Aller au contenu

IS SYTHESIS SAREN'S VISION?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
336 réponses à ce sujet

#176
The Angry One

The Angry One
  • Members
  • 22 246 messages

Sauruz wrote...
I'm just saying that any Shepard who picks Synthesis is the same kind of 'delusional villain'-character as many others before him. (Or he just didn't think it through)


Sometimes it seems like the players in control of Shepard picking synthesis are the villain characters too.
Like the one who said "It's for their own good!". What.

#177
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages

The Angry One wrote...

Sauruz wrote...
I'm just saying that any Shepard who picks Synthesis is the same kind of 'delusional villain'-character as many others before him. (Or he just didn't think it through)


Sometimes it seems like the players in control of Shepard picking synthesis are the villain characters too.
Like the one who said "It's for their own good!". What.


This.

#178
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 587 messages

The Angry One wrote...
Don't worry little Timmy, your mom and dad were turned into husks, but it's okay. Now you can be a husk too!

Do tell, where are the Husks here? I see a human and a synthetic who seems to be acting more alive than before.

Image IPB

#179
adneate

adneate
  • Members
  • 2 970 messages

MisterJB wrote...
However, this is only true if you consider the Reapers to be the problem rather than a symptom of it. The real problem being, as understood by the Catalyst, synthetic life and the inevitable extinction of organics at its hands. In this case, Destroy is the least effective choice since it only solves the problem temporarily by destroying all current synthetics whereas the other choices offer, at least, the possibility of a permanent solution that might or might not work.


The Catalyst's problem is not our problem and the catalyst provides precisely no information to make this problem supercede the pending destruction of all advanced life in the galaxy by the reapers. His "argument" also makes a series of assumption about the nature of AI that I would say make these hypothetical beings sounds less like AIs and more like logic based computer programs.

Given that we don't care about or are able to understand or relate to the catalyst's hypothetical problem that still leaves destroy as the most efficent and effective means of solving our problems. I don't see why anyone would care what the Catalyst wants since his argument is so weak, I'm not expecting Socrates but I expect more than "This hypothetical situation that has never happened will happen and it will be bad, therefore you should do what I say". That's less of an argument and more prophecy, fitting that it's apocalyptic in nature I suppose.

#180
richard_rider

richard_rider
  • Members
  • 450 messages
There should be a 4th choice...speculation...:o

#181
M Hedonist

M Hedonist
  • Members
  • 4 299 messages

The Angry One wrote...

Sauruz wrote...
I'm just saying that any Shepard who picks Synthesis is the same kind of 'delusional villain'-character as many others before him. (Or he just didn't think it through)


Sometimes it seems like the players in control of Shepard picking synthesis are the villain characters too.
Like the one who said "It's for their own good!". What.

Well, I'm just happy to know none of these will ever really be in a position of power similar to Shepard's.

#182
Wabajakka

Wabajakka
  • Members
  • 1 244 messages

Sauruz wrote...

Orange Tee wrote...

Sauruz wrote...

Orange Tee wrote...

Synthesis and Control thorought the entire series are portrayed as the ideals of two villans, both of which you kill over those very ideas, then they suddenly become true at the final moment and you believe it because some projection of a kid, supposedly the controller of Reapers told you so? No.

+ Forcing unity on the world has always been the motive of 'delusion villain'-type characters.


Sure, but it's honestly not even about genocide or anything like that.

It's the idea of control and synthesis themselves. It's made extremely clear throughout the entire series that these are the ideals of the Reapers, given to the organic that have fallen under their indoctrination.

Suddenly believing these ideas are possible (not to mention believing it while they are told to you by "the Reaper king child" lol) is rediculous.

I'm just saying that any Shepard who picks Synthesis is the same kind of 'delusional villain'-character as many others before him. (Or he just didn't think it through)


Ya for sure. Same goes for control.

#183
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages

MisterJB wrote...

The Angry One wrote...
Don't worry little Timmy, your mom and dad were turned into husks, but it's okay. Now you can be a husk too!

Do tell, where are the Husks here? I see a human and a synthetic who seems to be acting more alive than before.

Image IPB


Yes. Because I've never seen a religious allegory before. Real freaking deep Bioware.

:sick:

#184
The Angry One

The Angry One
  • Members
  • 22 246 messages

MisterJB wrote...

The Angry One wrote...
Don't worry little Timmy, your mom and dad were turned into husks, but it's okay. Now you can be a husk too!

Do tell, where are the Husks here? I see a human and a synthetic who seems to be acting more alive than before


Ignoring the fact that this really tells us little, I'm speaking of the PSYCHOLOGICAL impact of people who have seen their friends and loved ones turned into husks.

Do you think they're going to say "Oh kewl, I'm a cyborg! Better stronger faster pew pew!" or are they going to say "NOOOO I'm turning into one of those things OH MY GOD HELP ME."

#185
M Hedonist

M Hedonist
  • Members
  • 4 299 messages

richard_rider wrote...

There should be a 4th choice...speculation...:o


Well, you can speculate what happens to the crucible if you wait too long to pick any ending.

#186
The Night Mammoth

The Night Mammoth
  • Members
  • 7 476 messages

MisterJB wrote...

The Angry One wrote...
Don't worry little Timmy, your mom and dad were turned into husks, but it's okay. Now you can be a husk too!

Do tell, where are the Husks here? I see a human and a synthetic who seems to be acting more alive than before.

Image IPB


I see a human with some stupid holographic character skin, not really changed at all besides that, with the same potentially crippling disease, and a synthetic, who has the same bullsh*t character skin supposed to imply that everyone's now part synthetic, EVEN THOUGH SHE'S A ROBOT. What, is she now double synthetic? With extra synthetic parts interfacing with her already synthetic body? 

Also, that line about how they're 'more alive' could well be the most contrived statement ever pulled from the depths of a human's anal sphincter I've seen on this forum. 

#187
Guest_john_sheparrd_*

Guest_john_sheparrd_*
  • Guests
destroy is the best ending
sythesis is bull****
control is interesting but not a option

#188
PsyrenY

PsyrenY
  • Members
  • 5 238 messages

Sauruz wrote...

The fact that there are many people here who voice their concerns about becoming a cyborg?
Or how suddenly changing the very fundaments of existence could be a traumatic experience to many, especially to less-developed cultures and species?


"Many people" like who? The Quarians are almost all cyborgs. EDI says the Salarians love the idea. Biotics of all races obviously embrace it for their amps. Soldiers of all races get implants as well. Chakwas doesn't like the idea, but even she grudgingly admits that your implants are very effective. Engineer Adams loves the idea. Who are these supposed "many people?"

Taboo-XX wrote...

He hasn't thought it through.


I've done so to the extent that the provided information allows us to. I'm more than happy to revise my opinion if EC provides additional details, but for now it stands.

The Angry One wrote...

You don't know that for sure.
Maybe the fleet will win, or maybe they will cripple the Reapers with so many losses that there's no guarantee they'll be able to subdue the next cycle.


They won't; conventional victory is impossible. This is the game's premise, not fanfiction.
Also, subduing the next cycle is as easy as coming early. A single Reaper coming at us in the 1920s would wipe us all out, never mind the 1600s etc.

All options preserve the Reaper agenda somehow. Destroy is by far the least desirable, of course, but what it wants is synthesis.


Of course it wants Synthesis; it considers synthesis to be the only way around the organic-synthetic conflict that it perceives.

Likely because the Crucible isn't capable of synthesis with low EMS.
Remember how upset the Catalyst sounds if you come there with low EMS? "WHY are you here!?"


But even with high EMS, he still presents the other options. If you show up with high enough EMS and Synthesis = Reapers Win, why mention the other two at all?

Saren told you there was nothing you could do to stop him or Sovereign. This didn't make it true.
So why do you believe there's no other way to stop the Catalyst?


Because Shepard does not know how to operate the Crucible. He says so himself.

The point is everything you say about synthesis can be applied to control, so synthesis is a non-option.


Except that Synthesis is presented as a sure end to the cycle, while Control is presented with doubt. This implies that the Reapers will revert to their original programming if Control stops for any reason.

It's scale. 300k people vs. the entire galaxy, instead of changing trillions without their consent vs. finding another way.


"Changing trillions" still leaves them alive, and can easily leave them in a better position than they would be relative to the other options. The dead can change nothing.

Because there was time to do so.


That doesn't change the fact that Shepard unilaterally decided first, then warned the Batarians second.

Just as he unilaterally decided the fate of the Rachni (twice).

Aside from the billions of life forms who simply won't have a clue what's been done to them and will panic (primitive worlds, etc.) the people of the galaxy have been fighting cyborg machines who've turned their friends and loved ones into cyborg machines. How will they feel after being turned into cyborg machines themselves?

Don't worry little Timmy, your mom and dad were turned into husks, but it's okay. Now you can be a husk too!


EDI and Joker clearly were not husks, troll harder.


(Note: I have nothing against femshep, I just can't be bothered writing "s/he" and "him/her" etc. all the time.)

#189
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 587 messages

The Angry One wrote...
Ignoring the fact that this really tells us little, I'm speaking of the PSYCHOLOGICAL impact of people who have seen their friends and loved ones turned into husks.

Do you think they're going to say "Oh kewl, I'm a cyborg! Better stronger faster pew pew!" or are they going to say "NOOOO I'm turning into one of those things OH MY GOD HELP ME."

Panic will likely be the first reaction. People always fear change.
Those idiotic enough to kill themselves in the meantime did everyone else a favor by removing themselves from the gene pool.

#190
richard_rider

richard_rider
  • Members
  • 450 messages

adneate wrote...

The Catalyst's problem is not our problem and the catalyst provides precisely no information to make this problem supercede the pending destruction of all advanced life in the galaxy by the reapers. His "argument" also makes a series of assumption about the nature of AI that I would say make these hypothetical beings sounds less like AIs and more like logic based computer programs.

Given that we don't care about or are able to understand or relate to the catalyst's hypothetical problem that still leaves destroy as the most efficent and effective means of solving our problems. I don't see why anyone would care what the Catalyst wants since his argument is so weak, I'm not expecting Socrates but I expect more than "This hypothetical situation that has never happened will happen and it will be bad, therefore you should do what I say". That's less of an argument and more prophecy, fitting that it's apocalyptic in nature I suppose.


This is, honestly, my biggest problem with the ending. His logic, and lack of proof.

Shepard is not a kid, and Casper isn't his mother, "Because I said so" is not a good reason.

Shepard never takes anything at face value, but we're supposed to just nod and agree with a little creepy kid whose "solution" has been trying to kill us for a length of 3 games.

Kind of seems like a plight of the losing side...

#191
PsyrenY

PsyrenY
  • Members
  • 5 238 messages

MisterJB wrote...

The Angry One wrote...
Don't worry little Timmy, your mom and dad were turned into husks, but it's okay. Now you can be a husk too!

Do tell, where are the Husks here? I see a human and a synthetic who seems to be acting more alive than before.

Image IPB


Clearly they are mere moments away from panic/madness/suicide. -_-

#192
M Hedonist

M Hedonist
  • Members
  • 4 299 messages

Optimystic_X wrote...

Sauruz wrote...

The fact that there are many people here who voice their concerns about becoming a cyborg?
Or how suddenly changing the very fundaments of existence could be a traumatic experience to many, especially to less-developed cultures and species?


"Many people" like who? The Quarians are almost all cyborgs. EDI says the Salarians love the idea. Biotics of all races obviously embrace it for their amps. Soldiers of all races get implants as well. Chakwas doesn't like the idea, but even she grudgingly admits that your implants are very effective. Engineer Adams loves the idea. Who are these supposed "many people?"

You know, the individuals on these forums beside you who have other opinions than yourself?
Please tell me you're kidding when you're just assuming everybody shares your opinion and your line of thinking. You can't be for real.

#193
lordnyx1

lordnyx1
  • Members
  • 802 messages

MisterJB wrote...

The Angry One wrote...
Ignoring the fact that this really tells us little, I'm speaking of the PSYCHOLOGICAL impact of people who have seen their friends and loved ones turned into husks.

Do you think they're going to say "Oh kewl, I'm a cyborg! Better stronger faster pew pew!" or are they going to say "NOOOO I'm turning into one of those things OH MY GOD HELP ME."

Panic will likely be the first reaction. People always fear change.
Those idiotic enough to kill themselves in the meantime did everyone else a favor by removing themselves from the gene pool.

But they've reached the apex of evoluation, theres no reason to mate anymore.

This is, honestly, my biggest problem with the ending. His logic, and lack of proof.

Shepard is not a kid, and Casper isn't his mother, "Because I said so" is not a good reason.

Shepard
never takes anything at face value, but we're supposed to just nod and
agree with a little creepy kid whose "solution" has been trying to kill
us for a length of 3 games.

Kind of seems like a plight of the losing side...

Hmm my shepards have taken the Rachni oily shadow discussion at face value multiple times, we'll totally run off and will eventually help you kick reapers back into dark space, even after it bit her/him in the ass.

Modifié par lordnyx1, 01 mai 2012 - 07:18 .


#194
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages

Sauruz wrote...

Optimystic_X wrote...

Sauruz wrote...

The fact that there are many people here who voice their concerns about becoming a cyborg?
Or how suddenly changing the very fundaments of existence could be a traumatic experience to many, especially to less-developed cultures and species?


"Many people" like who? The Quarians are almost all cyborgs. EDI says the Salarians love the idea. Biotics of all races obviously embrace it for their amps. Soldiers of all races get implants as well. Chakwas doesn't like the idea, but even she grudgingly admits that your implants are very effective. Engineer Adams loves the idea. Who are these supposed "many people?"

You know, the individuals on these forums beside you who have other opinions than yourself?
Please tell me you're kidding when you're just assuming everybody shares your opinion and your line of thinking. You can't be for real.


I've been trying to say what you said for several pages.

#195
PsyrenY

PsyrenY
  • Members
  • 5 238 messages

Sauruz wrote...

You know, the individuals on these forums beside you who have other opinions than yourself?
Please tell me you're kidding when you're just assuming everybody shares your opinion and your line of thinking. You can't be for real.


Obviously everyone doesn't share my opinion. Just like I don't share the opinion that destroying the Geth is worthwhile, and never will.

#196
M Hedonist

M Hedonist
  • Members
  • 4 299 messages

Optimystic_X wrote...

Sauruz wrote...

You know, the individuals on these forums beside you who have other opinions than yourself?
Please tell me you're kidding when you're just assuming everybody shares your opinion and your line of thinking. You can't be for real.


Obviously everyone doesn't share my opinion. Just like I don't share the opinion that destroying the Geth is worthwhile, and never will.

You have to realize what my point is... that there is a strong majority of people who simply dislike the idea of being turned into a cyborg against their will...
Oh god I don't even know why I bother anymore.

#197
PsyrenY

PsyrenY
  • Members
  • 5 238 messages

Sauruz wrote...

You have to realize what my point is... that there is a strong majority of people who simply dislike the idea of being turned into a cyborg against their will...
Oh god I don't even know why I bother anymore.


Must I agree with your position? Whatever happened to the diversity you claim to support so much? 
As for whether you guys are a "strong majority," I don't agree with that either.

#198
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 587 messages

Sauruz wrote...
You have to realize what my point is... that there is a strong majority of people who simply dislike the idea of being turned into a cyborg against their will...

May I ask why?
Let's assume the best possible. All of Paul Grayson's superhuman abilties without the loss of free will and individuality.
Why would you oppose this?

#199
The Angry One

The Angry One
  • Members
  • 22 246 messages

Optimystic_X wrote...

They won't; conventional victory is impossible. This is the game's premise, not fanfiction.


The codex says otherwise. Hackett is a defeatist.

Also, subduing the next cycle is as easy as coming early. A single Reaper coming at us in the 1920s would wipe us all out, never mind the 1600s etc.


Because it totally works that way.

Of course it wants Synthesis; it considers synthesis to be the only way around the organic-synthetic conflict that it perceives.


So tell me, why does this option preserve the Reapers? If the cycle is truly gone, aren't they obsolete?

But even with high EMS, he still presents the other options. If you show up with high enough EMS and Synthesis = Reapers Win, why mention the other two at all?


Because they're still options, and maybe even the idiot that Shepard has suddenly become would grow suspicious if synthesis were presented alone.
Notice how he goes through destroy and control, acting negatively with each then reaches synthesis, the "perfect" solution.

Because Shepard does not know how to operate the Crucible. He says so himself.


Call Hackett on the radio. Get some more opinions.

Except that Synthesis is presented as a sure end to the cycle, while Control is presented with doubt. This implies that the Reapers will revert to their original programming if Control stops for any reason.


As a sure end by the enemy.

"Changing trillions" still leaves them alive, and can easily leave them in a better position than they would be relative to the other options. The dead can change nothing.


It violates them to their very core. Even if the Reapers won, they would not affect that many on such a scale.

That doesn't change the fact that Shepard unilaterally decided first, then warned the Batarians second.

Just as he unilaterally decided the fate of the Rachni (twice).


Again, scale. Making impactful decisions does not give anyone the right to proceed to alter the galaxy itself at the behest of the enemy.

EDI and Joker clearly were not husks, troll harder.


As I said earlier, this has to do with what people may think is happening to them.

(Note: I have nothing against femshep, I just can't be bothered writing "s/he" and "him/her" etc. all the time.)


Ah, call your Shep/Shep in general what you like, I was only making a correction when referring to mine.

#200
Tom Lehrer

Tom Lehrer
  • Members
  • 1 589 messages

MisterJB wrote...

The Angry One wrote...
Ignoring the fact that this really tells us little, I'm speaking of the PSYCHOLOGICAL impact of people who have seen their friends and loved ones turned into husks.

Do you think they're going to say "Oh kewl, I'm a cyborg! Better stronger faster pew pew!" or are they going to say "NOOOO I'm turning into one of those things OH MY GOD HELP ME."

Panic will likely be the first reaction. People always fear change.
Those idiotic enough to kill themselves in the meantime did everyone else a favor by removing themselves from the gene pool.


Sythesis destoryed the gene pool though and because everyone is now  at apex of evolution breeding is no longer needed because everyone is perfect. There is no more need to think or devlope new technology eaither because they are so perfect now.