Aller au contenu

Photo

Northwest University Professor Under Fire


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
315 réponses à ce sujet

#26
Guest_greengoron89_*

Guest_greengoron89_*
  • Guests

DarkDragon777 wrote...

You know, because violence is, whether you like it or not, a neccesary and unavoidable part of life.


And sex isn't?

Interesting point of view you have there.

#27
Guest_Tigerblood and MilkShakes_*

Guest_Tigerblood and MilkShakes_*
  • Guests
Teaching is teaching.
if they were warrened before hand and told the extra event would be highly adultlike.then i see no wrong.

#28
DarkDragon777

DarkDragon777
  • Members
  • 1 956 messages

greengoron89 wrote...

DarkDragon777 wrote...

You know, because violence is, whether you like it or not, a neccesary and unavoidable part of life.


And sex isn't?

Interesting point of view you have there.


Sex for reproduction is necessary.

Sex for profit, and public nudity isn't.

Modifié par DarkDragon777, 06 mai 2012 - 05:22 .


#29
android654

android654
  • Members
  • 6 105 messages

DarkDragon777 wrote...

Sorry people, our reproductive organs are something we use to reproduce, not flash in public.



Sex. You're doing it so f**king wrong.

Modifié par android654, 06 mai 2012 - 05:38 .


#30
Guest_Tigerblood and MilkShakes_*

Guest_Tigerblood and MilkShakes_*
  • Guests

DarkDragon777 wrote...

greengoron89 wrote...

DarkDragon777 wrote...

You know, because violence is, whether you like it or not, a neccesary and unavoidable part of life.


And sex isn't?

Interesting point of view you have there.


Sex for reproduction is necessary.

Sex for profit, and public nudity isn't.


the profit part i agree,
but

public is an adventure

#31
bmwcrazy

bmwcrazy
  • Members
  • 3 622 messages

DarkDragon777 wrote...

Sex for profit, and public nudity isn't.


Did we read the same article?

This is about study of sexuality in a not-so-public classroom. Not public nudity or prostitution.

*orders an electric saw and a *******

#32
DarkDragon777

DarkDragon777
  • Members
  • 1 956 messages

bmwcrazy wrote...

DarkDragon777 wrote...

Sex for profit, and public nudity isn't.


Did we read the same article?

This is about study of sexuality in a not-so-public classroom. Not public nudity or prostitution.

*orders an electric saw and a *******


Actually I was responding to a statement that the guy with the awesome Morrigan avatar made about being more open about sex in America.

Modifié par DarkDragon777, 06 mai 2012 - 05:34 .


#33
android654

android654
  • Members
  • 6 105 messages

Tigerblood and MilkShakes wrote...

DarkDragon777 wrote...

greengoron89 wrote...

DarkDragon777 wrote...

You know, because violence is, whether you like it or not, a neccesary and unavoidable part of life.


And sex isn't?

Interesting point of view you have there.


Sex for reproduction is necessary.

Sex for profit, and public nudity isn't.


the profit part i agree,
but

public is an adventure


I'm not s sure about that, some countries and cities have figured out how to have prostitution legal and not be a burden on their respective communities. IF you can pull that off, then I don't see the issue with it being for profit.

#34
bmwcrazy

bmwcrazy
  • Members
  • 3 622 messages

android654 wrote...

Sex. You're doing it so f**king wrong.


Psst... You should use the original quote, not the one I fixed.

#35
android654

android654
  • Members
  • 6 105 messages

bmwcrazy wrote...

android654 wrote...

Sex. You're doing it so f**king wrong.


Psst... You should use the original quote, not the one I fixed.


Good catch.

#36
RedArmyShogun

RedArmyShogun
  • Members
  • 6 273 messages
Hmm...


SMUT FOR THE SMUT GOD!

#37
DarkDragon777

DarkDragon777
  • Members
  • 1 956 messages

android654 wrote...

DarkDragon777 wrote...

Sorry people, our reproductive organs are something we use to reproduce, not flash in public.



Sex. You're doing it so f**king wrong.


Your "humor" doesn't actually legitimize your "argument".

#38
Guest_Tigerblood and MilkShakes_*

Guest_Tigerblood and MilkShakes_*
  • Guests

android654 wrote...

Tigerblood and MilkShakes wrote...

DarkDragon777 wrote...

greengoron89 wrote...

DarkDragon777 wrote...

You know, because violence is, whether you like it or not, a neccesary and unavoidable part of life.


And sex isn't?

Interesting point of view you have there.


Sex for reproduction is necessary.

Sex for profit, and public nudity isn't.


the profit part i agree,
but

public is an adventure


I'm not s sure about that, some countries and cities have figured out how to have prostitution legal and not be a burden on their respective communities. IF you can pull that off, then I don't see the issue with it being for profit.


i know some countires have and its worked out decent enough and cut some of the sexual related crimes down.but at the same time more will go for easy money and eventually a super aid will be released cause america will create it in a lab.due to being jelly

i think i know a part of the market ill buy stock into

#39
bmwcrazy

bmwcrazy
  • Members
  • 3 622 messages

DarkDragon777 wrote...

Actually I was responding to a statement that the guy with the awesome Morrigan avatar made about being more open about sex in America.


Well, being "more open" about sex doesn't mean legalizing prostitution and public nudity.

I'm pretty sure the "guy" with the Morrigan avatar is referring to the learning and the understanding part.

#40
slimgrin

slimgrin
  • Members
  • 12 471 messages
In all seriousness, I find it absurd a university would fund what is essentially a live sex show. If there was any educational value to be gleaned from watching a woman shove a power tool in her cooch, the internet would have sufficed.

#41
android654

android654
  • Members
  • 6 105 messages

DarkDragon777 wrote...

android654 wrote...

DarkDragon777 wrote...

Sorry people, our reproductive organs are something we use to reproduce, not flash in public.



Sex. You're doing it so f**king wrong.


Your "humor" doesn't actually legitimize your "argument".


Have you ever had sex before? Taken a lecture on sexuality and it's link to psychology? Ever studied human sexuality?

If you have you'd understand the causation for reproduction comes from the pleasure of sex. No one has sex with the pure intent of reproducing. The reason every mammal exists is because they evolved to a point where sexual activity yields a pleasurable response which causes them to have sex repeatedly. So the reason for sex is pleasurable satisfaction , and reproduction is a production of the satisfaction.

#42
android654

android654
  • Members
  • 6 105 messages

slimgrin wrote...

In all seriousness, I find it absurd a university would fund what is essentially a live sex show. If there was any educational value to be gleaned from watching a woman shove a power tool in her cooch, the internet would have sufficed.


It's not up to the school exactly. It's up to the department of psychology and the head of that department. Like I mentioned earlier, Dr. Bailey has a long resume and history with respect for his work, so if he decided to incorporate this into his lecture there's a good reason for it. He's not some hippy professor out of nowhere, he's a respected scientist and the display was a small portion of the overall lecture. It should also be noted that his course on human sexuality deals with the psychological components of the evolution of sex, its not a how-to-f**k course.

#43
bmwcrazy

bmwcrazy
  • Members
  • 3 622 messages

slimgrin wrote...

In all seriousness, I find it absurd a university would fund what is essentially a live sex show. If there was any educational value to be gleaned from watching a woman shove a power tool in her cooch, the internet would have sufficed.


My friends and I started our own anti-alcohol abuses and alcoholism club and we actually managed to get plenty of funding from the university.

Of course, we used the money to buy alcohols for events and parties on campus in the name of raising awareness of alcohol abuse.

:D

#44
DarkDragon777

DarkDragon777
  • Members
  • 1 956 messages

android654 wrote...

DarkDragon777 wrote...

android654 wrote...

DarkDragon777 wrote...

Sorry people, our reproductive organs are something we use to reproduce, not flash in public.



Sex. You're doing it so f**king wrong.


Your "humor" doesn't actually legitimize your "argument".


Have you ever had sex before? Taken a lecture on sexuality and it's link to psychology? Ever studied human sexuality?

If you have you'd understand the causation for reproduction comes from the pleasure of sex. No one has sex with the pure intent of reproducing. The reason every mammal exists is because they evolved to a point where sexual activity yields a pleasurable response which causes them to have sex repeatedly. So the reason for sex is pleasurable satisfaction , and reproduction is a production of the satisfaction.




Yes, of course, but all I'm saying is that things have gotten a little too out of hand.

Modifié par DarkDragon777, 06 mai 2012 - 06:05 .


#45
slimgrin

slimgrin
  • Members
  • 12 471 messages

android654 wrote...

It's not up to the school exactly. It's up to the department of psychology and the head of that department. Like I mentioned earlier, Dr. Bailey has a long resume and history with respect for his work, so if he decided to incorporate this into his lecture there's a good reason for it. 


What reason? I want to see some speculation here.

#46
termokanden

termokanden
  • Members
  • 5 818 messages

DarkDragon777 wrote...

Yes, of course, but all I'm saying is that things have gotten a little too out of hand.


I have to disagree. A lot of things that shouldn't be taboo still are.

I'm not convinced the live demonstration was necessary though. But you have to agree that it has generated quite a bit of interest :)

#47
RedArmyShogun

RedArmyShogun
  • Members
  • 6 273 messages

android654 wrote...

DarkDragon777 wrote...

android654 wrote...

DarkDragon777 wrote...

Sorry people, our reproductive organs are something we use to reproduce, not flash in public.



Sex. You're doing it so f**king wrong.


Your "humor" doesn't actually legitimize your "argument".


Have you ever had sex before? Taken a lecture on sexuality and it's link to psychology? Ever studied human sexuality?

If you have you'd understand the causation for reproduction comes from the pleasure of sex. No one has sex with the pure intent of reproducing. The reason every mammal exists is because they evolved to a point where sexual activity yields a pleasurable response which causes them to have sex repeatedly. So the reason for sex is pleasurable satisfaction , and reproduction is a production of the satisfaction.





Now that can be thrown out the damn window. Its called having a bit of self control and not being an animal controlled by your urges.

#48
bmwcrazy

bmwcrazy
  • Members
  • 3 622 messages

termokanden wrote...

I have to disagree. A lot of things that shouldn't be taboo still are.

I'm not convinced the live demonstration was necessary though. But you have to agree that it has generated quite a bit of interest :)


Having popular courses means job security.

#49
Sigma Tauri

Sigma Tauri
  • Members
  • 2 675 messages

termokanden wrote...

I have to disagree. A lot of things that shouldn't be taboo still are.

I'm not convinced the live demonstration was necessary though. But you have to agree that it has generated quite a bit of interest :)


If it does gather interest, is necessity really relevant? I think going further on provocation just to generate a dialogue about sexuality is useful.

Like banging a table really loudly just to get people to listen...except naked. Is it necessary? No, but sometimes why not?

#50
Guest_greengoron89_*

Guest_greengoron89_*
  • Guests

bmwcrazy wrote...

DarkDragon777 wrote...

Actually I was responding to a statement that the guy with the awesome Morrigan avatar made about being more open about sex in America.


Well, being "more open" about sex doesn't mean legalizing prostitution and public nudity.

I'm pretty sure the "guy" with the Morrigan avatar is referring to the learning and the understanding part.


LOL. I am indeed a guy, just to clarify - and my avatar is indeed awesome.

It goes beyond just learning and understanding, though - so many people jump at the very sight of even something as simple and harmless as nudity. Are we so puritan still that the idea of showing a woman's breasts on television is shocking and unacceptable? Is there something so wrong with nudity that it must be censored and kept away from our eyes at all costs?

Yet I can turn on TV and see coroners dump the dismembered, rotted remains of a serial killer victim onto an autopsy table in one of the numerous crime dramas that come on numerous channels day in and day out - and nobody seems to bat an eye.

How did it come to be that depictions of violence are more acceptable than a displaying a woman's bare breasts? Does no one other than I see the inherent flaw in these bizarre lines of thought society has about these things?

Modifié par greengoron89, 06 mai 2012 - 06:24 .