Operation Carry - Unofficial BSN Weekend Event ***Success***
#326
Posté 28 avril 2012 - 10:30
#327
Posté 28 avril 2012 - 10:34
[quote]MockingAsp wrote...
[quote]TommyTekkno wrote...
inconcievable.
[/quote]
[/quote]
Add Techryan and watch it happen. you guys think it takes science to win gold with low levels. Its really not that hard. so i don't get why people think it cant be done.
#328
Posté 28 avril 2012 - 10:39
MockingAsp wrote...
Assuming you're not lying, you may also be a freak of statistical probability.TommyTekkno wrote...
Why are people hating on lower lvl's? I just played a gold match with 3 friends on my lvl 1 QI and we rocked it in 27 mins and i only needed to be res'd twice, with everyone else getting 3-4 res's each. People are quick to judge. I've seen N7<100 do waaaay better than N7>300. People need to chill the hell out.
The reason why people don't like having low levels in a gold match is essentially why there are no midgets in basketball. Is it possible that the little guy can outscore all the other players on the team and carry everyone to victory. Yes. Absolutely.
How likely is it? Well, about as likely as Steve Urkle beating Tyson in a fist fight. Possible, but damned near inconcievable.
You guys give me a headache. Just because most people can't doesn't mean it can't be done at all. I've seen it done, i've been part of it. With your basketball analogy research spud webb and muggsy bogues. hell look at nate robinson now. might be "inconcievable" to regular people, but it happens and it happens more times than you guys think.
#329
Posté 28 avril 2012 - 10:42
#330
Posté 28 avril 2012 - 10:46
Now bronze is going to seem even more relaxing than ever. Thanks for my Eagle II (oh please oh please) y'all.
#331
Posté 28 avril 2012 - 10:47
#332
Guest_XxTaLoNxX_*
Posté 28 avril 2012 - 10:55
Guest_XxTaLoNxX_*
1 guy was N7 120 (but had a black widow V, so I assume he just didn't promote) and the other guys was an N7 30ish with a lvl 20 HV... we obviously didn't kick.
And yes me and my really good friend did carry the team BUT that N7 30 HV actually did really good... after the first wave when they discovered they aren't a superhero on Gold and can't play like on Bronze. Instead using Charge/Nova defensively for the team and to great effect.
#333
Posté 28 avril 2012 - 10:59
#334
Posté 28 avril 2012 - 11:01
Modifié par Dynamik78, 28 avril 2012 - 11:03 .
#335
Posté 28 avril 2012 - 11:04
Keep it up!
#336
Posté 28 avril 2012 - 11:48
[quote]jonal11 wrote...
[quote]MockingAsp wrote...
[quote]TommyTekkno wrote...
inconcievable.
[/quote]
[/quote]
Add Techryan and watch it happen. you guys think it takes science to win gold with low levels. Its really not that hard. so i don't get why people think it cant be done.
[/quote]
Dude, take a chill pill. I only posted that link because of what I think everytime I hear or see that word. That's why I edited out everything but that word. Have you not beat gold this weekend? =p
#337
Posté 28 avril 2012 - 11:51
Did I end up with the highest score? No. Did you carry me because you got a higher score? NO!
#338
Posté 28 avril 2012 - 11:54
All in all a pretty good run! Better than many FBWGG games I've been in >.> I'll try to get a few more in this weekend.
#339
Guest_Guest12345_*
Posté 28 avril 2012 - 11:58
Guest_Guest12345_*
#340
Posté 29 avril 2012 - 12:07
Good show all round.
#341
Posté 29 avril 2012 - 12:18
jonal11 wrote...
Score is as pointless as N7 rank, I have a high N7 rank, nearing 1000. But I don't spend my time trying to get every single kill or point.
Did I end up with the highest score? No. Did you carry me because you got a higher score? NO!
It doesn't mean anything in itself, but it is an indication.
As I said in an earlier post, since I am focusing mainly on keeping flanks clear and holding position instead of making sure to get kills I am often 3rd in points up until things start to get hairy at wave 4-5 or so.
Then the team starts to fall apart and I need to cover them and help them out more and I end up with the most points by a pretty wide margin.
The points tell part of the story.
You can get the highest score by far without carrying the team, the game just played out like that.
You can even get the highest score and be the one who is carried by the team!
I've played with people that get A LOT of kills but end up dying a lot and getting both themselves and the team into bad situations.
So yes, score in itself is pointless, but, that is not what this thread is about.
#342
Posté 29 avril 2012 - 12:29
Barneyk wrote...
So yes, score in itself is pointless, but, that is not what this thread is about.
Score is not the point of this thread, but it has come up in the posts in this thread.
So when I was reading this thread and people were talking about N7 ranks and their scores I felt a need to defend people like that, such as myself. Not the point of the thread maybe, but where it was heading.
High N7 ranks are still helping you out, even if you outscore them if they are people like me!
Modifié par jonal11, 29 avril 2012 - 12:33 .
#343
Posté 29 avril 2012 - 12:36
Barneyk wrote...
It doesn't mean anything in itself, but it is an indication.
So yes, score in itself is pointless, but, that is not what this thread is about.
I re read your post and I saw this. So what is it? An idication or pointless? Are you trying to argue both? I know I only took one critical thinking class in college, but the idea that something can be a pointless indication screams of some kind of logical fallacy.
EDIT: I read my post again, and I want to stress that I'm not angry or attacking. I'm smiling and questioning. I have a bad habit of comming off as a jerk on the interwebs . I'm not trying to be mean.
Modifié par jonal11, 29 avril 2012 - 12:39 .
#344
Posté 29 avril 2012 - 12:44
We kept reviving our stuck guy for what it was worth but all he could do was AOE attack while he was trapped in one spot. Not very useful but at least he managed to distract things now and again when he wasn't too busy being dead.
Either way he somehow managed to get himself onto the launchpad and just as the final few seconds passed on Wave 11 we managed a full extraction.
My wee Salarian infiltrator had his work cut out constantly running round blasting Phantoms and reviving squadmates. It was a major coup when we pulled it off in the end
gg
#345
Posté 29 avril 2012 - 12:50
[quote]TommyTekkno wrote...
[quote]jonal11 wrote...
[quote]MockingAsp wrote...
[quote]TommyTekkno wrote...
inconcievable.
[/quote]
[/quote]
Add Techryan and watch it happen. you guys think it takes science to win gold with low levels. Its really not that hard. so i don't get why people think it cant be done.
[/quote]
Dude, take a chill pill. I only posted that link because of what I think everytime I hear or see that word. That's why I edited out everything but that word. Have you not beat gold this weekend? =p
[/quote]
i only play gold and ive cleared it 4 times today. i prolly do need to chill but its irritating when your having fun and clearing gold with low lvls and a random comes in talkin **** that we cant do it. then we clear it and they go wow!! so hearing it on here too is just annoying. i play with 2 other friends and we have a system that works on just about any map. its just annoying when people say we cant when we do it whenever we promote.
#346
Posté 29 avril 2012 - 12:53
jonal11 wrote...
Score is not the point of this thread, but it has come up in the posts in this thread.
So when I was reading this thread and people were talking about N7 ranks and their scores I felt a need to defend people like that, such as myself. Not the point of the thread maybe, but where it was heading.
High N7 ranks are still helping you out, even if you outscore them if they are people like me!
I think most people here are just using the score to summarize what happened in the game, or maybe I am being to optimistic?
But that is how I have done it myself, it is easier to just refer to scores than it is to do a full on play by play and still get the same point across.
jonal11 wrote...
I re read your post and I saw this. So
what is it? An idication or pointless? Are you trying to argue both? I
know I only took one critical thinking class in college, but the idea
that something can be a pointless indication screams of some kind of
logical fallacy.
Well, you should've taken more classes then I guess.
An indication of something does not make it so.
Without more information a simple indication is pointless since you can't know if the indication is correct or not.
So, in itself it is pointless since the indication it gives can be missleading and there is no way to know what it really means.
But, if you were playing the game and you have the experience and memory of the game, then you can analyze the scores and they can mean something.
And since most of us here have played many games you can extrapolate information from references to scores.
It might be misleading, but I chose to assume that people aren't that pathetic that they retell stories about games they played to make themselves seem much better than they actually are.
So then you can use scores as shorthand to explain what happend in the games.
I hope this clears it up for you.
#347
Posté 29 avril 2012 - 01:34
WEEEEEEHHHH!!!!
(GE)
#348
Posté 29 avril 2012 - 01:45
Barneyk wrote...
jonal11 wrote...
Score is not the point of this thread, but it has come up in the posts in this thread.
So when I was reading this thread and people were talking about N7 ranks and their scores I felt a need to defend people like that, such as myself. Not the point of the thread maybe, but where it was heading.
High N7 ranks are still helping you out, even if you outscore them if they are people like me!
I think most people here are just using the score to summarize what happened in the game, or maybe I am being to optimistic?
But that is how I have done it myself, it is easier to just refer to scores than it is to do a full on play by play and still get the same point across.jonal11 wrote...
I re read your post and I saw this. So
what is it? An idication or pointless? Are you trying to argue both? I
know I only took one critical thinking class in college, but the idea
that something can be a pointless indication screams of some kind of
logical fallacy.
Well, you should've taken more classes then I guess.
An indication of something does not make it so.
Without more information a simple indication is pointless since you can't know if the indication is correct or not.
So, in itself it is pointless since the indication it gives can be missleading and there is no way to know what it really means.
But, if you were playing the game and you have the experience and memory of the game, then you can analyze the scores and they can mean something.
And since most of us here have played many games you can extrapolate information from references to scores.
It might be misleading, but I chose to assume that people aren't that pathetic that they retell stories about games they played to make themselves seem much better than they actually are.
So then you can use scores as shorthand to explain what happend in the games.
I hope this clears it up for you.
Okay man, you need to take a reading comprehension course at your local community college. (I'm being mean now cause you don't get my niceness.) You retort to my post and it makes no sense, not in a logical way. You talk about extrapolating data (that you don't have) where is your data? It's all hersay. So you hear people talk about Bigfoot and Crop Circles and believe it? Even if real facts tell you different. You sir. Are a reason I know I won't win against you, but I hope others reading this will understand.
If you drag me down me to your level, I will lose. You have more experience.
Modifié par jonal11, 29 avril 2012 - 01:50 .
#349
Posté 29 avril 2012 - 01:53
jonal11 wrote...
Okay man, you need to take a reading comprehension course at your local community college. (I'm being mean now cause you don't get my niceness.) You retort to my post and it makes no sense, not in a logical way. You talk about extrapolating data (that you don't have) where is your data? It's all hersay. So you hear people talk about Bigfoot and Crop Circles and believe it? Even if real facts tell you different. You sir. Are a reason I know I won't win against you, but I hope others reading this will understand.
If you drag me down me to your level, I will lose. You have more experience.
What the hell?
I spent some effort in good spirit trying to explain myself and I get this bunch of unsulting nonsense back?
That was surprising, well, it is the internet, what could I expect.
I simply tried to explain myself. I didn't realize we were arguing, I thought you didn't understand me and I tried to explain myself.
I didn't attempt to argue with you, it feels a bit harsh to be met with insults after I spent thoughts and effort in trying to explain myself.
#350
Posté 29 avril 2012 - 01:53





Retour en haut




