This really needs to be a series of polls.
Do you Like or Dislike?
Have you spent money?
Would you spend (more) money if it wasn't random?
Would you spend (more) money if one item wasn't random?
=====
Your poll does not do a good job explaining the choices. Also a stance like Eelectrica's is not covered well.
That could be
"Option 1 or 2 + but I would prefer a system where I knew what I was buying."
or
"Option 1 or 2 + I would probably spend (more) real money in a system where I knew what I was buying"
You're splitting the votes between to many similarly worded questions. If I were to go about interpreting your current poll numbers I'd actually be looking at the combination of the last four potions.
Additionaly this
"Option 1 or 2 + but I would prefer a system where I knew what I was buying."
and
"Option 3 or 4 + and I would prefer a system where I knew what I was buying."
Are basically telling you the same thing but in less direct language. "I would prefer a system where I knew what I was buying."
Stacking that up with people who would be willing to spend money if they knew your results, shifts it dramatically. 16% approve and don't want any change to 83% who'd be okay (to our right want) a change.
====
This why professional polling is done using a series of questions, and using the same questions but worded differently. You want to be able to track many different vairables in peoples responces.
Modifié par Dorje Sylas, 25 avril 2012 - 06:10 .





Retour en haut




