You need to get ready, again. (More "Gambles" lie ahead)
#676
Posté 14 mai 2012 - 05:24
I find it more amusing than anything that he did it. As if it will stop people from reading it.
I'm not angry.
#677
Posté 14 mai 2012 - 05:26
#678
Posté 14 mai 2012 - 05:26
#679
Posté 14 mai 2012 - 05:28
#680
Posté 14 mai 2012 - 05:29
#681
Posté 14 mai 2012 - 05:29
Either, the truth really hurts, or someone's having a bad day because a lot of threads have suffered the ban hammer.
#682
Posté 14 mai 2012 - 05:29
#683
Posté 14 mai 2012 - 05:30
Atakuma wrote...
This is pretty much exclusively a problem of the ME team. The DA devs have been very good at dialoguing with the fanbase despite all of the flack they get. The ME folks on the other hand seem to be completely unwilling or unable to do the same, which is unfortunate.
Didn't the DA teams also said sorry for da2 being rushed? or did i dream that?
#684
Posté 14 mai 2012 - 05:31
This in itself, relates to this thread, because of such a huge lack of communication with the community.
Modifié par Superstarsage, 14 mai 2012 - 05:32 .
#685
Posté 14 mai 2012 - 05:31
My writing is terrible. There is no way he did it in that amount of time.
#686
Posté 14 mai 2012 - 05:35
#687
Posté 14 mai 2012 - 05:36
I guess the lesson is to be careful when posting about Bioware employees and naming names....that is not encouraged here. At least no one is getting banned.
Modifié par mcgreggers99, 14 mai 2012 - 05:37 .
#688
Posté 14 mai 2012 - 05:39
incinerator950 wrote...
Well, this topic isn't about the discussion of the story, so why didn't it get deleted in the wave of topic removal's?
He damned himself by locking the topic.
It wasn't a personal attack. I merely pointed out an opinion.
That's fine though. He has missed the psychological ramifications of what he's done. By locking it so quickly it makes it look like he doesn't want it discussed which makes the points I suggested even more apparent to some.
I won't fight him about it. I just want him to know that I think it was a bad idea.
Modifié par Taboo-XX, 14 mai 2012 - 05:40 .
#689
Posté 14 mai 2012 - 05:50
#690
Posté 14 mai 2012 - 05:51
#691
Posté 14 mai 2012 - 05:55
I seriously doubt that he hasn't read Watchmen.
#692
Guest_Lyme Eilserv_*
Posté 14 mai 2012 - 05:57
Guest_Lyme Eilserv_*
The very first question I had after completing the game, and still the one I keep asking is "how". How did the ending happen? It's so incomprehensibly awful that almost any rational explanation yields ludicrous results, and yet here we are. Just want you to know that I for one appreciate your theories and the time you put into them.
#693
Posté 14 mai 2012 - 05:58
Taboo-XX wrote...
I sent him a quote in Latin. I hope he knows what it means. Nothing offensive but one that symbolizes the problem. Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
I seriously doubt that he hasn't read Watchmen.
Well I imagine his boss does, he can't just start posting racist or offensive comments, he would be fired, so its not like he has total control.
#694
Posté 14 mai 2012 - 05:58
The Reapers of course, they make sure no forum can create a problem that will wipe out all threads everywhere.Taboo-XX wrote...
I sent him a quote in Latin. I hope he knows what it means. Nothing offensive but one that symbolizes the problem. Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
I seriously doubt that he hasn't read Watchmen.
#695
Posté 14 mai 2012 - 06:00
I've seen this before. There isn't a plot, at all. It's a mistake at the very base level of development, one that has been at the back of my head for a while. I thought it was simply Hudson and Walters at first but now it appears that it's everyone at the top thought this was a good idea, at least to me.
I'm glad that Gamble is handling it though, as is Patrick Weekes.
#696
Posté 14 mai 2012 - 06:01
Taboo-XX wrote...
I sent him a quote in Latin. I hope he knows what it means. Nothing offensive but one that symbolizes the problem. Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Isn't that quote from Juvenals "Satires"? Who watches the watchers?
#697
Posté 14 mai 2012 - 06:02
SpiritWolf448 wrote...
Taboo-XX wrote...
I sent him a quote in Latin. I hope he knows what it means. Nothing offensive but one that symbolizes the problem. Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Isn't that quote from Juvenals "Satires"? Who watches the watchers?
Yes. He recognized it as Latin on Twitter. I hope he understood what it meant.
#698
Posté 14 mai 2012 - 06:09
And regardless of how fast the thread was locked, thank you for the effort. Made for a nice and interesting read.
#699
Posté 14 mai 2012 - 06:11
Wow.
At least now I won't have to put any time and effort into responses. The topic can speak for itself.
#700
Posté 14 mai 2012 - 06:14
Taboo-XX wrote...
incinerator950 wrote...
Well, this topic isn't about the discussion of the story, so why didn't it get deleted in the wave of topic removal's?
He damned himself by locking the topic.
It wasn't a personal attack. I merely pointed out an opinion.
That's fine though. He has missed the psychological ramifications of what he's done. By locking it so quickly it makes it look like he doesn't want it discussed which makes the points I suggested even more apparent to some.
I won't fight him about it. I just want him to know that I think it was a bad idea.
It was a good read, sorry it got locked, but it was going to get ugly.
I did like this part:
By why am I still here? David Bowie has the answer.....
I'm thinking that it must be love
It's too late - to be grateful
It's to late - to be late again
It's to late - to be hateful
I fear the EC will come too late.
Modifié par Kunari801, 14 mai 2012 - 06:17 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





