549 réponses à ce sujet

[oblique9]

If it were any other game, I'd give it a 9. Since there are so many things that were so painfully done (face import bug, ems bug, chobot, certain awful photoshops, sprites, some very rushed voice work (not blaming the VA's here), lots of half-arsing and my god, the ending), I give it a 6.8. Just because these items add up to make the game genuinely a notch lower than the others in the series.

Edit:
Oh yea, autodialog. -1.2 pts.
Also, fetch quests and very few actual side quests, -.3 pts.

5.3

Modifié par oblique9, 12 mai 2012 - 05:30 .

[natie]

People downvote to let others know there is something very wrong with the game (be it the ending, Origin or day1DLC) as the "proffesional game journalists" failed to even mention it in their reviews.
They won't get noticed unless they vote the game extremally low.

[oblique9]

natie wrote...

People downvote to let others know there is something very wrong with the game (be it the ending, Origin or day1DLC) as the "proffesional game journalists" failed to even mention it in their reviews.
They won't get noticed unless they vote the game extremally low.

As much as I hate to see people giving 1s and 0s with no real explanation, I have to agree... When "pro reviewers" lie about the game, someone has to make a point...

[fchopin]

If people think ME3 deserves a 3.8 score then they should not play the game again and not even bother with EC as the game is not meant for them.

[xsdob]

I don't agree with that. 6 or 5/10 is acceptable, but not 3.8, that's just flashpan reviewing and highly reactionary(the immediate emotions of the ending rather than looking at the whole game, the ending does not negate the rest of the game or franchise no matter how you feel about it, that is reviewing 101.)

This game is not the room, or birdemic, or superman 64, or atari's E.T., or MIND JACK!!! it's a fairly decent game from the most negative of viewpoints and that should be reflected in the score.

Also, fun fact, I didn't know metacritic even existed until people started waving it around on the forums, and I still don't care about them at all.

Modifié par xsdob, 12 mai 2012 - 05:39 .

[Arcadian Legend]

EternalAmbiguity wrote...

oblique9 wrote...

As much as I hate to see people giving 1s and 0s with no real explanation, I have to agree... When "pro reviewers" lie about the game, someone has to make a point...

01001000  01000101  01001100  01010000 

Thats what SPOILERS VI EDI said in ME1 before going dark.

Modifié par Arcadian Legend, 12 mai 2012 - 05:41 .

[ArmedCarp]

The atmosphere of ME3 is just kind of bleh, and the ending is... questioned. But the graphics are good, the controls well suited, and the multiplayer is fun in spurts. It's honestly a really average release, and should have maybe gotten a 5/10. 3.8 is just a revenge score.

[Kakita Tatsumaru]

napushenko wrote...
What rating would you give it ?

Personally without the ending I would rate it 6, perhaps 7 at best as ME3 was stripped of almost everything I liked.
With the ending? Zero for breaking my will to play ME1 and ME2 again (I only have one Shepard and wished to do many full trilogy playthrough, until I played ME3 that was...).

[Dudeman315]

fchopin wrote...

If people think ME3 deserves a 3.8 score then they should not play the game again and not even bother with EC as the game is not meant for them.

You're right it is now meant for us, those who preorder the collecters edition of ME2 and ME1, because of the injustice it does to the frantise as a whole. That's part of the problem, the conclusion of the trilogy is not meant for people who are familar with and love the series. 

[DaJe]

I'd give it a 7/10 standalone
6/10 as last game of a trillogy.

Metacritic is not objective, neither the "professional" nor the user reviews are and the massive difference between the two is exemplary for that.

Like someone said it has become a sort of protest, just like amazon reviews and that is a very, very good thing.
It is the most effective way currently to work against the biased, bought out and inflated reviews from so called journalists.

In general, the less greedy bull**** business practices, PR lies and disrespect for customers the more even the scores are on metacritic like for games such as Batman: Arkham Asylum, Skyrim or the Witcher 2.
Every game get's their share of hate-ratings but with time the general opinion prevails. Mass Effect 3 is still incredible low with it's user score and so is Dragon Age 2. Ignoring this because it's not objective would be foolish.

[fchopin]

Dudeman315 wrote...

fchopin wrote...

If people think ME3 deserves a 3.8 score then they should not play the game again and not even bother with EC as the game is not meant for them.

You're right it is now meant for us, those who preorder the collecters edition of ME2 and ME1, because of the injustice it does to the frantise as a whole. That's part of the problem, the conclusion of the trilogy is not meant for people who are familar with and love the series. 

A person who loves the game does not give it a 3.8 score, 3.8 signifies the game is rubbish and can not be fixed.

[xsdob]

Look my avatar in the eyeslots and honestly say that mass effect 3 was worse than mindjack.

I dare you.

[SalsaDMA]

ArmedCarp wrote...

The atmosphere of ME3 is just kind of bleh, and the ending is... questioned. But the graphics are good, the controls well suited, and the multiplayer is fun in spurts. It's honestly a really average release, and should have maybe gotten a 5/10. 3.8 is just a revenge score.

I disagree on your assesment of the graphics and the controls.
Lots of older games with better graphics. Some of the animations I would actually directly rate as being bad. And the controls... Urgh... No shooter with tight controls it surely ain't... I felt clumsy as hell in it compared to the 'real' shooter' I played before trying it out.

Never tried MP as it's not my thing.

[Kakita Tatsumaru]

fchopin wrote...

Dudeman315 wrote...

fchopin wrote...

If people think ME3 deserves a 3.8 score then they should not play the game again and not even bother with EC as the game is not meant for them.

You're right it is now meant for us, those who preorder the collecters edition of ME2 and ME1, because of the injustice it does to the frantise as a whole. That's part of the problem, the conclusion of the trilogy is not meant for people who are familar with and love the series. 

A person who loves the game does not give it a 3.8 score, 3.8 signifies the game is rubbish and can not be fixed.

Minus he said "series", not "game".

[SalsaDMA]

fchopin wrote...

Dudeman315 wrote...

fchopin wrote...

If people think ME3 deserves a 3.8 score then they should not play the game again and not even bother with EC as the game is not meant for them.

You're right it is now meant for us, those who preorder the collecters edition of ME2 and ME1, because of the injustice it does to the frantise as a whole. That's part of the problem, the conclusion of the trilogy is not meant for people who are familar with and love the series. 

A person who loves the game does not give it a 3.8 score, 3.8 signifies the game is rubbish and can not be fixed.

I think you misread what he wrote. He wrote series, not game.
There's a difference, and I agree with him.

[KrisDude]

Metacritic.com Has Given Out Harsh Unpopular And Poorly Written Reviews And Previews Before Does Mass Effect 3 Deserve That Low Of A Score No, Is It The Best Of The Series Not Yet. Not Until We Can Finally Experience This Extra Work There Putting Into It And Only Time Will Tell, The One Thing That Still Needs Some Fixes Is The Multiplayer Hopefully Soon But I Can Appreciate It Being Semi Important Until After The EC Content But In The Mean Time They Could Do What It Looks Like There Trying To Do Which Is Fix Some Of The Glitches And Problems That Are Deemed That They Need To Be Reasonably Fixed. But At The Same Time They Don't Deserve That
Kind Of A Rating.

[The Razman]

This is why anybody who actually pays attention to Metacritic should give up being a gamer.

[Raizo]

natie wrote...

People downvote to let others know there is something very wrong with the game (be it the ending, Origin or day1DLC) as the "proffesional game journalists" failed to even mention it in their reviews.
They won't get noticed unless they vote the game extremally low.

As much as I hate this and as much as I disagree with the dishonesty involved I do get this. I don't understand how ME3 could get soo many perfect review scores from the preofessional reviewers when I can't play it for more than an hour without picking out all it's flaws and all the stuff that I think is wrong with ME3. I do feel that there should be some sort of balance, if the professional reviewers are going to be so blatant with thier lying then I guess i understand why so many gamers have gone to such great lengths to review bomb ME3 ( even if I don't like it ).

[swordsman1612]

At best the game's mediocre...

* Waaaay to much autodialog.
* Faulty character import system.
* I mentioned the autodialog, right? It's twice as annoying as anything else on this list.
* Insuficient War Assets to get every ending.
* Journal system that doesn't update as you complete missions.
* All the eavesdropping fetchquests.
* Lackluster Priority:Earth.

On top of that add the absurdity of the ending itself... 4 or 5 out of 10... at best.

[MrDbow]

Mass Effect 3 has given me pause on how I rate my games. Before I would throw out 9 & 10 like it was Halloween candy, but with ME3, I had to tone it down and rethink on what my particular rating would mean to me.

1 - 10: 5 is average.

So for me.... and my rethinking of how I rate... Mass Effect 1 receives a 6 (down from 8). Mass Effect 2 receives a 8 (down from 9/10). Mass Effect 3 receives a solid 7.

I would like to think that now I grade more harishly and that the rating is reflective of that.

Dragon Age:Origins is a 7.  Dragon Age 2 is a 5.

I think there is now only one game that I would rate as close to a 10 as possible.

Modifié par SimplyNeo, 12 mai 2012 - 06:12 .

[fchopin]

SalsaDMA wrote...

I think you misread what he wrote. He wrote series, not game.
There's a difference, and I agree with him.

I don't see what 'series' has to do with it, if i give a game under a 6 then i stop playing the game and do not even bother to comment, just go for another game.
 
If some one gives a game a 3.8 score for me it means that the game is not for them. If they are unhappy with parts of the game then they can make comments and try to get them changed.