why wait until the very moment the beacon was lit to sound the retreat?

The only factor Loghain truly failed to account for was the darkspawn swarming up into the Tower of Ishal to overwhelm the men he stationed there. A pity for Loghain, because if the beacon had never been lit, no one would have cause to question his betrayal.

Modifié par thats1evildude, 26 avril 2012 - 09:31 .


#170
Dave of Canada

Dave of Canada
  • Members
  • 17 484 messages
The true fault at Ostagar and what happened after lies with the Grey Wardens, who hadn't warned anything about their spider senses with Darkspawn or how they were necessary to kill the Archdemon. Cailan and Loghain had planned for a small darkspawn incursion while Duncan was sitting in the back, humming to himself and not pushing the issue that they needed to wait for reinforcements.

Had he pointed out that they needed more Wardens, pushed the issue that this was in fact a blight and not simply a darkspawn incursion and pointed out that Wardens were necessary to end the Blights, then maybe--just maybe--Cailan wouldn't have charged in like an idiot, forcing Loghain to retreat.

Even in the worst case scenario where Ostagar still occurred, Loghain wouldn't have gone "Let's make all the Wardens wanted: Alive or Dead!" and he'd actually have been forced to accept the Wardens from Orlais were necessary.

Keeping vital secrets which might hinder recruitment from commoners is fine, though keeping those same vital secrets from monarchs and their general is just plain stupid. Deciding how to end a potential Archdemon should involve the Grey Wardens, rather than planning different ways without knowing that you can't kill it unless it's a Warden who does it.

Though, if Cailan lived, we'd probably have dealt with other political ****storms afterwards, possibly a full blown civil war (more so than what happened post-Ostagar) when Cailan announces he'd marry Celene.

Modifié par Dave of Canada, 26 avril 2012 - 09:37 .


#171
Mr.House

Mr.House
  • Members
  • 23 338 messages

HiroVoid wrote...

Dragon Age: Origins suffers from a storyline change in case you haven't noticed.

Originally, Loghain was intended to have left him there on purpose because he was abandoning Anora to go marry Celene. This would have been Loghain's motivation to abandon Cailan because in his mind, Cailan would be betraying both his country and his daughter which is his two most cherished things in the world.

This storyline was scrapped, so changes had to come as a result though some elements had to remain. Without that storyline, Loghain has no more motivation to kill his best friend's child. As a result, what happened at Ostagar was simply a matter of bad planning and the darkspawn being much more powerful than imagined.

They kinda readded that with the RtO dlc, too bad the stuff you find thoguh is ignored as it shows that Eamon and Cailan are traitors.

#172
thats1evildude

thats1evildude
  • Members
  • 11 007 messages

Dave of Canada wrote...
The true fault at Ostagar and what happened after lies with the Grey Wardens, who hadn't warned anything about their spider senses with Darkspawn or how they were necessary to kill the Archdemon. Cailan and Loghain had planned for a small darkspawn incursion while Duncan was sitting in the back, humming to himself and not pushing the issue that they needed to wait for reinforcements.


I can see how that would have gone over. "We know that this is a Blight and the archdemon is coming because the special Warden senses we get from drinking darkspawn blood tells us so."

Mr.House wrote...

They kinda readded that with the RtO dlc, too bad the stuff you find thoguh is ignored as it shows that Eamon and Cailan are traitors.


Marrying Empress Celene would hardly have been an act of treason. That's how most countries formed alliances up until the 20th century.

Modifié par thats1evildude, 26 avril 2012 - 09:50 .


#173
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages

thats1evildude wrote...

Duncan may have told Loghain about Eamon's forces, but I never heard one word from Loghain about waiting for Eamon's reinforcements. Considering that Loghain was planning to poison Eamon, I doubt he would be eager for his help


Your Majesty, I'm not so sure the Blight can be defeated as easily as you wish -- Duncan

I'm not even sure this is a real Blight. There are plenty of Darkspawn on the field, but there are no signs of an Archdemon. -- Cailan

If the Warden-Commander expresses his doubt at how easily a Blight can be defeated -- when history has shown that previous Blights took decades if not hundreds of years -- then I think a King should be listening to the Wardens.

And Loghain only poisoned Eamon after Ostagar, considering he couldn't have been in Ostagar and Denerim at the same time.

Jowan tells the Warden he was in Denerim when the Teyrn approached him, and Loghain had been in Ostagar helping to defeat the Darkspawn.

Loghain also kept urging Cailan not to fight on the front lines. That's enough for me to know that he never sought Cailan's death, even if he thought very little of his king.

Dave of Canada wrote...

Keeping vital secrets which might hinder recruitment from commoners is fine, though keeping those same vital secrets from monarchs and their general is just plain stupid. Deciding how to end a potential Archdemon should involve the Grey Wardens, rather than planning different ways without knowing that you can't kill it unless it's a Warden who does it.


I had a similar discussion with KoP some days earlier. He was arguing the same line of thought you are, and I ultimately conceded that they should let monarchs and generals know during a Blight.

That said, Duncan did tell people that he felt the Archdemon's presence. While it can be said that wasn't enough, that should be looked at as a strong indication that the Wardens are necessary, if they can feel the presence of the leader of the horde when no one else -- save for fellow Wardens -- can.




thats1evildude wrote...

The only factor Loghain truly failed to account for was the darkspawn swarming up into the Tower of Ishal to overwhelm the men he stationed there. A pity for Loghain, because if the beacon had never been lit, no one would have cause to question his betrayal.


That's why when I played my Dwarf Noble -- the first Origin I played the full game with, but not the first origin I played. Human Noble took that honor, but was stopped prior to being recruited -- Xanthos Aeducan facepalmed when he heard they were just now exploring the lower reaches instead of doing the more prudent thing: sealing them.

Having been told of the cunning of the Darkspawn outside of a Blight during his life in Orzammar and knowing full well that during a Blight the Darkspawn were even more dangerous, he thought that exploring the lower levels was a waste of time.

Especially considering Loghain's plan had nothing to do with the lower levels.

I mean for the love of the Paragons, that fortress has been in Ferelden since the time of the Tevinter Imperium and the Fereldans are just now deigning to map the fortress?

I'm not sure whether Fereldans are people to admire or people to pity.

Loghain's a character that makes it a point to know where his borders end. You'd think that a military general would've taken the time to travel to a fortress and see how well it can function and map it, should a certain neighboring nation decide to invade again.

Or hell, should the Chasind organize themselves again and attack. Even Sister Petrine was wise enough to know that the Chasind were being ignored at Ferelden's peril.

Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 26 avril 2012 - 10:11 .


#174
Dave of Canada

Dave of Canada
  • Members
  • 17 484 messages

thats1evildude wrote...

I can see how that would have gone over. "We know that this is a Blight and the archdemon is coming because the special Warden senses we get from drinking darkspawn blood tells us so."


Anything would've been better than Duncan saying "But I know it's a blight... Ijustwon'ttellyouwhy" and then humming Take A Chance On Me.

#175
Aggie Punbot

Aggie Punbot
  • Members
  • 2 736 messages
Of course there's hope for Loghain in DA3. Despite the fact that most players likely killed him, they can handwave his appearance away with a 'The Maker did not think it was my time' excuse. That always works.

Modifié par TS2Aggie, 26 avril 2012 - 10:13 .