The point to this forum is that while people who disliked the endings say they feel alienated, what they don't realize is that they themselves are committing the exact same crime by trying to bully people who do like the ending
Unfortunately, there are as many bullies on the pro-ending side as there are on ours, if not more. But turning this thread into "our bullies are better than yours" isn't my point, my point "sort out your bullies first, then preach about ours". Aight? For myself I say this - I hate bullies in general and try to step in to stop them regardless of their sides.
I've read loads, and not one doesn't fall into one of the three catagories
1.been inferred by the complainer,
2.taken in isolation and out of context
with the rest of the game which builds to its climax all the way through
3.totally unrealistic expectations
Sadly, the same can be said of any pro-endings threads. All explanations offered either by the employee twitters or pro-enders fall into one of the three categories:
1. Information not available in the game (f.e. the fate of the Citadel's inhabitants post-Cronos).
2. Wild speculation based on "this is the only way it could have been" (f.e. any and all arguments on impossibility of conventional warfare trumping Reaper fleet at Earth if you have in excess of 7K EMS).
3. Overlooking or flat-out ignoring any and all outstanding plotholes or unresolved plot threads. (f.e. the contradiction between Starchild's words and everything Sovereign did, f.e. how does HELPING the Geth and Zha'Til destroy their creators - when neither originally wanted to do it - further the Reaper goals of preventing organics being destroyed by synthetics?)
Also, restating your words in the exact same order, but broken down into bullet points does not help get your point across. It only helps show that you have no valid arguments to present. Sorry.
Modifié par Noelemahc, 30 avril 2012 - 10:47 .