181 réponses à ce sujet

[Ultra Prism]

Well said from Mark Meer ... Controversial!

[soulprovider]

eddieoctane wrote...

Probably the only answer Meer could have given. But the look on his face would suggest a tendancy to side with the fans over the developer. Maybe I'm worng, but someone who supported the ending would likely have defended it a bit more. He just wrote it off like a lost cause.

Now I'm just waiting for Family Guy or Robot Chicken to do a joke about the game. The former is far more likely to happen before the EC is released and flops. How great would that cut-away be? Maybe have Brian get knocked down a few pegs over his "art". I wonder how that novel is doing...

actually my friend family guy did a joke about ME3 long before its release, remember the 100th episod where stewie kills lois and at the ending it shows him coming out of the simulator and they talked about the sapranos ending, sadly I can't find a video link, way too much junk to filter through.

[Zkyire]

YourFunnyUncle wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

They are mass murderers. They deserve no autonomy. Regardless of control, Harbinger revelled in what he did. So did Sovereign.
They certainly do not deserve to win, which is what synthesis gives them. Total victory.

You think that, but I don't see it that way. I see it as giving their victims a renewed chance to live on in some form. Neither of us can say for sure that we are right, so attacking someone as racist for preferring synthesis is quite simply not justified unless we get enough clarification of the consequences of the choices.

You can claim that for Harbinger, but Sovereign?

Sovereign had nothing but utter disgust and contempt for organics and synthetics alike. Sovereign delighted in their destruction.

[Lookout1390]

Wow, an actual honest response from someone.

[chevyguy87]

The Angry One wrote...

It doesn't matter how it ends, the very philosophy behind it is racist and intolerant. It teaches that people can never co-exist if they're different, that differences are a bad thing, that homogenisation is the way forward.

That is exactly the reason I cannot stomach the Synthesis ending. Yet so many seem to believe it is the "best" route for the ending. Although robbing every living being of it's individuality and diversity apparently is a good thing to some.

Another bit that I did not wish to take part of was the fact that the Catalyst pretty much forced us (the players) into a corner deciding Synthetics vs Organics. Legion and Shepard got along just fine so why are we made to believe we can never co-exist?

[Hudathan]

I love it.

[poundoffleshaa]

Zkyire wrote...

YourFunnyUncle wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

They are mass murderers. They deserve no autonomy. Regardless of control, Harbinger revelled in what he did. So did Sovereign.
They certainly do not deserve to win, which is what synthesis gives them. Total victory.

You think that, but I don't see it that way. I see it as giving their victims a renewed chance to live on in some form. Neither of us can say for sure that we are right, so attacking someone as racist for preferring synthesis is quite simply not justified unless we get enough clarification of the consequences of the choices.

You can claim that for Harbinger, but Sovereign?

Sovereign had nothing but utter disgust and contempt for organics and synthetics alike. Sovereign delighted in their destruction.

You are over emoting Sovereign, Sovereign doesn't hate organics any more than we hate bugs, but that won't stop him stepping on us for his convienance.