Aller au contenu

Photo

The contridiction of Anti-IT....


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
1357 réponses à ce sujet

#776
CavScout

CavScout
  • Members
  • 1 601 messages

ohupthis wrote...

SubAstris wrote...

1) What you linked to doesn't invalidate what I said
2) "intecidy"- WTF? Do you mean "intensity"? We know that the faster the indoctrination, the more likely. The fact that there is no way to calculate works against IT, since we don't even know if it would be possible without melting his brains



That's totally evident during the scene where Shep shoots Anderson, as TIM is showing THE POWER it HAS, instantly Shep shoots Anderson, and during the scene the INDOCTRINATION black-oily visuals appear, along with I might add, the Reaper-growl.


Shep and Anderson had their bodies controled. Nothing suggests indoctrination....

#777
CavScout

CavScout
  • Members
  • 1 601 messages

dreman9999 wrote...

hammerfan wrote...
I didn't say that NO electrical impulses come from the brain. I said that NOT ALL electrical impulses come from the brain.

But the ones basedon body functions are. It ether goes out of the brain or to it.


http://en.wikipedia....icial_pacemaker

#778
dreman9999

dreman9999
  • Members
  • 19 067 messages

CavScout wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

hammerfan wrote...
I didn't say that NO electrical impulses come from the brain. I said that NOT ALL electrical impulses come from the brain.

But the ones basedon body functions are. It ether goes out of the brain or to it.


http://en.wikipedia....icial_pacemaker

It clear that we are not taking about implaints...

#779
OH-UP-THIS!

OH-UP-THIS!
  • Members
  • 2 399 messages
[quote]CavScout wrote...

[quote]dreman9999 wrote...
[quote]CavScout wrote...
It doesn't. It clearly says Shep needs to make the next choice because it can't itself. Why pretend it had more control than it did?
[/quote]To trick Shepard. Remeber, race of machines with a history of great deception.:whistle:[/quote]

Why do so many people just make stuff up? What evidence is there that the Catalyst was trying to "trick" Shep?[/quote]


Could you please stop timewarping us back to yesterday?

We've already covered this and yet you still HARP on about it? Image IPB

BLOODY HELL, go away and play some halodrivel or pet your fave unicorn. Image IPB

#780
OH-UP-THIS!

OH-UP-THIS!
  • Members
  • 2 399 messages
snip, forums acting up again.

Modifié par ohupthis, 06 mai 2012 - 07:57 .


#781
CavScout

CavScout
  • Members
  • 1 601 messages

LaZy i IS wrote...

DarthSliver wrote...

LaZy i IS wrote...

@OP
The IT is derived using circular logic and evidence that is at best, circumstantial.


IT at this point like said in my last post a theory created by the fans to help them deal with the ending and keep them able to play ME3 or the ME series over. If IT was true it wouldve been made plainly obivious or hinted at bigger than it was. 


Yeah. Well put.
Also, most of the "evidence" for IT has a much simpler non-IT explanation.


Heck, most "evidence" for IT isn't even evidence. Most are un-related points that IT folks try and connect. Simple apophenia.

#782
OH-UP-THIS!

OH-UP-THIS!
  • Members
  • 2 399 messages

CavScout wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

hammerfan wrote...
I didn't say that NO electrical impulses come from the brain. I said that NOT ALL electrical impulses come from the brain.

But the ones basedon body functions are. It ether goes out of the brain or to it.


http://en.wikipedia....icial_pacemaker



I told you NOT to GO there, my spouse has one so ****** off !!!!!!!!!!!

#783
dreman9999

dreman9999
  • Members
  • 19 067 messages

CavScout wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

CavScout wrote...
It doesn't. It clearly says Shep needs to make the next choice because it can't itself. Why pretend it had more control than it did?

To trick Shepard. Remeber, race of machines with a history of great deception.:whistle:


Why do so many people just make stuff up? What evidence is there that the Catalyst was trying to "trick" Shep?


It's from a race of machine with a history of deception and it has no reason to help Shepard....The choice given to Shepard has him..
Grabing a live wire.
Walking off that edge into a firy lazer.
Walking into an explotion.


...
ThEIR IS NO  PROOF THE STARCHILD IS TELLING THE TRUTH..

I can go on, but the base of it is that their is no reason to turst the starchild.

#784
CavScout

CavScout
  • Members
  • 1 601 messages

KingZayd wrote...

EpyonX3 wrote...

KingZayd wrote...


And what else is it? He's been studying indoctrination. Whatever he has is based on that research. Are you suggesting he's been able to come up with a technology beyond the reapers? TIM's a remarkable man indeed, but I think you overestimate him.


No I'm not saying that at all. What I'm saying is that he researched Indoctrination to figure out how to gain control over people.

He reverse engineered it and made it his own. Just like he tells you in the final scene. A lot of tech in the future is reverse engineered from reaper tech. This provides grounds to possibility of reverse engineering Indoctrnation.


But the reapers like to control people too? Something like that would be really useful against Shepard. Why does TIM's device work better than the Reapers' own tech?


Considering TIM dies, how much better was it?

#785
Raiil

Raiil
  • Members
  • 4 011 messages

CavScout wrote...

KingZayd wrote...

Coming from an IT proponent, this is laughable.


Since it's you who's laughing, i'll just assume it's because you don't understand again.


Guys, please. :( Look, IT isn't actually as far fetched as some people want it to be, but neither is it the airtight, ironclad theory that others propose. The truth of the matter is, we're missing necessary data to accurately assume one way or another. We don't know for certain whether God Child is an AI (shackled or unshackled), a VI, or even an uploaded personality like the Virtual Aliens. Hell, it might even be Harbinger. There is no evidence that puts one idea ahead of the others. Everyone needs to accept this. Believe what you want, but no one outside BioWare knows the truth right now. 

#786
dreman9999

dreman9999
  • Members
  • 19 067 messages

CavScout wrote...

LaZy i IS wrote...

DarthSliver wrote...

LaZy i IS wrote...

@OP
The IT is derived using circular logic and evidence that is at best, circumstantial.


IT at this point like said in my last post a theory created by the fans to help them deal with the ending and keep them able to play ME3 or the ME series over. If IT was true it wouldve been made plainly obivious or hinted at bigger than it was. 


Yeah. Well put.
Also, most of the "evidence" for IT has a much simpler non-IT explanation.


Heck, most "evidence" for IT isn't even evidence. Most are un-related points that IT folks try and connect. Simple apophenia.

http://social.biowar...75/blog/212630/ :whistle:

#787
LaZy i IS

LaZy i IS
  • Members
  • 163 messages

KingZayd wrote...

LaZy i IS wrote...

KingZayd wrote...

ThinkIntegral wrote...

KingZayd wrote...

ThinkIntegral wrote...

KingZayd wrote...

so either the crucible was able to reprogram an AI that nobody knew was there, or it makes the Catalyst stupid by hogging resources... kinda like firefox?


Apparently someone knew it was there because the plans for the Crucible at some point in time included the Catalyst.  Second, I have no idea how you get the hogging resources idea from some change in logical gates.  In any case the details of how it does it have kind of a low relevancy.  Based on what we know the Crucible does something to the Catalyst because it explicitly says so, it gives you three choices, and you're talking to it.


i got that from the case that nobody did program it, and there was some sort of accidental change to the personality.

The Starchild said that no organic had ever been there before. How would anyone discover it's presence and create a a device capable of reprogramming the catalyst.

The change is merely this addition of a crucible that allows 3 options. This is why he says "the crucible changed me" not when he's explaining that the old solution won't work anymore, but before he tells you what the new possibilities are.

The device was designed to work with the Citadel. Not an AI nobody knew about. Otherwise surely the Starchild would be able to activate the Crucible itself?


Uh huh.  Well logical gates aren't like hogging resources.

That's an unknown and more or less unimportant because all that matters is that at some point the Catalyst was included in the design of the Crucible and the two combined stop the Reapers.

So you're limiting change to that?  I don't even know why you're singling that out.

You have no conclusive knowledge of whether previous civilizations knew there was an AI there.  Just because they don't know it, doesn't exclude the possibility that some previous civilization did. Everyone in the current cycle had no idea how the Crucible works. Plus, just because you build a device to interact with another device doesn't per se mean that the other has the ability to manipulate it. The design and intent of the creators dictate that.

But why even bring that up? Again, I have no idea what you're trying show.


I was addressing the only way I could think of that there could be some accidental change in personality. That's where i got resource hogging from.

He mentions the change only when he's saying there are now possiblities. He gives no indication that the change affects his personality or compels him. This is something that you've been saying.

He tells us that no organics have been there before. So tell me please, how did someone design the crucible to interact with this AI that nobody knew was there? or perhaps suggest a way they could have figured out there was an AI there?

The catalyst needed to complete the crucible is the Citadel. Unless you can tell me why the AI is needed for this device to work?


Chorban found out abot the keeper's origins and  that they are programmed to do something every 50000 years just by scanning 21 of them. Who's to say someone couldn't have found out about the AI without going there?


The Catalyst is the AI. Dialogue: "I am the Catalyst, the Citadel is a part of me". 
Since the Crucible uses the relay system, the Citadel being the main relay, it seems pretty likely that the AI is needed for the Crucible to fire across the relay system.


Ok then so:
Why does the Catalyst (of whom the Citadel is part of) need a reaper that it controls to stay behind and tell  it when the Harvest is ready [the organic races are on the Citadel (part of the Catalyst)], so that it can send a signal to the Keepers so that they can open the Citadel relay (part of the Catalyst)? How do the Protheans sneak onto the Citadel (part of the Catalyst) and change it without alerting the Catalyst? When the Citadel receives Sovereign's signal, and the keepers aren't activated, why doesn't it let Sovereign know what's going on? Why does Sovereign have to spend thousands of years figuring out by himself, and eventually using Saren to discover the truth. Why does the Citadel (part of the catalyst) have a master control console that organics can use? Why hasn't the Catalyst made the other reapers it controls who can enter the Milky Way using FTL drives, do so in all that time? 


The whole catalyst thing was probably bad writing anyways, but let's try to answer:
The Catalyst seems to be pretty isolated from the info you get in the game, how do you know it has access to all citadel systems? It's an AI, so whoever made it could've just as easily had programming "shackles" or protocols that stop it from interfering with the rest of the citadel.
The Catalyst doesn't signal the keepers, Sovereign does.
The Protheans did it via the conduit, and if the Catalyst could detect the inside of the citadel, Sovereign would be completely unnecessary.
Sovereign does know that the keepers won't respond, so uses Saren to grant access.
The citadel needs controls that the organics inside can use, such as for closing/opening the arms, how else to defend against attack(wars/etc.)?
How do you know how long the reapers would take to travel into the galaxy from dark space? There's no mention of the distance anywhere.

Best I can do with what little info there is, combined with some logic.
As I said, the whole "starchild" ending just seems badly done to me.

#788
savionen

savionen
  • Members
  • 1 317 messages
Whether IT is true or not (which it most likely isn't) it makes a lot more sense than the current ending.

Modifié par savionen, 06 mai 2012 - 08:02 .


#789
CavScout

CavScout
  • Members
  • 1 601 messages

KingZayd wrote...

CavScout wrote...

KingZayd wrote...

I'm trying to point out there aren't as many reasonable explanations as you think. Sure with enough handwaving you can get something that works, but you end up making the entire story convoluted and the reapers laughable.


Coming from an IT proponent, this is laughable.


Since it's you who's laughing, i'll just assume it's because you don't understand again.


Says the one who doesn't understand the ending and so invented one to cling to instead.

#790
CavScout

CavScout
  • Members
  • 1 601 messages

dreman9999 wrote...

CavScout wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

hammerfan wrote...
I didn't say that NO electrical impulses come from the brain. I said that NOT ALL electrical impulses come from the brain.

But the ones basedon body functions are. It ether goes out of the brain or to it.


http://en.wikipedia....icial_pacemaker

It clear that we are not taking about implaints...


We are talking about alternative ways of controling the body without the mind, which some (you?) claim is impossible.

#791
CavScout

CavScout
  • Members
  • 1 601 messages

ohupthis wrote...

CavScout wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

CavScout wrote...
It doesn't. It clearly says Shep needs to make the next choice because it can't itself. Why pretend it had more control than it did?

To trick Shepard. Remeber, race of machines with a history of great deception.:whistle:


Why do so many people just make stuff up? What evidence is there that the Catalyst was trying to "trick" Shep?[/quote]


Could you please stop timewarping us back to yesterday?

We've already covered this and yet you still HARP on about it? Image IPB

BLOODY HELL, go away and play some halodrivel or pet your fave unicorn. Image IPB


Troll away.

Modifié par CavScout, 06 mai 2012 - 08:04 .


#792
KingZayd

KingZayd
  • Members
  • 5 344 messages

ThinkIntegral wrote...

KingZayd wrote...

ThinkIntegral wrote...

KingZayd wrote...

ThinkIntegral wrote...

KingZayd wrote...

so either the crucible was able to reprogram an AI that nobody knew was there, or it makes the Catalyst stupid by hogging resources... kinda like firefox?


Apparently someone knew it was there because the plans for the Crucible at some point in time included the Catalyst.  Second, I have no idea how you get the hogging resources idea from some change in logical gates.  In any case the details of how it does it have kind of a low relevancy.  Based on what we know the Crucible does something to the Catalyst because it explicitly says so, it gives you three choices, and you're talking to it.


i got that from the case that nobody did program it, and there was some sort of accidental change to the personality.

The Starchild said that no organic had ever been there before. How would anyone discover it's presence and create a a device capable of reprogramming the catalyst.

The change is merely this addition of a crucible that allows 3 options. This is why he says "the crucible changed me" not when he's explaining that the old solution won't work anymore, but before he tells you what the new possibilities are.

The device was designed to work with the Citadel. Not an AI nobody knew about. Otherwise surely the Starchild would be able to activate the Crucible itself?


Uh huh.  Well logical gates aren't like hogging resources.

That's an unknown and more or less unimportant because all that matters is that at some point the Catalyst was included in the design of the Crucible and the two combined stop the Reapers.

So you're limiting change to that?  I don't even know why you're singling that out.

You have no conclusive knowledge of whether previous civilizations knew there was an AI there.  Just because they don't know it, doesn't exclude the possibility that some previous civilization did. Everyone in the current cycle had no idea how the Crucible works. Plus, just because you build a device to interact with another device doesn't per se mean that the other has the ability to manipulate it. The design and intent of the creators dictate that.

But why even bring that up? Again, I have no idea what you're trying show.


I was addressing the only way I could think of that there could be some accidental change in personality. That's where i got resource hogging from.

He mentions the change only when he's saying there are now possiblities. He gives no indication that the change affects his personality or compels him. This is something that you've been saying.

He tells us that no organics have been there before. So tell me please, how did someone design the crucible to interact with this AI that nobody knew was there? or perhaps suggest a way they could have figured out there was an AI there?

The catalyst needed to complete the crucible is the Citadel. Unless you can tell me why the AI is needed for this device to work?


Well as I said before...

As far as personality goes, we don't even know if it had a personality or what its personality was previously.  Kind of irrelevant.  As far as the Crucible compelling the Catalyst to do something, technically yeah it did, because otherwise you wouldn't be standing at the bottom of the Presidium talking to it about to make three choices nor would an energy bubble disperse or shoot out from the device.  Shepard would've failed and died right there in front of the console.

That detail is something you and I will never know and because of that is kind of irrelevant.  The important thing you should be focusing on is that at some point someone did; whether figuring out an AI is there and/or designing the Crucible to interface with it because Vendetta said the Citadel was incorporated into the Crucible designs.  In other words, there was a reason why.  Yes the reaso could be that they weren't aware of an AI and thought that the Citadel was an added component to disperse energy.  But the end result, the fact that you're talking to the Catalyst, that it gives you three freaking choices to choose from, and honors your choices or is forced to exercise your choice suggests there was more to the design of the Crucible.

Like Cavscout said, your problem and frustration is because you're trying to ask questions on things that you won't probably ever know even with the EC, and some of which are tangential. 


You're there because it brought you up there. It doesn't tell you why it brought you up there, and it only mentions that it's been changed when it's saying there are new possibilties. He was changed like Iron Man. new hardware, new possibilities.

It's not irrelevant. For what you're saying to make sense there has to be a way for the designers to know of the AI so they can factor it into the design. If what you're saying is true, but there isn't a way for the designers to know of the AI in the first place, then the story is nonsensical.  As for the latter part of the paragraph: "A mad man sees what he sees".  I haven't yet seen an explanation that makes sense and can address these issues, that isn't indoctrination. I'm asking you to try and address them some other way.

My problem is that I'm thinking about the story? I don't need to have all the answers, but there should at least be some plausible explanation for the story to make sense.

#793
CavScout

CavScout
  • Members
  • 1 601 messages

ohupthis wrote...

CavScout wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

hammerfan wrote...
I didn't say that NO electrical impulses come from the brain. I said that NOT ALL electrical impulses come from the brain.

But the ones basedon body functions are. It ether goes out of the brain or to it.


http://en.wikipedia....icial_pacemaker



I told you NOT to GO there, my spouse has one so ****** off !!!!!!!!!!!


So?

#794
CavScout

CavScout
  • Members
  • 1 601 messages

dreman9999 wrote...

CavScout wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

CavScout wrote...
It doesn't. It clearly says Shep needs to make the next choice because it can't itself. Why pretend it had more control than it did?

To trick Shepard. Remeber, race of machines with a history of great deception.:whistle:


Why do so many people just make stuff up? What evidence is there that the Catalyst was trying to "trick" Shep?


It's from a race of machine with a history of deception and it has no reason to help Shepard....The choice given to Shepard has him..
Grabing a live wire.
Walking off that edge into a firy lazer.
Walking into an explotion.


...
ThEIR IS NO  PROOF THE STARCHILD IS TELLING THE TRUTH..

I can go on, but the base of it is that their is no reason to turst the starchild.


You need to show the Catalyst to be lying. You don't get to demand we prove he is telling the truth. One does not prove a negative.

#795
KingZayd

KingZayd
  • Members
  • 5 344 messages

CavScout wrote...

ohupthis wrote...

SubAstris wrote...

1) What you linked to doesn't invalidate what I said
2) "intecidy"- WTF? Do you mean "intensity"? We know that the faster the indoctrination, the more likely. The fact that there is no way to calculate works against IT, since we don't even know if it would be possible without melting his brains



That's totally evident during the scene where Shep shoots Anderson, as TIM is showing THE POWER it HAS, instantly Shep shoots Anderson, and during the scene the INDOCTRINATION black-oily visuals appear, along with I might add, the Reaper-growl.


Shep and Anderson had their bodies controled. Nothing suggests indoctrination....


Except the fact that this device was only obtained after studying indoctrination. Why is it that the reapers can't do this?

#796
CavScout

CavScout
  • Members
  • 1 601 messages

savionen wrote...

Whether IT is true or not (which it most likely isn't) it makes a lot more sense than the current ending.


No it doesn't. It means the whole game was a fake, a waste of time and had no ending.

#797
LaZy i IS

LaZy i IS
  • Members
  • 163 messages

dreman9999 wrote...

CavScout wrote...

LaZy i IS wrote...

DarthSliver wrote...

LaZy i IS wrote...

@OP
The IT is derived using circular logic and evidence that is at best, circumstantial.


IT at this point like said in my last post a theory created by the fans to help them deal with the ending and keep them able to play ME3 or the ME series over. If IT was true it wouldve been made plainly obivious or hinted at bigger than it was. 


Yeah. Well put.
Also, most of the "evidence" for IT has a much simpler non-IT explanation.


Heck, most "evidence" for IT isn't even evidence. Most are un-related points that IT folks try and connect. Simple apophenia.

http://social.biowar...75/blog/212630/ :whistle:


Like I said, circumstantial evidence and circular logic.

Fact 1. People are indoctrinated by being near reapers and reaper tech. 

Fact 2. People that at are under the process of indoctrination here whispers.

Fact 3.Shepard is near allot of reaper tech through out ME1 and ME2.  


You can't look at this first or you end up with circular logic...

Theory should follow evidence, not the other way around.:mellow:

#798
LaZy i IS

LaZy i IS
  • Members
  • 163 messages

CavScout wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

CavScout wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

hammerfan wrote...
I didn't say that NO electrical impulses come from the brain. I said that NOT ALL electrical impulses come from the brain.

But the ones basedon body functions are. It ether goes out of the brain or to it.


http://en.wikipedia....icial_pacemaker

It clear that we are not taking about implaints...


We are talking about alternative ways of controling the body without the mind, which some (you?) claim is impossible.


You could directly affect the spinal cord rather than the brain.

#799
CavScout

CavScout
  • Members
  • 1 601 messages

KingZayd wrote...

CavScout wrote...

ohupthis wrote...

SubAstris wrote...

1) What you linked to doesn't invalidate what I said
2) "intecidy"- WTF? Do you mean "intensity"? We know that the faster the indoctrination, the more likely. The fact that there is no way to calculate works against IT, since we don't even know if it would be possible without melting his brains



That's totally evident during the scene where Shep shoots Anderson, as TIM is showing THE POWER it HAS, instantly Shep shoots Anderson, and during the scene the INDOCTRINATION black-oily visuals appear, along with I might add, the Reaper-growl.


Shep and Anderson had their bodies controled. Nothing suggests indoctrination....


Except the fact that this device was only obtained after studying indoctrination. Why is it that the reapers can't do this?


You don't even know what the device was. Yet you claim to know what it can do. Fact is, Anderson and Shep were lucid. They didn't lose their minds.

PS: You think the scene is not real anyways. Why so serious?

#800
KingZayd

KingZayd
  • Members
  • 5 344 messages

CavScout wrote...

KingZayd wrote...

EpyonX3 wrote...

KingZayd wrote...


And what else is it? He's been studying indoctrination. Whatever he has is based on that research. Are you suggesting he's been able to come up with a technology beyond the reapers? TIM's a remarkable man indeed, but I think you overestimate him.


No I'm not saying that at all. What I'm saying is that he researched Indoctrination to figure out how to gain control over people.

He reverse engineered it and made it his own. Just like he tells you in the final scene. A lot of tech in the future is reverse engineered from reaper tech. This provides grounds to possibility of reverse engineering Indoctrnation.


But the reapers like to control people too? Something like that would be really useful against Shepard. Why does TIM's device work better than the Reapers' own tech?


Considering TIM dies, how much better was it?


Considering that the Reapers die too (according to the face value interpretation) and TIM gets closer to stopping Shepard? it's certainly better.