Hardin4188 wrote...
I think the Chantry's regulation is a good thing. The trouble in the tower shows that the templars were getting slack. Maybe apostates shouldn't be hunted down, but they definitely should eliminate blood mages. They are too dangerous to keep around.
That is as absurd as banning electricity because it... electrocutes people.
Blood Magic is a tool and that´s it. The Chantry hates it for a very simple fact: if a mage wants to perform awesome magic, needs lyrium and, how curious, the Chantry controls its distribution. But blood is something every mage has and can spill to archive extra power (just like Jowan shows in the mage origin) .
It is also true that Blood Mage can use someone else´s blood to get "extra juice for your batteries" but once again, that is up to the personal morals of the mage, not a fault of the tool itself.
adembroski11 wrote...
That said, I don't see Morrigan as
strictly Libertarian. She reminds me of people who look at oppressed
people in, say, Iran, China, or North Korea and make the claim that
their culture does not allow for freedom or that they don't want
freedom. She seems to look down on the oppressed as somehow deserving
of their bondage simply for being in bondage, and this is typically a
view you get out of isolationist leftists, not Civil Libertarians and
Social Capitalists like Rand and Smith.
DA offers a perfect example of that theory being taken to the toilet: they do not have a culture of liberties because it´s fairly difficult to fight AK´s with words. Alienages and casteless dwarfs show how it is very difficult in material terms to overthrow a system which prevent you form having the tools to revolt, both cultural (knowledge and education) and material (weapons).
When you tell Morrigan about becoming a golem herself in the Anvil of the Void scene she just thinks "hey, that´s not cool!"
Modifié par Statulos, 08 décembre 2009 - 09:45 .