estebanus wrote...
That depends on the people that discuss it.
Some (Most I know of) bring forth very insightful points, while others just act like zealots.
The same goes for people who are against the theory.
There will always be the smart ones, and there will always be the overly zealous ones. The same goes for each and everything in this world.
I'm also sick of people who don't bring forth any evidence to support their claims, but just ridicule us and treat us like scum.
And I know one side that does that very frequently.
If you can't accept that some people have different opinions than yours, then you're gonna have to deal with it. Trying to impeach our rights of civil discussion won't help your case in any way.
Very much this. I tire of people coming onto a forum about discussion actively attempting to remove or impede discussion. It's negates the entire premise of this board. It's also foolish and incredibly close-minded. People on both sides seem to do it, but there is one side who does this more.
At any rate, saying there are sides in this is false. However, there is no other way to describe this situation in English terms. All of us did not like the ending in its literal interpretation (well, most of us). All of us are united in the hope for a better, more cohesive ending in the EC. None of us actually like that we were sold an unfinished game These uniting opinions should be more important than whether or not someone believes the ending was a metaphor or just bad writing. Arguing amongst ourselves in an uncivil manner accomplishes nothing.
Modifié par BatmanTurian, 13 mai 2012 - 07:23 .