ME3: Extended Cut - Are We Being Lied To, Again?
#26
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 08:19
#27
Guest_Dominus Solanum_*
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 08:29
Guest_Dominus Solanum_*
iVitriol wrote...
The ending was the only thing about ME3 that I hated. Maybe I'm not hard to please. I loved the game for what it's worth, and am sorry you seem to have a stick up your ass over it.Dominus Solanum wrote...
They said straight up before the game was released your choices made through out the game will affect the ending.
They said straight up in the release announcement for the Extended Cut your choices made through out the game will affect the ending.
They said straight up they believe in the artistic vision of the ending and that they won't be changing it.
Which of these statements do you think will prove to be accurate? What exactly are you expecting from the EC? Because if it's something monumental, ground breaking or satisfying I think you're setting yourself up for disappointment.
Originally, the ending was the only thing I hated too. Running through the game a couple of times out of masochistic desire to do things differently really began to show the cracks in the game that had nothing to do with the endings. If you truly have no other complaints about the game then the ending, I'll agree that you're not hard to please, because ME3 could have been so much more. It's the unfulfilled potential that is the greatest crime of ME3.
However, you asked about the EC and worried about the veracity of the promises made about it. I was pointing out that some of the promises made about the EC are and were identical to the promises made about ME3 the first time around. I'm expecting very, very little from the EC in terms in repairing the damage done and I think people are hoping for too much given that we've already been told it won't change the endings.
Am I on board for being suckered into false assumptions about the EC and having it be a full blown revamp of the endings everyone's been asking for since about a week after release? Yep. Is that going to happen? Well, in the realm of statistics, it's certainly possible. You're choosing to be guardedly optimistic; I'm choosing to look at facts and the what's already happened.
Modifié par Dominus Solanum, 22 avril 2012 - 08:30 .
#28
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 08:32
iVitriol wrote...
As I said above, there is no such thing as bad publicity.Phillips94 wrote...
I think this is wishful thinking and we are just praying they change it, apart from anything else if you ****** off your fans and lots of them enough to have to change the end you dont lie about it cause that wont do you any good as a companyDifferent devs have said different things. Gamble said it would be more than cutscenes.Sparse wrote...
All Bioware have said is that they are working on a couple of cutscenes to clarify the ending. I am fairly confident that will turn out to be true.
It won't fix the problem but they won't have been lying.
But it has also said no new game play meaning cut scenes and dialogue
#29
Guest_iVitriol_*
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 08:42
Guest_iVitriol_*
They never said that, they haven't said anyting at all really, which is what people are still pissed about.Phillips94 wrote...
But it has also said no new game play meaning cut scenes and dialogue
#30
Guest_iVitriol_*
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 08:45
Guest_iVitriol_*
Dominus Solanum wrote...
Originally, the ending was the only thing I hated too. Running through the game a couple of times out of masochistic desire to do things differently really began to show the cracks in the game that had nothing to do with the endings. If you truly have no other complaints about the game then the ending, I'll agree that you're not hard to please, because ME3 could have been so much more. It's the unfulfilled potential that is the greatest crime of ME3.
However, you asked about the EC and worried about the veracity of the promises made about it. I was pointing out that some of the promises made about the EC are and were identical to the promises made about ME3 the first time around. I'm expecting very, very little from the EC in terms in repairing the damage done and I think people are hoping for too much given that we've already been told it won't change the endings.
Am I on board for being suckered into false assumptions about the EC and having it be a full blown revamp of the endings everyone's been asking for since about a week after release? Yep. Is that going to happen? Well, in the realm of statistics, it's certainly possible. You're choosing to be guardedly optimistic; I'm choosing to look at facts and the what's already happened.
I can see people's complaints, but those things never bothered me. I just enjoyed the game.
EC could be groundbreaking or utter ****. Let's just wait and see.
Modifié par iVitriol, 22 avril 2012 - 08:45 .
#31
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 08:47
Dominus Solanum wrote...
They said straight up before the game was released your choices made through out the game will affect the ending.
They said straight up in the release announcement for the Extended Cut your choices made through out the game will affect the ending.
They said straight up they believe in the artistic vision of the ending and that they won't be changing it.
Which of these statements do you think will prove to be accurate? What exactly are you expecting from the EC? Because if it's something monumental, ground breaking or satisfying I think you're setting yourself up for disappointment.
Pretty much this. Even setting myself up for a dissapointment [which is the exact opposite way I went into ME3 the first time] I feel like I'm going to be let down.
I'm hoping setting the bar on the floor means Bioware wont trip and make it worse
#32
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 08:48
FBI-Azzurri wrote...
Again, it's not all BioWare's fault that the ending to ME3 was so badly done. EA is the company we should be targeting and thankfully we did just that by voting them the Worst Company in America. EA forced this whole situation upon BioWare to make the ending as open as possible to either make more money off the Mass Effect franchise and its characters with more games like ME4 or to charge people for future ME3 expansions.
EA knows they hit gold with BioWare's Mass Effect series and why would they end the Shepard Story, when they can make more money? The Extended Cut must succeed in order to win back the fans. It has the whole team working on it and it will only show us our war assets actually fighting in the battle and probably will include a lot more of everyone's love interest and squadmates because they know people love the characters the most and by making more scenes with them and having more romance moments with Shepard and the LI, it's a win-win situation to win back fans. There will be a few more Dialogue scenes/Cinematic scenes and maybe more dialogue options for Shepard when he comes face to face with the StarChild. Also, the Extended Cut is free because EA is in damage control mode and they know they need to have the fans and the media back on their side. There will be nothing added after Shepard takes a breath in the rubble because that is the window they created to coninue to make more games and expansions, so sadly this big cliffhanger will remain. Just my honest assumption of what is going on right now and what will go down in this Extended Cut DLC.
Don't blame EA. A greedy corporation run by non gaming execs would have been fine with a boring conservative overdone ending that let them continue the franchise and sell lots of DLC.
Blame Bioware. They went with an artsy, highminded piece of crap so they could take their art to the next level or something.
And the thing is Bioware can NEVER admit that the ending is bad. Or that the ending was only done by 2 people with no review. The time to own up to mistakes and admit fault is done. Now all they can do is weather the storm and tough it out.
So no, I think they are being EXTREMELY truthful about what is in the DLC. (can you imagine if they promised us stuff and didn't deliver again? BOOM! there goes their customer base) I think the extended cut will add some cutscenes, fleets in action, a little context, a little clarity of the three choices and their outcome, a little justification for their darling starchild and a whole bunch of "we say its true so that makes it true, hand waving" to clean up all the doom and gloom mess of the endings"
#33
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 08:48
#34
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 08:48
iVitriol wrote...
They never said that, they haven't said anyting at all really, which is what people are still pissed about.Phillips94 wrote...
But it has also said no new game play meaning cut scenes and dialogue
well that and the words 'art' 'clarity' 'will not change the ending'
#35
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 08:51
Oldbones2 wrote...
FBI-Azzurri wrote...
Again, it's not all BioWare's fault that the ending to ME3 was so badly done. EA is the company we should be targeting and thankfully we did just that by voting them the Worst Company in America. EA forced this whole situation upon BioWare to make the ending as open as possible to either make more money off the Mass Effect franchise and its characters with more games like ME4 or to charge people for future ME3 expansions.
EA knows they hit gold with BioWare's Mass Effect series and why would they end the Shepard Story, when they can make more money? The Extended Cut must succeed in order to win back the fans. It has the whole team working on it and it will only show us our war assets actually fighting in the battle and probably will include a lot more of everyone's love interest and squadmates because they know people love the characters the most and by making more scenes with them and having more romance moments with Shepard and the LI, it's a win-win situation to win back fans. There will be a few more Dialogue scenes/Cinematic scenes and maybe more dialogue options for Shepard when he comes face to face with the StarChild. Also, the Extended Cut is free because EA is in damage control mode and they know they need to have the fans and the media back on their side. There will be nothing added after Shepard takes a breath in the rubble because that is the window they created to coninue to make more games and expansions, so sadly this big cliffhanger will remain. Just my honest assumption of what is going on right now and what will go down in this Extended Cut DLC.
Don't blame EA. A greedy corporation run by non gaming execs would have been fine with a boring conservative overdone ending that let them continue the franchise and sell lots of DLC.
Blame Bioware. They went with an artsy, highminded piece of crap so they could take their art to the next level or something.
And the thing is Bioware can NEVER admit that the ending is bad. Or that the ending was only done by 2 people with no review. The time to own up to mistakes and admit fault is done. Now all they can do is weather the storm and tough it out.
So no, I think they are being EXTREMELY truthful about what is in the DLC. (can you imagine if they promised us stuff and didn't deliver again? BOOM! there goes their customer base) I think the extended cut will add some cutscenes, fleets in action, a little context, a little clarity of the three choices and their outcome, a little justification for their darling starchild and a whole bunch of "we say its true so that makes it true, hand waving" to clean up all the doom and gloom mess of the endings"
You have it all wrong my friend....
Read this post explaining why EA is the reason the ending sucked: social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/355/index/11193774
Modifié par FBI-Azzurri, 22 avril 2012 - 08:52 .
#36
Guest_iVitriol_*
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 08:51
Guest_iVitriol_*
If changing the ending will make EA moar money, then BioWare will be forced to. EA has never given a rat's ass about "art." Their PR has sucked and has been quite untrue in the past month.Phillips94 wrote...
iVitriol wrote...
They never said that, they haven't said anyting at all really, which is what people are still pissed about.Phillips94 wrote...
But it has also said no new game play meaning cut scenes and dialogue
well that and the words 'art' 'clarity' 'will not change the ending'
Take nothing a face value, that's what I do.
Modifié par iVitriol, 22 avril 2012 - 08:55 .
#37
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 08:52
#38
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 08:54
Then again, many have calmed down since they confirmed the DLC, so maybe they're not changing their minds about changing it.
#39
Guest_iVitriol_*
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 08:56
Guest_iVitriol_*
I'm cautiously optimistic, but I'll fall back on my headcanon if all else fails.Linkenski wrote...
Well adding a new choice at where you don't die/destroy all mass relays in the catalyst scene, wouldn't be "changing" the ending would it? I hope that they were vague enough to make something like that happen.
Then again, many have calmed down since they confirmed the DLC, so maybe they're not changing their minds about changing it.
#40
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 08:57
Don't only pay attention to what people say, watch what they do. If what they say and what they do don't match, they shouldn't be trusted.
#41
Guest_iVitriol_*
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 08:58
Guest_iVitriol_*
FBI-Azzurri wrote...
You have it all wrong my friend....
Read this post explaining why EA is the reason the ending sucked: social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/355/index/11193774
How can you build off of the ending?!
EVERYTHING IS ****ED!!!
There is no ME universe after that debacle.
#42
Guest_iVitriol_*
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 08:59
Guest_iVitriol_*
Words to live by, sir.Ahms wrote...
There's a very important life lesson that everybody needs to learn when they're little children and be reminded of until the day they die:
Don't only pay attention to what people say, watch what they do. If what they say and what they do don't match, they shouldn't be trusted.
#43
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 08:59
#44
Guest_iVitriol_*
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 09:03
Guest_iVitriol_*
You can't seriously take that PR bull**** at face value now, can you?seedubya85 wrote...
they're using everybody hating the ending as a marketing thing now. so probably not
#45
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 09:03
#46
Guest_iVitriol_*
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 09:04
Guest_iVitriol_*
I don't beleive so.lillitheris wrote...
Wasn't this exact thread title up a few days ago?
If you have nothing to contribute, why bother posting?
Modifié par iVitriol, 22 avril 2012 - 09:07 .
#47
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 09:06
An English Gamer wrote...
I hope we are being lied to if an ending change is what they're covering up. However I severely doubt it. I don't mind being lied to if it means I am to be surprised with something brilliant.
Same here, but after what we've seen, I doubt we'll be pleasantly surprised
#48
Guest_iVitriol_*
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 09:08
Guest_iVitriol_*
Hope is an illusion, but it's all we have now.goose2989 wrote...
An English Gamer wrote...
I hope we are being lied to if an ending change is what they're covering up. However I severely doubt it. I don't mind being lied to if it means I am to be surprised with something brilliant.
Same here, but after what we've seen, I doubt we'll be pleasantly surprised
#49
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 09:09
iVitriol wrote...
As the old PR saying goes... there is no such thing as bad publicity.nwj94 wrote...
No company intentional goes out to cause this kind of reaction. BW is going to have this black mark against them for years to come. Every game they produce will have the stigma of "what if its another ME3?" Its going to take a long time before their reputation can return.
That *is* an old saying. And a saying for an old age. It's questionable if it were ever really true, but these days it almost certainly isn't. In the old days when that saying came about, information tended to get buried, and people could forget why exactly your name sounded familiar, hence good publicity. However, these days a familiar name is just a google search away, and the advantage of your name being familiar is gone if that search turns up negative reasons for the familiarity.
So I tend to agree with the post you quoted: No company comprised of moderately sane individuals deliberately shoots itself in the foot repeatedly.
#50
Posté 22 avril 2012 - 09:10





Retour en haut






