Poshible wrote...
Silfren wrote...
Poshible wrote...
Anders:"I'll show you why mages are feared..."
Anders period. The entire DA2 game proves this, all the blood mages running rampant. It is not just for the involvement with demons. It is the entire history of the Tevinter Imperium.and the belief in the the Maker and Andraste. Magic is meant to serve man not rule over him. Magic lead to the blights. Or so they say.
This argument falls COMPLETELY flat when you consider that Anders entire perspective exists explicitly because of the way the (white) Chantry has treated mages for a thousand years. You CANNOT examine his actions without that context. No, really, you can't, because you can't lock mages up, and then when they resort to extreme measures specifically because they are locked up, say that that is the reason you lock them up. Logic doesn't work this way, and this is why just legal systems reject that kind of botched causal logic.
Fine. Grace. Remember her? Do you remember any of the mages from DA2? The ones that abducted Keran? I am sad for those that say "mages were driven to it". I am sorry, but the ends do not justify the means here and never will. They are not "locked up" like in jail either. But, when people become a danger to themselves and other's--they need to be...locked up.
I was also not using what he did, I was using how he acts. He is unstable. As most mages are. The argument as to why is academic. Mages are dangerous on thier own or through the connection with the fade. The Chantry merely seeks to control the chao's if they can not control it, they will purge it *exhaulted march* anybody? Fact is that blood magic is forbidden for a reason, as are free roaming mages.
I see people call the Chantry evil daily. That is thier opinion, In my opinion that is a misunderstaning. I have no ties to religion, I am athiest. I side with the Chantry because the mage side has yet to show me self control. The only good mage I can place is Bethany; or Wynne--and even she is an abomination. Yet Wynne understands why this order must prevail. Bethany even comes to see the light. Huzzah!
Fact is, we are going to disagree on this. We will never agree, because I see things in a way you do not. You see things in a way I do not. I feel bad for them, I do. But, I see no reason to let them live freely. The Chantry's means do justify their ends. The mages do not. I can agree to disagree.
Legal systems do in fact accept this "botched casual logic" ever heard of profiling? Have you studied law? Politics? I have, which...in fact is why I take the side I take. Think about it. We even have legal electronic profilers.
Further more, the mages can separate from the circle if they so choose. Read Asunder?
The Chantry's MEANS justify their ENDS? I can only assume--and hope--that was an accidental mistype.
Either way, if the Chantry's ends OR means justify the other, then you can hardly claim that the mages' own do not. But then I hold that ensuring a base level of freedom for all people is vastly more important than perceived security. Especially when that supposed threat to security appears to be largely overstated.
The mages ARE locked up; this is indisputable. The very lore of both Origins and DA2 is explicit on this point. It's the entire bloody point of the Circles in the first place
Going forward, Grace is a single example among many. She is the exception, not the rule. Neither is she an exception that proves the rule. Even so, there is evidence that she behaves as she does as a result o the Chantry, not in spite of it. Tarohne is a better example of what you're trying to argue here, but even she could be argued as deciding that mages should rule mundanes because the Circle system created by the Chantry has propagated an either/or mindset: either we rule the mages or they will rule us. That mindset is NOT inevitable, but the Chantry has preached it for so long it shouldn't surprise anyone that both good and evil mages will have internalized the message.
One mage gone rogue for unrelated reasons does NOT invalidate my argument that the Chantry in large part creates the very problem it claims to fight. I have never once claimed that NO mage, ever, will ever behave in immoral or illegal ways. I have only said that that the fact that some will does not justify the Circle system as a preventative measure against such. Just as no real world criminals justify the mass locking up of whole populations, regardless of any crime such an act may reduce.
Most of the mages we see do make statements that actually back up my claim here. They are fighting for their freedom, the basic right to live as freely as do the rest of the people, who DO, regardless of claims to the contrary, have considerable more autonomy in their daily lives than any mages do.
Profiling involves many things, but it does not involve locking up entire populations of people. For that matter, there are arguments to be made AGAINST profiling, which I'll not go into here. The point is merely that yes, I'm familiar with the concept, and reject it as not justifying the wholesale condemnation of all mages, everywhere.
Finally, yes, I've read Asunder, and yes I'm aware that the mages chose to rebel against the Chantry. I'm completely at a loss as to what your point is, however. If you're trying to claim that it means that the mages have the legal option to say no to the Chantry, you are simply incorrect. The book lays out that they chose to rebel against the system, causing a war in the process because it is illegal for them to do this. If that's what you meant, then again I don't understand why you brought it up because I don't see that it has anything to do with this discussion.
Modifié par Silfren, 07 mai 2012 - 01:01 .