http://www.gamestar....51,2567510.html
Was haltet ihr davon? Möglicherweise werden wir erhört und wir bekommen tatsächlich ein neues Ende.
Modifié par xxx_Overlord_xxx, 06 mai 2012 - 12:17 .
Extended Cut - Mehr als erwartet?
Débuté par
xxx_Overlord_xxx
, mai 06 2012 12:08
#1
Posté 06 mai 2012 - 12:08
xxx_Overlord_xxx
-
- Members
- 38 messages
Fand auf der Gamestar-Seite eine interessante News:
http://www.gamestar....51,2567510.html
Was haltet ihr davon? Möglicherweise werden wir erhört und wir bekommen tatsächlich ein neues Ende.
http://www.gamestar....51,2567510.html
Was haltet ihr davon? Möglicherweise werden wir erhört und wir bekommen tatsächlich ein neues Ende.
Retour en haut
#2
Posté 06 mai 2012 - 12:21
miko07749
-
- Members
- 88 messages
Gamestar waren aber auch die, die das Ende als "würdigen Abschluss" bezeichnet haben und "So muss man eine Trilogie beenden".
Bei denen bin ich mittlerweile ganz vorsichtig.
Bei denen bin ich mittlerweile ganz vorsichtig.
#3
Posté 06 mai 2012 - 12:35
Deflecter
-
- Members
- 362 messages
bin der selben meinung wie miko
aber, dass die original-sprecher wieder neuen content aufnehmen ist aufjedenfall mal ein Fingerzeig in die richtige Richtung... es ist einfach zu bezweifeln, dass jetzt die sprecher wegen einiger weniger zeilen ins studio beordert werden ... da kommt definitiv mehr auf uns zu (beim outro und vor/während der "hammer" landungsaktion)
aber, dass die original-sprecher wieder neuen content aufnehmen ist aufjedenfall mal ein Fingerzeig in die richtige Richtung... es ist einfach zu bezweifeln, dass jetzt die sprecher wegen einiger weniger zeilen ins studio beordert werden ... da kommt definitiv mehr auf uns zu (beim outro und vor/während der "hammer" landungsaktion)
#5
Posté 06 mai 2012 - 12:54
Lord_WImpus
-
- Members
- 85 messages
miko07749 wrote...
Gamestar waren aber auch die, die das Ende als "würdigen Abschluss" bezeichnet haben und "So muss man eine Trilogie beenden".
Bei denen bin ich mittlerweile ganz vorsichtig.
Auf die Wertungen der meisten Spielezeitschriften kann man doch heute eh keinen Pfifferling mehr geben.
#6
Posté 06 mai 2012 - 12:58
Lord_WImpus
-
- Members
- 85 messages
Deflecter wrote...
bin der selben meinung wie miko
aber, dass die original-sprecher wieder neuen content aufnehmen ist aufjedenfall mal ein Fingerzeig in die richtige Richtung... es ist einfach zu bezweifeln, dass jetzt die sprecher wegen einiger weniger zeilen ins studio beordert werden ... da kommt definitiv mehr auf uns zu (beim outro und vor/während der "hammer" landungsaktion)
Auch nach dem "Weekes Interview" (wer es nicht kennt http://social.biowar...dex/11154234/5 zu urteilen, kommt da echt was echt Geniales auf uns zu (hoffentlich)
Modifié par Lord_WImpus, 06 mai 2012 - 12:59 .
#7
Posté 06 mai 2012 - 01:05
Deflecter
-
- Members
- 362 messages
AUSZUG aus dem Englischen Forum: 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Okay, here is what I asked Patrick Weekes,
and his answers as best as I can remember them. I've paraphrased but
I'm doing my best to stick to what he said rather than introduce any
interpretation.
THESE ARE NOT DIRECT QUOTES.
-Is there still a setting to explore after the ending? Is everything ruined?
The setting is definitely not ruined. We still have a big, lively galaxy.
-Will
long-distance superluminal travel still be possible post-Ending? (will
Tali or Wrex or Garrus see their homeworlds again? Will everyone
starve?)
Galactic civilization will rebuild. The
mass relays were not necessary for interstellar flight. Remember, what
does it say in the Codex about the speed of ships? That's right, 12
lightyears per (day? hour? minute?). And that's only the cruising speed,
not the maximum speed.
People have never needed to research
basic FTL improvements before because they have mass relays. With the
relays gone, new technology will increase that speed. Additionally, the
element zero cores of the dead/controlled Reapers can be used to improve
FTL drives.
Starflight will continue using conventional FTL.
-Why did Joker leave Shep behind?
Joker would never abandon Shep without a good reason. Hopefully this will be clear in the Expanded Cut.
-Why can EDI survive the Destroy ending?
We
argued a lot about this, I said that she was made of Reapertech and
should therefore be destroyed, but (unclear, don't remember - wish I'd
been able to ask a followup as his response doesn't make much sense)
-Did anyone on the Citadel survive?
Yes.
We would never, ever do anything that made the player feel, on replay,
that it would be better for everyone on the Citadel if they just died.
The Citadel has emergency shelters and kinetic barriers - even if it
blows up, millions might survive. You should assume that everyone plot-important on the Citadel survived.
-Is it better for Kelly Chambers if we talk her into suicide?
No, see above.
-Who wrote the death of Joker's sister?
I did! We intentionally did not connect the dots. We were very interested to see how fast gamers figured it out.
-Whose idea was it to make the Rayya fall out of the sky if you destroy the Quarian fleet?
Someone in the audio department, it was brilliant.
-Did the mass relays pull an Arrival and go supernova?
No, they didn't. (i'm paraphrasing here, please don't interpret this too hard) They overloaded, they didn't rupture.We
really didn't mean to imply that the whole galaxy had been destroyed.
People interpreted the ending in ways we really didn't expect.
(Mr.
Weekes dropped a lot of hints that he really didn't like the ending. He
also said something that was almost 100% verbatim from the Penny Arcade
Forum post often attributed to him)
-Why did Legion pull a 180 from his Mass Effect 2 philosophy?
He
and the Geth were backed into a corner. They'd been made a lot dumber
by the attack on the Dyson swarm. There was no other choice for Geth
survival.
-What was up with the Rachni story? Why did we get railroaded?
Welcome
to game development. In some games (Alpha Protocol) they make a bold
choice where some decisions can knock entire missions out of the story.
At BioWare, we never want people to be locked out of content due to a
decision several games ago. We just didn't have the resources to do an
alternate for the Rachni mission, so we decided that the Rachni mission
could occur whether or not players saved the Queen.
-Why didn't (X squadmate from ME2) return?
There
was a very ugly month of development where we fought out who would
return. We knew we had to have a smaller cast so we could fit in more
squad banter. Eventually we decided to bring Garrus and Tali back, so
they could be squadmates in all three games. We also knew we'd have Vega
in order for new players to have someone dumber than they were.
I
was very resentful of Vega at first because I thought he was taking a
slot that could've gone to a ME2 character, but he grew on me.
-Why did EDI have cameltoe?
We don't get a lot of feedback from the art department but (unclear, wish I remembered this better
)
Lots
of discussion about how he was uncomfortable doing Pinocchio stories
for both Legion and EDI because 'EDI was fine, she was an AI, she was
cool - do we really need her to turn into Commander Data? We had seven
seasons of Data, that was enough.'
-Why did you write Pinocchio stories for all the synthetic characters?
See above
-What was up with the Human Reaper in ME2? Why did it look so dumb?
We
wanted to use the Suicide Mission to show several steps of the Reaper
development process, from human reaper embryo all the way to cuttlefish.
But the mission grew too complicated so it was cut for time.
Do the Reapers really only generate one capital ship per cycle? How do they ever break even?
Well,
we never totally pinned that down. But this cycle was really anomalous.
They don't normally take any capital-size Reaper losses at all.
-What was up with Kai Leng? How do you feel about him?
We
really wanted to have a recurring antagonist for Shep, a 'Darth Maul'
(his words). But I feel like there was some definite conflict between
cutscene and gameplay there, and I think it's something we have to work
on.
'He was a great antagonist in the books'
-Why did we only get top and bottom dialogue choices, no middle?
Part
of it was resources. Part of it is that Mass Effect 3 is a war story
and it's really hard for Shep to feel middling about the Reapers.
-How did YOU feel about the ending?
(I didn't ask this, but he seems to have gone to GREAT lengths to think ways around a lot of stuff the ending implied.)
Why no female (alien X?)
Resource
limitations. They have a very strict budget for how many different
characters they can use in a given area. Some are basically free - if
you have human males you have Batarians because they're humans with
funny heads, if you have human females you have asari, etc.
Where was Harbinger? Can we ASSUME DIRECT CONTROL of him?
I definitely want more closure on Harbinger. That'd be hilarious. Stop punching yourself, Harbinger.
How did the Reapers storm the Citadel? Why didn't they shut down the relays as per their original plan once they had control?
Originally
we planned to have a cutscene of Reapers taking over, Reaper monsters
punching buttons, et cetera. But we cut it, partially for resource
reasons and partly because it disrupted the pacing.
The Reapers
didn't shut down the mass relays because the Keepers interfered with
that. (I wish I could've asked a follow-up here, it doesn't make much
sense.)
Why don't Ken and Gabby have more dialogue?
They
actually have a bunch more on disk, but we somehow introduced a bug
where their dialogue is tied to your approval level with Ash. If Ash has
low approval, or isn't present, most of Ken and Gabby's dialogue won't
play.
Why do you guys do Star Wars style space battles instead of the battles described in the codex?
We
want to provide a familiar, compelling visual experience for people who
grew up on Star Wars and stuff like that. These are some of our
favorite parts of the game.
***
Things I wish I'd asked:
Why the drat Starchild?
What was up with the Stargazer? (He touched on the Stargazer once and pretty much said 'oh, yeah, the Stargazer.'
Again:
NOT DIRECT QUOTES. These are NOT OFFICIAL BIOWARE STATEMENTS. Please
don't gently caress Patrick Weekes over by posting these as 'official
BioWare PR' or whatever. Please feel free to ask me follow-up questions,
as I definitely didn't cover the whole conversation with him.
My
takeaway was: the epilogue DLC is probably going to do a lot of good
and be pretty well written, and Patrick Weekes should've been lead
writer on ME3.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
auserdem scheint das "Character Design"-Team stark in den EC eingebunden zu werden :innocent:
wer weiß, vllt arbeiten sie ja an "happy ends" mit gerenderten tali-ingame-face
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Okay, here is what I asked Patrick Weekes,
and his answers as best as I can remember them. I've paraphrased but
I'm doing my best to stick to what he said rather than introduce any
interpretation.
THESE ARE NOT DIRECT QUOTES.
-Is there still a setting to explore after the ending? Is everything ruined?
The setting is definitely not ruined. We still have a big, lively galaxy.
-Will
long-distance superluminal travel still be possible post-Ending? (will
Tali or Wrex or Garrus see their homeworlds again? Will everyone
starve?)
Galactic civilization will rebuild. The
mass relays were not necessary for interstellar flight. Remember, what
does it say in the Codex about the speed of ships? That's right, 12
lightyears per (day? hour? minute?). And that's only the cruising speed,
not the maximum speed.
People have never needed to research
basic FTL improvements before because they have mass relays. With the
relays gone, new technology will increase that speed. Additionally, the
element zero cores of the dead/controlled Reapers can be used to improve
FTL drives.
Starflight will continue using conventional FTL.-Why did Joker leave Shep behind?
Joker would never abandon Shep without a good reason. Hopefully this will be clear in the Expanded Cut.
-Why can EDI survive the Destroy ending?
We
argued a lot about this, I said that she was made of Reapertech and
should therefore be destroyed, but (unclear, don't remember - wish I'd
been able to ask a followup as his response doesn't make much sense)
-Did anyone on the Citadel survive?
Yes.
We would never, ever do anything that made the player feel, on replay,
that it would be better for everyone on the Citadel if they just died.
The Citadel has emergency shelters and kinetic barriers - even if it
blows up, millions might survive.
You should assume that everyone plot-important on the Citadel survived. -Is it better for Kelly Chambers if we talk her into suicide?
No, see above.
-Who wrote the death of Joker's sister?
I did! We intentionally did not connect the dots. We were very interested to see how fast gamers figured it out.
-Whose idea was it to make the Rayya fall out of the sky if you destroy the Quarian fleet?
Someone in the audio department, it was brilliant.
-Did the mass relays pull an Arrival and go supernova?
No, they didn't. (i'm paraphrasing here, please don't interpret this too hard) They overloaded, they didn't rupture.
Wereally didn't mean to imply that the whole galaxy had been destroyed.
People interpreted the ending in ways we really didn't expect.
(Mr.
Weekes dropped a lot of hints that he really didn't like the ending. He
also said something that was almost 100% verbatim from the Penny Arcade
Forum post often attributed to him)
-Why did Legion pull a 180 from his Mass Effect 2 philosophy?
He
and the Geth were backed into a corner. They'd been made a lot dumber
by the attack on the Dyson swarm. There was no other choice for Geth
survival.
-What was up with the Rachni story? Why did we get railroaded?
Welcome
to game development. In some games (Alpha Protocol) they make a bold
choice where some decisions can knock entire missions out of the story.
At BioWare, we never want people to be locked out of content due to a
decision several games ago. We just didn't have the resources to do an
alternate for the Rachni mission, so we decided that the Rachni mission
could occur whether or not players saved the Queen.
-Why didn't (X squadmate from ME2) return?
There
was a very ugly month of development where we fought out who would
return. We knew we had to have a smaller cast so we could fit in more
squad banter. Eventually we decided to bring Garrus and Tali back, so
they could be squadmates in all three games. We also knew we'd have Vega
in order for new players to have someone dumber than they were.
I
was very resentful of Vega at first because I thought he was taking a
slot that could've gone to a ME2 character, but he grew on me.
-Why did EDI have cameltoe?
We don't get a lot of feedback from the art department but (unclear, wish I remembered this better
)Lots
of discussion about how he was uncomfortable doing Pinocchio stories
for both Legion and EDI because 'EDI was fine, she was an AI, she was
cool - do we really need her to turn into Commander Data? We had seven
seasons of Data, that was enough.'
-Why did you write Pinocchio stories for all the synthetic characters?
See above
-What was up with the Human Reaper in ME2? Why did it look so dumb?
We
wanted to use the Suicide Mission to show several steps of the Reaper
development process, from human reaper embryo all the way to cuttlefish.
But the mission grew too complicated so it was cut for time.
Do the Reapers really only generate one capital ship per cycle? How do they ever break even?
Well,
we never totally pinned that down. But this cycle was really anomalous.
They don't normally take any capital-size Reaper losses at all.
-What was up with Kai Leng? How do you feel about him?
We
really wanted to have a recurring antagonist for Shep, a 'Darth Maul'
(his words). But I feel like there was some definite conflict between
cutscene and gameplay there, and I think it's something we have to work
on.
'He was a great antagonist in the books'
-Why did we only get top and bottom dialogue choices, no middle?
Part
of it was resources. Part of it is that Mass Effect 3 is a war story
and it's really hard for Shep to feel middling about the Reapers.
-How did YOU feel about the ending?
(I didn't ask this, but he seems to have gone to GREAT lengths to think ways around a lot of stuff the ending implied.)
Why no female (alien X?)
Resource
limitations. They have a very strict budget for how many different
characters they can use in a given area. Some are basically free - if
you have human males you have Batarians because they're humans with
funny heads, if you have human females you have asari, etc.
Where was Harbinger? Can we ASSUME DIRECT CONTROL of him?
I definitely want more closure on Harbinger. That'd be hilarious. Stop punching yourself, Harbinger.
How did the Reapers storm the Citadel? Why didn't they shut down the relays as per their original plan once they had control?
Originally
we planned to have a cutscene of Reapers taking over, Reaper monsters
punching buttons, et cetera. But we cut it, partially for resource
reasons and partly because it disrupted the pacing.
The Reapers
didn't shut down the mass relays because the Keepers interfered with
that. (I wish I could've asked a follow-up here, it doesn't make much
sense.)
Why don't Ken and Gabby have more dialogue?
They
actually have a bunch more on disk, but we somehow introduced a bug
where their dialogue is tied to your approval level with Ash. If Ash has
low approval, or isn't present, most of Ken and Gabby's dialogue won't
play.
Why do you guys do Star Wars style space battles instead of the battles described in the codex?
We
want to provide a familiar, compelling visual experience for people who
grew up on Star Wars and stuff like that. These are some of our
favorite parts of the game.
***
Things I wish I'd asked:
Why the drat Starchild?
What was up with the Stargazer? (He touched on the Stargazer once and pretty much said 'oh, yeah, the Stargazer.'
Again:
NOT DIRECT QUOTES. These are NOT OFFICIAL BIOWARE STATEMENTS. Please
don't gently caress Patrick Weekes over by posting these as 'official
BioWare PR' or whatever. Please feel free to ask me follow-up questions,
as I definitely didn't cover the whole conversation with him.
My
takeaway was: the epilogue DLC is probably going to do a lot of good
and be pretty well written, and Patrick Weekes should've been lead
writer on ME3.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
auserdem scheint das "Character Design"-Team stark in den EC eingebunden zu werden :innocent:
wer weiß, vllt arbeiten sie ja an "happy ends" mit gerenderten tali-ingame-face
#8
Posté 06 mai 2012 - 02:06
Lord_WImpus
-
- Members
- 85 messages
Die Quotes mit den Sirenen sind wie Balsam für die Seelen und gebrochenen Herzen der ME-Fans ... so genial
... so genial
Modifié par Lord_WImpus, 06 mai 2012 - 02:06 .
#9
Posté 07 mai 2012 - 09:34
Kane Dragonheart
-
- Members
- 116 messages
Ich habe mich die ganze Zeit gewundert warum alle so über die Enden abgegangen sind. Die hervorgehobenen Quotes bzgl. des Überlichtreisens waren doch logisch oder nicht? Ich hab das mehrfach in Threads geschrieben, die Zerstörung einer Technologie zerstört nicht den Effekt der sie ermöglicht. Das wär ja so als wenn wir eine Rutsche, die uns aufgrund der Gravitation von A nach B bringt kaputt machen und auf einmal is keine Gravitation mehr da.
Naja, was auch immer sich die Leute da ausgemalt haben, viel Glück mit der extended version.
Naja, was auch immer sich die Leute da ausgemalt haben, viel Glück mit der extended version.
#10
Guest_sekxileen_*
Posté 07 mai 2012 - 11:23
Guest_sekxileen_*
Guest_sekxileen_*
-
- Guests
Es ist also bestätigt das der Sprecher von Kaidan neue Aufnahmen für ME 3 macht, schön für alle die ihn seit Teil 2 schon nicht mehr dabei haben. Welch tragende Rolle soll er denn wohl bekommen? Ich glaube den ganzen Mist erst wenn ich es sehe.
#11
Posté 08 mai 2012 - 06:58
Andrycha
-
- Members
- 65 messages
sekxileen wrote...
Es ist also bestätigt das der Sprecher von Kaidan neue Aufnahmen für ME 3 macht, schön für alle die ihn seit Teil 2 schon nicht mehr dabei haben. Welch tragende Rolle soll er denn wohl bekommen? Ich glaube den ganzen Mist erst wenn ich es sehe.
Widersehen im Jehnseits? Aber auch wenn er auf Virmire überlebte, besteht immer noch die möglichkeit ihn auf der Citadel bei der Udina's Verrrat mission zu erledigen (vermute ich mal, da bei mir es die Ashley war aber ich denke mal die stränge sind identisch ? )
Von daher das dieser Charakter als erster (?) bei den Arbeiten zum EC drankommt ist etwas seltsam, ich vermutre eher es geht um einen DLC
Modifié par Andrycha, 08 mai 2012 - 07:00 .
#12
Posté 08 mai 2012 - 07:06
at-1000
-
- Members
- 886 messages
es kann ja aber auch sein das die anderen sprecher es garnicht gesagt haben das sie eingeladen wurden.
#13
Posté 08 mai 2012 - 07:07
Eariel101
-
- Members
- 1 449 messages
Eher nicht, man will ja das Ende nur "besser erklären"xxx_Overlord_xxx wrote...
Was haltet ihr davon? Möglicherweise werden wir erhört und wir bekommen tatsächlich ein neues Ende.
. Wie auch immer, es könnte ebenso für weiteren DLC sein und da man gerne, um Kosten zu sparen, alles in einem Aufwasch macht, wirds wohl gleich für verschiedenen Content sein, neben dem EC.
#14
Posté 08 mai 2012 - 10:00
Mortal Kasi 78
-
- Members
- 283 messages
Also manche sachen da oben im Interview glaubt der doch wohl selber nicht, oder? Sie haben nicht damit gerechnet das die Spieler die Zerstörung der Masse Protale nicht als Zerstörung der Galaxis Interpretieren würden? Tssss.. also wirklich.
Noch besser das mit der Rachni Storyline, sagt für mich alles über die Entwicklung aus. Da musste ja unbedingt ein halbgarer Multiplayer ins Spiel, das hat man nun davon. Ausserdem warum spiele ich denn ME seit Teil 1? Warum traf ich in den anderen Teilen entscheidungen? Das sind genau die aussagen die ein Fan hören will, ganz großes Kino.
By the Way, Alpha Protocol ist ein Super Spiel und irgendwie liebe ich es nach dieser aussage noch mehr, stichwort Wiederspielwert Mr. Weekes.
Noch besser das mit der Rachni Storyline, sagt für mich alles über die Entwicklung aus. Da musste ja unbedingt ein halbgarer Multiplayer ins Spiel, das hat man nun davon. Ausserdem warum spiele ich denn ME seit Teil 1? Warum traf ich in den anderen Teilen entscheidungen? Das sind genau die aussagen die ein Fan hören will, ganz großes Kino.
By the Way, Alpha Protocol ist ein Super Spiel und irgendwie liebe ich es nach dieser aussage noch mehr, stichwort Wiederspielwert Mr. Weekes.
Modifié par Mortal Kasi 78, 09 mai 2012 - 11:36 .
#15
Posté 09 mai 2012 - 10:20
Lord_WImpus
-
- Members
- 85 messages
#16
Posté 09 mai 2012 - 12:21
Lord_WImpus
-
- Members
- 85 messages
Und noch was ....
https://www.examiner...ctors-recording ' class='bbc_url' title='Lien externe' rel='nofollow external'> https://www.examiner...ctors-recording
http://www.ibtimes.c...elease-date.htm ' class='bbc_url' title='Lien externe' rel='nofollow external'> http://www.ibtimes.c...elease-date.htm
Mark Meer (Male Shep) und Jennifer Hale (Female Shep) sollen anscheinend auch wieder mit von der Partie
sein
https://www.examiner...ctors-recording ' class='bbc_url' title='Lien externe' rel='nofollow external'> https://www.examiner...ctors-recording
http://www.ibtimes.c...elease-date.htm ' class='bbc_url' title='Lien externe' rel='nofollow external'> http://www.ibtimes.c...elease-date.htm
Mark Meer (Male Shep) und Jennifer Hale (Female Shep) sollen anscheinend auch wieder mit von der Partie
sein
#17
Posté 09 mai 2012 - 12:45
Deflecter
-
- Members
- 362 messages
es wird erst ein zufriendenstellender DLC, wenn Anderson, TIM und Harbinger wieder dabei sind ...
#18
Posté 09 mai 2012 - 04:12
Surenas
-
- Members
- 1 061 messages
Yup, gebt den Toten eine 2te Chance zu sterben - in slow motion...
#19
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 01:17
Ahnenzorn
-
- Members
- 60 messages
es wird erst ein zufriedenstellender DLC wenn das ... godchild raus geschnitten wurde.
#20
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 01:35
geridrik
-
- Members
- 268 messages
Ahnenzorn wrote...
es wird erst ein zufriedenstellender DLC wenn das ... godchild raus geschnitten wurde.
dein wort in gottes ohr!
#21
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 01:56
greymouse
-
- Members
- 305 messages
Ich hatte erst die Hoffnung, das der EC doch etwas Ausführlicheres wird. Der Begriff "Sommer" umschliest ja einige Monate und in der Zeit kan man schon einiges auf die Beine stellen. Aber da sie bereits mit den Stimmenaufnahmen begonnen zu haben scheinen oder bald beginnen werden, hat sie sich wieder gelegt.
Wenn ich den ganzen Produktionsprozess richtig verstanden habe kommen die Stimmaufnahmen doch ziemlich zum Schluss. Oder möchte jemand korrigieren und mir wieder einen Grund zur Hoffnung geben? Darüber wäre ich sehr dankbar ^^
Wenn ich den ganzen Produktionsprozess richtig verstanden habe kommen die Stimmaufnahmen doch ziemlich zum Schluss. Oder möchte jemand korrigieren und mir wieder einen Grund zur Hoffnung geben? Darüber wäre ich sehr dankbar ^^
#22
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 02:13
Jussylein
-
- Members
- 695 messages
Nein eigentlich nicht, es kann während der Produktion begonnen werden, das heißt wenn die Entwickler mit dem Spiel noch nicht fertig sind, das sie zumindest die Sprachaufnahmen schon machen können, da ja der Script schon steht, und dann später vom Audio Producer alles wieder so eingefügt werden kann, wie es vom Entwickler vorgesehen ist, ich habe spiele schon erlebt wo die Sprachausgabe schon fertig war 3 Monate davor, obwohl das Spiel zu 50 % erst fertig war, das hat absolut nichts zu sagen, mit den Synchronsprechern.
#23
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 02:42
greymouse
-
- Members
- 305 messages
Ah, o.k. Also doch noch Hoffnung. Danke =D
Ich hatte immer angenommen das sie recht spät erfolgen da, wenn man mal Aufnahmen aus Synchronstudios sieht, sie immer einen Bildschirm mit der entsprächenden Szene haben, damit die Sprecher wissen, wann sie zu sprechen haben (oder so ähnlich). Deshalb nahm ich an, das dann alles andere schon stehen müsste. Aber da bin ich jetzt wieder etwas schlauer geworden. Danke, Lady Of Darkness ^^
Ich hatte immer angenommen das sie recht spät erfolgen da, wenn man mal Aufnahmen aus Synchronstudios sieht, sie immer einen Bildschirm mit der entsprächenden Szene haben, damit die Sprecher wissen, wann sie zu sprechen haben (oder so ähnlich). Deshalb nahm ich an, das dann alles andere schon stehen müsste. Aber da bin ich jetzt wieder etwas schlauer geworden. Danke, Lady Of Darkness ^^
#24
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 02:49
Jussylein
-
- Members
- 695 messages
greymouse wrote...
Ah, o.k. Also doch noch Hoffnung. Danke =D
Ich hatte immer angenommen das sie recht spät erfolgen da, wenn man mal Aufnahmen aus Synchronstudios sieht, sie immer einen Bildschirm mit der entsprächenden Szene haben, damit die Sprecher wissen, wann sie zu sprechen haben (oder so ähnlich). Deshalb nahm ich an, das dann alles andere schon stehen müsste. Aber da bin ich jetzt wieder etwas schlauer geworden. Danke, Lady Of Darkness ^^
Hi, ach kein Problem, aber das was du beschreibst sind Film aufnahmen aber keine Spiel aufnahmen da sehen die nämlich nicht das Spiel auf einer Leinwand, wenn ich interessiert wie es in einem Tonstudio läuft ich empfehle dir diesen Beitrag :-)
klicke auf das fenster, dann auf Making Of 1 von Black Mirror 2 (Deutsch)
www.butler-bates.de/
Modifié par Lady Of Darkness, 10 mai 2012 - 02:53 .
#25
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 03:31
Surenas
-
- Members
- 1 061 messages
geridrik wrote...
Ahnenzorn wrote...
es wird erst ein zufriedenstellender DLC wenn das ... godchild raus geschnitten wurde.
dein wort in gottes ohr!
Da wird aber nichts rausgeschnitten, vielmehr wird hinzugefügt. Man ist der Ansicht, wir seien morons, denen durch zusätzliche scenes nochmals die eigentliche message verkündet werden muss - das ending ist Mass Effect Realität. Ja für wie indoktrinierbar halten die uns eigentlich? Pitiful.
Modifié par Surenas, 10 mai 2012 - 03:46 .
