Fisterbear wrote...
I wouldn't mind giving Turians a roll. But then we have to give batarians a roll or sidestep, krogans a roll or sidestep and so on.
The non mobile classes are that way because of their increased durability. If you give them mobility as well, then why unfairly keep the already inferior humans (in most cases) at their reduced durability?
This is not a full representation of the situation. Turians occupy the middle position in the durability scale. They are far less durable than Krogans and even Batarians, yet equally as immobile. Pre-Rebellion, the Turian Soldier was actually ranked 12th most durable out of 24 characters. There are only 7 "poor mobility" classes.
The Turians do not necessarily need a roll, but they need some sort of evasive maneuver. Even a side-step only, with no forward or backward roll would help. While increased durability CAN be more important than rolling, the Turians, especially the Turian Soldier, do not have much increased durability; the Soldier has a paltry 50% extra shields, with no increased health. Furthermore, he is the only soldier out of five with no form of DR or Health regen. Yet of the 5 Soldiers, he ranks only 3rd in terms of durability, and 4th if you count that the Human Soldier has burst-DR which places him FAR above the Turian Soldier. The only remaining character is the Vorcha, who has constant health regen.
I will admit that the Turian Soldier is less adequate compared to the Sentinel, and any universal Turian change would unbalance the TS possibly, but the Soldier needs work.
Also, Human classes aren't as inferior as you say. Vanguards and Sentinels are best of class, Soldiers are in the running for it, and Engineers are solid. Only the Infiltrators and Adepts are lackluster.
Modifié par DarkerCompanion, 03 juin 2012 - 07:16 .





Retour en haut






