Fingertrip wrote...
Michael Pachter is a man of sense, and is actually a proffesional. This whole demand for a new ending is ridicilous and disrepectful towards the developers.
M25105 wrote...
Fingertrip wrote...
Michael Pachter is a man of sense, and is actually a proffesional. This whole demand for a new ending is ridicilous and disrepectful towards the developers.
Michael "Wii HD" Pachter doesn't know what he is talking about, he patently misunderstands (or is just ignorant) about plenty things. A freaking online blogger (Sean Malstrom) has more credibility than him.
Modifié par The Angry One, 13 mai 2012 - 01:55 .
The Angry One wrote...
Pachter is a "professional" in as much as he's paid to talk absolute **** on the internet.
He is an ignorant jackass who changes opinions depending on who's sponsoring in site more and deliberately flames those he considers gaming minorities to get attention (e.g. ME3 retakers and PC gamers).
He's not even a funny troll like Yahtzee, who is an ignorant jackass too but at least he's a troll who'll run around his cage flinging poo for our amusement.
Pachter just sits there and pretends he's an expert we're supposed to take seriously.
Edit: Oh and before BSN's resident trolls attempt to say I said that about Yahtzee because of what he said about ME3's ending controversy, no. He's an ignorant jackass for bashing Monster Hunter Tri for not having any giant monsters to fight.
Modifié par Merchant2006, 13 mai 2012 - 01:57 .
Merchant2006 wrote...
Thank you. I'm glad somebody else agrees that Pachter just spews nonsense.
satunnainen wrote...
I see some you are still stuck in this "with us" <> "against us" stage. He was answering a question and told an example about people who try to take EA/Bioware to FTC because they didnt like the ending. And now you people feel deeply insulted...
I bet half of you didnt even watch the video before you joined the anti-ender bandwagon in this thread.
Who defends the whiners anyway?
Guest_Imperium Alpha_*
)
satunnainen wrote...
I see some you are still stuck in this "with us" <> "against us" stage. He was answering a question and told an example about people who try to take EA/Bioware to FTC because they didnt like the ending. And now you people feel deeply insulted...
I bet half of you didnt even watch the video before you joined the anti-ender bandwagon in this thread.
Who defends the whiners anyway?
Focusing on, like, ONE person who made a complaint to the FTC that happened over a month ago that everybody's forgotten about is pathetic.
The Angry One wrote...
satunnainen wrote...
I see some you are still stuck in this "with us" <> "against us" stage. He was answering a question and told an example about people who try to take EA/Bioware to FTC because they didnt like the ending. And now you people feel deeply insulted...
I bet half of you didnt even watch the video before you joined the anti-ender bandwagon in this thread.
Who defends the whiners anyway?
a)! It doesn't matter what he says in the end, Pachter is a proven moron.
c) So what if retakers had a hand in EA winning the worst company in America award? It's clearly not the only reason. People have problems with EA, and these problems are justified.
d) Lumping people into like minded groups is biased and futile.
e) Considering all of the above, the one coming across as "whiny" is Pachter himself.
darkway1 wrote...
The Angry One wrote...
satunnainen wrote...
I see some you are still stuck in this "with us" <> "against us" stage. He was answering a question and told an example about people who try to take EA/Bioware to FTC because they didnt like the ending. And now you people feel deeply insulted...
I bet half of you didnt even watch the video before you joined the anti-ender bandwagon in this thread.
Who defends the whiners anyway?
a)! It doesn't matter what he says in the end, Pachter is a proven moron.
c) So what if retakers had a hand in EA winning the worst company in America award? It's clearly not the only reason. People have problems with EA, and these problems are justified.
d) Lumping people into like minded groups is biased and futile.
e) Considering all of the above, the one coming across as "whiny" is Pachter himself.
LOL,yeah.....whiner moaning about whiner's
The Night Mammoth wrote...
darkway1 wrote...
The Angry One wrote...
satunnainen wrote...
I see some you are still stuck in this "with us" <> "against us" stage. He was answering a question and told an example about people who try to take EA/Bioware to FTC because they didnt like the ending. And now you people feel deeply insulted...
I bet half of you didnt even watch the video before you joined the anti-ender bandwagon in this thread.
Who defends the whiners anyway?
a)! It doesn't matter what he says in the end, Pachter is a proven moron.
c) So what if retakers had a hand in EA winning the worst company in America award? It's clearly not the only reason. People have problems with EA, and these problems are justified.
d) Lumping people into like minded groups is biased and futile.
e) Considering all of the above, the one coming across as "whiny" is Pachter himself.
LOL,yeah.....whiner moaning about whiner's
It's more whiners whining about a whiner whining about whiners, whilst other whiners whine about these whiners whining about Pachter.
johnxtreeme wrote...
You don't like the ending, and thought Bioware let you down.
OPINION!
Because I don't like the ending to a book, I can't make the author change it. Saying 'nanananana I won't buy any more of your games EVA!!!!!!!!' is childish and immature. You can be disappointed, and you can express this on these very forums. However there isn't a basis for some kind of legal complaint.
WHY THE HECK should the government spend time on this???? You would have thought they have better things to be doing (I don't know, economy, foreign policy, trade, healthcare, gay rights, immigration..) than checking if a small part of the advertising for a harmless video-game product is accurate.
If Bioware want's to change the ending, and quite frankly they should because it's bad, that's their decision, but those who consider it their 'right' to have a good ending are just making all ME fans look bad.
johnxtreeme wrote...
You don't like the ending, and thought Bioware let you down.
OPINION!
Because I don't like the ending to a book, I can't make the author change it. Saying 'nanananana I won't buy any more of your games EVA!!!!!!!!' is childish and immature. You can be disappointed, and you can express this on these very forums. However there isn't a basis for some kind of legal complaint.
WHY THE HECK should the government spend time on this???? You would have thought they have better things to be doing (I don't know, economy, foreign policy, trade, healthcare, gay rights, immigration..) than checking if a small part of the advertising for a harmless video-game product is accurate.
If Bioware want's to change the ending, and quite frankly they should because it's bad, that's their decision, but those who consider it their 'right' to have a good ending are just making all ME fans look bad.
Modifié par The Angry One, 13 mai 2012 - 02:26 .
johnxtreeme wrote...
You don't like the ending, and thought Bioware let you down.
OPINION!
Because I don't like the ending to a book, I can't make the author change it. Saying 'nanananana I won't buy any more of your games EVA!!!!!!!!' is childish and immature. You can be disappointed, and you can express this on these very forums. However there isn't a basis for some kind of legal complaint.
WHY THE HECK should the government spend time on this???? You would have thought they have better things to be doing (I don't know, economy, foreign policy, trade, healthcare, gay rights, immigration..) than checking if a small part of the advertising for a harmless video-game product is accurate.
If Bioware want's to change the ending, and quite frankly they should because it's bad, that's their decision, but those who consider it their 'right' to have a good ending are just making all ME fans look bad.
Modifié par The Night Mammoth, 13 mai 2012 - 02:30 .
The Night Mammoth wrote...
Are you talking about the FTC guy?
Wow Marty McFLy, that was months ago and it was one randomer pretty much every regardless of opinion disagreed with.
darkway1 wrote...
If Mass3 was a book then the book reviewers would have slammed the title for it's ending..........it's doesn't seem to work that way in the game industry though.
Modifié par The Angry One, 13 mai 2012 - 02:34 .
The Angry One wrote...
darkway1 wrote...
If Mass3 was a book then the book reviewers would have slammed the title for it's ending..........it's doesn't seem to work that way in the game industry though.
Games industry standards have become a joke.
Gaming journalists are useless lickspittles, backhand deals and favours are constant (hi, Allers), developers and publishers are allowed to blatantly lie about their games with no reprisal, buggy and incomplete games are released without consequence, DLC is outright abused with on-disc and day one content, and so on.
I hope the ME3 fiasco is the beginning of a wakeup call for this farce of a system.
M25105 wrote...
The Angry One wrote...
darkway1 wrote...
If Mass3 was a book then the book reviewers would have slammed the title for it's ending..........it's doesn't seem to work that way in the game industry though.
Games industry standards have become a joke.
Gaming journalists are useless lickspittles, backhand deals and favours are constant (hi, Allers), developers and publishers are allowed to blatantly lie about their games with no reprisal, buggy and incomplete games are released without consequence, DLC is outright abused with on-disc and day one content, and so on.
I hope the ME3 fiasco is the beginning of a wakeup call for this farce of a system.
I remember one instance where "journalists/reviewers" were treated to prostitutes.
M25105 wrote...
The Angry One wrote...
darkway1 wrote...
If Mass3 was a book then the book reviewers would have slammed the title for it's ending..........it's doesn't seem to work that way in the game industry though.
Games industry standards have become a joke.
Gaming journalists are useless lickspittles, backhand deals and favours are constant (hi, Allers), developers and publishers are allowed to blatantly lie about their games with no reprisal, buggy and incomplete games are released without consequence, DLC is outright abused with on-disc and day one content, and so on.
I hope the ME3 fiasco is the beginning of a wakeup call for this farce of a system.
I remember one instance where "journalists/reviewers" were treated to prostitutes.
Retour en haut
