Aller au contenu

Photo

For anti IT members please explain the plot holes that IT fills

Débuté par Daddy555 , mai 07 2012 02:47

  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
232 réponses à ce sujet

#26
AlanC9
Posté 07 mai 2012 - 04:24

AlanC9
  • Members
  • 35 769 messages
OK, I guess we can play now. Thanks, slyguy

slyguy200 wrote...
Why your squad is on the normandy


Easy enough. Normandy's both capable of atmospheric flight and armed with Thanix cannons. These are the sort of ships you'd call in to attack the Reapers over London. After they're driven off the Normandy rescues survivors. Can't do anything more for Shepard since the beam is wrecked.

Why ME1 ever happened if the catalyst is in control


He isn't in direct control. Without the catalyst he can't do anything -- otherwise the blue ending would be the easiest to achieve, and it is not. He only controls the Reapers in the sense that they follow their original programming.

#27
Icemix
Posté 07 mai 2012 - 04:25

Icemix
  • Members
  • 412 messages
You want plot holes explained?
Bad last minute writing. Once you understand that Bioware just ****ed up and you stop grasping at straws, you will get it.

#28
AlanC9
Posté 07 mai 2012 - 04:26

AlanC9
  • Members
  • 35 769 messages
Well, yeah.... but where's the fun in that?

#29
bluewolv1970
Posté 07 mai 2012 - 04:28

bluewolv1970
  • Members
  • 1 749 messages

AlanC9 wrote...

OK, I guess we can play now. Thanks, slyguy

slyguy200 wrote...
Why your squad is on the normandy


Easy enough. Normandy's both capable of atmospheric flight and armed with Thanix cannons. These are the sort of ships you'd call in to attack the Reapers over London. After they're driven off the Normandy rescues survivors. Can't do anything more for Shepard since the beam is wrecked.

Why ME1 ever happened if the catalyst is in control


He isn't in direct control. Without the catalyst he can't do anything -- otherwise the blue ending would be the easiest to achieve, and it is not. He only controls the Reapers in the sense that they follow their original programming.


really including the corpsicles...and is the squad SMILING when they get out of the normandy - including shepards LI and the pilot that just mutinied??? are they just excited Shepard is dead and or missing and Earth was ravaged???  

#30
LightningSamus
Posté 07 mai 2012 - 04:30

LightningSamus
  • Members
  • 476 messages
I'd rather wait for the extended cut that hear all these opinions but the DLC isn't out yet so i have no choice.

I don't beleive anyone's opinions, i'll find out the real ending when the DLC is released.

#31
Izhalezan
Posté 07 mai 2012 - 04:31

Izhalezan
  • Members
  • 917 messages
How come the millions of years old master control room has human numbers and letters, 1M1.

#32
Icemix
Posté 07 mai 2012 - 04:32

Icemix
  • Members
  • 412 messages

AlanC9 wrote...

Well, yeah.... but where's the fun in that?

Not enough speculations eh?

#33
Guest_slyguy200_*
Posté 07 mai 2012 - 04:32

Guest_slyguy200_*
  • Guests
plot holes:
why does it dismiss our choices

synthesis space magic

Why do paragon and renegade get the same outcomes

Mass relay destruction destroys entire systems, right?

Crew abandons you and somehow manages to get picked up

Additions to the crucible, why involve the catalyst

Those are a few.

Modifié par slyguy200, 07 mai 2012 - 04:33 .

#34
Kaelef
Posté 07 mai 2012 - 04:33

Kaelef
  • Members
  • 1 519 messages

Izhalezan wrote...

How come the millions of years old master control room has human numbers and letters, 1M1.


:lol:

I wondered about that one, too!






And I swear I'll step on a kitten's tail if someone says that's more proof of IT...  :pinched:

Modifié par Kaelef, 07 mai 2012 - 04:34 .

#35
Izhalezan
Posté 07 mai 2012 - 04:35

Izhalezan
  • Members
  • 917 messages

AlanC9 wrote...

Why ME1 ever happened if the catalyst is in control


He isn't in direct control. Without the catalyst he can't do anything -- otherwise the blue ending would be the easiest to achieve, and it is not. He only controls the Reapers in the sense that they follow their original programming.


What..? The Catalyst isn't in direct control of the Catalyst?
I'm going on a limb and assuming his question was more "Why does ME1 happen when the creator of everything Reaper has been on the Citadel the whole time, why didn't he just open the relay himself?"

Modifié par Izhalezan, 07 mai 2012 - 04:39 .

#36
mauro2222
Posté 07 mai 2012 - 04:37

mauro2222
  • Members
  • 4 236 messages

Izhalezan wrote...

How come the millions of years old master control room has human numbers and letters, 1M1.


Even Sur'Kesh has everything written with latin letters and arabic numbers.

#37
Izhalezan
Posté 07 mai 2012 - 04:37

Izhalezan
  • Members
  • 917 messages
EDIT: Derp, wrong button.

Modifié par Izhalezan, 07 mai 2012 - 04:38 .

#38
Guest_slyguy200_*
Posté 07 mai 2012 - 04:37

Guest_slyguy200_*
  • Guests

AlanC9 wrote...

OK, I guess we can play now. Thanks, slyguy

slyguy200 wrote...
Why your squad is on the normandy


Easy enough. Normandy's both capable of atmospheric flight and armed with Thanix cannons. These are the sort of ships you'd call in to attack the Reapers over London. After they're driven off the Normandy rescues survivors. Can't do anything more for Shepard since the beam is wrecked.

Why ME1 ever happened if the catalyst is in control


He isn't in direct control. Without the catalyst he can't do anything -- otherwise the blue ending would be the easiest to achieve, and it is not. He only controls the Reapers in the sense that they follow their original programming.

Those are all assumptions.
Why the heck do the crew members seem to not care about it. 

He says that he controls them, not that he gave them some guidelines.

#39
Izhalezan
Posté 07 mai 2012 - 04:37

Izhalezan
  • Members
  • 917 messages

Modifié par Izhalezan, 07 mai 2012 - 04:38 .

#40
Kaelef
Posté 07 mai 2012 - 04:38

Kaelef
  • Members
  • 1 519 messages

mauro2222 wrote...

Izhalezan wrote...

How come the millions of years old master control room has human numbers and letters, 1M1.


Even Sur'Kesh has everything written with latin letters and arabic numbers.



So wait... does that mean... does that mean THE WHOLE MASS EFFECT SERIES HAS BEEN ONE LONG INDOCTRINATION-INDUCED HALLUCINATION?!!???!  :o:o:o:o:o:o:o:o

#41
Izhalezan
Posté 07 mai 2012 - 04:40

Izhalezan
  • Members
  • 917 messages

Kaelef wrote...

mauro2222 wrote...

Izhalezan wrote...

How come the millions of years old master control room has human numbers and letters, 1M1.


Even Sur'Kesh has everything written with latin letters and arabic numbers.



So wait... does that mean... does that mean THE WHOLE MASS EFFECT SERIES HAS BEEN ONE LONG INDOCTRINATION-INDUCED HALLUCINATION?!!???!  :o:o:o:o:o:o:o:o


My God, this whole time.. we've been under the illusion we're Commander Shepard...

#42
Han Shot First
Posté 07 mai 2012 - 04:43

Han Shot First
  • Members
  • 21 206 messages
Latin script: There so the player can make sense of what is written on the wall.

That sort of thing has been around since Mass Effect 1. If you want an in universe explanation, it is probably written in the default trade language of the Citadel that all the full and associate members of the Citadel speak. The player just sees it in Latin script so that it is understandable.

Likewise Shepard most likely isn't speaking Enlish, but rather that same default alien trade language of the Citadel. We just hear it in English for the same reason that we hear Romans speaking English in Gladiator.

#43
SetecAstronomy
Posté 07 mai 2012 - 04:43

SetecAstronomy
  • Members
  • 598 messages

Izhalezan wrote...

How come the millions of years old master control room has human numbers and letters, 1M1.


The Keepers love the aesthetic. Before humans came around, the chambers were covered in Asari still lifes.

#44
Kaelef
Posté 07 mai 2012 - 04:44

Kaelef
  • Members
  • 1 519 messages

Izhalezan wrote...

Kaelef wrote...

mauro2222 wrote...

Izhalezan wrote...

How come the millions of years old master control room has human numbers and letters, 1M1.


Even Sur'Kesh has everything written with latin letters and arabic numbers.



So wait... does that mean... does that mean THE WHOLE MASS EFFECT SERIES HAS BEEN ONE LONG INDOCTRINATION-INDUCED HALLUCINATION?!!???!  :o:o:o:o:o:o:o:o


My God, this whole time.. we've been under the illusion we're Commander Shepard...



The reality is far too horrible to contemplate!!

However terrifying, it's entirely possible that we've actually been wasting time sitting in front of our computers when we should be out getting some fresh air and sunshine!!   God, say it isn't so!!!

WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY???!!!!!!!!!!!

#45
Izhalezan
Posté 07 mai 2012 - 04:46

Izhalezan
  • Members
  • 917 messages

Kaelef wrote...



The reality is far too horrible to contemplate!!

However terrifying, it's entirely possible that we've actually been wasting time sitting in front of our computers when we should be out getting some fresh air and sunshine!!   God, say it isn't so!!!

WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY???!!!!!!!!!!!



Too bad for you, my EMS was high enough for the "open the window and curtains ending" this morning.

#46
Kaelef
Posté 07 mai 2012 - 04:47

Kaelef
  • Members
  • 1 519 messages

Izhalezan wrote...

Kaelef wrote...



The reality is far too horrible to contemplate!!

However terrifying, it's entirely possible that we've actually been wasting time sitting in front of our computers when we should be out getting some fresh air and sunshine!!   God, say it isn't so!!!

WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY???!!!!!!!!!!!



Too bad for you, my EMS was high enough for the "open the window and curtains ending" this morning.



I KNEW I SHOULD'VE PLAYED MULTIPLAYER!!   DAMN YOU, BIOWARE!!! 

#47
DaJe
Posté 07 mai 2012 - 04:51

DaJe
  • Members
  • 962 messages
Even if the IT is true that simply means we didn't get an actual ending.

No ending or terrible ending?
Bioware knows how to deliver.

#48
Guest_slyguy200_*
Posté 07 mai 2012 - 05:00

Guest_slyguy200_*
  • Guests

DaJe wrote...

Even if the IT is true that simply means we didn't get an actual ending.

No ending or terrible ending?
Bioware knows how to deliver.


We didn't get a real ending anyway.

#49
Matchy Pointy
Posté 07 mai 2012 - 05:08

Matchy Pointy
  • Members
  • 1 229 messages
IT is just silly fanfic from unhappy fans, thats all.

#50
ME 3
Posté 07 mai 2012 - 05:12

ME 3
  • Members
  • 131 messages
You can't fill in plotholes then assume that the IT is correct.
That's just silly.
They are called plotholes because they are holes/mistakes in the story that won't prove anything.

Just because IT could fill some plotholes, that doesn't mean its true.
I can't explain why there are plotholes because they are plotholes, their not supposed to be explainable.
You are a fool
Retourner dans General Discussion


  1. The BioWare Forum
  2. → Mass Effect
  3. → Mass Effect 3
  4. → General Discussion