242 réponses à ce sujet

[malakim2099]

Scottus4 wrote...

I don't know if my computer can run Diablo 3, and the last game I bought when I was unsure of the system requirements I had to wait a year before I could upgrade my computer to run it so... no thanks D3. For those who don't care the slightest to learn about computer hardware, consoles will remain the dominant platform of choice. It is sort of sad, but Diablo 3 isn't going to be anything SPECIAL, a great game for sure, but Blizzard doesn't innovate, and the hack-n-slash genre hasn't seen enough innovation for Blizzard to borrow.

Well, Diablo 3 ran okay on my three-year old laptop (at least the demo did). Granted, my laptop was pretty top of the line (but not gaming optimized) three years ago, so... YMMV?

[palker]

I do not even know what Diablo is. I have won Diablo II in some competition long time at least 2 years ago and I have not got around to play it so far so i could not care less about some Diablo III.
What i will be buying and playing is Sniper Elite V2.

[Saradas85]

They can coexist. Why do you have to choose between the two when you can play both? Being a new release I will play D3 70%/Me3Mp 30%, but after some time probably 50%/50%

[Blest HR]

na this game will die off more when diablo comes out and ghost recon future soldier. Which I think that it wil make it easier for people to drop N7 weapons if my theory is right.

Modifié par Blest HR, 14 mai 2012 - 04:20 .

[pistolols]

imo blizzard hasn't made a good game since 1997

[sinosleep]

Oodle12 wrote...

Killzone is the halo killer.... yeah remember that one

Are you seriously making that comparison? Killzone was a mediocre at best franchise that had an awesome reveal at E3 compared to a gaming giant in Halo. 

Diablo is UNQUESTIONABLY a bigger franchise than Mass Effect and has 12 years of anticipation on it's side. There's for more validitty to this argument than the one for Killzone which no one that knew anything about gaming took seriously any way.

[Niblix]

I'll still play ME3....unless Diablo 3 is on sale yet at 75% off.

Will need the savings to place items on the real money auction house due to all the fee's

[Scottus4]

Killzone is the halo killer.... yeah remember that one

Halo Reach was the Halo killer. Poor Halo.

[Father Giliam]

Nocturnalfox wrote...

Father Giliam wrote...

Ill still be here, plus ill still be at SWTOR.

/inb4swtorhate.

Fixed :innocent:

Mmmm too bad I already covered that with ib4swtorhate.

And I couldnt help but laugh at the comment made by Dest1ny. If swtor was overhyped, you know what diablo 3 will be like? Atleast SWTOR is what it advertised, a more casual storybased MMO. Dont like it, play WorldofGrindfest.

Diablo has 10+ years of hype building, its going to leave alot to be desired by what people expect for that long of development.

Modifié par Father Giliam, 14 mai 2012 - 04:26 .

[Cutlass Jack]

Yeah Diablo 3. Can't say I care or am going anywhere near that thing. I'll just wait for Torchlight 2.

[nhcre8tv1]

I won't be joining you people, sadly. I don't get excited for things anymore.
Thanks Mass Effect.
That actually might be a good thing, now that I think about.

[Rivermann]

Scottus4 wrote...

I don't know if my computer can run Diablo 3, and the last game I bought when I was unsure of the system requirements I had to wait a year before I could upgrade my computer to run it so... no thanks D3. For those who don't care the slightest to learn about computer hardware, consoles will remain the dominant platform of choice. It is sort of sad, but Diablo 3 isn't going to be anything SPECIAL, a great game for sure, but Blizzard doesn't innovate, and the hack-n-slash genre hasn't seen enough innovation for Blizzard to borrow.

I highly doubt consoles are the dominant platform for gaming. Sure, it's popular but most games are run on PC. I don't think I know of any PC gamer IRL that buys a game he can't run. If you can't afford to upgrade your PC every 4-5 years then you're probably not a computer guy anyway.

But I agree with D3, mind numbing time waster. I tried the beta and thought this will be the worst product Blizzard ever made.

[Blest HR]

Scottus4 wrote...

Killzone is the halo killer.... yeah remember that one

Halo Reach was the Halo killer. Poor Halo.

really I thought it was halo 3. Odst was a improvement but then they just merged the mutiplayer from halo 3 putting it on a downer.

[Thessair]

palker wrote...

I do not even know what Diablo is. I have won Diablo II in some competition long time at least 2 years ago and I have not got around to play it so far so i could not care less about some Diablo III.
What i will be buying and playing is Sniper Elite V2.

I've been enjoying Sniper Elite in small doses. The levels are my big issue with it, being much smaller than they first appear and the indestructible wooden doors that keep you penned in are a little ridiculous. Also, I'm pretty sure some of the main character's actions would have instigated conflict between U.S. and Red Army forces. Still, despite all my gripes it is pretty fun.

[Blest HR]

nhcre8tv1 wrote...

I won't be joining you people, sadly. I don't get excited for things anymore.
Thanks Mass Effect.
That actually might be a good thing, now that I think about.

Yea I don't get to frilled about games in a long time ever because every time your put in disappointment with most of the games.

[tdot_butcher]

can i make a Drell Adept in Diablo 3? If so, I'M IN!!!

[Niblix]

Rivermann wrote...

But I agree with D3, mind numbing time waster. I tried the beta and thought this will be the 2nd worst product Blizzard ever made. The first being WoW.

You know it's true

[Dorje Sylas]

Cal132 wrote...

justgimmedudedammit wrote...

Care Cup: \\_/ <--- Empty

Thank you for the laugh!

Let me refill that for you \\▄/ 

Modifié par Dorje Sylas, 14 mai 2012 - 04:28 .

[Silasqtx]

D3 with all those healing bubbles, cartoon-ish graphics and even more "overpowered hack n slash" suddenly went in my mental recycle bin.

D1 was the game. Dark, bloody and crude. D3 is idk, Twilight?

[Blest HR]

Rivermann wrote...

Scottus4 wrote...

I don't know if my computer can run Diablo 3, and the last game I bought when I was unsure of the system requirements I had to wait a year before I could upgrade my computer to run it so... no thanks D3. For those who don't care the slightest to learn about computer hardware, consoles will remain the dominant platform of choice. It is sort of sad, but Diablo 3 isn't going to be anything SPECIAL, a great game for sure, but Blizzard doesn't innovate, and the hack-n-slash genre hasn't seen enough innovation for Blizzard to borrow.

I highly doubt consoles are the dominant platform for gaming. Sure, it's popular but most games are run on PC. I don't think I know of any PC gamer IRL that buys a game he can't run. If you can't afford to upgrade your PC every 4-5 years then you're probably not a computer guy anyway.

But I agree with D3, mind numbing time waster. I tried the beta and thought this will be the worst product Blizzard ever made.

ye aI always heard talk of diablo but never bothered to play it not going to start, but from what I've heard it's like fall out, fable and all those kind of games so not missing out on much.

[ChapDev]

Well don't worry I'll still be here when everyone apparently leaves^_^ Actually that might be cause to worry if you thought about coming back=] No matter.

I'll see you all when you decide to blow up more Banshee

[Maria Caliban]

Midnight tonight already passed.

[Blissey1]

ah, reminds me of the all the "X will kill WoW!" threads back when I played WoW.

[Taritu]

Folks in the beta keep telling me Diablo 3 is boring.

We'll see, but for now, I ain't buyin'it.