178 réponses à ce sujet

[SetecAstronomy]

I am participating in a boycott of TotalBiscuit's youtube videos.

I am currently reading a transcription of his youtube videos and will be offering my views on them shortly.

[Teddie Sage]

Oh, then I remove my cuss.

[Berkilak]

EternalAmbiguity wrote...

Berkilak wrote...

It's funny because he justifies why his opinion matters in the actual video. Quite frankly, I can't stand the guy. But I decided to give it a watch simply because of the vitriol being spewed against him in ignorance here.

I think you and I have different definitions of vitriol, because there's been zero vitriol, merely indifference.

If you were indifferent, you wouldn't be posting. 

[Naughty Bear]

TieRantaSaurusWrex wrote...

Lol @ everybody coming in the thread about TB's opinion on the ending. Just to say they don't care..
It kind of seems like you guys do care... well atleast enough to reply.

I just came in to post that i don't care. Just for the hell of it because i can.

[Adanu]

SetecAstronomy wrote...

I am participating in a boycott of TotalBiscuit's youtube videos.

I am currently reading a transcription of his youtube videos and will be offering my views on them shortly.

<3

You, Sir, are awesome.

This **** is about as 'valid' as a used car salesmans opinion.

[Amioran]

Berkilak wrote...

It's funny because he justifies why his opinion matters in the actual video.

And he contradicts himself a lot of times while doing it.

One of the most glaring is when he says that what matters most are the facts behind an opinon (impling that it doesn't matter the expertise in the field of the one formulating the opinon, but the facts in the same), a thing I agree about (for what it concerns the literal meaning), the problem is that a person that has expertise in the sector relevant to the opinion it is obvious that will have more facts to bring to the table about it than one that doesn't know almost nothing (or very little) about the same.

If I play chess from 10 years and I am a GM the facts I can bring in support of my judgment (because opinon is another thing, he either mix concepts) on an opening, for example, will be infinetely more than those of one that never played (or played on on amateur level, once in a while) can bring.

So, he tried to prove a concept and in doing so he actually completely proved the contrary of the point he was trying to imply.

There are many more that I could quote but I'm sure people will not be too much interested.

Modifié par Amioran, 04 mai 2012 - 03:56 .

[elecmanexe001]

TB over did it with the DLC, like a lot of people, but whatever that's his opinion and he respectfully explains it, unlike many here. Knowing TB it's not a surprise he would not like it, but he would likely enjoy the rest of the game if he chose to play it. So?

[Mylia Stenetch]

slyguy200 wrote...

Good video.
Watch all the people who don't like what he is saying in it try to dismiss it by using something stupid.

People on the interenet saying STFU noob to a side they don't agree with...quick notify the news your on to something!

[Drake_Hound]

Go way troll , cause you play chess 10 doesn't mean you are the same as somebody who can be GM chess player in 1 year ..

Or has beter outcome prediction , chess is calculation against a computer .
Chess is against a human opponent more then that , it is analyse baiting calculate all on the assumption of the most logical human nature .
A mistake , to be human is to make mistakes .

So basically saying that only experts opnions are of more value , then the experts in the field of human nature .
Means everybody is of less value then me !!

conclusion in a more easy understandable fashionable modern way .
So ENDING sucks rewrite it ! , cause you don't have to be a game maker .
To understand a mistake has been made .

[Amioran]

slyguy200 wrote...
He says that an expertise in the field could help judgement, not be an exclusive source.

And he tried to prove it with what I said, that actually contradicts completely that "proof", as I explained.

Reality is that expertise in the field is the primary aspect to take in consideration for what it concerns plausibility of judgment, because everything relies on it; other factors that can help judgment are subsidiary and have less value.

[RyuujinZERO]

 Listen to that accent... that accent speaks of timeless wisdom and critical thinking.

(I may be biased on this matter being a cynical brit also  )

[Drake_Hound]

@eternal bull**** , care to back a opnion with a explanation?
Why some people think dog meats are great , other like rat stew ..
Some in the world even love ants with honey ..

But those are all taste , and have to do with pyschical .

But since you like a ending of something means you can rationalise why you like it .
Or are you incapable of rationalising , logical tought pattern and putting your feelings into writings.
In that case yes your opnion is worthless and consider one of those millions of people .
I want to speak out , but do not dare to do any actions , so i write garbage all day .

[incinerator950]

EternalAmbiguity wrote...

I think the ending is great. But, guess what? It's all opinion. There's no definitive proof either way.

I guess we'll just have to deal.

Now you're just trolling.  <3

[Khevan77]

If we are to state that our opinions of the endings are valid, we also have to realise that some other people will have other opinions.

I disagree wholeheartedly with EternalAmbiguity with my views of the endings. I felt they were rushed, had plot holes you could fit the Citadel into, destroyed the established lore and plot of ME1, and by extension the rest of the series, etc etc ad infinitum ad nauseum.

Eternal feels differently, something about the ending worked for him (her? sorry if I messed up my pronouns). While I cannot understand that viewpoint, since it is so alien from my own, I also need to respect the fact that he thinks that way.

Don't like the ending? Say so, explain why, give reasons, be passionate. But don't trash someone else because they liked it. Common courtesy. I wish it were more common.

[Drake_Hound]

LOL no less respect , cause I can no longer tolerate the misuse of respect , same as misuse of so called rights .

We are going back to reality , since BSN has become reality .
So put the money where the mouth is .
Earn your respect , clarify the opnion !
Explain , no longer those trolling lines in defense and offense , playing on human sympathy .
Current generation is not worthy of respect , they still need to earn it .

[chester013]

Well it's more interesting about what Paul Barnett said, it's unsurprising he doesn't like the opinion of customers after Warhammer Online. It took what, about three months before it flopped? Since his project now only runs on 3 servers worldwide, he just comes across as bitter, and this bitterness is directed at us the consumer.

While yes, a random guy in the street's opinion is not worth all that much, retail businesses learnt a long time ago that being dismissive of customers is suicide. But hey what the **** do I know, I'm just a guy with an XBox.

Modifié par chester013, 04 mai 2012 - 04:28 .

[Mylia Stenetch]

Drake_Hound wrote...

LOL no less respect , cause I can no longer tolerate the misuse of respect , same as misuse of so called rights .

We are going back to reality , since BSN has become reality .
So put the money where the mouth is .
Earn your respect , clarify the opnion !
Explain , no longer those trolling lines in defense and offense , playing on human sympathy .
Current generation is not worthy of respect , they still need to earn it .

Welcome to the internet where respect will never be earned since it is not reality and we "live" behind a random .gif. One does not need to clarify their opinion since it is their opinion, you have to accept it and move on or get into an internet arguement. Also you got trolled, and trolled hard.

[Drake_Hound]

So then if one does not need to clarify its opnion ,
Then you can be called a troll !
Simple as that stating random garbage on the street , people think you are a idiot .
Stating random garbage on the internet is the same deal .

Since we are slowly turning internet into worst then reality show ..
And no am not MAD just plain LOGICAL ...

So your mad opnion is mooted !

[Cruders]

Amioran wrote...

aftermath_diogo wrote...
Year's of experience as a gaming journalist, tons of contacts and direct knowledge from hundreds of game developers, of tons of different companies, and maybe his 240.000.000 youtube views have some importance and are there for a reason no?

All of these things, while surely important on their own, have no relevance whatsoever for the ability to objectively judge a narrative and have your judgment possess a pertinence in the same.

That would be like saying that since a person has, for example, 10 years of experience in rally that should be reason enough for the guy to have a somewhat relevant judgment on painting.

Expertize must be correlated to the thing you have experience upon to have some relevance.

If you actually watched the video... he says this. I haven't heard of him before this topic, but I decided to listen and see what he had to say on the subject.

[Mylia Stenetch]

Drake_Hound wrote...

So then if one does not need to clarify its opnion ,
Then you can be called a troll !
Simple as that stating random garbage on the street , people think you are a idiot .
Stating random garbage on the internet is the same deal .

Since we are slowly turning internet into worst then reality show ..
And no am not MAD just plain LOGICAL ...

So your mad opnion is mooted !

She trolled you and trolled you hard. You took the bite and I pushed it father. Opinions are opinions.