549 réponses à ce sujet

[TwelfthCrusader]

User reviews on Metacritic can't really be trusted. Generally, it's just fanboys who love it giving 10s and people who hate it (For something petty, normally) who give it 0 (Or 1, can't really remember). Pretty much every console exclusive has low scores because of this.

[Naughty Bear]

napushenko wrote...

for the last time, the fetch quests are quests if you consider resource mining quests.

and games like this dont deserve ratings like 1. or 2.
its like someone sayd i dont like how quest system works in baldurs gate 2. i think il rate it with 1.
so, sorry, but anyone who rates this below 7 is a troll because hes not objective at all. fact.
bye bye

Just ignore this forum member people, rate the game what you want, but don't start accusing people of trolling just because they think otherwise.

[xkg]

Legion_IV wrote...

xkg wrote...

napushenko wrote...
so, sorry, but anyone who rates this below 7 is a troll because hes not objective at all. fact.
bye bye

napushenko wrote...
cant fight the trolls. too many. run away. come back next time. bring flamethrower.
clarification : anyone who gives me3 less then 7 rating is troll, blind or has the brain size of a peanut. 
sorry but its true.

Oh lol, napushenko finally revealed his true face.

I remember him from DA2 forum - looks like he heasn't changed much.
Discussing with him is a waste of time.

Have fun guys.  I am going to grab some popcorn 

Can I have some?

Sure thing, here
http://t3.gstatic.co...VtAM5L0xh75dxmg
But beware, it is microwaved buttered popcorn, I heard it is not very healthy.

[poerksen]

Raizo wrote...

poerksen wrote...

Do not consider myself a troll, simply comparing to previous installments of ME. I think a score btw. 5-7 is valid on a 10 point-scale.

Well if you legitimate complaints about ME3 and you are honest about what the game did right and what it did wrong and you still feel like giving ME3 a score of 5 or less than I have no problem with that as long as you explain why ME3 3ends up getting the score you gave it, my main beef is with guys who have reviewed ME3 on Metacritic and Amazon and say stuff like perfect game until the end 2/10 or day 1 dlc, EA/Bioware suck 3/10.

Agreed.

[Allen Spellwaver]

9 to me.Be rational.The ending just amplify the complaint.ME3 is definitely better than ME2.

[Tazzmission]

i still say the game is a 8.5 or a 9 but the only real complaints i had was bugs

i wouldnt say the ending is terrible but it is confusing but i still think the story was great

the fetch missions imo i didnt really care for

eavesdropping was fine


those are really my only gripes with the game

[abaris]

Allen Spellwaver wrote...

9 to me.Be rational.The ending just amplify the complaint.ME3 is definitely better than ME2.

One word: tastes.

It certainly isn't better in my books. And that's not just about the endings.

[Tazzmission]

abaris wrote...

Allen Spellwaver wrote...

9 to me.Be rational.The ending just amplify the complaint.ME3 is definitely better than ME2.

One word: tastes.

It certainly isn't better in my books. And that's not just about the endings.

see i disagree i think the story was fantastic up until the elevator part because when you meet casper the evil ghost then it becomes confusing

im not saying omg it destroyed the franchise or anything but i even agree that yea i was confused

i just hope the ec explains how my team ends up on the normandy when there with me on earth

i also want more diolauge with casper

Modifié par Tazzmission, 12 mai 2012 - 03:56 .

[Allen Spellwaver]

abaris wrote...

Allen Spellwaver wrote...

9 to me.Be rational.The ending just amplify the complaint.ME3 is definitely better than ME2.

One word: tastes.

It certainly isn't better in my books. And that's not just about the endings.

Despite better characters and combat,I don't see any positive points for ME2 when comparing to ME1.
Despite better journal systems and some side quests,I don't see any positive either when comparing to ME3.Or maybe I should count the ending in.
ME2 failed in inconstant storyline and lack of tactics in combat.The characters were awesome but...In my words:Holy God,Shep you are gonna crush the Collectors on squadmates numbers???
The combat scenes are always a straightline.The AI was relatively stupid.The insanity was hard because taking down armors was quite a challenge,especially when confronting a lot of husks.But the question is,some powers even squadmates are useless in this challenge.Like shockwave and Jack which was my savior when sieged by husks.
But in all,I strongly believe ME is the best game trilogy ever and all three games are awesome.

[Serenade]

I think a lot of people should try to expand their way of thoughts and realize that a disappointing game doesn't necessarily mean a bad game. Disappointment comes from dissatisfaction from our own expectations. We all here have our own opinions, try expressing them in an informative and respectful way. It can be hard especially when it's easy to get blinded by hatred or love.

[WhiteKnyght]

RME3 supporters sabotage the ratings until they get what they want.

RetakeME3 supporters are the Equalists of our world. They claim to have a fair and great cause, when in reality they are petty and childish troublemakers.

[sdm83]

FlamingBoy wrote...

probably would have given it a 7

as for the metacritic, not sure what to think, i guess its better than misleading people with constant perfect 10's, also metacritic has sort of become a form of protest

How is misleading people with really low scores any better?

[Allen Spellwaver]

Master Bandit wrote...

I think a lot of people should try to expand their way of thoughts and realize that a disappointing game doesn't necessarily mean a bad game. Disappointment comes from dissatisfaction from our own expectations. We all here have our own opinions, try expressing them in an informative and respectful way. It can be hard especially when it's easy to get blinded by hatred or love.

Yes.I don't get why some people are hard to stay civil and rational.

[Tazzmission]

Master Bandit wrote...

I think a lot of people should try to expand their way of thoughts and realize that a disappointing game doesn't necessarily mean a bad game. Disappointment comes from dissatisfaction from our own expectations. We all here have our own opinions, try expressing them in an informative and respectful way. It can be hard especially when it's easy to get blinded by hatred or love.

im not dissapointed because the game is fine until after the anderson and activate citadel arms  scene 


ill be honest i wish they wouldve just ended it right there and maybe show a cutscene after the victory of shepard marrying his love interest and retire from the navy

[Oldbones2]

I'd give it a six.

Harsh, but the ending is a zero and it spills ruin all over the preceding 30 hours.

[abaris]

Allen Spellwaver wrote...

Despite better characters and combat,I don't see any positive points for ME2 when comparing to ME1.
Despite better journal systems and some side quests,I don't see any positive either when comparing to ME3.Or maybe I should count the ending in.
ME2 failed in inconstant storyline and lack of tactics in combat.The characters were awesome but...In my words:Holy

Again, tastes.

Better characters, debatable. I don't think so.

Better combat system, I couldn't care less, since that hasn't been the reason why I got hooked on Mass Effect.

Suffice to say, I replayed ME2 about 15 times. I only did 1,5 runs with ME3 since I pretty soon got the feeling of having seen it all.

[Allen Spellwaver]

abaris wrote...

Allen Spellwaver wrote...

Despite better characters and combat,I don't see any positive points for ME2 when comparing to ME1.
Despite better journal systems and some side quests,I don't see any positive either when comparing to ME3.Or maybe I should count the ending in.
ME2 failed in inconstant storyline and lack of tactics in combat.The characters were awesome but...In my words:Holy

Again, tastes.

Better characters, debatable. I don't think so.

Better combat system, I couldn't care less, since that hasn't been the reason why I got hooked on Mass Effect.

Suffice to say, I replayed ME2 about 15 times. I only did 1,5 runs with ME3 since I pretty soon got the feeling of having seen it all.

Just express my attitude and some objective facts.

[Tazzmission]

abaris wrote...

Allen Spellwaver wrote...

Despite better characters and combat,I don't see any positive points for ME2 when comparing to ME1.
Despite better journal systems and some side quests,I don't see any positive either when comparing to ME3.Or maybe I should count the ending in.
ME2 failed in inconstant storyline and lack of tactics in combat.The characters were awesome but...In my words:Holy

Again, tastes.

Better characters, debatable. I don't think so.

Better combat system, I couldn't care less, since that hasn't been the reason why I got hooked on Mass Effect.

Suffice to say, I replayed ME2 about 15 times. I only did 1,5 runs with ME3 since I pretty soon got the feeling of having seen it all.

i think me2 had the better charachters but lack of story

however i do think me3 has an awesome story ( other then the confusing ending) but the charachters imo that really stand out great is javik, liara, tali, garrus even james

kaidan and ashley just felt meh to me honestly

[Allen Spellwaver]

Tazzmission wrote...

abaris wrote...

Allen Spellwaver wrote...

Despite better characters and combat,I don't see any positive points for ME2 when comparing to ME1.
Despite better journal systems and some side quests,I don't see any positive either when comparing to ME3.Or maybe I should count the ending in.
ME2 failed in inconstant storyline and lack of tactics in combat.The characters were awesome but...In my words:Holy

Again, tastes.

Better characters, debatable. I don't think so.

Better combat system, I couldn't care less, since that hasn't been the reason why I got hooked on Mass Effect.

Suffice to say, I replayed ME2 about 15 times. I only did 1,5 runs with ME3 since I pretty soon got the feeling of having seen it all.

i think me2 had the better charachters but lack of story

however i do think me3 has an awesome story ( other then the confusing ending) but the charachters imo that really stand out great is javik, liara, tali, garrus even james

kaidan and ashley just felt meh to me honestly

I feel so either.They seem to be lack of characteristic.

[paul165]

Without the ending maybe a 6 with the ending 5.

The unfixed game breaking bugs (face import; impossible to acheive 4k EMS in SP) for me make the game unscorable because it isn't complete.

I was getting pretty hacked off with the game before Earth it's just Earth took removed any desire to forgive them for the rest of the screw ups they made.

For completeness ME1 8-8.5 as combat was pretty weak but the story was amazing and ME2 gets a 9 being incredibly slick and polished with only the equipment system and the relative lack of conversations with companions bringing it down.

...

...

Still prefer fewer conversations than autodialogue flirting with Vega though seriously WTH

[abaris]

Tazzmission wrote...

i think me2 had the better charachters but lack of story

Exactly. And that's what got me hooked. Bioware's stories never have been that original to begin with. It was always about the characters.

I could spend quite a while patrolling the Normandy in ME2 whilst in ME3 I got bored when doing the same. Same goes for the hubs or hub when it comes to ME3.

That's why I said I would rate it 6 or 7 if I ever did a rating. ME2 would get a solid 8, maybe a 9 if I am in a good mood.

And the positives about ME3 are indeed the combat system, the nice touch of squadmates moving around on the Normandy and certain parts of the story, but not the story as a whole.

[paul165]

Master Bandit wrote...

I think a lot of people should try to expand their way of thoughts and realize that a disappointing game doesn't necessarily mean a bad game. Disappointment comes from dissatisfaction from our own expectations. We all here have our own opinions, try expressing them in an informative and respectful way. It can be hard especially when it's easy to get blinded by hatred or love.

But if you are disappointed by it doesn't it mean that in your opinion it's bad? Not being sarcy just slightly confused.

[Ericus]

3.8 is extremely low, but I think ME3 was the weakest part of the trilogy (not because of the ending). I'd give it a 7.5, but ME1 and ME2 are both in the 9 range for me.

[KDD-0063]

Metacritic user review reflects a user's satisfaction with the game.

It's not an overall rating; that doesn't mean it's meaningless. In fact ME3 deserved it.
Because guess what? A player of ME3 will generally get this level of satisfaction.

[SalsaDMA]

I bought ME1, ME2 and all the DLC for ME2. Both of those rank as some of best experiences I had playing games.

ME3, and the choices behind its production, made me decide not to spend a single dime in EA/Bioware's favour on the product.

That's how I would rate it.

Under those circumstances I would call the metacritic fully deserving, if not being too kind on them.