True, but at most he can try to sway you and try to convince you because it's clear he can't control the situation, that's definitely not dictating terms.The Angry One wrote...
The leader of the Reapers. It is not an impartial information giver by definition.
And? Because it is the Reapers' goal it is a bad thing? That would be up to the player, it's like hating on Saren because he believes in transhumanism.The Catalyst's goal is to stop the supposed conflict, which it believes synthesis will do.
The Reapers believe their form to be superior, and that all who become it are ascended.
Synthesis may be different from Reaperisation in method, but it is in principle the same thing, fushing organic and synthetic into a new life form. This is Reaperisation only on some kind of molecular scale (let's ignore the crushingly bad science of that).
Synthesis isn't inherently bad, you can hate fervorously the idea of the Reapers and the procces of their construction but you don't have to hate synthesis, the basic idea might be the same but the result is vastly different. That said I agree it has dire moral implications, but that's a discussion for other time.
No it isn't, the Catalyst is a logic being, logic dictates that losing the Reapers is the worst possible outcome for it's solution, it makes no sense, on the other hand I can see why the Crucible might detroy all synthetics, both as a conscious or collateral effect of it's function.It destroys all synthetics. This is more the Catalyst's philosophy than organic species.
Or a design choice, or a side effect, or speculation.In the cycles, synthetics are often victims of the Reapers as well, such as the zha'til. Destroy as it currently functions feels more like a creator-designed failsafe than an anti-Reaper device speficially.
We are never explained what changes the crucible produced on it, it doesn't mean the crucible changed it's philosophy or viewpoint, besides those new possibilities are tied to the crucible and the crucible only can do that much.It claims that the Crucible has "changed" it and it's solution is no longer valid.
Why must we be rigidly held to these new solutions? It is either lying, or Shepard is stupid for not even trying to make it see reason.
We don't know that, the information on the Mars archives might have been incomplete, or maybe the Protheans discovered pieces of information that didn't reveal the nature of the Catalyst itself until they found about it later, and the Mars info was outdated, or maybe not. Point is: we don't know and BioWare can make something up if they want.Yes. I can prove it with the fact that this info is not in the Crucible files.
It is ludicrous to believe that these plans would survive every single cycle but nothing else. Literally, all you would need is a picture of the Citadel among the Crucible files.
Retour en haut
Some 'what happened' talks after Normandy crash.
