55528 réponses à ce sujet

[L0NEWOLF25]

nightcobra8928 wrote...

 i have my links prepared for tuesday

EC = good 


EC = bad

^this

[ZerebusPrime]

Salient Archer wrote...

VR pods confirmed; I'll post screens as soon as my video is done processing.

Glad to hear that it wasn't just my imagination.  It does help explain how the interface Legion uses with Shepard came to be.  That the Geth would just have one of those things lying around seemed almost ludicrous.

Now... What on Earth were they going to do with all of those?

[llbountyhunter]

Ive said this before... but what if IT itself can used to defeat the reapers? I mean its a mental battle, it could end up killing harbinger in real life..... sovereign was disabled in me1 after you killed saren.

And maybe, since the reapers have a consensus of sorts, the outside reapers can be disabled or have their shields removed. (Similar to how destroying a node in the geth consensus disabled some get ships)

If its just their shields taken out, this could Be a perfect moment to show off your war assets and previous decisions.




If something like this happens id be ok with a open ending

Modifié par llbountyhunter, 24 juin 2012 - 04:10 .

[TJBartlemus]

Hey guys!! What have I missed???

[MaximizedAction]

llbountyhunter wrote...

Ive said this before... but what if IT itself can used to defeat the reapers? I mean its a mental battle, it could end up killing harbinger in real life..... sovereign was disabled in me1 after you killed saren.

And maybe, since the reapers have a consensus of sorts, the outside reapers can be disabled or have their shields removed. (Similar to how destroying a node in the geth consensus disabled some get ships)

If its just their shields taken out, this could Be a perfect moment to show off your war assets and previous decisions.




If something like this happens id be ok with a open ending

Though, I'd miss the Ewok party and that final shot of the Normandy crew, I too could live with that, I guess.

Modifié par MaximizedAction, 24 juin 2012 - 04:12 .

[UrgedDuke]

llbountyhunter wrote...

Ive said this before... but what if IT itself can used to defeat the reapers? I mean its a mental battle, it could end up killing harbinger in real life..... sovereign was disabled in me1 after you killed saren.

And maybe, since the reapers have a consensus of sorts, the outside reapers can be disabled or have their shields removed. (Similar to how destroying a node in the geth consensus disabled some get ships)

If its just their shields taken out, this could Be a perfect moment to show off your war assets and previous decisions.




If something like this happens id be ok with a open ending

you know that we all want to fight harby or at least some form of a boss battle involving him to be satisfied

[L0NEWOLF25]

UrgedDuke wrote...

llbountyhunter wrote...

Ive said this before... but what if IT itself can used to defeat the reapers? I mean its a mental battle, it could end up killing harbinger in real life..... sovereign was disabled in me1 after you killed saren.

And maybe, since the reapers have a consensus of sorts, the outside reapers can be disabled or have their shields removed. (Similar to how destroying a node in the geth consensus disabled some get ships)

If its just their shields taken out, this could Be a perfect moment to show off your war assets and previous decisions.




If something like this happens id be ok with a open ending

you know that we all want to fight harby or at least some form of a boss battle involving him to be satisfied

I'd like to be able to fly the normandy and fight Harbinger with it, something Like that would have made the Ending so much better. Sadly I don't see that ever coming true.

[Dwailing]

Flog61 wrote...

@Arian Dynas- I would like to point out that you actually translated your Latin wrongly. If you're going to quote Latin ot sound smart, then its a bit embaressing if you do it wrong.

This is what you said: Quid quid latine dictum sit. Altum videtur.

"Anything said in Latin sounds profound."

This is not correct. Firstly, Altum videtur is in this case a separate sentence, and should not be. Secondly 'quidquid' meaning anything is actually one word. What you have written is 'what what'.

So you have actually written 'What what is said in Latin. It sounds profound'. Not to mention the fact that capital letters did not actually exist in Latin. The latin meaning you want would be recieved from 'quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur'

If you are trying to impress everyone, then this was one hell of a fail.

Hey, cut Arian some slack!

[Humakt83]

Couple thoughts related to Geth I posted in another thread.

Shepard saved Legion from a connection device designed by Reapers. Every other Geth were indoctrinated (that is in their case reprogrammed), but not Legion? Legion deceives Shepard twice. First by not telling Shepard beforehand that he intends to release Geth (VI mission). Then by not telling that he still had Reaper code in him before final Rannoch mission.

The plant where you can find the location of the Reaper manufactures the mentioned VI pods Shepard used to interface with Geth reality. Legion tells that Geth can gain true sentience by uploading Reaper code to them...

Modifié par Humakt83, 24 juin 2012 - 04:34 .

[Big G13]

Flog61 wrote...

@Arian Dynas- I would like to point out that you actually translated your Latin wrongly. If you're going to quote Latin ot sound smart, then its a bit embaressing if you do it wrong.

This is what you said: Quid quid latine dictum sit. Altum videtur.

"Anything said in Latin sounds profound."

This is not correct. Firstly, Altum videtur is in this case a separate sentence, and should not be. Secondly 'quidquid' meaning anything is actually one word. What you have written is 'what what'.

So you have actually written 'What what is said in Latin. It sounds profound'. Not to mention the fact that capital letters did not actually exist in Latin. The latin meaning you want would be recieved from 'quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur'

If you are trying to impress everyone, then this was one hell of a fail.

PARTY PEOPLE SAY QUID QUID! works for me.

[byne]

Flog61 wrote...

@Arian Dynas- I would like to point out that you actually translated your Latin wrongly. If you're going to quote Latin ot sound smart, then its a bit embaressing if you do it wrong.

This is what you said: Quid quid latine dictum sit. Altum videtur.

"Anything said in Latin sounds profound."

This is not correct. Firstly, Altum videtur is in this case a separate sentence, and should not be. Secondly 'quidquid' meaning anything is actually one word. What you have written is 'what what'.

So you have actually written 'What what is said in Latin. It sounds profound'. Not to mention the fact that capital letters did not actually exist in Latin. The latin meaning you want would be recieved from 'quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur'

If you are trying to impress everyone, then this was one hell of a fail.

Arian doesnt need correct Latin to impress us. He is impressive all on his own. You, on the other hand, coming in and randomly spending an entire post correcting his Latin, seem to be trying to impress us with your knowledge of Latin.

Also: I missed Arian?! Nooooooooooooo!

[UrgedDuke]

Flog61 wrote...

@Arian Dynas- I would like to point out that you actually translated your Latin wrongly. If you're going to quote Latin ot sound smart, then its a bit embaressing if you do it wrong.

This is what you said: Quid quid latine dictum sit. Altum videtur.

"Anything said in Latin sounds profound."

This is not correct. Firstly, Altum videtur is in this case a separate sentence, and should not be. Secondly 'quidquid' meaning anything is actually one word. What you have written is 'what what'.

So you have actually written 'What what is said in Latin. It sounds profound'. Not to mention the fact that capital letters did not actually exist in Latin. The latin meaning you want would be recieved from 'quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur'

If you are trying to impress everyone, then this was one hell of a fail.

Listen... who the f*** cares

[Dwailing]

byne wrote...

Also: I missed Arian?! Nooooooooooooo!

Yeah, that's my feeling.

[UrgedDuke]

I can't find my OP but I was wondering if any of you guys noticed that Major Coats was with you in the Mako and in the scene that Harby lands, and yet he is the one calling for the retreat after you wake up even tho he should have made the run to the beam with you

[byne]

Dwailing wrote...

byne wrote...

Also: I missed Arian?! Nooooooooooooo!

Yeah, that's my feeling.

Someone needs to make a clip containing Grif screaming 'Noooo!' for times like this.

[Andromidius]

UrgedDuke wrote...

I can't find my OP but I was wondering if any of you guys noticed that Major Coats was with you in the Mako and in the scene that Harby lands, and yet he is the one calling for the retreat after you wake up even tho he should have made the run to the beam with you

Maybe he's got a dicky leg *whistles innocently*

Yeah, it is very fishy.  Adds to the evidence against him.

[GethPrimeMKII]

Flog61 wrote...

byne wrote...

Flog61 wrote...

@Arian Dynas- I would like to point out that you actually translated your Latin wrongly. If you're going to quote Latin ot sound smart, then its a bit embaressing if you do it wrong.

This is what you said: Quid quid latine dictum sit. Altum videtur.

"Anything said in Latin sounds profound."

This is not correct. Firstly, Altum videtur is in this case a separate sentence, and should not be. Secondly 'quidquid' meaning anything is actually one word. What you have written is 'what what'.

So you have actually written 'What what is said in Latin. It sounds profound'. Not to mention the fact that capital letters did not actually exist in Latin. The latin meaning you want would be recieved from 'quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur'

If you are trying to impress everyone, then this was one hell of a fail.

Arian doesnt need correct Latin to impress us. He is impressive all on his own. You, on the other hand, coming in and randomly spending an entire post correcting his Latin, seem to be trying to impress us with your knowledge of Latin.

Also: I missed Arian?! Nooooooooooooo!

Heh im not trying to offend anyone, im just saying i don't know one person who quotes in latin who i don't consider to be doing i to flaunt their knowledge rather than to actually make their point.

Cool story. Have you anything to say about indoctrination?

[Big G13]

Flog61 wrote...

byne wrote...

Flog61 wrote...

@Arian Dynas- I would like to point out that you actually translated your Latin wrongly. If you're going to quote Latin ot sound smart, then its a bit embaressing if you do it wrong.

This is what you said: Quid quid latine dictum sit. Altum videtur.

"Anything said in Latin sounds profound."

This is not correct. Firstly, Altum videtur is in this case a separate sentence, and should not be. Secondly 'quidquid' meaning anything is actually one word. What you have written is 'what what'.

So you have actually written 'What what is said in Latin. It sounds profound'. Not to mention the fact that capital letters did not actually exist in Latin. The latin meaning you want would be recieved from 'quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur'

If you are trying to impress everyone, then this was one hell of a fail.

Arian doesnt need correct Latin to impress us. He is impressive all on his own. You, on the other hand, coming in and randomly spending an entire post correcting his Latin, seem to be trying to impress us with your knowledge of Latin.

Also: I missed Arian?! Nooooooooooooo!

Heh im not trying to offend anyone, im just saying i don't know one person who quotes in latin who i don't consider to be doing i to flaunt their knowledge rather than to actually make their point.

o.k. but, in the case of Arian Dynas you are mistaken.

[Dwailing]

UrgedDuke wrote...

I can't find my OP but I was wondering if any of you guys noticed that Major Coats was with you in the Mako and in the scene that Harby lands, and yet he is the one calling for the retreat after you wake up even tho he should have made the run to the beam with you

Yeah, that IS pretty interesting.  Considering he said their ENTIRE force was decimated, you'd think that he would have been part of it.  So, unless he ran away, I get the feeling that something was up, definitely.

[byne]

Big G13 wrote...

Flog61 wrote...

byne wrote...

Flog61 wrote...

@Arian Dynas- I would like to point out that you actually translated your Latin wrongly. If you're going to quote Latin ot sound smart, then its a bit embaressing if you do it wrong.

This is what you said: Quid quid latine dictum sit. Altum videtur.

"Anything said in Latin sounds profound."

This is not correct. Firstly, Altum videtur is in this case a separate sentence, and should not be. Secondly 'quidquid' meaning anything is actually one word. What you have written is 'what what'.

So you have actually written 'What what is said in Latin. It sounds profound'. Not to mention the fact that capital letters did not actually exist in Latin. The latin meaning you want would be recieved from 'quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur'

If you are trying to impress everyone, then this was one hell of a fail.

Arian doesnt need correct Latin to impress us. He is impressive all on his own. You, on the other hand, coming in and randomly spending an entire post correcting his Latin, seem to be trying to impress us with your knowledge of Latin.

Also: I missed Arian?! Nooooooooooooo!

Heh im not trying to offend anyone, im just saying i don't know one person who quotes in latin who i don't consider to be doing i to flaunt their knowledge rather than to actually make their point.

o.k. but, in the case of Arian Dynas you are mistaken.

Yeah, if Arian wanted to flaunt his knowledge, he'd just flaunt his knowledge. He wouldnt waste time speaking in Latin.

[Angelo2027]

I found this video on youtube and thought it was interesting i dont know if this was discussed on here i havent gone trough all the pages they are too much xD if not what do you think of this?

[Dwailing]

Flog61 wrote...

GethPrimeMKII wrote...

Flog61 wrote...

byne wrote...

Flog61 wrote...

@Arian Dynas- I would like to point out that you actually translated your Latin wrongly. If you're going to quote Latin ot sound smart, then its a bit embaressing if you do it wrong.

This is what you said: Quid quid latine dictum sit. Altum videtur.

"Anything said in Latin sounds profound."

This is not correct. Firstly, Altum videtur is in this case a separate sentence, and should not be. Secondly 'quidquid' meaning anything is actually one word. What you have written is 'what what'.

So you have actually written 'What what is said in Latin. It sounds profound'. Not to mention the fact that capital letters did not actually exist in Latin. The latin meaning you want would be recieved from 'quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur'

If you are trying to impress everyone, then this was one hell of a fail.

Arian doesnt need correct Latin to impress us. He is impressive all on his own. You, on the other hand, coming in and randomly spending an entire post correcting his Latin, seem to be trying to impress us with your knowledge of Latin.

Also: I missed Arian?! Nooooooooooooo!

Heh im not trying to offend anyone, im just saying i don't know one person who quotes in latin who i don't consider to be doing i to flaunt their knowledge rather than to actually make their point.

Cool story. Have you anything to say about indoctrination?

 Do you? In your post just now you didn't say anything about indoctrination either.
 
Anyway I do. Just wanted to let you guys know that the indoctrination theory documentary part 2 will be released on youtube in a couple of hours, although in the interview released with the EC info it (unfortunately) sounds like they may ignore any IT stuff.

At what point in the interview do they even MENTION IT?  'Cause I watched it, and I don't remember them saying ANYTHING about it.