Girl Left Cripped Brain Damaged Chicken Twister Wrap
#26
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 12:13
#27
Guest_jollyorigins_*
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 12:26
Guest_jollyorigins_*
And I thought the food in England was bad...
#28
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 12:32
android654 wrote...
You're going to die young, gasping for air.
At least I'll die quickly and from the satisfaction only cholesteral can bring, while the skinny will die slowly from cancer.
Death from heart disease > Death from cancer.
#29
Guest_Obi-Wan Old Ben Kenobi_*
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 12:35
Guest_Obi-Wan Old Ben Kenobi_*
Yeah, I don't know where you heard that, but that's total bulls**t.
[/quote]
You'd be wrong. I've got a book with nutritional information on the menu items of most food chains in America. The simple fact that it's two pieces of chicken with some cheese in between knocks it above, say, a Whopper.
"Your eyes can decieve you, don't trust them."
[/quote] Hey, Dude don't quote me! Argh! webkit-fake-url://FC4DF4EA-7244-400B-9138-DA225C3DE038/imagepng
#30
Guest_Puddi III_*
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 12:35
Guest_Puddi III_*
How is that relevant when the comparison is between fast food restaurants?android654 wrote...
TheBlackBaron wrote...
android654 wrote...
TheBlackBaron wrote...
greengoron89 wrote...
Also, those Double Downs are disgusting - you might as well just drink grease out of a bucket, as it's pretty much the same thing.
Believe it or not, even the fried version is better than 95% of what goes through a fast food restaurant window.
Get the grilled version and it's downright neutral on the health scale.
Yeah, I don't know where you heard that, but that's total bulls**t.
You'd be wrong. I've got a book with nutritional information on the menu items of most food chains in America. The simple fact that it's two pieces of chicken with some cheese in between knocks it above, say, a Whopper.
"Your eyes can decieve you, don't trust them."
Yeah, you're still wrong. All fastfood chains use an undisclosed amount of additives in their food FDA even allows all fast food chains to have a 20% margin of error in the disclosure of nutritional facts of all items on their menu. 40 grams of sugars could be 60, if they say something has 1000 calories in it could be 1200 and so on. Also the human body isn't great at metabolising dairy or complex carbs, so anything with cheese or bread takes a toll on the human digestive system.
In short, if you buy food from any place with a commercial, a drive-thru or a mascot of any kind you're always taking a gamble in terms of what you're eating.
#31
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 12:45
Filament wrote...
How is that relevant when the comparison is between fast food restaurants?android654 wrote...
TheBlackBaron wrote...
android654 wrote...
TheBlackBaron wrote...
greengoron89 wrote...
Also, those Double Downs are disgusting - you might as well just drink grease out of a bucket, as it's pretty much the same thing.
Believe it or not, even the fried version is better than 95% of what goes through a fast food restaurant window.
Get the grilled version and it's downright neutral on the health scale.
Yeah, I don't know where you heard that, but that's total bulls**t.
You'd be wrong. I've got a book with nutritional information on the menu items of most food chains in America. The simple fact that it's two pieces of chicken with some cheese in between knocks it above, say, a Whopper.
"Your eyes can decieve you, don't trust them."
Yeah, you're still wrong. All fastfood chains use an undisclosed amount of additives in their food FDA even allows all fast food chains to have a 20% margin of error in the disclosure of nutritional facts of all items on their menu. 40 grams of sugars could be 60, if they say something has 1000 calories in it could be 1200 and so on. Also the human body isn't great at metabolising dairy or complex carbs, so anything with cheese or bread takes a toll on the human digestive system.
In short, if you buy food from any place with a commercial, a drive-thru or a mascot of any kind you're always taking a gamble in terms of what you're eating.
Because their "nutritional facts" are falsified, and the commonly held beliefs on what is "okay" for the human body to metabolize is very much skewed from reality. So Subway isn't healthy and neither is KFC. The differences between the two are very miniscule.
#32
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 12:47
chunkyman wrote...
android654 wrote...
You're going to die young, gasping for air.
At least I'll die quickly and from the satisfaction only cholesteral can bring, while the skinny will die slowly from cancer.
Death from heart disease > Death from cancer.
Shi**y diets lead to cancer. Still gonna die a shi**y death though. Hope you're not leaving anyone behind.
#33
Guest_greengoron89_*
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 12:54
Guest_greengoron89_*
TheBlackBaron wrote...
greengoron89 wrote...
Also, those Double Downs are disgusting - you might as well just drink grease out of a bucket, as it's pretty much the same thing.
Believe it or not, even the fried version is better than 95% of what goes through a fast food restaurant window.
Get the grilled version and it's downright neutral on the health scale.
I'm mighty skeptical of that, but I won't try and argue about it.
Still, I think it's a disgusting "sandwich" - I had one a good while back, and was less than pleased with it. Ironically, it's the Twisters that I only ever went to KFC for in the first place - then those fools took it off the menu and left us with garbage like that chicken tender thing-a-ma-jig and the Double Down.
KFC can shove it.
#34
Guest_Puddi III_*
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 01:05
Guest_Puddi III_*
The fact that they have loose regulations doesn't mean the numbers are completely made up and therefore cannot be used for any sort of comparison whatsoever. If there's a 20% margin of error then a 560 calorie double down has 670 calories. That's still a hell of a lot less than practically anything from Carl's Jr. The same would apply to other nutritional values.android654 wrote...
Filament wrote...
How is that relevant when the comparison is between fast food restaurants?android654 wrote...
TheBlackBaron wrote...
android654 wrote...
TheBlackBaron wrote...
greengoron89 wrote...
Also, those Double Downs are disgusting - you might as well just drink grease out of a bucket, as it's pretty much the same thing.
Believe it or not, even the fried version is better than 95% of what goes through a fast food restaurant window.
Get the grilled version and it's downright neutral on the health scale.
Yeah, I don't know where you heard that, but that's total bulls**t.
You'd be wrong. I've got a book with nutritional information on the menu items of most food chains in America. The simple fact that it's two pieces of chicken with some cheese in between knocks it above, say, a Whopper.
"Your eyes can decieve you, don't trust them."
Yeah, you're still wrong. All fastfood chains use an undisclosed amount of additives in their food FDA even allows all fast food chains to have a 20% margin of error in the disclosure of nutritional facts of all items on their menu. 40 grams of sugars could be 60, if they say something has 1000 calories in it could be 1200 and so on. Also the human body isn't great at metabolising dairy or complex carbs, so anything with cheese or bread takes a toll on the human digestive system.
In short, if you buy food from any place with a commercial, a drive-thru or a mascot of any kind you're always taking a gamble in terms of what you're eating.
Because their "nutritional facts" are falsified, and the commonly held beliefs on what is "okay" for the human body to metabolize is very much skewed from reality. So Subway isn't healthy and neither is KFC. The differences between the two are very miniscule.
I won't argue about additives (though again, if we're speaking relative to other fast food companies, that's hardly relevant unless KFC uses more), but just randomly throwing cheese and bread in there doesn't really help your case against fast food. As if no other food uses cheese and bread, lol.
#35
Guest_jollyorigins_*
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 01:06
Guest_jollyorigins_*

Is that chicken in a jam doughnut smothered in honey? You filthy motherf*ckers, I hope you choke on it!
#36
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 01:10
jollyorigins wrote...
Is that chicken in a jam doughnut smothered in honey? You filthy motherf*ckers, I hope you choke on it!
Ewwwww
#37
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 01:10
Filament wrote...
The fact that they have loose regulations doesn't mean the numbers are completely made up and therefore cannot be used for any sort of comparison whatsoever. If there's a 20% margin of error then a 560 calorie double down has 670 calories. That's still a hell of a lot less than practically anything from Carl's Jr. The same would apply to other nutritional values.
I won't argue about additives (though again, if we're speaking relative to other fast food companies, that's hardly relevant unless KFC uses more), but just randomly throwing cheese and bread in there doesn't really help your case against fast food. As if no other food uses cheese and bread, lol.
It's a 20% margin of error, and it's also unenforced. The FDA rweally lets fast food restaurants do their own thing with the hope that they self regulate.
As for cheese and bread, if you know anything about human metabolism and nutrition then you'd know any complex carb does harm to body when it's metabolizing. So yeah it's bad for you.
#38
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 01:11
jollyorigins wrote...
Now now boys and girls, lets settle down and not say nasty things to each other. Lets remember why we came here...to look at disgusting abominations of what people call 'food' that shouldn't exist. Like this:
Is that chicken in a jam doughnut smothered in honey? You filthy motherf*ckers, I hope you choke on it!
My computer threw up.
#39
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 01:15
The peak of haute cuisine.jollyorigins wrote...
Now now boys and girls, lets settle down and not say nasty things to each other. Lets remember why we came here...to look at disgusting abominations of what people call 'food' that shouldn't exist. Like this:
Is that chicken in a jam doughnut smothered in honey? You filthy motherf*ckers, I hope you choke on it!
... does this abomination also exist the other way round? A jam doughnut between two chicken Schnitzel?
#40
Guest_greengoron89_*
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 01:28
Guest_greengoron89_*
Modifié par greengoron89, 30 avril 2012 - 01:28 .
#41
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 01:34
I was shocked this year to find out that the "Heart Attack Grill" was real.jollyorigins wrote...
Manage to dig up a favourite cracked article about crappy food like the double down, oh and look the double down is #2.
And I thought the food in England was bad...
#42
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 01:35
Hahahahaha, yes!greengoron89 wrote...
LOL. That looks like something you'd see in the intro of Dexter - I can picture Dexter slicing through it then pulling the other half away to reveal that disgusting mess.
#43
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 01:43
chunkyman wrote...
Lmfao at all the replies my pic got.
The Double Down is delicious! I order two whenever I go to KFC.
So chunkman isn't just a name then?
#44
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 01:49
#45
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 01:50
Skelter192 wrote...
chunkyman wrote...
Lmfao at all the replies my pic got.
The Double Down is delicious! I order two whenever I go to KFC.
So chunkman isn't just a name then?
It's a title that's earned apparently.
#46
Guest_Ivandra Ceruden_*
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 02:07
Guest_Ivandra Ceruden_*
#47
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 02:13
Ivandra Ceruden wrote...
but the food...
Heavy heart disease risk... but the priiize...
#48
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 02:24
Ivandra Ceruden wrote...
OMFG...Only Americans know how to mess up food that way...And those HUGE meals they serve...I'm never able to eat even half of it.No offense to Americans, tho. 'Murica's a beautiful country, but the food...
Apparently you can't read.
#49
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 02:25
Skelter192 wrote...
chunkyman wrote...
Lmfao at all the replies my pic got.
The Double Down is delicious! I order two whenever I go to KFC.
So chunkman isn't just a name then?
It's a lifestyle.
#50
Guest_Ivandra Ceruden_*
Posté 30 avril 2012 - 02:41
Guest_Ivandra Ceruden_*





Retour en haut







