Auralius Carolus wrote...
Alright, I'm gonna skip some of the minor issues and make some larger criticisms here, for the OP to consider in possible amendment:
#1. The notion that Shepard can beat Indoctrination "Once and for all" has no standing in the lore. A victory over attempted indoctrination is temporary; the nanite-based implants remain within the subject, who will continue to be affected by indoctrination. It is largely hinted at, that even if the indoctrinating Reaper is killed, the effect can continue.
#2. The presence of the the trees and shrubs CAN make sense, and some additional ones do appear after the beam. Aside from the new inserts, much like the child being seen both consciously and subconsciously, the trees and shrubs are signs of Shepard losing touch with what is real and what is not.
#3. Moving Walls can be seen in the Citadel, as visible with the path cleared for Shepard and the shifting rows running alongside the stream of biological fluid under the bridge. Albeit, the connection to the Shadow Broker is strong, the "moving walls" can still be perceived.
#4. While 1M1 may or may not be intentional, the notion of the host's and the Reapers' wills converging is paramount to the notion of indoctrination.
#5. Your location appears to actually be on the Citadel Tower, although you are at its base, not on top, (the Crucible docks at the underside of the base). As neither Shepard nor Anderson recall a place like this, it is likely that you are supposed to be in the Keeper Tunnels, the depths of which are largely unexplored or inaccessable. Seeing as the Keepers were ment to summon the Reapers into each cycle, it is reasonable to assume that they have their own personal Citadel control console that is hidden from other beings.
#6. Humanity is not the only race found worthy to be copied by the Reapers. Each "Reaper", visible from the outside, is a role-specific armored vessel. The actual Reaper- the biometal construct- exists within the vessel and largely reflects the source species, physically.
#7. Shepard didn't wipe out the Batarians, he only killed off a single colony.
#8. "I know you've thought about destroying us..."- you claim that this cannot be argued against, but it can. The metaphysical origin of the Reaper is likely Thomas Hobbes, who created "The Leviathan". The Leviathan discusses how a society submits to a mastermind and willing transfers their rights and wills to the "Sovereign". The Sovereign becomes a single entity imbued with the unyielding support of its society. This is the literal biological origin of the Reapers and likely represents their existance as a whole- they are many, but in spirit, one. Therefore, the Catalyst is one with the Reapers, indoctrination or not. Its will and desire extend through them, making them both all powerful and without value; singular and nearly-infinite all at once.
#9. The likely "canon" origin of Shepard's Indoctrination is with Object Rho, which holds ties to TIM's indoctrination and in the following battle Harbinger declares that Shepard's mind would be his. That was in the last moments of the last DLC in the previous game. The first scene in ME3, as seen through Shepard, is of the Child playing outside. This narrative link is highly significant, IMO.
Just a few notes. Take with them what you will.
Good stuff Auralius. In the name of good debate I'll attempt to address these issues as gentlemanly as possible. xD
1) I suppose you're right; but my reaction to that is "so what" (I mean that in the most innocent, non-****y-way possible). It doesn't exactly change anything about the theory, other than the fact that Shepard is just fighting off indoctrination, one way or another. In fact, that would mean we could even see another indoc attempt in future DLC, which would be cool.
2) Others have shown me some instances where there are trees that magically appear, but my response to them is that the developers may have just assumed the trees were there already since there were others present when charging down the hill. Maybe they got confused because they were being pushed for time. Maybe they wanted to add to the surrealism. Maybe they just made a mistake. Or maybe you guys are right; after hearing about that newer evidence in regard to the trees magically appearing, I'd likely go back and tick it up to a reluctant plausible.
3) I thought about this myself. BUT, "moving walls" means "moving walls". It produces an extremely specific type of mental image: a wall that moves. Not shield platings, doors, or even floors, but WALLS. And none of ANY of the rooms' perimeter walls move, ever.
4) Certainly a convincing and convenient link, but I think this was not intentional as stated in the video. We already saw these in ME1, and during that time, there was a very, very different ending being considered. However, it's too subjective and someone could come right back and say "Convergence was also happening back in ME1's ending, so it makes sense there too, and they just reused the theory here". So, that's why I ended up giving it a plausible. I couldn't DEFINITIVELY disprove it, and ended up actually finding even more evidence for it before I finished. I still don't like it though *old man grumble*.
5) This is definitely something I never considered. But you're absolutely right, the crucible lands on the bottom of the citadel tower. It makes sense for these to be the keeper tunnels, never-before-seen. But, if this was a sealed-off area that was only to be opened now, how did the Keepers get there to begin with? Same with the "no control panels" aspect. What are they all working on? But as for the placement itself, you could be very right.
6) I meant
in this cycle, and in the most recent cycles, as evidenced in Mass Effect 2. They specifically have a hard-on for the humans due to their genetic adaptability; something the Reapers need to continue the cycles.
7) I said "effectively" wiped out. Not the same thing as "completely". At least not in my own personal brain-dictionary. I figured that was an appropriate term to use, because the Batarians were ALREADY almost extinct. That was basically their last major colony. So, he "effectively" wipes them out.
8) I'm actually very familiar with Hobbes and The Leviathan (go philosophy 101 a few years ago!), but I think that's a bit of a stretch. Obviously the relevance is clearly intended between The Leviathan and the ME series, but in this particular instance, I don't see how it applies. Even if it's true, it still means the starchild is a reaper, or of reaper origin. Yet he claims to be the catalyst, and never explicity states that he IS one with the reapers. Rather, he implies that he is above the Reapers.
But if this is true, AND if what I said is true, in either case, the starchild is subjected to the Reaper influence, which was never made clear to the player or Shepard, and therefore we can assume that the starchild has an agenda, and ultimately, is just the Reapers trying to indoctrinate Shepard to do as they wish. Just more evidence when you look at it that way.
9) I had thought about including the Object Rho concepts, but figured I'd just leave them out for everybody to figure out on their own. The fact of "when" indoctrination starts isn't really relevant to the theory, IMO. However, you brought up an excellent point I'd never considered about the ending of the DLC coinciding with the intro to ME3. That would certainly be Harbinger doing as he claimed: Beginning the manipulation.
PHEW. Glad that's over! You're good at this, I'll give you that. xD
Modifié par Ownaholic, 09 mai 2012 - 07:47 .