Aller au contenu

Photo

Girl Left Cripped Brain Damaged Chicken Twister Wrap


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
102 réponses à ce sujet

#26
ObserverStatus

ObserverStatus
  • Members
  • 19 046 messages
The double down looks OK, but it has nothing on the Toilet-Bombing Heart-Molester.

Image IPB

#27
Guest_jollyorigins_*

Guest_jollyorigins_*
  • Guests
 Manage to dig up a favourite cracked article about crappy food like the double down, oh and look the double down is #2.

And I thought the food in England was bad...

#28
chunkyman

chunkyman
  • Members
  • 2 433 messages

android654 wrote...

You're going to die young, gasping for air.


At least I'll die quickly and from the satisfaction only cholesteral can bring, while the skinny will die slowly from cancer.

Death from heart disease > Death from cancer.

#29
Guest_Obi-Wan Old Ben Kenobi_*

Guest_Obi-Wan Old Ben Kenobi_*
  • Guests
[/quote]

Yeah, I don't know where you heard that, but that's total bulls**t.

[/quote]

You'd be wrong. I've got a book with nutritional information on the menu items of most food chains in America. The simple fact that it's two pieces of chicken with some cheese in between knocks it above, say, a Whopper. 

"Your eyes can decieve you, don't trust them."
[/quote] Hey, Dude don't quote me! Argh! webkit-fake-url://FC4DF4EA-7244-400B-9138-DA225C3DE038/imagepng

#30
Guest_Puddi III_*

Guest_Puddi III_*
  • Guests

android654 wrote...

TheBlackBaron wrote...

android654 wrote...

TheBlackBaron wrote...

greengoron89 wrote...

Also, those Double Downs are disgusting - you might as well just drink grease out of a bucket, as it's pretty much the same thing.


Believe it or not, even the fried version is better than 95% of what goes through a fast food restaurant window. 

Get the grilled version and it's downright neutral on the health scale. 


Yeah, I don't know where you heard that, but that's total bulls**t.


You'd be wrong. I've got a book with nutritional information on the menu items of most food chains in America. The simple fact that it's two pieces of chicken with some cheese in between knocks it above, say, a Whopper. 

"Your eyes can decieve you, don't trust them."


Yeah, you're still wrong. All fastfood chains use an undisclosed amount of additives in their food FDA even allows all fast food chains to have a 20% margin of error in the disclosure of nutritional facts of all items on their menu. 40 grams of sugars could be 60, if they say something has 1000 calories in it could be 1200 and so on. Also the human body isn't great at metabolising dairy or complex carbs, so anything with cheese or bread takes a toll on the human digestive system.

In short, if you buy food from any place with a commercial, a drive-thru or a mascot of any kind you're always taking a gamble in terms of what you're eating.

How is that relevant when the comparison is between fast food restaurants?

#31
android654

android654
  • Members
  • 6 105 messages

Filament wrote...

android654 wrote...

TheBlackBaron wrote...

android654 wrote...

TheBlackBaron wrote...

greengoron89 wrote...

Also, those Double Downs are disgusting - you might as well just drink grease out of a bucket, as it's pretty much the same thing.


Believe it or not, even the fried version is better than 95% of what goes through a fast food restaurant window. 

Get the grilled version and it's downright neutral on the health scale. 


Yeah, I don't know where you heard that, but that's total bulls**t.


You'd be wrong. I've got a book with nutritional information on the menu items of most food chains in America. The simple fact that it's two pieces of chicken with some cheese in between knocks it above, say, a Whopper. 

"Your eyes can decieve you, don't trust them."


Yeah, you're still wrong. All fastfood chains use an undisclosed amount of additives in their food FDA even allows all fast food chains to have a 20% margin of error in the disclosure of nutritional facts of all items on their menu. 40 grams of sugars could be 60, if they say something has 1000 calories in it could be 1200 and so on. Also the human body isn't great at metabolising dairy or complex carbs, so anything with cheese or bread takes a toll on the human digestive system.

In short, if you buy food from any place with a commercial, a drive-thru or a mascot of any kind you're always taking a gamble in terms of what you're eating.

How is that relevant when the comparison is between fast food restaurants?


Because their "nutritional facts" are falsified, and the commonly held beliefs on what is "okay" for the human body to metabolize is very much skewed from reality. So Subway isn't healthy and neither is KFC. The differences between the two are very miniscule.

#32
android654

android654
  • Members
  • 6 105 messages

chunkyman wrote...

android654 wrote...

You're going to die young, gasping for air.


At least I'll die quickly and from the satisfaction only cholesteral can bring, while the skinny will die slowly from cancer.

Death from heart disease > Death from cancer.



Shi**y diets lead to cancer. Still gonna die a shi**y death though. Hope you're not leaving anyone behind.

#33
Guest_greengoron89_*

Guest_greengoron89_*
  • Guests

TheBlackBaron wrote...

greengoron89 wrote...

Also, those Double Downs are disgusting - you might as well just drink grease out of a bucket, as it's pretty much the same thing.


Believe it or not, even the fried version is better than 95% of what goes through a fast food restaurant window. 

Get the grilled version and it's downright neutral on the health scale. 


I'm mighty skeptical of that, but I won't try and argue about it.

Still, I think it's a disgusting "sandwich" - I had one a good while back, and was less than pleased with it. Ironically, it's the Twisters that I only ever went to KFC for in the first place - then those fools took it off the menu and left us with garbage like that chicken tender thing-a-ma-jig and the Double Down.

KFC can shove it.

#34
Guest_Puddi III_*

Guest_Puddi III_*
  • Guests

android654 wrote...

Filament wrote...

android654 wrote...

TheBlackBaron wrote...

android654 wrote...

TheBlackBaron wrote...

greengoron89 wrote...

Also, those Double Downs are disgusting - you might as well just drink grease out of a bucket, as it's pretty much the same thing.


Believe it or not, even the fried version is better than 95% of what goes through a fast food restaurant window. 

Get the grilled version and it's downright neutral on the health scale. 


Yeah, I don't know where you heard that, but that's total bulls**t.


You'd be wrong. I've got a book with nutritional information on the menu items of most food chains in America. The simple fact that it's two pieces of chicken with some cheese in between knocks it above, say, a Whopper. 

"Your eyes can decieve you, don't trust them."


Yeah, you're still wrong. All fastfood chains use an undisclosed amount of additives in their food FDA even allows all fast food chains to have a 20% margin of error in the disclosure of nutritional facts of all items on their menu. 40 grams of sugars could be 60, if they say something has 1000 calories in it could be 1200 and so on. Also the human body isn't great at metabolising dairy or complex carbs, so anything with cheese or bread takes a toll on the human digestive system.

In short, if you buy food from any place with a commercial, a drive-thru or a mascot of any kind you're always taking a gamble in terms of what you're eating.

How is that relevant when the comparison is between fast food restaurants?


Because their "nutritional facts" are falsified, and the commonly held beliefs on what is "okay" for the human body to metabolize is very much skewed from reality. So Subway isn't healthy and neither is KFC. The differences between the two are very miniscule.

The fact that they have loose regulations doesn't mean the numbers are completely made up and therefore cannot be used for any sort of comparison whatsoever. If there's a 20% margin of error then a 560 calorie double down has 670 calories. That's still a hell of a lot less than practically anything from Carl's Jr. The same would apply to other nutritional values.

I won't argue about additives (though again, if we're speaking relative to other fast food companies, that's hardly relevant unless KFC uses more), but just randomly throwing cheese and bread in there doesn't really help your case against fast food. As if no other food uses cheese and bread, lol.

#35
Guest_jollyorigins_*

Guest_jollyorigins_*
  • Guests
 Now now boys and girls, lets settle down and not say nasty things to each other. Lets remember why we came here...to look at disgusting abominations of what people call 'food' that shouldn't exist. Like this:

Image IPB

Is that chicken in a jam doughnut smothered in honey? You filthy motherf*ckers, I hope you choke on it!

#36
Marixus99.9

Marixus99.9
  • Members
  • 734 messages

jollyorigins wrote...

Is that chicken in a jam doughnut smothered in honey? You filthy motherf*ckers, I hope you choke on it!


Ewwwww

#37
android654

android654
  • Members
  • 6 105 messages

Filament wrote...

The fact that they have loose regulations doesn't mean the numbers are completely made up and therefore cannot be used for any sort of comparison whatsoever. If there's a 20% margin of error then a 560 calorie double down has 670 calories. That's still a hell of a lot less than practically anything from Carl's Jr. The same would apply to other nutritional values.

I won't argue about additives (though again, if we're speaking relative to other fast food companies, that's hardly relevant unless KFC uses more), but just randomly throwing cheese and bread in there doesn't really help your case against fast food. As if no other food uses cheese and bread, lol.


It's a 20% margin of error, and it's also unenforced. The FDA rweally lets fast food restaurants do their own thing with the hope that they self regulate.

As for cheese and bread, if you know anything about human metabolism and nutrition then you'd know any complex carb does harm to body when it's metabolizing. So yeah it's bad for you.

#38
android654

android654
  • Members
  • 6 105 messages

jollyorigins wrote...

 Now now boys and girls, lets settle down and not say nasty things to each other. Lets remember why we came here...to look at disgusting abominations of what people call 'food' that shouldn't exist. Like this:

Image IPB

Is that chicken in a jam doughnut smothered in honey? You filthy motherf*ckers, I hope you choke on it!


My computer threw up.

#39
Drone696

Drone696
  • Members
  • 1 319 messages

jollyorigins wrote...

 Now now boys and girls, lets settle down and not say nasty things to each other. Lets remember why we came here...to look at disgusting abominations of what people call 'food' that shouldn't exist. Like this:

Image IPB

Is that chicken in a jam doughnut smothered in honey? You filthy motherf*ckers, I hope you choke on it!

The peak of haute cuisine.

... does this abomination also exist the other way round? A jam doughnut between two chicken Schnitzel?

#40
Guest_greengoron89_*

Guest_greengoron89_*
  • Guests
LOL. That looks like something you'd see in the intro of Dexter - I can picture Dexter slicing through it then pulling the other half away to reveal that disgusting mess.

Modifié par greengoron89, 30 avril 2012 - 01:28 .


#41
ObserverStatus

ObserverStatus
  • Members
  • 19 046 messages

jollyorigins wrote...

 Manage to dig up a favourite cracked article about crappy food like the double down, oh and look the double down is #2.

And I thought the food in England was bad...

I was shocked this year to find out that the "Heart Attack Grill" was real.

#42
Drone696

Drone696
  • Members
  • 1 319 messages

greengoron89 wrote...

LOL. That looks like something you'd see in the intro of Dexter - I can picture Dexter slicing through it then pulling the other half away to reveal that disgusting mess.

Hahahahaha, yes!

#43
Chromie

Chromie
  • Members
  • 9 881 messages

chunkyman wrote...

Lmfao at all the replies my pic got.

The Double Down is delicious! I order two whenever I go to KFC.


So chunkman isn't just a name then?

#44
MarchWaltz

MarchWaltz
  • Members
  • 3 233 messages
I never eat a fast food places, only small hole in the wall places where you can see the food being made and know the staff personally.

#45
android654

android654
  • Members
  • 6 105 messages

Skelter192 wrote...

chunkyman wrote...

Lmfao at all the replies my pic got.

The Double Down is delicious! I order two whenever I go to KFC.


So chunkman isn't just a name then?


It's a title that's earned apparently.

#46
Guest_Ivandra Ceruden_*

Guest_Ivandra Ceruden_*
  • Guests
OMFG...Only Americans know how to mess up food that way...And those HUGE meals they serve...I'm never able to eat even half of it. :P No offense to Americans, tho. 'Murica's a beautiful country, but the food...

#47
Inquisitor Recon

Inquisitor Recon
  • Members
  • 11 811 messages

Ivandra Ceruden wrote...
but the food...


Heavy heart disease risk... but the priiize...


#48
Chromie

Chromie
  • Members
  • 9 881 messages

Ivandra Ceruden wrote...

OMFG...Only Americans know how to mess up food that way...And those HUGE meals they serve...I'm never able to eat even half of it. :P No offense to Americans, tho. 'Murica's a beautiful country, but the food...


Apparently you can't read.

#49
chunkyman

chunkyman
  • Members
  • 2 433 messages

Skelter192 wrote...

chunkyman wrote...

Lmfao at all the replies my pic got.

The Double Down is delicious! I order two whenever I go to KFC.


So chunkman isn't just a name then?


It's a lifestyle. :police:

#50
Guest_Ivandra Ceruden_*

Guest_Ivandra Ceruden_*
  • Guests
@Skelter192: Oh, I beg your pardon. Please enlighten this puny mortal with your overwhelming amount of knowledge. *sarcasm*