Modifié par Catamantaloedis, 10 mai 2012 - 12:18 .
Who started all of this Indoctrination nonsense?
#1
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 12:14
#2
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 12:15
#3
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 12:15
#4
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 12:15
#5
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 12:17
Modifié par GLR-0053, 10 mai 2012 - 12:17 .
#6
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 12:17
#7
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 12:18
Modifié par Catamantaloedis, 10 mai 2012 - 12:19 .
#8
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 12:19
Modifié par spockjedi, 10 mai 2012 - 12:19 .
#9
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 12:20
Not a good way for a fandom to act in my opinion, especially with the rise of the 'didn't pick destroy? must not have played the other games' crowd cropping up in the story and campaign section of the forums.
Ranted enough, I'll take my leave now, also lordofdogtown19 probably got it right.
Modifié par xsdob, 10 mai 2012 - 12:21 .
#10
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 12:21
#11
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 12:21
It didn't turn into a conspiracy theory/Bioware apologist haven for at least a day or two after the initial "this endgame is stupid and trippy. Let's pretend it never happened" bout of threads.
#12
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 12:22
Modifié par ReXspec, 10 mai 2012 - 12:22 .
#13
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 12:23
spockjedi wrote...
Bioware. They made a ending that makes less sense than a hallucination.
Yep.
#14
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 12:24
ShepnTali wrote...
Hints of it in the game. The dreamy weird stuff around the boarder of the screen was the big obvious indicator of something peculiar. Whatever it is The Scooby Doo gang have been examining the whole thing with a fine tooth comb since.
I just want to know the first person who ever made mention of Indoctrination as the explanation for the ending.
Whether there were hints of it in the game, is not important.
#15
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 12:24
*boop*
(seriously though, I reckon it was the mega-thread that's still going today)
#16
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 12:25
#17
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 12:26
GLR-0053 wrote...
BioWare did but they scrapped it.
While at the very least seems they left some of that scrap in the game. Time crunch, deal with it later, future plans, just being artsy... who knows.
#18
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 12:30
Catamantaloedis wrote...
ShepnTali wrote...
Hints of it in the game. The dreamy weird stuff around the boarder of the screen was the big obvious indicator of something peculiar. Whatever it is The Scooby Doo gang have been examining the whole thing with a fine tooth comb since.
I just want to know the first person who ever made mention of Indoctrination as the explanation for the ending.
Whether there were hints of it in the game, is not important.
Good luck. Who was the guy that first thought drinking white stuff from that disgusting looking thing under a cow, was a great idea?
#19
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 12:31
Random Geth wrote...
Bioware putting Reaperized eyes on Shep in 2 of the 3 endings certainly didn't do much to stop that theory.
"The eyes have it."
#20
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 12:32
ShepnTali wrote...
Catamantaloedis wrote...
ShepnTali wrote...
Hints of it in the game. The dreamy weird stuff around the boarder of the screen was the big obvious indicator of something peculiar. Whatever it is The Scooby Doo gang have been examining the whole thing with a fine tooth comb since.
I just want to know the first person who ever made mention of Indoctrination as the explanation for the ending.
Whether there were hints of it in the game, is not important.
Good luck. Who was the guy that first thought drinking white stuff from that disgusting looking thing under a cow, was a great idea?
This is the internet. There's usually a deviant around who knows or is willing to search hours on end for this sort of thing.
#23
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 12:39
Modifié par Catamantaloedis, 10 mai 2012 - 12:42 .
#24
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 12:40
xsdob wrote...
Whoever it was has started a new wave of 'true fanism' where only one theory is right and everyone who doesn't subscribe to it is not a true fan of mass effect.
Not a good way for a fandom to act in my opinion, especially with the rise of the 'didn't pick destroy? must not have played the other games' crowd cropping up in the story and campaign section of the forums.
Ranted enough, I'll take my leave now, also lordofdogtown19 probably got it right.
you mean the pro enders who say that people are idoits for thinking the IT is real, and that Separd desrves better fans
#25
Posté 10 mai 2012 - 12:41
It has been updated many times. If it wasn't the first it was very close to it.Catamantaloedis wrote...
Yes, I know of that thread. It's possible that that's the original thread, but I doubt it. It seems a bit weird that someone would be looking for that much evidence first, instead of someone simply saying, I think the ending was the result of indoctrination and then finding the evidence for it.
Modifié par Malanek999, 10 mai 2012 - 12:42 .





Retour en haut






