1357 réponses à ce sujet

[dreman9999]

EpyonX3 wrote...

Tom Lehrer wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

Gorkan86 wrote...

What is the difference, it was a dream or a hallucination? He still on Earth, according to (any)IT.

There is a difference....Hallucination theory has shep on the citadel. Dream has him on earth. 

Does it matter? Both say its all just a bad dream like some halfassed thriller movie.

And that he ends up being indoctrinated if he chooses anything but destroy.

The other 2 ending are just Shepard submitting to the reapers.

[Gorkan86]

Can you point me to this Hallucination IT tread? I would be grateful.

[EpyonX3]

dreman9999 wrote...

EpyonX3 wrote...

Tom Lehrer wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

Gorkan86 wrote...

What is the difference, it was a dream or a hallucination? He still on Earth, according to (any)IT.

There is a difference....Hallucination theory has shep on the citadel. Dream has him on earth. 

Does it matter? Both say its all just a bad dream like some halfassed thriller movie.

And that he ends up being indoctrinated if he chooses anything but destroy.

The other 2 ending are just Shepard submitting to the reapers.

Like I said, anything but destroy.

[CavScout]

balance5050 wrote...

 This handily expesses I.T.

[Image Snip]

You misspelled hardly.

[CavScout]

dreman9999 wrote...
Sharks don't natually attack human. Look it up.

They don't attack humans in an unnatural way....

1. I'm just using thefact given from the lore. The lore stated their no sign till it's too late. IT is just bring the point that it soon will be that point but not yet.

You're not using fact; you trying to twist lore to say that you can't prove indoctrination because indoctrination would never show you being indoctrinated. It's as silly as claiming anything that debunks IT as being part of IT and therefore not capable of debunking IT.

2. What proof? Their is no proof the kid is real. Post it, please.

It's called the game.

3. If you bring yourself  to be exposed into a danger or contague area, their chances a negative effect will happen. I'm also just bring up the point that has a lot of flaws. By your logic, swiming in a pool will  mean I would get eatten by Sharks or swim in the part of theocean with no sharks will indanger me of getting eat by sharks. It not the same case of you "water" referance being that bring in water doen't mean I'm putting my self in danger. I wouldn't get eaten by sharks by bathing would I? Point being, Everytime Shepard is near a reaper device...He puts himself indanger of being indoctrination. My point is that it's acase of swimingwith sharks becasue being in indoctrination wave is alway dangerous, while being in water, based on the chance of being eaten by sharks by being in it , is not. We arenot using that leep of logic here...You are.

Just because you are near sick people isn't proof that you are sick yourself. As for logic, you doing it all wrong. It's probably above your pay grade.

4. It's deductive because is calcualitive of sound facts.

Like logic, you use terms like "deductive" without actually knowing what they mean.

[CavScout]

dreman9999 wrote...

Gorkan86 wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

Gorkan86 wrote...

Shepard have artificial eyes, so what?

They are red...Not Blue.

And Red eyes means?  
Eye color affects what?

 
 
 
......
I the eye and the technical shape is a sign of indoctrination....

Correlation is not causation. Nor have you provided images of folks absorbed by beams with blue eyes... you know like Shep was.

[dreman9999]

CavScout wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

Gorkan86 wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

Gorkan86 wrote...

Shepard have artificial eyes, so what?

They are red...Not Blue.

And Red eyes means?  
Eye color affects what?

 
 
 
......
I the eye and the technical shape is a sign of indoctrination....

Correlation is not causation. Nor have you provided images of folks absorbed by beams with blue eyes... you know like Shep was.

That's like saying just because you a have a fever,coughing and sneezing, it doesn't prove you sick. That's flat out denial.

[dreman9999]

CavScout wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...
Sharks don't natually attack human. Look it up.

They don't attack humans in an unnatural way....

1. I'm just using thefact given from the lore. The lore stated their no sign till it's too late. IT is just bring the point that it soon will be that point but not yet.

You're not using fact; you trying to twist lore to say that you can't prove indoctrination because indoctrination would never show you being indoctrinated. It's as silly as claiming anything that debunks IT as being part of IT and therefore not capable of debunking IT.

2. What proof? Their is no proof the kid is real. Post it, please.

It's called the game.

3. If you bring yourself  to be exposed into a danger or contague area, their chances a negative effect will happen. I'm also just bring up the point that has a lot of flaws. By your logic, swiming in a pool will  mean I would get eatten by Sharks or swim in the part of theocean with no sharks will indanger me of getting eat by sharks. It not the same case of you "water" referance being that bring in water doen't mean I'm putting my self in danger. I wouldn't get eaten by sharks by bathing would I? Point being, Everytime Shepard is near a reaper device...He puts himself indanger of being indoctrination. My point is that it's acase of swimingwith sharks becasue being in indoctrination wave is alway dangerous, while being in water, based on the chance of being eaten by sharks by being in it , is not. We arenot using that leep of logic here...You are.

Just because you are near sick people isn't proof that you are sick yourself. As for logic, you doing it all wrong. It's probably above your pay grade.

4. It's deductive because is calcualitive of sound facts.

Like logic, you use terms like "deductive" without actually knowing what they mean.

I think you need to read the lore more. You can't even understand it.