Taboo-XX wrote...
Szuli wrote...
Omega Torsk wrote...
I can't possibly see how it could get any worse. Not with the amount of eyes currently on the devs.Taboo-XX wrote...
The implications are beginning to form in my head.
I HAVE seen this before.
But I can't be certain until the EC is released.
Concerning Priestly's question, I'm beginning to come to the conclusion that it's PR prep for post-release of the EC. The ME team wants to get all of their ducks in a row, this time.
They've had two months to get a clear image of what people "want." I believe the final draft has been penned, VA's have been recorded, and now they're working on polishing the content and implementing it into the game. We'll probably get an ETA come E3.
OP, your fears aren't unfounded. While I still don't understand the latent fear you're harboring, I'm going to hold onto my fool's hope that the ME devs genuinely care about fan feedback, the EC will be some kind of reflection of that, and that the current ending was a tragic mistake originating from a fast-approaching deadline and an unchecked Hudson.
That's all I can really do at this point... I'm getting tired of voicing my criticisms to a brick wall.
Unfortunately Hudson is on the team working on the EC...
With the participation of everyone else.
One person left unchecked can do a lot of damage.
But I don't know if Mr. Hudson was the only person to write the endings.
Yeah, Hudson is responsible for a lot of the ME universe; I have no problem with him contributing to the conclusion, but the key like you said is "with the participation of everyone else".
Peer review is a powerful tool, and if the full complement of the ME3 writing team is working on EC, that's a good thing.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





