Aller au contenu

To all the people who choose the Red ending, I have a question


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
428 réponses à ce sujet

#326
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*

Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
  • Guests

webhead921 wrote...

The Mad Hanar wrote...

Many people are bringing up Arrival, I never played it because I didn't have room on my Xbox. Based on what my friends told me though, Shepard wasn't the one who crashed that asteroid into the relay. It was somebody else and he couldn't stop it. Also, many Batarians died, but not on the scale that the Geth would in the Destroy ending.



Shepard hits the switch that sends the asteroid into the realy.  Shepard specifically says in a conversation that she is willing to destroy an ENTIRE SYSTEM to just to slow down the reapers (this is not a paragon/renegade choice, this is pre-set dialogue if I'm not mistaken).  The scale of destruction is pretty huge.  300,000 Batarians die.  And remember, this happens regardless of whether your shepard is a paragon or renegade.  The destroy ending is the only ending that is consistent with these events.


Still, 300,00 Batarians =/= to millions of Geth.

#327
Draining Dragon

Draining Dragon
  • Members
  • 5 502 messages
Everybody who chose endings other than destroy seems to have forgotten the multiple nonsensical genocides that the Reapers carried out.

#328
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*

Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
  • Guests

Draining Dragon wrote...

Everybody who chose endings other than destroy seems to have forgotten the multiple nonsensical genocides that the Reapers carried out.


Justifying a crime with a crime is not a good argument.


Besides, if we do what they do how are we any better than them?

#329
The Mercenary55

The Mercenary55
  • Members
  • 201 messages
lol i have one thing to say

starbrat said you would die if you chose destroy, yet theres a scene where shepard takes a breathe, now if he was false about that, whos to say he isnt false about edi and the geth dying.

think about it

#330
Draining Dragon

Draining Dragon
  • Members
  • 5 502 messages

The Mad Hanar wrote...

Draining Dragon wrote...

Everybody who chose endings other than destroy seems to have forgotten the multiple nonsensical genocides that the Reapers carried out.


Justifying a crime with a crime is not a good argument.


Besides, if we do what they do how are we any better than them?


It's not a crime to execute a murderer.

#331
Brother Takka

Brother Takka
  • Members
  • 398 messages
I guess OP, you missed the part where you proved him wrong with the Geth making peace and EDI falling in love with Joker. If he's wrong about that, then he could be wrong about the Geth. If the EC tells us other wise. Then so be it. But untill then, I didn't kill anyone I didn't have to.

#332
wook77

wook77
  • Members
  • 82 messages

The Mercenary55 wrote...

lol i have one thing to say

starbrat said you would die if you chose destroy, yet theres a scene where shepard takes a breathe, now if he was false about that, whos to say he isnt false about edi and the geth dying.

think about it


But... but... that requires thinking! The Starkid said it so it has to be true because the Starkid totally wouldn't lie to save his own hide, right? He's like the Stephen Colbert of the Mass Effect World - he's a warrior for Truthiness and Veritasiness!

(in other words, I agree with you, good sir. Starbrat is a lying Liar McLiarton.)

#333
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*

Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
  • Guests

Draining Dragon wrote...

The Mad Hanar wrote...

Draining Dragon wrote...

Everybody who chose endings other than destroy seems to have forgotten the multiple nonsensical genocides that the Reapers carried out.


Justifying a crime with a crime is not a good argument.


Besides, if we do what they do how are we any better than them?


It's not a crime to execute a murderer.


Destroying innocent people, such as the Geth, is a crime though.

#334
Fox In The Box

Fox In The Box
  • Members
  • 389 messages

Hadeedak wrote...

Pick the least annoying/most fitting for your Shepard one, headcanon, and wait for the Extended cut! >>


Hooray! My headcanon is the best. All the cool synthetics survived Destroy, and Legion is still alive somewhere.

/in denial

#335
webhead921

webhead921
  • Members
  • 899 messages

The Mad Hanar wrote...


Still, 300,00 Batarians =/= to millions of Geth.


Yes, but the stakes are much higher in the ending.  Shepard kills 300,000 batarians just to slow down the reapers.  It makes sense that a bigger reward (finishing the reapers once and for all) warrants a bigger sacrifice.  It would be pretty anti climactic if the sacrifice to slow down the reapers was greater than the sacrifice to kill the reapers.  

Also, we do not know for sure if destruction will kil all sythetics.  The catalyst says that even you are partly sythetic, yet shepard lives if her EMS is high enough.  We also do not know what destruction entails.  Perhaps it will just destroy the geth's physical bodies.  Maybe they can be rebuilt, and their memories/consciousness can be uploaded to new physical bodies.  We just do not know.  Is it still genocide if we can rebuild geth bodies and upload their memories?  

#336
Draining Dragon

Draining Dragon
  • Members
  • 5 502 messages

The Mad Hanar wrote...

Draining Dragon wrote...

The Mad Hanar wrote...

Draining Dragon wrote...

Everybody who chose endings other than destroy seems to have forgotten the multiple nonsensical genocides that the Reapers carried out.


Justifying a crime with a crime is not a good argument.


Besides, if we do what they do how are we any better than them?


It's not a crime to execute a murderer.


Destroying innocent people, such as the Geth, is a crime though.


Genetic violation of the entire galaxy is a crime as well.

#337
Auztin

Auztin
  • Members
  • 546 messages
 It's not genocide.It's sacrifice.They knew the cost of this war.They gave thier lives to save us.I will have a statue about how synthetics sacrificed thierselves for organics.

#338
webhead921

webhead921
  • Members
  • 899 messages

The Mad Hanar wrote...

Draining Dragon wrote...

Everybody who chose endings other than destroy seems to have forgotten the multiple nonsensical genocides that the Reapers carried out.


Justifying a crime with a crime is not a good argument.


Besides, if we do what they do how are we any better than them?


We are better than them because we are not wiping out all intelligent life in the milky way galaxy.  If you really think it is better to risk the fate of the galaxy by assuming direct control, then that's the ending for you.  However, that goes against Shepard's character (paragon or renegade or in between) and it goes against the themes of the series.  It sucks that the Geth are going to die in destroy, but it is consistent with Shepard's character to make huge sacrifices to stop the reapers once and for all.

Modifié par webhead921, 09 mai 2012 - 09:29 .


#339
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*

Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
  • Guests

webhead921 wrote...

The Mad Hanar wrote...


Still, 300,00 Batarians =/= to millions of Geth.


Yes, but the stakes are much higher in the ending.  Shepard kills 300,000 batarians just to slow down the reapers.  It makes sense that a bigger reward (finishing the reapers once and for all) warrants a bigger sacrifice.  It would be pretty anti climactic if the sacrifice to slow down the reapers was greater than the sacrifice to kill the reapers.  

Also, we do not know for sure if destruction will kil all sythetics.  The catalyst says that even you are partly sythetic, yet shepard lives if her EMS is high enough.  We also do not know what destruction entails.  Perhaps it will just destroy the geth's physical bodies.  Maybe they can be rebuilt, and their memories/consciousness can be uploaded to new physical bodies.  We just do not know.  Is it still genocide if we can rebuild geth bodies and upload their memories?  


Assuming that their personalities and memories could be recovered, then no it's not genocide. The mind is more important the body *in this case*. It's impossible to know if that's the case though.





Draining Dragon wrote...

The Mad Hanar wrote...

Draining Dragon wrote...

The Mad Hanar wrote...

Draining Dragon wrote...

Everybody
who chose endings other than destroy seems to have forgotten the
multiple nonsensical genocides that the Reapers carried out.


Justifying a crime with a crime is not a good argument.


Besides, if we do what they do how are we any better than them?


It's not a crime to execute a murderer.


Destroying innocent people, such as the Geth, is a crime though.


Genetic violation of the entire galaxy is a crime as well.


Not necessairly, if it's an improvement and people retain their free will.

Modifié par The Mad Hanar, 09 mai 2012 - 09:27 .


#340
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*

Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
  • Guests
DP

Modifié par The Mad Hanar, 09 mai 2012 - 09:26 .


#341
Obeded the 2nd

Obeded the 2nd
  • Members
  • 2 199 messages
Depends on the species, turian.

Love that line :D

#342
wook77

wook77
  • Members
  • 82 messages

The Mad Hanar wrote...
[snipped to get rid of quotation pyramid]

Not necessairly, if it's an improvement and people retain their free will.


You mean my free will to say that i do not want to be partially synethetic, even if you think it's an improvement? 

#343
An English Gamer

An English Gamer
  • Members
  • 955 messages
 Seeing how EDI survived then the Geth probably survived, causing the Genocide of the Reapers is fine by me.

#344
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*

Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
  • Guests

wook77 wrote...

The Mad Hanar wrote...
[snipped to get rid of quotation pyramid]

Not necessairly, if it's an improvement and people retain their free will.


You mean my free will to say that i do not want to be partially synethetic, even if you think it's an improvement? 


So if someone walked up to you and said, "Would you rather gain an immense amount of intellgence and understanding or kill a whole race of people so you don't get it?", what would your choice be?

#345
malakim2099

malakim2099
  • Members
  • 559 messages

The Mad Hanar wrote...

Do you enjoy commiting genocide, Shepard?


As much as you enjoy trolling, apparently. :wizard:

#346
Warod

Warod
  • Members
  • 76 messages

The Mad Hanar wrote...

Do you enjoy commiting genocide, Shepard?


Depends on the species, Hanar...


+1 Internet to those who get the ME1 reference.

Modifié par Warod, 09 mai 2012 - 09:33 .


#347
Stump01

Stump01
  • Members
  • 113 messages
I only picked the other options to see what they looked like. Anytime I'm taking it seriously, I pick Destroy. Control and Synthesis just don't make any sense to me, when taken as a whole. How can you control the reapers if you're dead?

How could the Crucible+Catalyst, something that was designed piecemeal and improved over eons by people who didn't know what it did, possibly change the genetic material of every organic being in the galaxy, when many of the species hadn't even evolved yet when it was designed?!?!?! Don't try to tell me that the Catalyst was still active up to the point when the Crucible was attached, how would the Catalyst possibly know how to do that EVERY organic being in the galaxy without killing them? How could you give genetic material to existing synthetics, and where would the magic green light stop? Would toasters and microwave ovens get "a whole new DNA"? Finally, how would the synthesis of existing organic and synthetic life prevent the creation of new artificial life, which could then destroy us all? Synthesis is just plain stupid, they REALLY need to take that option out of the game. At least Control and Destroy make some sense.

#348
webhead921

webhead921
  • Members
  • 899 messages

The Mad Hanar wrote...

wook77 wrote...

The Mad Hanar wrote...
[snipped to get rid of quotation pyramid]

Not necessairly, if it's an improvement and people retain their free will.


You mean my free will to say that i do not want to be partially synethetic, even if you think it's an improvement? 


So if someone walked up to you and said, "Would you rather gain an immense amount of intellgence and understanding or kill a whole race of people so you don't get it?", what would your choice be?


You are mischaracterizing the situation.  It's more like if someone walked up to you and said "would you rather kill millions to save trillions, or fundamentally change the building blocks of life"?  I do think that some of the synthesis haters are just overanalyzing things, but synthesis does have some very serious negative implications.  

It's important to note that in synthesis, the soldiers do not cheer when the reapers leave.  They just stand there.  The soldiers are cheering in both destroy and control.

#349
wook77

wook77
  • Members
  • 82 messages

The Mad Hanar wrote...

wook77 wrote...

The Mad Hanar wrote...
[snipped to get rid of quotation pyramid]

Not necessairly, if it's an improvement and people retain their free will.


You mean my free will to say that i do not want to be partially synethetic, even if you think it's an improvement? 


So if someone walked up to you and said, "Would you rather gain an immense amount of intellgence and understanding or kill a whole race of people so you don't get it?", what would your choice be?


You have a decision here based on a false premise. Not surprising considering how you seem so willing to take Starkid at his word.

More appropriate: 

Someone walks up to me and says "you can believe me when I say you're going to kill an entire race of people to stop me from destroying the planet or you can believe me when I say you're going to gain an immense amount of intelligence but you're going to change everyone on the planet, as well and maybe I won't destroy the planet. Oh and ignore the fact that I'm totally just trying to save my own bum here because I'm actually the genocidal maniac jerkface".

Simply put, I don't believe Starkid. I don't believe that I'm going to become synthetic and merge Reapers with people. I also don't believe Starkid that I'm going to kill a bunch of people, including myself, when he says so. This is based on the fact that when I decided to kill off the Reapers, Shepard still lived.

Taking that to the side... your premise is equally as false because I'm not making the decision that only affects myself. I'm making a decision that affects the entire galaxy. So a better example would be "so would you like to force everyone on the planet to possibly gain a bunch of knowledge while fundamentally changing who and what they are at their core or would you like to kill me and, possibly, a small segment of society to stop me from killing everything and everyone anyway".

In that case, I would still choose to sacrifice the minority to benefit the majority because I cannot choose to fundamentally alter the entire freaking galaxy by merging them with the freaking Reapers. There will always be losses in a war, no matter its size and scope. I will always choose to sacrifice myself and the smallest segment of society so as to allow society to continue on its path.

Also - who says that becoming partially synthetic would grant me a boatload of intelligence and understanding? Where did you see that in the Synethesis cutscene? Cause what I saw was that Joker, in the Synthesis ending, still continues to limp, even though he's partially synethetic now and should be fixed because Starkid told me that disease would go away. Guess it didn't actually go away completely, huh? 

#350
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*

Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
  • Guests
Look, the Destroy leaves people with nothing. The Relays are destroyed, the Citadel is destroyed and there's good reason to believe that the Geth are destroyed. Everybody is screwed.

My interpretation of the Synthesis ending is that when species combine themselves with one another, their memories and knowledge are shared. Therefore, people would gain the knowledge to rebuild the relays and even if they didn't the creators of the relays would still be around. It's not too much of a stretch to say that rebuilding would be in the best interests for the Reapers. That same principle applies with the control ending, minus the shared knowledge part.

So not only do you not have to kill anybody but yourself, but you also give people a fighting chance to rebuild in Control and Synthesis.

Modifié par The Mad Hanar, 09 mai 2012 - 09:49 .