stop it you elitist d*&%$
#26
Posté 12 mai 2012 - 01:46
#27
Posté 12 mai 2012 - 01:46
#28
Posté 12 mai 2012 - 01:47
Insta-kick!
#29
Posté 12 mai 2012 - 01:48
Bamford38 wrote...
Easy answer.
Stop bronze players infecting gold.
There should be a kind of license test before youre allowed to play gold.
To be allowed to play silver you have to solo 3 rounds of bronze. To play gold you have to solo 6 rounds of silver.
That should easily separate the retards from the people that deserve to be playing gold.
I understand what you are saying, but it should not be that way.
Im not too sure that you have done solo bronze 3 times and solo silver 6 times...
#30
Posté 12 mai 2012 - 01:48
The one thing that makes this not so much a big deal anymore is the PJEPS. Not really a problem to waste some consumables on a match with noobs because we can just buy them again whenever.
#31
Posté 12 mai 2012 - 01:49
Terraflare wrote...
BERT AND ERNY wrote...
if im sh*!t then so be it, if he/she is s*!t then so be it, if your that good it shouldnt make a diff if you have to carry one guy/girl. you never know, that one vangaurd you dint s!*t on may just pull YOUR ass out the fire. to BW, i would suggest an imunity to new players in a room. a kick option after the match sure, but before is stopping a lot of peeps playing how they want to.
rant over.
Highlighted the 3 important bits. You kind of answered your own questions why you were kicked.
1) If you're sh!t, why should I play with you? You want me to waste 20 minutes of my time and consumables playing with a bad player? So i should LIKE losing? I like my games successful, stress free, with everyone pulling their weight, over in 20 minutes tops with 75k credits to show for, thanks.
2) "You never know". Exactly. For all I knew you could be cooler or rapha behind that screen. For all I know you could also be a semi-blind dog with 1 leg and a quarter of a brain. I dont know. Therefore I will kick you if your loadout suggests to me that you are a bad player and more likely to be a semi-blind dog with 1 leg and a quarter of a brain, who's going to need a revive every 10 seconds.
3) Well, I want to play a nice, smooth game. You're stopping me from doing that. See the fail logic behind what you just said? If you are obese and get rejected by Barcelona are you going to rant that they are preventing you from playing anyway you want to? If your resume/grades are bad, are you going to rant to your interviewer that you dont deserve that rejection?
I have no way of knowing if you are a good player or a bad player. So if you appear to me as a bad player, I will kick you.
QFT. Seriously.
Since when did votekicking people you dont want to play with become elitist?
#32
Posté 12 mai 2012 - 01:54
#33
Posté 12 mai 2012 - 01:57
I run underdog classes, and the only one I wouldn't join a game with is Vanguard due to host requirements.
I rarely get kicked, and usually only do if I try to join a random gold with a low level.
On PC. I honestly don't see the problem there. Perhaps it's different in console (my experience with them previously is more immaturity).
Anyway, you have a point but the thread is rather pointless. Just build a decent friendslist from the players on this forum and play whatever you like.
Saying all of this, if you were running an Adept with a Claymore and Widow I would probably ask you to change.
There's being free to play the game how you like, bit also being free to not play with players who can't oil their weight due to an inefficient loudout or build.
Also, I'd the team is lacking synergy I would ask someone to change (or change myself if it would help).
I almost always host when I pug, and many times the room fills up with nothing but SIs and GIs. When it does I usually request someone switches. If I'm ignored I tend to leave and rehost or instigate a kick. As said, I have just as much right to play this game how I want (ie: efficiently) as everyone else.
So yeh, kicking is sometimes valid and perfectly reasonable.
#34
Guest_Aotearas_*
Posté 12 mai 2012 - 01:58
Guest_Aotearas_*
dyrebar- wrote...
*snip*
QFT. Seriously.
Since when did votekicking people you dont want to play with become elitist?
Ever since some of the few true elitists got being the measurebar for everyone that's doing remotely analoguous things, i.e. vote kicking.
#35
Posté 12 mai 2012 - 02:02
Winz! And revenge.
Modifié par Kel Riever, 12 mai 2012 - 02:03 .
#36
Posté 12 mai 2012 - 02:02
WeAreLegion- wrote...
Bamford38 wrote...
Easy answer.
Stop bronze players infecting gold.
There should be a kind of license test before youre allowed to play gold.
To be allowed to play silver you have to solo 3 rounds of bronze. To play gold you have to solo 6 rounds of silver.
That should easily separate the retards from the people that deserve to be playing gold.
I understand what you are saying, but it should not be that way.
Im not too sure that you have done solo bronze 3 times and solo silver 6 times...
By rounds, i meant waves
#37
Posté 12 mai 2012 - 02:03
#38
Posté 12 mai 2012 - 02:03
Modifié par Dest1ny, 12 mai 2012 - 02:04 .
#39
Posté 12 mai 2012 - 02:04
#40
Posté 12 mai 2012 - 02:08
If you're that worried about having players that aren't great on your team i'd hazard I guess that you just wouldn't be able to carry anyone through a match anyway.Wordlywisewiz wrote...
N7 of less than 200 unless they have a cool name or -200% weight = insta kick sorry buddy but I am not gonna carry you through a match!
N7 of 150 here btw, promoted once for the achievement and never again. Still wondering how long it'll take people to realise that judging people based on a number that can quite easily stagnate for a long time at a rating as low as 20 is just retarded.
Modifié par DayusMakhina, 12 mai 2012 - 02:09 .
#41
Posté 12 mai 2012 - 02:08
#42
Posté 12 mai 2012 - 02:11
DayusMakhina wrote...
If you're that worried about having players that aren't great on your team i'd hazard I guess that you just wouldn't be able to carry anyone through a match anyway.Wordlywisewiz wrote...
N7 of less than 200 unless they have a cool name or -200% weight = insta kick sorry buddy but I am not gonna carry you through a match!
N7 of 150 here btw, promoted once for the achievement and never again. Still wondering how long it'll take people to realise that judging people based on a number that can quite easily stagnate for a long time at a rating as low as 20 is just retarded.
true. n7 is meaningless. time played or chars promoted does not = skill.
#43
Posté 12 mai 2012 - 02:13
Its a team game, it was designed as such and it should be played as such.Bamford38 wrote...
Its to show that someone can handle the higher difficulty, extraction on silver doesnt do that.uzivatel wrote...
Requiring soloing in coop game would be stupid.
(full) extraction on lower difficulty? sure, why not...
Also, its possible to leech your way through it.
Massive fail for you sir
Massive..........
Requiring soloing to progress would actively discourage teamwork and use of classes which are best used in pairs with others.
#44
Posté 12 mai 2012 - 02:15
uzivatel wrote...
Its a team game, it was designed as such and it should be played as such.
Requiring soloing to progress would actively discourage teamwork and use of classes which are best used in pairs with others.
In the end it would benefit the team much more, as you would get rid of the weak links that are plaguing gold at the minute.
#45
Posté 12 mai 2012 - 02:15
Go make friends, go make private games. It isn't hard (unless you are a d*ck). You can do it. I believe in you.
#46
Posté 12 mai 2012 - 02:16
#47
Posté 12 mai 2012 - 02:18
#48
Posté 12 mai 2012 - 02:18
BERT AND ERNY wrote...
stop insta kicking. its annoying, selfish, rude and a childish. just cos somebody rolls with gear or class you dont like should not give you the right to kick. if thr is genuine reason say something. pm if needs be but dont just insta kick. and by all means kick leachers or idiots after a match but before the damn thing even starts is just wrong. regardless of what person x wants to run with thats his/her call. i shouldnt have to be forced to switch to my SI because thats what YOU deem acceptible. if you are that up your own a#* that you cant play a game without it being the most important thing in the world, set the game to private. thats what its there for. if im sh*!t then so be it, if he/she is s*!t then so be it, if your that good it shouldnt make a diff if you have to carry one guy/girl. you never know, that one vangaurd you dint s!*t on may just pull YOUR ass out the fire. to BW, i would suggest an imunity to new players in a room. a kick option after the match sure, but before is stopping a lot of peeps playing how they want to.
rant over.
Sir, do you know why you've been pulled over? Do you have any idea how mad you were going?
#49
Posté 12 mai 2012 - 02:19
BERT AND ERNY wrote...
DayusMakhina wrote...
If you're that worried about having players that aren't great on your team i'd hazard I guess that you just wouldn't be able to carry anyone through a match anyway.Wordlywisewiz wrote...
N7 of less than 200 unless they have a cool name or -200% weight = insta kick sorry buddy but I am not gonna carry you through a match!
N7 of 150 here btw, promoted once for the achievement and never again. Still wondering how long it'll take people to realise that judging people based on a number that can quite easily stagnate for a long time at a rating as low as 20 is just retarded.
true. n7 is meaningless. time played or chars promoted does not = skill.
A high grade, top class honours and a full resume do not = ability. But an employer will always hire a person that has ticked the checkboxes over one that has not. Why are you expecting the benefit of the doubt? I can replace you instantly by kicking you, and chances are that I will get someone with a more efficient build than yours who signals to me that they are not a deadweight.
Read my point : YOU might know you are a good player and can handle yourself as vanguard with a low level weapon. I DONT know, and CANNOT know that. Wasting 10 minutes wiping is a cost to me. I am not willing to incur that cost. Kicking you takes very little time and I am certain I can find someone who is more likely to not be a failure.
#50
Posté 12 mai 2012 - 02:21
bobobo878 wrote...
BERT AND ERNY wrote...
stop insta kicking. its annoying, selfish, rude and a childish. just cos somebody rolls with gear or class you dont like should not give you the right to kick. if thr is genuine reason say something. pm if needs be but dont just insta kick. and by all means kick leachers or idiots after a match but before the damn thing even starts is just wrong. regardless of what person x wants to run with thats his/her call. i shouldnt have to be forced to switch to my SI because thats what YOU deem acceptible. if you are that up your own a#* that you cant play a game without it being the most important thing in the world, set the game to private. thats what its there for. if im sh*!t then so be it, if he/she is s*!t then so be it, if your that good it shouldnt make a diff if you have to carry one guy/girl. you never know, that one vangaurd you dint s!*t on may just pull YOUR ass out the fire. to BW, i would suggest an imunity to new players in a room. a kick option after the match sure, but before is stopping a lot of peeps playing how they want to.
rant over.
Sir, do you know why you've been pulled over? Do you have any idea how mad you were going?
sorry officer. long day. stress at work. i wont do it again i promise




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut







