KingNothing125 wrote...
Samara has been chasing Morinth for 400+ years.
and she could have easily killed hundreds if not more,innocent people in that time span,like I said, Nef is just the only one we are really told about
KingNothing125 wrote...
Samara has been chasing Morinth for 400+ years.
tonnactus wrote...
It was necessary to survive while others like her mother hunted her.
Nef is just the only one we are really told about
Modifié par Geneaux486, 04 mai 2012 - 11:31 .
LoganofET wrote...
I do conceed that Samara was easily the most boring squadmate in ME2 and the warrior code bit was old before it started, at least she's following an agreed opon set of rules that people can predict. Morith just goes and kills for pleasure and makes it up as she goes along.
p__q wrote...
I'm honestly curios about your stand point here as you obviously have a problem with the sexualised aspecct of Morinth and what that represents which is your right to an opinion but I don't understand why your actively happy that players who picked her were screwed over in ME3. Considering how Morinth is optional and isn't a character forced on you like Liara its not like your experience would have been negatively impacted at all by having her in the game, all it would have done would be to bring enjoyment to the people who did save her and if your objection to her inclusion is based on a more broad view of (to put it bluntly) not liking skanks in videogames at all then that still confuses me as even though her character isn't expanded on much her sexual aspect is arguabley dwarfed by her renegade killer side which is what I (and im sure many other people) decided to save her for as I assumed the presence of a psychotic killer would make for more interesting and dramatic story and thus make the game more enjoyable
Modifié par Eromenos, 04 mai 2012 - 11:36 .
Geneaux486 wrote...
It wasn't necesarry for anything.
Modifié par The Angry One, 04 mai 2012 - 11:38 .
Modifié par Eromenos, 04 mai 2012 - 11:56 .
tonnactus wrote...
Geneaux486 wrote...
It wasn't necesarry for anything.
It was. For survival. Where someone hide from police and justicars? At unpleasant,dangerous places. Strong biotics come in handy there. And those became stronger through her mind melds.
Without doing that she would be nothing else then a weak victim for her mother.
tonnactus wrote...
LoganofET wrote...
I do conceed that Samara was easily the most boring squadmate in ME2 and the warrior code bit was old before it started, at least she's following an agreed opon set of rules that people can predict. Morith just goes and kills for pleasure and makes it up as she goes along.
I doubt anyone else then a justicar know all 5000 "laws".
Modifié par Shepardtheshepard, 05 mai 2012 - 12:15 .
KingNothing125 wrote...
If Morinth is exploitative, I'm guessing you think True Blood on HBO is exploitative. Morinth is just a run-of-the-mill vampire, Mass Effect-style. Not sure what's so harmful about that.
I think you're getting Emily Wong confused with Diana Allers.
Modifié par Eromenos, 05 mai 2012 - 12:16 .
Shepardtheshepard wrote...
Do you really think it's not written down somewhere?
Shepardtheshepard wrote...
And it's already been established that justicars will uphold the basic laws of the land.
Modifié par tonnactus, 05 mai 2012 - 12:24 .
Eromenos wrote...
I do have a problem with Morinth's sexualized aspect, but I don't have ablanket problem with sexuality on the screen. My problem is that onscreen sexuality is almost always narrowed and dumbed-down to stuff that caters to dudebros, and that comes with a price that they don't end up having to pay. I referred to Morinth as a "Basic Instinct"-style exploitation that hurts women, particularly women who are lesbian or bisexual. She and Kelly Chambers were both insulting examples made just for guys. There's nothing empowering about either one of them. They're just recycled sci-fi manifestations of the "ideal woman" crap.
Morinth is optional only in the barest sense. We are forced to deal with her, i.e. to dignify her content in Samara's loyalty quest if we want Samara empowered and/or wearing slightly-less-ridiculous-"armor." The attitudes and messages in Morinth's content are insulting to women and queers and should never have been allowed.
As for me being happy that people who cared about Morinth can no longer get what they want. Why wouldn't I be? I don't dignify or respect her concept. If you were in the dark about these issues until now, then blame BioWare for manufacturing and selling Morinth to you in the first place. It's good now that they wasted no more time on her. You probably won't agree with me, but my stance is that every one of us was screwed over by ME2's concepts from the start. Many people bought into them anyway, but I didn't. Either way ME2 was a waste of time in the ME storyline, and Morinth also happened to be one of the chief symptoms that can summarize the dim attitude of ME2.
KingNothing125 wrote...
I am totally missing the point with your Emily Wong "disdain."
She's a reporter in ME1 who asks for incriminating data from Fist, and then wants you to plant a bug in the flight traffic control office. What in the world has she done to get lumped in with Diana Allers and Kelly Chambers?
Modifié par razor150, 05 mai 2012 - 12:43 .
tonnactus wrote...
Shepardtheshepard wrote...
Do you really think it's not written down somewhere?
Why should that matter. 5000 sutras is a little to big to remember them all or read them fast if needed...
And there is also the interpretation of such rules. I doubt shepardt can do that right,when not even people of the same religion(the code is just a ruleset that religions also have) had different opinions about that and even started wars...Shepardtheshepard wrote...
And it's already been established that justicars will uphold the basic laws of the land.
They not even respect asari or council laws. Otherwise there would be no need to arrest samara and she hadnt a fight with nilus.
Modifié par Shepardtheshepard, 05 mai 2012 - 12:52 .
Modifié par sH0tgUn jUliA, 05 mai 2012 - 01:23 .
tonnactus wrote...
It was. For survival. Where someone hide from police and justicars? At unpleasant,dangerous places. Strong biotics come in handy there. And those became stronger through her mind melds.
Without doing that she would be nothing else then a weak victim for her mother.
Morinth is a psychopath and a predator, who is bisexual because all Asari are bisexual by nature.
How is that "hurtful" to anyone?
And you still haven't said what's wrong with Emily Wong.
Modifié par Geneaux486, 05 mai 2012 - 01:32 .
Eromenos wrote...
p__q wrote...
I'm honestly curios about your stand point here as you obviously have a problem with the sexualised aspecct of Morinth and what that represents which is your right to an opinion but I don't understand why your actively happy that players who picked her were screwed over in ME3. Considering how Morinth is optional and isn't a character forced on you like Liara its not like your experience would have been negatively impacted at all by having her in the game, all it would have done would be to bring enjoyment to the people who did save her and if your objection to her inclusion is based on a more broad view of (to put it bluntly) not liking skanks in videogames at all then that still confuses me as even though her character isn't expanded on much her sexual aspect is arguabley dwarfed by her renegade killer side which is what I (and im sure many other people) decided to save her for as I assumed the presence of a psychotic killer would make for more interesting and dramatic story and thus make the game more enjoyable
I do have a problem with Morinth's sexualized aspect, but I don't have ablanket problem with sexuality on the screen. My problem is that onscreen sexuality is almost always narrowed and dumbed-down to stuff that caters to dudebros, and that comes with a price that they don't end up having to pay. I referred to Morinth as a "Basic Instinct"-style exploitation that hurts women, particularly women who are lesbian or bisexual. She and Kelly Chambers were both insulting examples made just for guys. There's nothing empowering about either one of them. They're just recycled sci-fi manifestations of the "ideal woman" crap.
Morinth is optional only in the barest sense. We are forced to deal with her, i.e. to dignify her content in Samara's loyalty quest if we want Samara empowered and/or wearing slightly-less-ridiculous-"armor." The attitudes and messages in Morinth's content are insulting to women and queers and should never have been allowed.
As for me being happy that people who cared about Morinth can no longer get what they want. Why wouldn't I be? I don't dignify or respect her concept. If you were in the dark about these issues until now, then blame BioWare for manufacturing and selling Morinth to you in the first place. It's good now that they wasted no more time on her. You probably won't agree with me, but my stance is that every one of us was screwed over by ME2's concepts from the start. Many people bought into them anyway, but I didn't. Either way ME2 was a waste of time in the ME storyline, and Morinth also happened to be one of the chief symptoms that can summarize the dim attitude of ME2.
nategator wrote...
Also, LMAO at the idea that Morinth or Kelly Chambers would qualify as part of the "ideal women" type.
Modifié par Geneaux486, 05 mai 2012 - 01:38 .
sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...
Morinth? I got the option one playthrough. I killed Samara to unlock "Dominate", then reloaded the game and killed Morinth. No way would I want that filthy creature on my ship, even as a renegade.