to hold his tongue?! Its as though Shep has this "If you don't have anything nice to say, then don't say anything at all." -- attitude. And it makes me want to pull my frakking hair out in rage!
I don't know about you, but while playing ME3, I sort of felt like BioWare wanted us all to
experience what it felt like to be EDI in Mass Effect 2.
Every-time in a conversation, when no option would present itself to ask a question that was on the tip of my tongue. I was reminded of what EDI kept saying when you would ask her certain questions in ME2.
"I have a "block" preventing me from answering that question." Shep even says on Cronos Station that he thinks that he might be a high tech VI, which thinks that its Commander Shepard. And while playing ME3, at so many points of the story I felt as though he may have been right.
It was like:
Shepard VI: I have a "Block" preventing me from asking that question.
Shepard VI: I have a "block" preventing me from talking back to this character and putting them in their place.
Many on the forums have made clear their frustration about how Shep is not allowed to ask the Starchild enough questions or tell it to f-off.But there are so many other moments where I felt that Shep is no where near
as confrontational or argumentative as he use to (could) be in the previous games.
When I think back to how Shep could express how mortified he is at Mordin's work on the Modified Genophage Project. And when we reach the point where Mordin 's Loyalty Mission is unlocked. Shep can even go as
far as saying, (I'm paraphrasing) of Mordin's colleague Maelon: "I don't
care what happens to him on Tuchanka.He deserves what he gets!"
When I think back to how Shep could interact with Tali, Ashley, Garrus, Kaidan, Wrex or Liara in Mass Effect 1. How Shep could either befriend them or be abrasive or indifferent to their presence. You could tell Tali essentially, that her people picked a fight with an opponent who was bigger stronger and smarter than them.And they have no one to blame but themselves for their current precarious state of existence.
I felt like in Mass Effect 3 -- BioWare acts upon this assumption that NPC like Garrus and Tali are every players good buddy or girlfriend.
Shep does have a few moments where he vents his frustration, in a very eloquent matter.Like in the Geth Consensus mission.When he talks to Legion about how everyone is exploiting this crisis for there own
personal gain.But there should have been so many more moments like this.
So what is this thread about? What I would like to see here.Is my fellow forumites to write dialogue for either Renegade or Paragon Shepard. Because I think we all may need such an outlet for our frustration at
how limited Commander Shepard's responses were in ME3.
And on another note: does anyone else feel like there were way to many: Who the hell do you think your talking to like that!? Moments in ME3, that Shep lets stand unanswered.
To start off: What Admiral Anderson says to Shep on earth if you did not destroy the Alpha Relay.
Anderson: The sh!t you've done.Any other soldier would have been court martialed--discharged or left to rot in the brig.
Shepard: The sh!t I've done. You mean like steal the Normandy -- mutiny and follow Saren to Illos? Oh wait, that was your idea -- Admiral.
And if your thinking that Shepard would never say something like that to
Anderson. Somebody then told you wrong...
salutes Hackket or stands at attention.If you've played the Arrival DLC, you will notice that when Shep goes up to his quarters to talk to Hackett. When the Admiral tells him what he would have him do.Shep turns
his back on the Admiral.Leans back on the wall, crosses his arms and ask Hackett one question:
"So why come to me?" When Shepard is in the Medbay post Arrival and Hackett debriefs him.Shepard doesn't get up and salute Hackett.He talks to Hackett no differently than if he was a business associate.Nothing
more.
Jack is sooooooooooooooooooooooo right when she calls Shepard "The King of the Boyscouts" :innocent: in ME3. Because that's exactly what BioWare has turned our Shepard's into.
character they created has made.How are they to think we are to react to the fact that in ME1 Admiral Hackett was just some annoying dude who kept trying to derail us from our primary objective of hunting down the
Rogue Spectre Saren Arterious.By continuously requesting Shepard's aid.Because apparently Shepard is the only competent soldier in the Alliance.
To Hackett essentially being Commander Shepard's boss in ME3. I would prefer the Illusive Man to be as he was to Shepard in ME2 over Hackket. This may sound strange to some, but here me out.At least with TIM, we
could tell him off every now and then and give him a piece of our mind.The whole freaking galaxy is crumbling around them.And I'm suppose to believe that the person who has had more success against the Reapers
than anyone else (Shepard) is going to be taking orders from some dude (Hackett) who presided over the greatest naval defeat in human history! A man who failed to protect the Alliance Parliment.The capital of the
Alliance -- Arcturus Station was destroyed on his watch. This is Shepard's boss?!
I had believed that in Mass Effect 3 -- the first human Spectre was going to be as the "organizer of victory" George Marshall of World War 2 fame, glory and honor. By all rights: Commander Shepard in 2186 should
have held a similar position akin to General Dwight D. Eisenhower in World War 2.That is that of Supreme Allied Commander. Instead Shepard is -- I don't know what Shepard is in ME3. But its not what he or she
should have been.
Modifié par ubermensch007, 13 mai 2012 - 02:27 .





Retour en haut







