LazyTechGuy wrote...
In all seriousness, I'm really intrigued by this.
LazyTechGuy wrote...
MegaSovereign wrote...
LazyTechGuy needs to charge his phone.
MegaSovereign wrote...
LazyTechGuy needs to charge his phone.
GethPrimeMKII wrote...
zambot wrote...
GethPrimeMKII wrote...
An assumption is still an assumption, and an assumption does not equal fact. Regardless of how many people played it or not. Going by your logic, the events of Mass Effect 1 and 2 should not be considered canon because not everyone played them.
No that is not my logic. I have already said that if you did not play ME1 and ME2, the events that you did are clearly explained to you in the beginning of and throughout ME3. If indeed my Shep destroyed Object Rho, ME3 is lying to me in 3 places about it.
If you insist that a comic about Arrival made the events of Arrival canon, then clearly ME3 retcon'd it, because ME3 is in fact canon as well, and it came out later than the comic. Again, unless you think ME3's explanation of the events in Arrival are errors by the writers, the game explicitly contradicts it. This is either because the events were not canon to begin with, or Bioware changed canon.
We'll just agree to disagree on Arrival then. Even without that DLC, there is still a million 'n one ways Shepard could have been affected by the reapers and indoctrinated. Shepard walked around inside one afterall.
dreamgazer wrote...
MaximizedAction wrote...
FellishBeast wrote...
Woah woah woah. Jessica Merizan just said we might get an end decision with 3-4 decisions.........
huh...what could be an additional choice that doesn't involve anything IT-y?
Who knows. Maybe it'll be the "shoot yourself" ending that so many claimed to want at the beginning, just to avoid the choice.
The awesome thing is, I was thinking of writing this, but I thought "that'd be stupid"MegaSovereign wrote...
LazyTechGuy needs to charge his phone.
dreamgazer wrote...
MaximizedAction wrote...
FellishBeast wrote...
Woah woah woah. Jessica Merizan just said we might get an end decision with 3-4 decisions.........
huh...what could be an additional choice that doesn't involve anything IT-y?
Who knows. Maybe it'll be the "shoot yourself" ending that so many claimed to want at the beginning, just to avoid the choice.
dreamgazer wrote...
MaximizedAction wrote...
FellishBeast wrote...
Woah woah woah. Jessica Merizan just said we might get an end decision with 3-4 decisions.........
huh...what could be an additional choice that doesn't involve anything IT-y?
Who knows. Maybe it'll be the "shoot yourself" ending that so many claimed to want at the beginning, just to avoid the choice.
MaximizedAction wrote...
The awesome thing is, I was thinking of writing this, but I thought "that'd be stupid"MegaSovereign wrote...
LazyTechGuy needs to charge his phone.dreamgazer wrote...
MaximizedAction wrote...
FellishBeast wrote...
Woah woah woah. Jessica Merizan just said we might get an end decision with 3-4 decisions.........
huh...what could be an additional choice that doesn't involve anything IT-y?
Who knows. Maybe it'll be the "shoot yourself" ending that so many claimed to want at the beginning, just to avoid the choice.
Thought about that too, but besides causing the ultimate fanrage, it would be absolutely non-explainable withouth IT. And that is not gonna be tackled in the EC.
UrgedDuke wrote...
dreamgazer wrote...
MaximizedAction wrote...
FellishBeast wrote...
Woah woah woah. Jessica Merizan just said we might get an end decision with 3-4 decisions.........
huh...what could be an additional choice that doesn't involve anything IT-y?
Who knows. Maybe it'll be the "shoot yourself" ending that so many claimed to want at the beginning, just to avoid the choice.
maby she's counting the outcomes or maby there will be the fabled rainbow ending
UrgedDuke wrote...
maby she's counting the outcomes or maby there will be the fabled rainbow ending
byne wrote...
To be fair, the '3-4 decisions' could just refer to how some people count surviving destroy as a different ending than destroy.
Dwailing wrote...
LT123 wrote...
I'm reading that Deception rage comic right now.
I just got to the cereal part. That actually happens?
Looking forward to the video, HellishFiend!
Yeah, it actually FRAKKING happens. And so, Kai Leng, Cereal Killer, was born.
Modifié par BatmanTurian, 23 juin 2012 - 08:43 .
byne wrote...
The only thing I really think is canon of the things you listed is that Shep destroyed Object Rho. Shep's gender is specifically kept vague in the novels and comics, as far as I know.
BatmanTurian wrote...
God, that book is so frakking stupid.
BatmanTurian wrote...
Dwailing wrote...
LT123 wrote...
I'm reading that Deception rage comic right now.
I just got to the cereal part. That actually happens?
Looking forward to the video, HellishFiend!
Yeah, it actually FRAKKING happens. And so, Kai Leng, Cereal Killer, was born.
God, that book is so frakking stupid.
I'm saying I'm fairly sure that players
are aware thats what would have happened had they played
the Arrival DLC, so I see no reason to include the marines as a
backup if they hadnt
I'm saying I'm fairly sure that players
are aware thats what would have happened had they played
the Arrival DLC, so I see no reason to include the marines as a
backup if they hadnt
GethPrimeMKII wrote...
I have no doubt EC will be amazing. My body is ready.