Ivucci wrote...
I'm not gonna play a what's-more-evil game. More importantly, I completely and utterly fail to see the point of taking children away from their mothers and how does it help anything.
You are only seeing things from one side. I guess you never talk to people who lost their love ones at Redclift due to Isolde's selfishness. A village almost destroyed had my Warden didn't arrive there in time. Does it worth it to risk so many lives just for a child mage to be free?
Ivucci wrote...
I don't understand your example with the cavemen. No, I don't assume cavemen could understand lightning in a matter of days and I don't know how is it relevant to my argument.
Therefore I'll repeat what I said above:
"People plus one spirit in the game clearly start recognizing that something is awfully wrong with the system. Once they are aware of it, they took a certain mental step forward and you can't push them back.
Well, you could try using force, which other posters are suggesting, but I very seriously doubt that will make things better."
Even though Kirkwall is an extreme example, the level of complete desperation that we saw there, the extreme measures taken by both sides = the system is not functional.
Middle age people don't understand what is "basic right" just like cavemen don't understand what is lightning. To understand what is "basic right" they have to go through the process of evolution like we did. They have not come to that point yet. They need natural section to work with. And they don't have that. Someone like Thomas Jefferson need to exist. US declaration of independance need to happen. Jean-jacques Rousseau need to born. Prinitng press and Industrialization need to happen so that idea can spread. University need to be be established so scholars all over the world could come and do their research All this natural selection need to happen assuming Thedas equal to our society evolution This is realistic society evolution. Not some magical society evolution that pop out nowhere. The point is average joe Templar, mages and common folks don't think the way you think.
Ivucci wrote...
Are you suggesting people have no right to fight against oppression, torture and inhuman practices just because "they happen all the time anyway"? I cannot accept that.
People cannot fight against something they never think about. They fight for survival. They fight to defend themselves. They fight to food. They fight for power and land. They fight for wealth. They fight for their religion.They fight for pure violence That's what middle age people do. They don't fight for equality to live among men. Only pre-industrialization and modern people do that.
Ivucci wrote.
Also, the fact that First Enchanters are allowed to study is irrelevant, it's the average-mage-Joe who needs to have all resources available to be able to study and understand what it is that he is constantly being accused of, even though he hasn't actually even committed it yet.
Average mage don't have the will to resist demon and blood magic. That's why they need to undergo Harrowind to proof themselves. Until they can proof themselves, it's safe to leave the study of demonology to those who qualified.
Ivucci wrote...
First Enchanters are still just dogs on a leash.
That's your opinion. As far as I can see. The chantry didn't say much how the First Enchanter should run his Circle. Knight Commander interfere sometime for security but even then he/she doesn't have much authority other than the right of annulment if demon outbreaks happen. Not all Knight Commander are irrational like Meredith. We have seen under certain circumstance, some Knight Commander can be reasonable. Just because Kirkwall is place of lunatic Templars and mages doesn't mean everywhere also the same.
Ivucci wrote...
Err... not sure what is expected of me now, shall I applaud your Amell for being amazing?
Every player's Amell is amazing. Not just mine. Have you played mage in DAO? You sound like someone who never been in a Circle before and play as mage.
Ivucci wrote...
No, I don't want complete freedom for mages and I have no idea why are you assuming that I do.
I'm saying there's a lot of room for a change, I'm saying the system is rotten and should be transformed, I'm saying a system that forces "weak" people (in other words, human beings who have doubts and fears) to
voluntarily agree to being emotionally crippled is an embodiment of somethig utterly evil, horrible and disgusting.
Sure. There a lot of room of improvement but what's the point? Thanks to Anders, now every mages is apostate and hunted down. How can you improve when you are at war?
Ivucci wrote..
Again, I don't know why are you automatically assigning me opinions. I happen to think, though, that the practice of Harrowing should be abandoned or at least transformed.
You are only viewing things from Ander's short sighted point of view. I suggest you start viewing the world from common folk and Templar point of view. And don't try to insert your modern society evolution theory about basic right. It doesn't work that way in sword and dragon fantasy.
The practise of Harrowind isn't perfect but it's solution to ensure the mage's free-will are safe from demon possesion and blood magic temptation. Only strong will mage can self control themselves and live among men. Until you have a better solution which is none, you either have to take Harrowind's test or perform the rite of transquility or be killed. It's your choice.